Discussion oneM2M WG2 contributions to address Network Optimization Group Name: WG2 Source: Takanori Iwai, NEC,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Machine-to-Machine(M2M) Communication for cdma2000 Systems Orlett W. Pearson, 3GPP2 LS to TR-50 October 2010.
Advertisements

Is a Node or not Node? ARC Node_resolution Group Name: ARC Source: Barbara Pareglio, NEC, Meeting Date: ARC#9.1 Agenda.
IoT in ODL Lionel Florit, Principal Engineer, ODL ID lflorit
3GPP Presence Requirements Requirements for Presence Service based on 3GPP specifications and wireless environment characteristics draft-kiss-simple-presence-wireless-
Doc.: IEEE /0408r0 Submission March 2004 Colin Blanchard, BTSlide 1 3GPP WLAN Interworking Security Colin Blanchard British Telecommunications.
Service Layer Session Management Group Name: WG2-ARC Source: IDCC, LGE, ZTE Meeting Date: TP16 Agenda Item:
REQ WG Reuse of underlying networks, 3GPP
REQ WG Reuse of underlying networks, 3GPP
REQ WG Reuse of underlying networks, 3GPP From: Omar Elloumi (ALU) Source: Alcatel-Lucent (ATIS) Meeting Date: Agenda Item:
On a Device Information Model for devices in oneM2M
Summary of 3GPP TR GPP2 TSG-S WG4 S Source: Qualcomm Incorporated Contact(s): Anand Palanigounder,
© 2011 Open Mobile Alliance Ltd. All Rights Reserved. Used with the permission of the Open Mobile Alliance Ltd. under the terms as stated in this document.
OneM2M-ARC BRequest_Resource Architecture Proposal to address Broadcasting/Multicasting Requirements Group Name: WG2 Source: Takanori Iwai, NEC,
22-23 June 2004TISPAN-3GPP Workshop - Sophia-Antipolis 1 Joint 3GPP & TISPAN Workshop on NGN-IMS - NGN-IMS issues handling - Alain Le Roux (France Telecom),
Mechanism to support establishment of charging policies Group Name: WG2-ARC Source: InterDigital Meeting Date: TP8 Agenda Item:
Optimized M2M interworking with mobile networks Group Name: oneM2M REQ Source: Takanori Iwai, NEC, Meeting Date: Agenda.
An Operators Input for oneM2M Baseline  Group name: TP#2/WG1  Source: DTAG, Vodafone Group  Meeting Date:  Agenda Item: WG1 agenda item.
In-Band Access Control Framework Group Name: WG4 SEC Source: Qualcomm Meeting Date: Agenda Item:
Introduction of PRO WG activities Group Name: TP Source: Shingo Fujimoto, FUJITSU, Meeting Date: Agenda Item:
IEEE MEDIA INDEPENDENT HANDOVER DCN: Title: MIH_Handover primitives and scenarios Date Submitted: April, 30,
3GPP Rel-13 Interworking discussions
In-Band Access Control Framework Group Name: WG4 SEC Source: Qualcomm Meeting Date: Agenda Item:
An operator’s perspective on support for different M2M deployment scenarios AT&T Group Name: TP Source: Farooq Bari, Jianrong Wang; AT&T;
Usage Scenarios for CSE Group Name: WG2(ARC-WG) Source: Shingo Meeting Date: Agenda Item: Message.
3GPP2 Vision: System Release 6 & 7 Jane Brownley Chair, Vision Ad Hoc 1.
Proposed Solution for Device Binding 3GPP2 TSG-S WG4 S Source: Qualcomm Incorporated Contact(s): Anand Palanigounder,
Work Group / Work Item Proposal Slide 1 © 2012 oneM2M Partners oneM2M-TP oneM2M_Work_Group_Work_Item_Proposal Group name: Technical Plenary Source:
1 3GPP2 GBA Overview Adrian Escott Chair, TSG-S WG4 24 May 2006.
