Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Meaningful Use and Health Information Exchange
Advertisements

Understanding Meaningful Use Presented by: Allison Bryan MS, CHES December 7, 2012 Purdue Research Foundation 2012 Review of Stage 1 and Stage 2.
Eligible Hospitals (EH) & Critical Access Hospitals (CAH)
2014 Certification Criteria associated with MU Menu Stage 2: 2014 Certification Criteria associated with MU Core Stage 2: 2014 Certification Criteria associated.
Meeting Stage 1 Meaningful Use Criterion Carlos A. Leyva, Esq. Digital Business Law Group, P.A.
Presenter James S. Dunnick, SESEDN LLC. Credentials: MD. FACC. CHCQM. CPC. Contact Information:
Practice Management System Electronic Medical Records Accelerate Your Practice Stage 2 Meaningful Use with MVE 2014 Practice Management.
GOVERNMENT EHR FUNDING: MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 2 UPDATE October 25, 2012 Jonathan Krasner Healthcare IT Consultant BEI
Meaningful Use Monitoring Methodology © 1 Meaningful Use Monitor (MUM) Initial Gap Assessment (IGA) Phase Kit 4/6/2010 Meaningful Use Monitor Indiana Radiology.
Behavioral Health providers are being challenged to adopt health information technology with very limited resources. There is a need to prepare for increased.
HITECH, Meaningful Use, and Interoperability. HITECH Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health – HITECH –Part of the 2009 American.
Series 1: Meaningful Use for Behavioral Health Providers From the CIHS Video Series “Ten Minutes at a Time” Module 2: The Role of the Certified Complete.
MEANINGFUL USE UPDATE 2014 Mark Huang, M.D. Chief Medical Information Officer Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago Associate Professor Department of PM.
“Preserve and Improve the Health Status of all Californians” Medi-Cal Electronic Health Records (EHR) Incentive Program Medi-Cal Electronic Health Records.
PR’s Journey Towards Electronic Health Records Adoption & Meaningful Use PRESENTATION TO PR HIT SUMMIT Antonio Fernandez Regional Extension Center for.
Oklahoma Electronic Health Record Incentive Program Oklahoma Health Care Authority Board Retreat Thursday, August 26, 2010 Carol McFarland, CPA, CGFM Melody.
Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs HIT Policy Committee June 5, 2013.
Criteria for HIT Stimulus Funding: Meaningful Use and Certification Requirements May 4, 2010 Meaningful Use Critical Access Hospital September 16, 2010.
August 12, Meaningful Use *** UDOH Informatics Brown Bag Robert T Rolfs, MD, MPH.
Vermont Information Technology Leaders, Inc. Meaningful Use Stage 2 For Eligible Professionals Carol Kulczyk October 10,
Moderator Kevin Larsen, MD Medical Director, Meaningful Use Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology Washington, D.C. Using.
A First Look at Meaningful Use Stage 2 John D. Halamka MD.
Meaningful Use Stage 2 Esthee Van Staden September 2014.
Meaningful Use Measures. Reporting Time Periods Reporting Period for 1 st year of MU (Stage 1) 90 consecutive days within the calendar year Reporting.
Saeed A. Khan MD, MBA, FACP © CureMD Healthcare ACOs and Requirements for Reporting Quality Measures Meaningful Use Are you still missing out? © CureMD.
EHRS as a Tool to Improve BP Control 1.Brief history of OQIUN, CCI. Began 1999 using data cards. Started working with multiple practice sites using different.
Series 1: Meaningful Use for Behavioral Health Providers From the CIHS Video Series “Ten Minutes at a Time” Module 2: The Role of the Certified Complete.
Practice Management System Electronic Medical Records Accelerate Your Practice Stage 1 Meaningful Use with MVE 2014 Practice Management.
New Jersey Institute of Technology Enterprise Development Center (EDC) 211 Warren Street, Newark, NJ Phone: Fax:
Meaningful Use Stage 1 & 2 Helping Colorado Providers Achieve Meaningful Use Tracy Rue Senior Consultant, Colorado Regional Extension Center.
NWH TRANSITION OF CARE DOCUMENT FOR MU STAGE 2 JUNE 6, 2014.
Christopher Geer, MBA Meaningful Use Project Manager Unity Health System
