2013-2014 CONSTITUTIONAL LAW DEBATE ONE Debate Prep: AFFIRMATIVE ACTION.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Higher education In a study of admissions at the college level, Bok and Bowen (The Shape of the River) found that Admission rates for blacks were greater.
Advertisements

Jessie Hauser. Regents of the University of California v. Bakke “ This landmark Supreme Court case imposed limitations on affirmative action to ensure.
The Constitution and the Branches of Government Landmark Civil Rights Cases.
 Review the first day power point!!  Know the different tests (strict scrutiny, middle level review, mere rationality review) and different classes (suspect,
Fisher v. Texas and the Future of Affirmative Action john a. powell, Director, Haas Institute for a Fair and Inclusive Society October 18, 2012.
Preferential Treatment on the Job Background: From Plessy to Brown Background: From Plessy to Brown United Steelworkers v. Weber United Steelworkers v.
Schools and Segregation For ELPS 200, Spring 2009.
SEATTLE DECISION: SCHOOL INTEGRATION SURVIVES WHAT’S NEXT? WHAT’S NEXT? John C. Brittain Chief Counsel, Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law.
FAPEFAPE Kathleen S. Whittier. Equal Protection Tests Rational Basis TestDoes the state have a rational basis for its actions? Is the state’s purpose.
Current Issues in Civil Rights. Affirmative Action Affirmative action – preferential practices should be used in hiring.
Current Issues in Civil Rights. Affirmative Action Affirmative action – preferential hiring practices should be used in hiring.
 Civil Rights  Definition: policies designed to protect people against arbitrary or discriminatory treatment by government officials or individuals 
Equal Protection under the Law April 25, 2013 Objective: When is the govt. discriminating against you?
Pearson Education, Inc., Longman © 2006 Chapter 16 Civil Rights Policymaking American Government: Policy & Politics, Eighth Edition TANNAHILL.
Chapter 21: Civil Rights: Equal Justice Under Law Section 3
Accepting Justice Kennedy’s Dare: Jefferson County Public Schools and the Future of Integration Daniel Kiel The University of Memphis Cecil C. Humphreys.
Copyright 2006 Prentice Hall Prentice Hall PoliticalScienceInteractive Magleby et al. Government by the People Chapter 17 Equal Rights Under the Law.
Chapter 21: Civil Rights: Equal Justice Under Law Section 2
Civil Rights. Definition of Civil Rights Civil Rights – The positive acts of government that seek to make constitutional guarantees a reality for all.
Affirmative Action Chapter 6, Theme C. Affirmative Action Solution  Define it!  What are the two views of the practice?  Compensatory action (helping.
Equality of Results vs Equality of Opportunity Andrew Adair x Michael Dotson.
Civil Rights 14 th Amendment “No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States;
MR. LIPMAN’S AP GOVERNMENT POWERPOINT
Color-blind vs. Color-defined Educational Opportunity Laura McNeal, J.D., Ph.D. Assistant Professor, Georgia State University Laura McNeal, J.D., Ph.D.
The Health Unit. FAQs: Frequently Asked Questions Q: What are we researching? Q: What are we researching? A: A Health related topic that will be determined.
BY Jaquille Douarnynney Justin Cotto Corey Singleton Brittany Lewonka Lezeny Nunez.
Civil Rights and Public Policy Chapter 5 Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman. Edwards, Wattenberg, and Lineberry Government.
Ch. 21 Equal Justice. Discrimination Against Women Women are in fact not a minority, making up over 51 percent of the U.S. population. Women, however,
What is Equal Protection? 1. Derived from Declaration of Independence “We hold these truths … all men are created equal” “We hold these truths … all men.
The Civil Rights Movement & Legislation Chapter 6, Theme B.
Equal Protection Jody Blanke Professor of Computer Information Systems and Law.
Chapter 5 Review PowerPoint
Inclusive Business Initiative: Establishing the Framework for M/WBE Procurement Policy Insight Center for Community Economic Development Webinar March.
Civil Rights Movement Summary and Modern Concerns.
THE UNFAIR TREATMENT OF MEMBERS OF MAJORITY GROUPS(WHITES) CAUSED FROM PREFERENTIAL POLICIES, AS IN COLLEGE ADMISSIONS OR EMPLOYMENT, PROPOSED TO HELP.
SUPREME COURT CASES AFFIRMATIVE ACTION. WHAT IS IT?? Affirmative action refers to policies that take factors including "race, color, religion, gender,
Supreme Court and Civil Rights of African Americans Plessy v. Ferguson separate does not mean unequal Brown v. Board of Ed 1954 – overturns separate.
Civil Liberties Personal rights & freedoms that cannot be abridged Limits governments power to restrain or dictate how we act Conflict occurs when individuals.
Constitutional Law Part 6: Equal Protection Lecture 1: Introduction to Scrutiny.
L EGAL I SSUES IN H IGHER E DUCATION : T HE S TUDENTS LS 517 Admissions & Diversity.
Being fair; Being Reasonable.  A. General Meaning: Treating Groups Differently  B. Some reasonable and inevitable: 1. Age Requirements for driver’s.
Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin Lorraine Jones Yu Sun.
Equal Protection of the Law: Basic Principles & Analytical Model LEARNING THE LAW © 2015 Brendan Beery & Daniel Ray. All rights reserved.
Objective: Students will identify how the US government has attempted to alleviate discrimination in order to evaluate if certain groups need more assistance.
Discrimination Chapter 43. What Is Discrimination? What Is Discrimination? Our legal traditions are rooted in part in a commitment to equality. Discrimination—
Gratz v. Bollinger (2003) Supreme Court Case Project Created by: Christina Dork.
Affirmative Action Is Affirmative Action Program Voluntary or Remedial? Is Challenge to Legality under Title VII or the Constitution? Is Preference for.
For more course tutorials visit PPA 403 Entire Course PPA 403 Week 1 DQ 1 Values in Administrative Law PPA 403 Week 1 DQ 2 The Federal.
PPA 403 MASTER Dreams Come True/ppa403master.com FOR MORE CLASSES VISIT
Social Studies: Class, Cultural Capital & Upward Mobility
CIVIL RIGHTS Defined: Protections against arbitrary discrimination by government or by other people because of personal characteristics such as race.
Types of Discrimination & Discrimination Based on Race
Intro to American Law.
CIVIL RIGHTS Defined: Protections against arbitrary discrimination by government or by other people because of personal characteristics such as race.
PPA 403 MASTER Lessons in Excellence--ppa403master.com.
PPA 403 Education for Service/tutorialrank.com
PPA 403 MASTER Education for Service--ppa403master.com.
Group Six Will Mason Tracy Epton Maile Kobayashi Susan Redick
Affirmative Action.
Lecture 42 Discrimination VI
Lecture 41 Discrimination V
Fisher v. Univ. of Texas (2013)
Legal Updates for the Federal DBE Program.
Civil Rights 10/8/07.
Affirmative Action.
Supreme Court – Scrutiny Tests
Chapter 21: Civil Rights: Equal Justice Under Law Section 2
Identify the powers of the judicial branch
Ap u.s. government & politics
Dragon Naturally Speaking App
Presentation transcript:

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW DEBATE ONE Debate Prep: AFFIRMATIVE ACTION

What is Success?

What it comes down to…

Define empathy… em·pa·thy ( ˈ empəTHē/) Noun 1.the ability to understand and share the feelings of another.

Deadlines/Prep Points Case Briefs and Answers  DUE Next Tuesday (10/1) by 11:59 PM  USE manual templates as a worksheet  TYPE questions and answers, TYPE case briefs  No prep points assigned  Will receive up to two fall points if not completed up to standards  2 Fall Points if not completed  1 Fall Point if completed or not completed up to standards

Deadlines/Prep Points Contd FIRST DRAFT  DUE Tuesday, 10/15/13 by 11:59 PM  FOLLOW examples and specs in manual for formatting  e.g. Font, Spacing, Headings  Will NOT receive full prep points if not properly followed  EARN up to two prep points FINAL DRAFT  DUE Tuesday, 10/22/13 by 11:59 PM (one week turn- around)  FOLLOW examples and specs in manual for formatting  e.g. Font, Spacing, Headings  Will NOT receive full prep points if not properly followed  EARN up to FOUR prep points

Deadlines/Prep Points Continued DEBATE COACHING  DUE Friday, 10/25 by 11:59 PM  Required one session  Earn up to two prep points  Will follow up with times to meet with debate coaches MENTOR RECEIPTS  DUE Friday, 10/25 by 11:59 PM  Required – two meetings during cycle  Earn up to four prep points  2 meetings = 4 points  1 meeting = 2 points

On to TEXABAMA!!

EQUAL PROTECTION

Three (3) Considerations

Start by asking…

C R E A C

Croson  Main Points Race = Suspect Class  Strict Scrutiny Remedial = Compelling Interest, but must show evidence Must be able to determine whether best-fit to accomplish specific objective Note – about local and state laws

Adarand  Main Points Remedial = Compelling Interest (Note – Croson holding summarized) Again – strict scrutiny, but first time applies it to federal law, not state or local law

Grutter  Main Points Diversity in higher education = compelling interest Must be narrowly tailored (approach to achieve interest is best fit) Race can be one “plus factor,” but must be considered in conjunction with entire individual, cannot be preference solely based on race

Seattle School District  Main Points Involves diversity in grade school Different from Grutter – Means not narrowly tailored “Here, racial balance the school districts seek is a defined range set solely by reference to the demographics of the respective school districts….racial balance is not to be achieved for its own sake.” (p. 33)

Hopwood  ID Pointers  Summarize Facts/Circumstances  Main Points Case is a good example of the necessity at times for remedial action Look at data and parts that are relied on by court in justifying remedying past discrimination

Ms. Sloan (973) (After School House) (908) (Cell)