Overview of analysis of existing SDO M2M architectures Group Name: REQ ARC#2 Source: Alcatel-Lucent.
Step by step approach Group Name: WG2 Source: Michael hs. Yang, LG uplus, Jaeseung Song, NEC Europe, Meeting.
Node-Specific Resource Group Name: ARC&MAS Source: LGE, Meeting Date: Agenda Item: Contribution.
3GPP Rel-13 Interworking discussions
September 28, 2006 Page 1 3GPP2 MMD Status for IMS Workshop Jack Nasielski
3GPP SCEF Interworking Call Flows
M2M Study Item 3GPP2 Orlett W. Pearson May | 3GPP2 M2M Study Item | May GPP2 M2M This study will include the following study targets: 
M2M Service Session Management (SSM) CSF
1. 2 Purpose of This Presentation ◆ To explain how spacecraft can be virtualized by using a standard modeling method; ◆ To introduce the basic concept.
Realizing Ms Interface with OMA DM Group Name: MAS WG Source: Seungkyu Park, LG Meeting Date:
Optimized M2M interworking with mobile networks Group Name: oneM2M REQ Source: Takanori Iwai, NEC, Meeting Date: Agenda.
November 2001 Lars Falk, TeliaSlide 1 doc.: IEEE /617r1 Submission Status of 3G Interworking Lars Falk, Telia.
Security API discussion Group Name: SEC Source: Shingo Fujimoto, FUJITSU Meeting Date: Agenda Item: Security API.
M2M Service Layer – DM Server Security Group Name: OMA-BBF-oneM2M Adhoc Source: Timothy Carey, Meeting Date:
Page 1TTT - May 12, GPP IMS Standardization Update Bell Labs Innovations Lucent Technologies Room 9C Lucent Ln. Naperville, IL E Mail.
EHRPD-LTE Inter Technology Spectrum Optimization Source: Qualcomm Incorporated Contact: Jun Wang/George Cherian September 9, 2013 Notice ©2013. All rights.
3GPP SCEF Interworking Discussions
M2M Service Session Management (SSM) CSF Group Name: WG2-ARC Source: IDCC, LGE, ZTE Meeting Date: TP8 Agenda Item:
1 SAMSUNG BCMCS Security Architecture and Key Management JUNHYUK SONG SAMSUNG Incorporated grants a free, irrevocable license to 3GPP2 and its Organization.
DM Collaboration – OMA & BBF: Deployment Scenarios Group Name: WG5 - MAS Source: Tim Carey, ALU, Meeting Date:
3GPP TSG RAN WG2 meeting #92 Nanjing, China 23-27, May 2016 R
1 BCMCS Framework TSG-X BCMCS Adhoc August 20, 2003.
Introduction to Service Session Management Group Name: WG2-ARC Source: IDCC, LGE, ZTE Meeting Date: TP8 Agenda Item:
Possible options of using DDS in oneM2M Group Name: ARC Source: KETI, Huawei, Hitachi, China Unicom Meeting Date: Agenda Item: DDS binding.
3GPP Rel-13 Interworking discussions Group Name: TP #18 Source: Rejesh Bhalla, ZTE Corporation, Meeting Date: Agenda Item:
Background Data Transfer
3GPP R13 Small Data Delivery
Resource subscription using DDS in oneM2M
Update on 3GPP RAN3 Multi-RAT joint coordination
Group multicast fanOut Procedure
3GPP interworking in R3 Group Name: ARC
Possible options of using DDS in oneM2M
3GPP Rel-13 Interworking discussions
OneM2M-ARC BRequest_Resource Architecture Proposal to address Broadcasting/Multicasting Requirements Group Name: WG2 Source: Takanori Iwai,
3GPP Interworking Abstraction
MinitorEvent(UE_Reachability)
3GPP V2X Interworking Potential Impact
IEEE MEDIA INDEPENDENT HANDOVER DCN:
IEEE MEDIA INDEPENDENT HANDOVER DCN:
IEEE MEDIA INDEPENDENT HANDOVER DCN:
3gpp-liaison-report-may-2005
Presentation transcript:

