Exercise – Constructing a best track from multiple data sources NATIONAL HURRICANE CENTER JACK BEVEN WHERE AMERICA’S CLIMATE AND WEATHER SERVICES BEGIN.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Operational Use of the Dvorak Technique at the NHC
Advertisements

1 GOES-R Hurricane Intensity Estimation (HIE) Validation Tool Development Winds Application Team Tim Olander (CIMSS) Jaime Daniels (STAR)
Hurricane Igor Tropical Storm Julia Severe Marine Weather Studies using SMOS L-band Sensor Nicolas Reul 1, J. Tenerelli 2, B.Chapron 1, Y. Quilfen 1, D.
CalWater2 Gulfstream-IV Measurements Janet Intrieri NOAA/Earth System Research Laboratory April 23, 2014.
Future Plans  Refine Machine Learning:  Investigate optimal pressure level to use as input  Investigate use of neural network  Add additional input.
Future Plans  Refine Machine Learning:  Investigate optimal pressure level to use as input  Investigate use of neural network  Add additional input.
Hurricane watch is issued 24 to 48 hours before a storm arrives to cities that could be hit. A hurricane warning is issued when it is forecasted that it.
Part 4. Disturbances Chapter 12 Tropical Storms and Hurricanes.
WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT HURRICANES & TROPICAL CYCLONES AUG 19, 2009.
CORP Symposium Fort Collins, CO August 16, 2006 Session 3: NPOESS AND GOES-R Applications Tropical Cyclone Applications Ray Zehr, NESDIS / RAMM.
Forecasting Tropical cyclones Regional Training Workshop on Severe Weather Forecasting and Warning Services (Macao, China, 9 April 2013)
Kenji KISHIMOTO Forecast Division Japan Meteorological Agency.
Analysis of High Resolution Infrared Images of Hurricanes from Polar Satellites as a Proxy for GOES-R INTRODUCTION GOES-R will include the Advanced Baseline.
Where Do the Hurricanes Come From?. Introduction A tropical cyclone is a rapidly- rotating storm system characterized by a low-pressure center, strong.
Revised Pressure-Wind and Radial Profile Models: Implications for Tropical Cyclone Archives Mesoscale and Microscale Meteorology Division, ESSL National.
ATMS 373C.C. Hennon, UNC Asheville Observing the Tropics.
Best Track Re-Analysis Activities at the National Hurricane Center NATIONAL HURRICANE CENTER JACK BEVEN WHERE AMERICA’S CLIMATE AND WEATHER SERVICES BEGIN.
March 27, 2007 Using H*Wind to Improve Satellite-Based Wind Measurements in Tropical Cyclones John Allard Faculty Advisor: Dr. Christopher C. Hennon Introduction.
Application of the Computer Vision Hough Transform for Automated Tropical Cyclone Center-Fixing from Satellite Data Mark DeMaria, NOAA/NCEP/NHC Robert.
SMOS STORM KO meeting 30/01/2012 ESRIN Ocean Surface Remote Sensing at High Winds with SMOS.
Team Lead: Mark DeMaria NOAA/NESDIS/STAR Fort Collins, CO
Comparison of Airborne SFMR, Best Track and Dvorak ADT Maximum Surface Wind Estimates in Atlantic Tropical Cyclones Peter G. Black (1), Stephanie Mullins.
Improvements in Deterministic and Probabilistic Tropical Cyclone Surface Wind Predictions Joint Hurricane Testbed Project Status Report Mark DeMaria NOAA/NESDIS/ORA,
April nd IBTrACS Workshop 1 Operational Procedures How can we build consistent, homogeneous, well- documented climate quality data?
On the Improvement to H*Wind Hurricane Wind Analyses Due to the Inclusion of Future Ocean Surface Wind Measurements from Aircraft and Satellite Timothy.
A Comparison of Two Microwave Retrieval Schemes in the Vicinity of Tropical Storms Jack Dostalek Cooperative Institute for Research in the Atmosphere,
Lecture 7 (10/21) Hurricanes and Tropical Meteorology.
Tropical Cyclone Intensity Forecasting National Hurricane Center.
An Impact of SFMR Surface Wind Observations on Hurricane Landfall Forecasts and Warnings Peter G. Black NOAA/AOML/HRD James Franklin NOAA/NCEP/TPC 59th.
The Re-analysis of Hurricane Andrew (1992) The Re-analysis of Hurricane Andrew (1992) Chris Landsea NOAA/Hurricane Research Division Miami, Florida, USA.
