Doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/491r2 SubmissionL. Cariou, Orange Labs Date: 2010-04-30 Fast Session Transfer May 2010 L. Cariou, Orange LabsSlide 1 Authors:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.:IEEE /1523r4 Submission November 2011 Access Delay Reduction for FILS: Network Discovery & Access congestion Improvements Slide 1 Authors:
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /0259r02 Submission Date: ad New Technique Proposal March 2010 Yuichi Morioka, Sony CorporationSlide 1 Authors:
Overview of IEEE and MAC Layer September 25, 2009 SungHoon Seo
Submission doc.: IEEE /1454r0 November 2014 Jarkko Kneckt (Nokia)Slide ax Power Save Discussion Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0550 Submission NameAffiliationsAddressPhone Kiseon RyuLG Electronics10225 Willow Creek Rd, San Diego, CA, 92131, USA +1
Doc.: IEEE /1126r0 Submission September 2012 Krishna Sayana, SamsungSlide 1 Wi-Fi for Hotspot Deployments and Cellular Offload Date:
Doc.: IEEE /492r02 Submission Orange Labs Date: Collaboration between 2.4/5 and 60 GHz May 2010 Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1054r0 Submission Sep Santosh Pandey (Cisco)Slide 1 FILS Reduced Neighbor Report Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1081r0 SubmissionSayantan Choudhury HEW Simulation Methodology Date: Sep 16, 2013 Authors: Slide 1.
Doc.: IEEE /0648r0 Submission May 2014 Chinghwa Yu et. al., MediaTekSlide 1 Performance Observation of a Dense Campus Network Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0878r0 Submission July 2012 Timo Koskela, Renesas Mobile CorporationSlide 1 On the Channel Switching in ah Date:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/0523r2 May 2013 Katsuo Yunoki, KDDI R&D LaboratoriesSlide 1 Understanding Current Situation of Public Wi-Fi Usage - Possible.
Doc.: IEEE /1032r1 Submission September 2004 Hiroyuki Nakase, Tohoku Univ.Slide 1 Enhanced MAC proposal for high throughput. Tohoku University.
Doc.: IEEE /0357r0 Submission March 2008 Michelle Gong, Intel, et alSlide 1 Enhancement to Mesh Discovery Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1263r2 Submission Dec 2009 Z. Chen, C. Zhu et al [Preliminary Simulation Results on Power Saving] Date: Authors: Slide.
Submission doc.: IEEE af-11/1051r0 Dual band operation of TVBDs Date: July 20, 2011 Chen Sun, NICT Author(s): NameCompanyAddressPhone Chen SUNNICT+81.
Doc.: IEEE / Submission March 2013 Juho Pirskanen, Renesas Mobile CorporationSlide 1 Discussion On Basic Technical Aspects for HEW Date:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/1051r2 Multi-channel information for AP discovery 1 September 2012 HTC Corp. NameAffiliationsAddressPhone Jing-Rong HsiehHTC.
Doc.:IEEE /0134r0 Submission Laurent Cariou January 18, 2010 Slide 1 Fast session transfer use cases Authors: Date:
COMP2322 Lab 1 Introduction to Wireless LAN Weichao Li Apr. 8, 2016.
IEEE Wireless LAN Standard
Submission doc.: IEEE /0314r1 March 2016 Katsuo Yunoki, KDDI R&D Labs.Slide 1 Possible Solutions for Mobile Offloading Use Case Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0785r1 LG Confidential July 2010 Byeongwoo Kang, LG ElectronicsSlide 1 PHY Power Saving Features For 11ac Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /492r00 Submission Orange Labs Date: Collaboration between 2.4/5 and 60 GHz May 2010 Slide 1 Authors:
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 July 2013
FILS Reduced Neighbor Report
AP Power Saving Date: Authors: May 2017 Month Year
Basic TGad MAC Layer Proposals and Options for Coexistence
[Preliminary Simulation Results on Power Saving]
Multi-AP Enhancement and Multi-Band Operations
[Preliminary Simulation Results on Power Saving]
Multi-band Discovery Assistance
Uplink Broadcast Service
Multiple Frequency Channel Scanning
Enhancements to Mesh Discovery
Multi-band Discovery Assistance
OCT based 6 GHz AP Operation Discussion
Follow-Up on WUR Discovery Frame and Discovery Channel
Fast Session Transfer Date: Authors: May 2010 March 2010
Collaboration between 2.4/5 and 60 GHz
FILS Reduced Neighbor Report
Follow-Up on WUR Discovery Frame and Discovery Channel
Discussion on Multi-Band for EHT
Functional Requirements for EHT Specification Framework
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0
Discussion on Multi-Band for EHT
802.11ba Architecture Discussion
Basic TGad MAC Layer Proposals and Options for Coexistence
Multi-AP Enhancement and Multi-Band Operations
Fast Session Transfer Session Setup in TVWS
(60GHz New Technique Proposal)
PHY Power Saving Features For 11ac
Comment resolution on CID 20175
CR for CID 1115 Date: Authors: May 2019
FILS Frame Content Date: Authors: February 2008
Fast Session Transfer Date: Authors: May 2010 March 2010
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0
Basic TGad MAC Layer Proposals and Options for Coexistence
Multiple Band Operation Discussion
Multi-link Operation Framework
Multi-link Operation Framework
Multi-link Operation Framework
TGu/TGv Joint Meeting Date: Authors: May 2008 Month Year
Multi-Link Operation: Design Discussion
Multiple Frequency Channel Scanning
Multiple Band Operation Discussion
Virtual BSS For Multi AP Coordination
Multi-Band Multi-Channel Concept in IEEE be – A Simple Study
Multi-link Operation Framework
Multi-link Operation Framework
Presentation transcript:

doc.: IEEE /491r2 SubmissionL. Cariou, Orange Labs Date: Fast Session Transfer May 2010 L. Cariou, Orange LabsSlide 1 Authors:

doc.: IEEE /491r2 SubmissionL. Cariou, Orange Labs Collaboration between 2.4/5 and 60 GHz bands allows the user experience to be met by seamlessly providing both the wide coverage of WLAN and the very high throughput of 60 GHz when available A key merit of ad is that it can build on past successful standards –e.g a/n/ad system –This will provide many new market opportunities for the ad standard In [1] and [2] we introduced several use cases dedicated to fast session transfer. A method of fast session transfer is proposed which enables very fast transparent switching to deal with user mobility, dynamic channel conditions and to allow joint management of multiple bands Abstract May 2010 L. Cariou, Orange LabsSlide 2

doc.: IEEE /491r2 SubmissionL. Cariou, Orange Labs AP Set-top box Use case 1: FST with a switchable interface in STA Media server FTTH Switchable interface Slide 3 Concurrent dual interfaces Single link either at 5 or 60 WiFi 60GHz ( 1 Gbps) WiFi 5GHz ( 500 Mbps)

doc.: IEEE /491r2 SubmissionL. Cariou, Orange Labs AP Set-top box Media server FTTH Use case 2: FST with concurrent dual interfaces in STA Slide 4 Concurrent dual interfaces Flow transfer between interfaces or bonding of the two interfaces Two links, at 5 and 60 WiFi 60GHz ( 1 Gbps) WiFi 5GHz ( 500 Mbps)

doc.: IEEE /491r2 SubmissionL. Cariou, Orange Labs Use cases 1&2: Switch from 2.4/5 to 60GHz or from 60 to 2.4/5GHz Band selection for all flows of a station (stations with only one band active at a given time (Switchable interface) or stations with multiple bands active simultaneously at a given time) –AP-STB either in 2.4/5 GHz band or in 60 GHz band (one at a time) Band selection for each flow of a station separately (only stations with multiple bands active simultaneously at a given time) –Multiple HD flows between AP and STB either in 2.4/5 GHz band or in 60 GHz band –Session transfer of some HD flows in case of saturation of 2.4/5GHz or 60GHz  Band selection may be based on (a) maintaining coverage with user mobility, (b) dynamically changing channel quality, (c) throughput enhancement, (d) load balancing between bands, etc  We believe that this interface convergence will improve the overall home network In this presentation, we only consider the case 1 with -an AP concurrent dual band -a STA with switchable interface Slide 5