Discussion oneM2M WG2 contributions to address Network Optimization Group Name: WG2 Source: Takanori Iwai, NEC, Tetsuo Inoue, NEC, Ataru Kobayashi, NEC, JaeSeung Song, NEC Lab Europe, Joerg Swetina, NEC Lab Europe, Meeting Date: Agenda Item: oneM2M-ARC Network_Optimization_Discussion_Doc

Agenda Backgrounds – oneM2M Use Case, Requirements and LS (oneM2M  3GPP) Drafting Contributions – Overview – X Reference Point (AE  CSE: Request ) – Functions in Common Services Entity (CSE) – Z Reference Point (CSE  NSE: Request) – Sequence (or information flow) References – State of the art; M2M network optimization capability in 3GPP (SA1/SA2) Page 2

Backgrounds Looking back at oneM2M Use Case, Requirements and LS (oneM2M -- 3GPP) Page 3

Concept & Benefits This mechanism allows a M2M service provider to take advantage of network optimization capability of underlying communication networks. It can optimize connection and mobility managements in the communication network based on the characteristics of device for communication and mobility. This mechanism involves authentication, charging, detecting characteristics of device for communication and mobility by M2M service provider and notifying the characteristics to appropriate underlying network. Interworking between M2M service platform and underlying network is required. – Benefit; It could offer to reduce load and improve reliability of underlying network. Page 4

Use case (1) Optimized M2M interworking with mobile networks (Optimizing connectivity management parameters) This use case illustrates detection of a change of data transmission interval on service layer and notification to the mobile network by interworking between the M2M service platform and the mobile network. Page 5

Use case (2) Optimized M2M interworking with mobile networks (Optimizing mobility management parameters) This use case illustrates detection of a change of mobility characteristics on service layer (through the M2M Application) and notification (through the oneM2M Service Capabilities) to the mobile network by interworking between the M2M service platform and the mobile network. Page 6

Requirements Approved oneM2M-TS-Requirements-V oneM2M Requirements Technical Specification – Requirements to be addressed Requirement IDDescriptionRelease OPR-005 The M2M System shall be able to exchange information with M2M Applications related to usage and traffic characteristics of M2M Devices or M2M Gateways by the M2M Application. This information includes the following features for a M2M Device: - Time controlled devices to send or receive data only during defined time intervals Note: “Low mobility” and “Time controlled” are equivalent to the MTC Features specified in [i.x] (section 7.2 of 3GPP TS ) OPR-006Depending on availability of suitable interfaces provided by the Underlying Network the M2M System shall be able to provide information related to usage and traffic characteristics of M2M Devices or M2M Gateways to the Underlying Network. Page 7

Requirements Approved (Cont.) – The other relevant requirements Requirement IDDescriptionRelease OSR-006 The M2M System shall be able to reuse the services offered by underlying networks to M2M Applications and/or M2M Service Layer, by means of open access models (e.g. OMA, GSMA OneAPI framework). An example of available services is:  IP Multimedia communications  Messaging  Location  Charging and billing services  Device information and profiles  Configuration and management of devices  Triggering, monitoring of devices  Small data transmission  Group management The set of features or APIs to be supported depends on the M2M Service Capabilities and access to available APIs. Page 8

LS (OneM2M  3GPP) oneM2M-TP R01 LS on interfaces of oneM2M with Underlying Networks (Outgoing LS to 3GPP, Aug 2013) oneM2M considers it beneficial to establish an on-going collaborative exchange of information between oneM2M and 3GPP. Some of the features that oneM2M is working on that could require interworking with 3GPP Rel-12 and Rel-13 are listed below: 1.An M2M Service provider and a Network Operator may exchange information related to characteristics of M2M Devices or M2M Gateways, such as indications for small data, transmission scheduling parameters, mobility characteristics, etc.. Page 9