An Overview of the Hurricane Imaging Radiometer (HIRAD) Robbie Hood, Ruba Amarin, Robert Atlas, M.C. Bailey, Peter Black, Courtney Buckley, Shuyi Chen,
NHC/JHT Products in ATCF Buck Sampson (NRL, Monterey) and Ann Schrader (SAIC, Monterey) IHC 2007 Other Contributors: Chris Sisko, James Franklin, James.
Tracking and Forecasting Hurricanes By John Metz Warning Coordination Meteorologist NWS Corpus Christi, Texas.
HRD Flight Requirements for Operational needs – tasked by NHC Reconnaissance/Surface Winds Research opportunities – tasked by HRD/NESDIS IFEX: Mature.
1 Using water vapor measurements from hyperspectral advanced IR sounder (AIRS) for tropical cyclone forecast Jun Hui Liu #, Jinlong and Tim.
Can Dvorak Intensity Estimates be Calibrated? John A. Knaff NOAA/NESDIS Fort Collins, CO.
Hurricane Research Division (HRD) Principal Investigator: Dr. Mark Powell Presented by: Sonia Otero Aircraft Operations Center (AOC) Real-time hurricane.
Improving Intensity Estimates Using Operational Information John Knaff NOAA/NESDIS Regional and Mesoscale Meteorology Branch Fort Collins, CO.
Improved SFMR Surface Winds and Rain Rates Eric W. Uhlhorn NOAA/AOML/Hurricane Research Division Bradley W. Klotz University of Miami/RSMAS/CIMAS and HRD.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Image: MODIS Land Group, NASA GSFC March 2000 The Role of Satellite Ocean.
2015 HS3 Science Team Meeting Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA.
GOES-R Hurricane Intensity Estimation (HIE) Winds-HIE Application Team Chris Velden & Tim Olander (CIMSS) Jaime Daniels (STAR)
Doppler Lidar Winds & Tropical Cyclones Frank D. Marks AOML/Hurricane Research Division 7 February 2007.
Second IBTrACS Workshop, April 2011, Honolulu, Hawaii 1 ESCAP/WMO Typhoon Committee Best Track Consolidation Meeting, Dec 2010 Hong Kong Summary.
Enrica Bellone, Jessica Turner, Alessandro Bonazzi 2 nd IBTrACS Workshop.
Applications of ATMS/AMSU Humidity Sounders for Hurricane Study Xiaolei Zou 1, Qi Shi 1, Zhengkun Qin 1 and Fuzhong Weng 2 1 Department of Earth, Ocean.
TC Projects Joint Hurricane Testbed, Surface winds GOES-R, TC structure – TC Size TPW & TC size (Jack Dostalek) IR climatology – RMW/wind profile Proving.
WMO 6 th International Workshop on Tropical Cyclones San Jose, Costa Rica. (20-30 November 2006) Dr. Mark A. Lander University of Guam Topic 1.4: Operational.
J. P. Kossin, 62 nd IHC, Charleston, SC An Objective Tool for Identifying Hurricane Secondary Eyewall Formation Jim Kossin and Matt Sitkowski Cooperative.
1 Current and planned research with data collected during the IFEX/RAINEX missions Robert Rogers NOAA/AOML/Hurricane Research Division.
Satellite + Aircraft Tropical Cyclone Surface Wind Analysis Joint Hurricane Testbed.
Ocean Vector Wind Experience Joe Sienkiewicz NOAA Ocean Prediction Center.
JP1.18 Physical processes associated with surface wind field uncertainty in Hurricanes Katrina and Rita (2005): Use of present and future observational.
Hurricane Alley Millions of people live, work, and vacation in Hurricane Alley.
The Centre for Australian Weather and Climate Research A partnership between CSIRO and the Bureau of Meteorology The Tropical Cyclone Boundary Layer 2:
Tropical Cyclone Forecasting and Monitoring
EXTREME WINDS AND PRECIPITATION FROM SPACE
Chapter 12 Tropical Storms and Hurricanes
A look at hurricane force extratropical cyclones
Training Session: Satellite Applications on Tropical Cyclones
Accounting for Variations in TC Size
WP-3D Orion Instrumentation
BFB: 9/29/2015 Tropical Weather
Tropical Weather By Rick Garuckas and Andrew Calvi
Defining Uncertainty in Hurricane Maximum Surface Wind Estimation
Michael J. Brennan National Hurricane Center
Hurricanes This chapter discusses:
Cyclonic Storm Vocabulary
Validation of CIRA Tropical Cyclone Algorithms
Presentation transcript:

Exercise – Constructing a best track from multiple data sources NATIONAL HURRICANE CENTER JACK BEVEN WHERE AMERICA’S CLIMATE AND WEATHER SERVICES BEGIN

Objectives To construct two best tracks (wind/pressure every 6 hours) for a tropical cyclone (from the Atlantic) The first uses only satellite data (subjective and objective Dvorak CI numbers/scatterometer) and surface obs The second includes a full array of Atlantic aircraft data Vertical black lines on the graphs denote landfalls Note that there are data sources that could be used but were omitted (doppler radar/AMSU/others) To construct two best tracks (wind/pressure every 6 hours) for a tropical cyclone (from the Atlantic) The first uses only satellite data (subjective and objective Dvorak CI numbers/scatterometer) and surface obs The second includes a full array of Atlantic aircraft data Vertical black lines on the graphs denote landfalls Note that there are data sources that could be used but were omitted (doppler radar/AMSU/others)

Notes on “conventional” data Satellite intensity estimates marked TAFB and SAB are subjective Dvorak estimates from the NHC Tropical Analysis and Forecast Branch and the Satellite Analysis Branch. The Objective T-Numbers are from the CIMSS ADT. All Dvorak estimates use the Atlantic Dvorak wind/ pressure calibration. The scatterometer ob is from QuikScat. Surface pressure obs plotted on the chart are not always central pressures. Sometimes they are near- center pressures used to calibrate the pressure curve. Satellite intensity estimates marked TAFB and SAB are subjective Dvorak estimates from the NHC Tropical Analysis and Forecast Branch and the Satellite Analysis Branch. The Objective T-Numbers are from the CIMSS ADT. All Dvorak estimates use the Atlantic Dvorak wind/ pressure calibration. The scatterometer ob is from QuikScat. Surface pressure obs plotted on the chart are not always central pressures. Sometimes they are near- center pressures used to calibrate the pressure curve.

Dvorak Technique Output Note: Other warning centers and basins use different pressures and wind averaging periods

Part 1 – No Aircraft Data Pressure (hPa) Wind (kt)

RECONNAISSANCE FLIGHT PATH Aircraft “ALPHA” Pattern

GPS Dropsondes GPS sondes are used in the eyewall, elsewhere in the storm, and on G-IV missions Hurricane Mitch - Eyewall GPS Dropsonde Wind Profile 27 October 98 Hurricane Mitch - Eyewall GPS Dropsonde Wind Profile 27 October 98

Winds increase downward from flight-level (10,000 ft) because the hurricane is “warm-core”. Friction decreases wind in the lowest 1500 ft of the eyewall. Reducing Flight-Level Data to the Surface Based on GPS Dropsonde Data WL150 MBL Wind averaging over the lowest layers of the sonde data

Stepped-Frequency Microwave Radiometer Relates microwave radiation from ocean to surface wind speedRelates microwave radiation from ocean to surface wind speed Can measure max surface winds in core of major hurricaneCan measure max surface winds in core of major hurricane Only provides data along line of flightOnly provides data along line of flight First data from C-130s in 2007; on entire fleet in 2008First data from C-130s in 2007; on entire fleet in 2008

SFMR Issues Shoaling – breaking waves in areas of shallow water can artificially increase the SFMR retrieved wind speedShoaling – breaking waves in areas of shallow water can artificially increase the SFMR retrieved wind speed Interaction of wind and wave field can introduce errors (~ 5 kt)Interaction of wind and wave field can introduce errors (~ 5 kt) Rain impacts not always properly accounted for (mainly < 50 kt).Rain impacts not always properly accounted for (mainly < 50 kt). Calibration has been undergoing revision. Algorithms still under development, and forecaster don’t fully understand the error mechanisms.Calibration has been undergoing revision. Algorithms still under development, and forecaster don’t fully understand the error mechanisms.

Notes on aircraft central pressure data Aircraft central pressures are either measured from dropsondes in/near the center or extrapolated from measured conditions at the flight-level center. Dropsondes measure the surface pressure, but do not always hit the lowest pressure/lightest winds area at the surface. Despite these issues, aircraft-measured pressures have a good track record compared to central pressures from surface obs. The aircraft data is usually good to within 1-3 hPa/mb. Aircraft central pressures are either measured from dropsondes in/near the center or extrapolated from measured conditions at the flight-level center. Dropsondes measure the surface pressure, but do not always hit the lowest pressure/lightest winds area at the surface. Despite these issues, aircraft-measured pressures have a good track record compared to central pressures from surface obs. The aircraft data is usually good to within 1-3 hPa/mb.

Notes on aircraft wind data Wind data has a lot of scatter, as the plots include winds from all quadrants of the radius of maximum winds – not just the strongest quadrant. Aircraft surface winds are from the SFMR. Flight-level winds have already had the appropriate reduction to the surface included on the plots. Flight-level>Surface winds relationships can change depending on the organization of the cyclone. The Dvorak Pressure>Wind data points use the Dvorak wind-pressure curve to convert central pressures to winds. Use these with caution! The dropsonde surface winds are the unaveraged winds at the last report from the sonde. They may or may not be representative. Wind data has a lot of scatter, as the plots include winds from all quadrants of the radius of maximum winds – not just the strongest quadrant. Aircraft surface winds are from the SFMR. Flight-level winds have already had the appropriate reduction to the surface included on the plots. Flight-level>Surface winds relationships can change depending on the organization of the cyclone. The Dvorak Pressure>Wind data points use the Dvorak wind-pressure curve to convert central pressures to winds. Use these with caution! The dropsonde surface winds are the unaveraged winds at the last report from the sonde. They may or may not be representative.

Part 2 – With Aircraft Data Pressure (hPa) Wind (kt)

The “Solution” - Pressure

The “Solution” - Wind