doc.: IEEE /491r2 SubmissionL. Cariou, Orange Labs Requirements on seamless fast session transfer Requirements for speed of a seamless fast session transfer –For video applications: 1080p 60Hz => frame every 16.6 ms Assuming packet loss: latency between 5 and 10 ms –For VoIP applications: Maximum acceptable BSS transfer for VoIP roaming is 50 ms –For gaming applications, distributed storage or contents sharing: Same constraints as for video  Session transfer should not exceed 5 to 10 ms Quite severe constraint: needs to be better than 11r Other requirements –Switch should be able to be initiated by either device in a link (AP or STA) Slide 6

doc.: IEEE /491r2 SubmissionL. Cariou, Orange Labs How to perform the seamless fast session transfer BSSID SSID Encryption key AID database BSSID SSID Encryption key AID database AID1 BSSID SSID Encryption key AID1 BSSID SSID Encryption key f 5GHz f 60GHz Example scenario: –One AP working at both 60 GHz and at 5 GHz link to TV at 5GHz (red) link to laptop at 60GHz (blue) to be switched to 5GHz Slide 7 5 GHz 60 GHz

doc.: IEEE /491r2 SubmissionL. Cariou, Orange Labs How to perform the seamless fast session transfer Required functions for FST:  Preparation phase: –Exchange of FST capabilities and FST negotiation for each link prior to transmission. We believe the negotiation should lead to the direct acceptance of future switches, to suppress the need to provide a response when a switch is requested –Sharing of the association parameters between the two bands To speed up the process by removing the need for disassociation/re-association during the switch –Definition in STA of a unique logical MAC address, switchable from one interface to another  FST phase (phase during which FST can be done): –Report request/response on one band/channel of particular metrics (such as the load and SNR) of the other band/channel –Triggering of the session transfer by the transmission of a signal frame No need for a response to the trigger frame because of the prior negotiation No need for disassociation/re-association because of the sharing of association parameters Slide 8

doc.: IEEE /491r2 SubmissionL. Cariou, Orange Labs How to perform the seamless fast session transfer Sharing of association parameters (1/2) Split between association function and forwarding function –Association to an AP, independently of the current interface/band: Negotiation of MAC parameters (security, power save, ….) Reception of a unique AID, whatever the band/channel Slide 9

doc.: IEEE /491r2 SubmissionL. Cariou, Orange Labs f f BSSID SSID Encryption key BSSID SSID Encryption key AID1 BSSID SSID Encryption key AID2 BSSID SSID Encryption key Association parameters match BSSID SSID Encryption key AID database How to perform the seamless fast session transfer Sharing of association parameters (2/2) Trigger signal frame Slide 10

doc.: IEEE /491r2 SubmissionL. Cariou, Orange Labs How to perform the seamless fast session transfer Forwarding (1/2) common MAC MAC 60 MAC 5 PHY 5 PHY 60 PHY 5 MAC 5 Physical MAC addr: MAC1 MAC 60 Physical MAC addr: MAC2 Logical MAC addr: MAClog0 IP IP addr linked to the unique logical MAC addr: MAClog0 MAC 60 MAC addr: MAC_ad0 PHY60 AP FST STA 11ad STA Definition in FST STA of a unique logical MAC address, switchable from one interface to another Definition in AP of a common MAC with a forwarding table indicating the active interface of a FST STA MAC addr MAClog0 5GHz MAC_ad0 60GHz