Drafting contributions, Overview Page 10

Points to be standardized; Network Optimize ( exchange information related to characteristics of M2M Devices ) In 3GPP, A mobile network will change parameters and process for specified device based on the information from service platform for transition of device’s behavior. Interfaces to be newly added or extended with additional parameters CSE – MTC-IWF  Tsp or new one MTC-IWF – MME/HSS  T5b, S6m Any other relevant interfaces Nodes to implement additional features MTC-IWF, MME, HSS, any other relevant nodes Overview The whole mechanism should be standardized which involves authentication, charging, detecting characteristics of device for communication and mobility by M2M service provider and notifying the characteristics to appropriate underlying network. Interworking between M2M service platform and underlying network is required.  Benefit; It could offer to reduce load and improve reliability of underlying network. In oneM2M, A M2M service platform will detect or receive transition of device’s behavior from apps and inform underlying network the information such as mobility or connectivity characteristics. Interfaces to be newly added or extended with additional parameters App – CSE  X reference point CSE – MTC-IWF  Z reference point Any other relevant interfaces Nodes to implement additional features NSE CSF and any other relevant CSFs or nodes MTC-IWF Mobile NW ( 3GPP ) Tsp I/F CSE Service PF ( oneM2M ) Applications HSS X Reference Point Z Reference Point MME T5b S6m Page 11

Points to be standardized in oneM2M Application Entity (AE) Application Entity (AE) Common Services Entity(CSE) ▐ Interface for AE to request to notify the usage and traffic characteristics of M2M devices (AE  CSE) Common request format (?) Dedicated request format for this functionality ▐ Functions to be implemented in CSE Functions to receive a request from an AE. Authenticate the originator (=AE) Validate and authorize the request (Optional) Charge the request Functions to send a request to NSEs Select appropriate NSEs (according to the request parameters and capability of NSEs) Transfer the request in the suitable form to the selected NSEs. (Optional) Accept the receipt from the NSE ▐ Interface for CSE to request to notify the usage and traffic characteristics of M2M devices (CSE  NSE ) Reference message flow and parameters (=data elements) sent/received through Z, though request formats depend on NSEs. Underlying Network Service Entity(NSE) Underlying Network Service Entity(NSE) Z Reference Point X Reference Point Common Service Functions ( CSFs) Common Service Functions ( CSFs) OPR-005 OPR-006 Page 12

Drafting contributions, X Reference Point ( A request from AE to CSE ) Page 13

Common request format (expected) Destination ID of CSE – ID defined by oneM2M (= CSE-ID? and/or M2M-Node-ID?) Source ID of AE – ID defined by oneM2M (= App-Inst-ID? and/or M2M-Node-ID?) Page 14

Dedicated request format for this functionality Mandatory items – Device ID Identifier of target device for transition of behavior (characteristics of device’s behavior). ex) IMSI or External ID of 3GPP. Optional items – Mobility characteristics Stop, Low Mobility, High Mobility Mobility area, Destination – Connectivity characteristics Average bandwidth of usage Average time of communication (or manipulation) Average interval between communications Schedule of communications Available delay time – Device power consumption information Remained power (percentage) Power saving mode, Power charging – Other options Booted application information Radio signal reception information Page 15

Drafting contributions, Functions in Common Services Entity (CSE) Page 16

List of functions Functions to receive a request from an AE – Authenticate the originator (=AE) – Validate and authorize the request (from technical and contractual aspects) – (Optional) Charge the request Functions to send a request to NSEs – Select appropriate NSEs (according to the request parameters and capability of NSEs) – Transfer the request in the suitable form to the selected NSEs. It may involve format conversion. – (Optional) Accept the receipt from the NSE (Optional) Charge the request and/or charge based on execution condition of NSE Page 17

Drafting contributions, Z Reference Point A request from CSE to NSE Page 18

Common request format Destination ID of NSE – ID defined and shared by oneM2M and 3GPP (?) Source ID of CSE – ID defined by oneM2M (= CSE-ID? and/or M2M-Node-ID?) Page 19

Dedicated request format for this functionality Mandatory items – Device ID Identifier of target device for transition of behavior (characteristics of device’s behavior). ex) IMSI or External ID of 3GPP. Optional items – Mobility characteristics Stop, Low Mobility, High Mobility Mobility area, Destination – Connectivity characteristics Average bandwidth of usage Average time of communication (or manipulation) Average interval between communications Schedule of communications Available delay time – Device power consumption information Remained power (percentage) Power saving mode, Power charging – Other options Booted application information Radio signal reception information Page 20