Prepared by: Health Technology Services Regional Extension Center A division of Mountain-Pacific Quality Health.
A First Look at Meaningful Use Stage 2 John D. Halamka MD.
Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs Stage 2 Final Rule Robert Anthony HITPC
Medicaid EHR Incentive Program For Eligible Professionals Overview of the Proposed 2015 Modification Rule Kim Davis-Allen Outreach Coordinator
Universal Adoption of the EHR What is Meaningful Use and why should it be important to me?
Meaningful Use Elizabeth W. Woodcock, MBA, FACMPE, CPC Update: 2015 Sponsored by.
Affordable Healthcare IT Solutions. MU RX Compliance with Meaningful Use Stage 2.
Implementation days 10 Days Onsite Training Additional Hardware Automated Workflow Paperless Environment MD with PC Tablet / iPad Workflow Analysis.
INTRODUCTION TO THE ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD CHAPTER 1.
Configuring Electronic Health Records Meaningful Use and Implementation Lecture a This material (Comp11_Unit8a) was developed by Oregon Health & Science.
GloStream and Meaningful Use August, Table of Contents Final rule from the ONC and CMS The gloStream path to truly meaningful use Medicare payment.
Making better healthcare possible ® Meaningful Use Stage 2 The Changing Seasons of Healthcare Conference WV-HFMA/WV-HIMSS September 27, 2012.
Component 11: Configuring EHRs Unit 2: Meaningful Use of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) Lecture 1 This material was developed by Oregon Health & Science.
Unit 1b: Health Care Quality and Meaningful Use Introduction to QI and HIT This material was developed by Johns Hopkins University, funded by the Department.
1 Meaningful Use Stage 2 The Value of Performance Benchmarking.
Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs Jason McNamara Technical Director for Health IT.
Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs Stage 2 Final Rule Travis Broome HIT Standards Committee
Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs Robert Anthony HIT Policy Committee March 7, 2012.
©2011 Falcon, LLC. All rights reserved. Proprietary. May not be copied or distributed without the express written permission of Falcon, LLC. Falcon EHR.
June 18, 2010 Marty Larson.  Health Information Exchange  Meaningful Use Objectives  Conclusion.
HITECH/MEANINGFUL USE Danielle Smith Trends and Issues in Healthcare December 2, 2014 Power Point Project.
HIT Policy Committee Stage 2 Recommendations Presentation to HIT Standards Committee June 22, 2011.
Component 11/Unit 2a Meaningful Use of the Electronic Health Record (EHR)
Meaningful Use Made Easy Step by Step Approach to Stage 1 Compliance and 2013 Changes My Vision Express Practice Management and EMR Software Presented.
Meaningful Use: Stage 2 Changes An overall simplification of the program aligned to the overarching goals of sustainability as discussed in the Stage.
CMS Medicare and Medicaid Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Programs Final Rule Overview 1 Robert Anthony.
What Lies Ahead for ONC Meaningful Use and Beyond Farzad Mostashari, MD ScM National Coordinator for Health Information Technology.
Configuring axiUm for Meaningful Use
New Jersey Institute of Technology Enterprise Development Center (EDC) 211 Warren Street, Newark, NJ Phone: Fax:
The Impact of Proposed Meaningful Use Modifications for June 23, 2015 Today’s presenters: Al Wroblewski, Client Services Relationship Manager.
By: Rebecca Cameron Amie Dennis Amy Everson Debborah Stokes.
Moving Toward HITECH Healthcare EHR Adoption at the Dawn of a New Era
Meaningful Use Update 2015: How Does It Impact Family Medicine? Ryan Mullins, MD, CPE, CPHQ, CPHIT.
Stage 2 Beyond the First Year on MU in 2014 Presenters: Randy Marsden – Chief Client Officer Leo Vilenskiy – Senior Customer Support Representative Rebecca.
The Value of Performance Benchmarking
Configuring Electronic Health Records
2017 Modified Stage 2 Meaningful Use Objectives Overview Massachusetts Medicaid EHR Incentive Program September 19 & 20, 2017 September 19,
Presentation transcript:

Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs Robert Anthony Deputy Director, Health IT Initiatives Group Office of E-Health Standards and Services Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services

Eligibility

Who is Eligible to Participate? Eligibility was defined in statute Hospital-based EPs are NOT eligible for incentives DEFINITION: 90% or more of their covered professional services in either an inpatient (POS 21) or emergency room (POS 23) of a hospital Incentives are based on the individual, not the practice

Medicare-only Eligible Professionals Could be eligible for both Medicare & Medicaid incentives Medicaid-only Eligible Professionals

Meaningful Use

Conceptual Approach to Meaningful Use Data capturing and sharing Advanced clinical processes Improved outcomes Stage 3 This is the structure to get us where we want to be. It is divided into three stages. The first stage involves collecting health information in a structured way and takes the first steps towards using that data. Structured data is crucial to meaningful use of EHRs. What we mean by structured data is that the system recognizes the data for what it is and knows how that data interacts with other data available in the system. For instance, Microsoft Word knows that aspirin is a seven letter word and even how it should be spelled, but it does not know that it is a drug and one that should be given to patients showing signs of a heart attack or not given to one that is also taking an anticoagulant. This is what we mean by structured data. The second stage involves designing and implementing processes that will use the data collected in a way that we believe will generate improved outcomes. The third stage involves finding out if we were right and determining the effects of meaningful use on outcomes. Stage 2 Stage 1

What are the Requirements of Stage 1 Meaningful Use? 2 Years 2 Years And so on . . . Stage 3 – 1 Year Stage 3 – 1 Year Stage 2 – 1 Year Stage 2 – 1 Year Stage 1 – 1 Year Stage 1 – 90 Days

What are the Requirements of Stage 1? Eligible Professionals 15 core objectives 5 of 10 menu objectives 20 total objectives

Stage 1 EP Core Objectives Computerized physician order entry (CPOE) E-Prescribing (eRx) Report ambulatory clinical quality measures to CMS/States Implement one clinical decision support rule Provide patients with an electronic copy of their health information, upon request Provide clinical summaries for patients for each office visit Drug-drug and drug-allergy interaction checks Record demographics Maintain an up-to-date problem list of current and active diagnoses Maintain active medication list Maintain active medication allergy list Record and chart changes in vital signs Record smoking status for patients 13 years or older Capability to exchange key clinical information among providers of care and patient-authorized entities electronically Protect electronic health information

Stage 1 EP Menu Objectives 5 of 10 Menu Objectives Drug-formulary checks Incorporate clinical lab test results as structured data Generate lists of patients by specific conditions Send reminders to patients per patient preference for preventive/follow up care Provide patients with timely electronic access to their health information Use certified EHR technology to identify patient-specific education resources and provide to patient, if appropriate Medication reconciliation Summary of care record for each transition of care/referrals Capability to submit electronic data to immunization registries/systems* Capability to provide electronic syndromic surveillance data to public health agencies* * At least 1 public health menu objective + 4 others

Stages of Meaningful Use Data capturing and sharing Advanced clinical processes Improved outcomes Stage 3 This is the structure to get us where we want to be. It is divided into three stages. The first stage involves collecting health information in a structured way and takes the first steps towards using that data. Structured data is crucial to meaningful use of EHRs. What we mean by structured data is that the system recognizes the data for what it is and knows how that data interacts with other data available in the system. For instance, Microsoft Word knows that aspirin is a seven letter word and even how it should be spelled, but it does not know that it is a drug and one that should be given to patients showing signs of a heart attack or not given to one that is also taking an anticoagulant. This is what we mean by structured data. The second stage involves designing and implementing processes that will use the data collected in a way that we believe will generate improved outcomes. The third stage involves finding out if we were right and determining the effects of meaningful use on outcomes. Stage 2 Stage 1