doc.: IEEE /491r2 SubmissionL. Cariou, Orange Labs Definition in FST STA of a unique logical MAC address, switchable from one interface to another Definition in AP of a common MAC with a forwarding table indicating the active interface of a FST STA How to perform the seamless fast session transfer Forwarding (2/2) common MAC MAC 60 MAC 5 PHY 5 PHY 60 PHY 5 MAC 5 Physical MAC addr: MAC1 MAC 60 Physical MAC addr: MAC2 Logical MAC addr: MAClog0 IP IP addr linked to the unique logical MAC addr: MAClog0 MAC 60 MAC addr: MAC_ad0 PHY60 AP FST STA 11ad STA MAC addr MAClog0 60GHz MAC_ad0 60GHz

doc.: IEEE /491r2 SubmissionL. Cariou, Orange Labs How to perform the seamless fast session transfer Trigger the switch by a signal frame (1/3) The trigger signal frame should provide the information to localize the destination band and to indicate which station the switch concerns FST signal frame needs to include –The channel number from the destination channel –The BSSID of the destination band –The AID of the station that will switch band Slide 13

doc.: IEEE /491r2 SubmissionL. Cariou, Orange Labs How to perform the seamless fast session transfer Trigger the switch by a signal frame (2/3) Additional information in FST signal frame to speed up the FST –Option 1: include the capabilities of the destination channel in the FST signal frame  By doing this, the station does not need to wait for the next beacon once arrived in the destination band in order to get the capabilities  This will be very efficient for destination bands/channels working with CSMA-CA (ex: from ad to n or ac): very low FST duration  However, for TDMA-based destination bands/channels like ad 60 GHz, the station will anyway need to wait for the next beacon to be informed a) of the next contention-period to request a reserved slot b) of its reserved slot, if a slot has been pre-reserved Slide 14

doc.: IEEE /491r2 SubmissionL. Cariou, Orange Labs How to perform the seamless fast session transfer Trigger the switch by a signal frame (3/3) Additional information in FST signal frame to speed up the FST –Option 2: use the principle of the "channel switch announcement frame" to plan the arrival in the destination band just before the beacon transmission signaling of the destination band/channel TBTT in the FST signal frame in addition, the switch can be planned using the "channel switch announcement element" field in the FST signal frame  By doing this, the station will directly receive the capabilities and the contention-period time in case of TDMA.  This will be very efficient for all destination band/channels working with either CSMA-CA or TDMA Slide 15

doc.: IEEE /491r2 SubmissionL. Cariou, Orange Labs Seamless fast session transfer performance Speed of the FST –When using option 2, the FST switch time easily satisfies the 5 to 10 ms switching requirements FST duration only includes the time needed to perform the switch and the reception of the beacon on the destination band/channel Trigger of the FST by the AP Trigger by a FST signal frame Such a decision requires a report on one band/channel of particular metrics (such as the load and SNR) of the other band/channel Trigger of the FST by the station The FST can be instantaneous thanks to UL data transmission in the new band Slide 16

doc.: IEEE /491r2 SubmissionL. Cariou, Orange Labs Fast session transfer is a very important feature to improve home network by allowing the joint management of multiple bands, and to open new market opportunities. To be efficient, FST needs to be seamless and triggered by either one or the other device of a link and to be as fast as 5 to 10ms. We proposed to share the association parameters and a new trigger frame that enable such an efficient FST. Conclusions May 2010 Slide 17

doc.: IEEE /491r2 SubmissionL. Cariou, Orange Labs Reference May 2010 Slide 18 [1] “5-60 GHz use cases”, 802/ r0 [2] “Fast Session Transfer use cases”, 802/ r0 [3] “Collaboration between 2.4/5 and 60GHz”, 802/ r0

doc.: IEEE /491r2 SubmissionL. Cariou, Orange Labs Time TBTT signaled in FST signal frame FST signal frame FST Switching instant How to perform the fast session transfer Trigger the switch by a signal frame Slide 19 FST switch duration << 5ms