Drafting contributions Sequence (Message Flow) Page 21

Basic Sequence (request from AE to send data) CSE NSE AE Check the request Select appropriate NSEs Convert the format of the request Request to notify M2M device information Execute optimized processing Response Response (ACK) Page 22

References Page 23

State of the art; network processing optimization in 3GPP (SA1/SA2) Page 24

Service requirements for Machine-Type Communications (MTC); Stage 1 for Rel-12 (3GPP TS ) 3GPP SA1 has defined the requirements below in TS – 6 Categories of features for Machine-Type Communications Machine Type Communication (MTC) applications do not all have the same characteristics. This implies that not every system optimisation is suitable for every MTC application. Therefore, MTC Features are defined to provide structure for the different system optimisation possibilities that can be invoked. MTC Features provided to a particular subscriber are identified in the subscription. MTC Features can be individually activated. The following MTC Features have been defined: – Low Mobility – Time Controlled – Small Data Transmissions – Infrequent Mobile Terminated – MTC Monitoring – Secure Connection – Group Based MTC Features – Group Based Policing – Group Based Addressing Page 25

3GPP SA1 has defined the requirements below in TS – 7.2.1Low mobility The MTC Feature Low Mobility is intended for use with MTC Devices that do not move, move infrequently, or move only within a certain region. For the Low Mobility MTC Feature: – The network operator shall be able to change the frequency of mobility management procedures or simplify mobility management per MTC Device. – The network operator shall be able to define the frequency of location updates performed by the MTC Device. Service requirements for Machine-Type Communications (MTC); Stage 1 for Rel-12 (3GPP TS ) Page 26

3GPP SA1 has defined the requirements below in TS – 7.2.2Time controlled The MTC Feature Time Controlled is intended for use with MTC Applications that can tolerate to send or receive data only during defined time intervals and avoid unnecessary signalling outside these defined time intervals. The network operator may allow such MTC Applications to send/receive data and signalling outside of these defined time intervals but charge differently for such traffic. Page 27 Service requirements for Machine-Type Communications (MTC); Stage 1 for Rel-12 (3GPP TS )

3GPP SA1 has defined the requirements below in TS – 7.2.5Small data transmissions The MTC Feature Small Data Transmissions is intended for use with MTC Devices that send or receive small amounts of data. For the Small Data Transmissions MTC Feature: – -The system shall support transmissions of small amounts of data with minimal network impact (e.g. signalling overhead, network resources, delay for reallocation). – -Before transmission of small amount of data, the MTC Device may be attached or detached to/from the network. Note:“Transmission” implies either sending or receiving small amount of data. – -The 3GPP system shall be able to count the number of small data transmissions per subscription e.g. for charging or statistical purposes. Note 1: observed size of many of the instances of data exchanges is on the order of 1K (1024) octets Note 2: Charging and accounting of small data transmissions between operators can be done on a bulk basis. Service requirements for Machine-Type Communications (MTC); Stage 1 for Rel-12 (3GPP TS ) Page 28

New Work Item for Rel-13 agreed on SA1: WID for Service Exposure and Enablement Support (SEES) 3GPP SA1 has agreed new WID for Service Exposure and Enablement Support (SEES) 3Justification * – This work item allows 3 rd parties to interact with the 3GPP System to use 3GPP functions to provide 3 rd party services to their customers. Since M2M services and other Application services often have the same or similar requirements on the 3GPP System these are addressed jointly in this work item. – The following service scenarios are considered in this work item: – M2M services: Standardization work related to M2M service enablement is on-going in standardization organisations outside 3GPP (e.g. ETSI TC M2M and the oneM2M Global Initiative). These SDOs work under the assumption that M2M service enablement can be offered by a network operator but can also be provided by third parties that have business agreements with operators. In addition, these SDOs want to use 3GPP capabilities beyond pure IP based data transmission that can be offered by 3GPP networks. On the other hand, 3GPP architecture work on MTC has started in Rel-10 and in Rel-12 SA2 is working on Small Data Transmissions and Low Power Consumption UEs. Some information (e.g. on transmission scheduling or indications for small data, device triggering...) may need to be provided by M2M service enablement. In Rel-11, 3GPP defined an interface (Tsp) between the 3GPP Core Network and M2M service enablement platforms.. Additionally, 3GPP has defined other interfaces (Le, Rx, Mo, Mf, and Mh) between the 3GPP Core Network and application platforms; these interfaces may also be used by M2M service enablement platforms. This work item extends the scope for this interworking. Explain in sufficient detail why this work is needed. Page 29