Eligible Professionals Eligible Hospitals & CAHs What are the Requirements of Stage 2 Meaningful Use? Stage 1 Stage 2 Eligible Professionals 15 core objectives 5 of 10 menu objectives 20 total objectives 17 core objectives 3 of 6 menu objectives Eligible Hospitals & CAHs 14 core objectives 5 of 10 menu objectives 19 total objectives 16 core objectives 3 of 6 menu objectives

Stage 1 Menu  Stage 2 Core EP Lab Results Patient Lists Patient Education Summary of Care Records Medication Reconciliation Immunizations Patient Reminders Online Patient Information

New for Stage 2 EP Secure Messaging Family Health History Imaging Results Registry Reporting Progress Notes

Closer Look at Stage 2: Patient Engagement Patient engagement – engagement is an important focus of Stage 2.   EXCLUSIONS – CMS is introducing exclusions based on broadband availability in the provider’s county. Requirements for Patient Action: More than 5% of patients must send secure messages to their EP More than 5% of patients must access their health information online More than 5% of patients must access their health information online (of the more than 50% of patients who received access). Requirements for Patient Action: More than 5% of patients must send secure messages to their EP More than 5% of patients must access their health information online

Closer Look at Stage 2: Electronic Exchange Stage 2 focuses on actual use cases of electronic information exchange: Stage 2 requires that a provider send a summary of care record for more than 50% of transitions of care and referrals. The rule also requires that a provider electronically transmit a summary of care for more than 10% of transitions of care and referrals. At least one summary of care document sent electronically to recipient with different EHR vendor or to CMS test EHR. Credit given when the receiving providers successfully “pulls” info down from HIE. This is in addition to the “push” methods of electronic HIE that were proposed. Stage 2 requires that a provider send a summary of care record for more than 50% of transitions of care and referrals. The rule also requires that a provider electronically transmit a summary of care for more than 10% of transitions of care and referrals.

Clinical Quality Measures

Eligible Hospitals and CAHs Eligible Hospitals and CAHs CQM Reporting in 2013 and 2014 Reporting in 2013 Reporting in 2014 and Beyond EPs Report 6 out of 44 CQMs 3 core or alt. core 3 menu EPs Report 9 out of 64 CQMs Selected CQMs must cover at least 3 of the 6 NQS domains Recommended core CQMs: 9 for adult populations 9 for pediatric populations Eligible Hospitals and CAHs Report 15 out of 15 CQMs Eligible Hospitals and CAHs Report 16 out of 29 CQMs Selected CQMs must cover at least 3 of the 6 NQS domains

CQM Selection and HHS Priorities All providers must select CQMs from at least 3 of the 6 HHS National Quality Strategy domains: Patient and Family Engagement Patient Safety Care Coordination Population and Public Health Efficient Use of Healthcare Resources Clinical Processes/Effectiveness Such as measures in which performance rates are currently low or for which there is wide variability in performance, or that address known drivers of high morbidity and/or cost for Medicare and Medicaid. For example, Medicare- and Medicaid-eligible physicians, and Medicaid-eligible nurse-practitioners, certified nurse-midwives, dentists, physician assistants) Based on the March 2011 report to Congress, "National Strategy for Quality Improvement in Health Care" (National Quality Strategy) (http://www.healthcare.gov/law/resources/reports/nationalqualitystrategy032011.pdf) and the Health Information Technology Policy Committee's (HITPC's) recommendations (http://healthit.hhs.gov/portal/server.pt?open=512&objID=1815&parentname=CommunityPage&parentid=7&mode=2&in_hi_userid=11113&cached=true).

Stage 1 and Stage 2 Resources http://www.cms.gov/ EHRIncentivePrograms/ For questions, please contact: Robert Anthony Office of E-Health Standards and Services Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services robert.anthony@cms.hhs.gov