New Work Item for Rel-13 agreed on SA1: WID for Service Exposure and Enablement Support (SEES) 3GPP SA1 has agreed new WID for Service Exposure and Enablement Support (SEES) 4Objective * – Stage 1 objectives: – Study and specify service requirements for the support of exposing selected 3GPP functions to – M2M service enablement layers (e.g. ETSI TC M2M and oneM2M). Use cases of oneM2M are contained in oneM2M TR oneM2M Use Case collection. Functions that may require such interworking have been identified by oneM2M should e.g. allow for: An M2M Service provider may request QoS and Prioritization for M2M communications to/from individual devices or groups of devices. A device may request QoS and Prioritization for M2M communications to/from the M2M Service Provider. – Note: For M2M communications initiated by the device QoS may be covered by existing call setup procedures. An M2M Service provider and a Network Operator may exchange information related to individual M2M Devices or Gateways, such as transmission scheduling or indications for small data, device triggering, etc. A Network Operator may request the M2M Service Provider to schedule traffic via the Operator Network (e.g. to delay specific M2M traffic when the 3GPP Network experiences high traffic load). Provide mechanisms to correlate the oneM2M Service Enablement Framework identifier of M2M Devices with the External Identifier used by the 3GPP network for the same MTC client. Upon request by the one M2M Service enablement Framework provide the oneM2M Service Enablement Framework with information regarding whether a M2M Device is authorized to access the 3GPP Operator Network. An M2M Service provider and a Network Operator may need to exchange information on charging and subscriptions to support interworking with M2M Service providers. Provide 3GPP security capabilities such as GBA for the benefit of oneM2M Services and Applications. Conversely provide mechanisms to leverage oneM2M security capabilities for the benefit of the 3GPP Operator Network security. An M2M Service provider and a Network Operator may exchange information related to location information of M2M Devices or M2M Gateways. – In order to avoid overlapping specifications, close cooperation with ETSI TC M2M and oneM2M is envisaged. Page 30

Analysis and proposal to 3GPP MTC for Rel-13 Page 31

Analysis and proposal to 3GPP MTC for Rel-13 Analysis on existing 3GPP MTC features – Currently, device characteristics such as Low Mobility, Time Controlled, Small Data Transmissions would be decided based on device subscription information which is statically provisioned on HSS or some other entities related to device subscription database. Future market expectation – It is expected increasing devices which might change its characteristic automatically depends on situations. – Examples of changing the characteristic are, stationary(low mobility) or mobile(High mobility) long interval or short interval permit delay or forbid delay Existing Key Issue – Dynamically change of device characteristics function is needed. ▐ Proposed features – To provide MTC features based on device characteristics which are dynamically changing Mechanism of detection and notification for transition of device characteristics Mechanism of selection for MTC features to be used based on transition of device characteristics Page 32

Low Mobility – The MTC Feature Low Mobility is intended for use with MTC Devices that do not move, move infrequently, or move only within a certain region. (Reference TS ) – It can be used for “Smart meter”. But it can not be used for “Car / Cargo”. – Because “Car / Cargo” usually move any region, and sometime “ Car” at home, “Cargo” in freight distribution center. Example of Static versus Dynamic of Mobility characteristic Network Parking or Moving Always stopping Provide Low Mobility Static Dynamic Detect device behavior And Provide Mobility characteristic Page 33