Management Forum Presentation November 3, 2008 Lynne Gervais, Associate Vice-Principal Human Resources 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Town Hall Presentation January 9-10, 2002 Curtis Powell Vice President for Human Resources The Division of Human Resources and William M. Mercer, Incorporated.
Advertisements

1 PRESENTATION TO THE PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON PUBLIC SERVICE AND ADMINISTRATION Report on the causes and effects of mobility amongst senior management service.
1 Market Pricing Organizations seek to offer market based pay rates in order to attract and retain competent employees There are two basic methods to recognize.
Strategic Value of the HR Function Presentation by
Career Banding in North Carolina and UNC General Administration.
UCLA Student Affairs Performance Management Program (PMP)
INTRODUCING THE CAREER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Talent Focus: The Port Authority of the Future.
Symposium on SALARY POLICY, SALARY SCALES, SALARY STRUCTURE
Faculty & Staff Compensation Programs Board of Regents Meeting
Designing Pay Levels, Mix, and Pay Structures
Fox, Lawson & Associates Compensation Study Summary Findings
PUSD Compensation Committee Process Overview Governing Board Study Session January 7, 2013.
“M’s at McGill: Current status, concerns, salary policy, and future directions” Prof. Anthony C. Masi, Provost McGill University Management Forum 2007.
Compensation Philosophy Performance-driven and market-referenced –We value high performance and compensate employees based on their contributions to the.
Pay For Performance: Managing Pay Systems Across Organizations
Staff Compensation Program Update
1 Strategic Staffing & Compensation Your NU Values Partner … “Committed to understanding and delivering value-added customer service that contributes to.
© 2011 Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible Web site, in whole or in part.11–1.
COMPENSATION MANAGEMENT
1 Surveying Market Pay Just as skill, effort, responsibility, and working conditions have been used to differentiate rates of pay among major job groupings,
MGMT Managing Employee Reward Systems Salary Structures and Pay Grade Dimensions Pay Grade Width –Distance from min. to max. of range –Typical ranges.
Salary Administration East Carolina University Department of Human Resources Classification and Compensation.
© 2007 Hay Group. All rights reserved. Salary Survey Report January 30, 2007 State of Kansas.
Total Rewards and Compensation
Career + Compensation Program?
© 2010 McGraw Hill Ryerson 8-1 COMPENSATION Third Canadian Edition Milkovich, Newman, Cole.
STAFF COMPENSATION PROGRAM TOWN HALL MEETINGS FEBRUARY 2004.
Competitive Market Compensation Review July 2009 Project Overview.
FAR Roundtable Luncheon Program Developing Market – Based Pay Practices March 22, 2006 Jim Moss Managing Director.
Sherri Coxon Executive HR Consultant Business Sherpa Group.
Field Engineer Development Program
Pay Structure Decisions
Erin Packwood 2005 Competitive Compensation Review Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT) January 17, 2006.
© 2007 Hay Group. All rights reserved. Review of Unclassified Pay Plan February 1, 2007 State of New Hampshire.
Staff Compensation Program – Phase 2 Internal Equity Adjustments October 2005.
Surveying Market Pay & Compensation Practices
2005 Supervisory and Professional Salary Survey Final Report September 14, 2005.
1 ACC FY07 Classification and Compensation Study.
HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT MIHE Mashal Institute of Higher Education.
© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. PowerPoint Presentation by Charlie Cook The University of West Alabama t e n t h e d i t i o n Gary Dessler.
RED RIVER COLLEGE PLAR/RPL IN ACTION! Recognizing Prior Learning.
Compensation Project Faculty & Staff Compensation Programs Board of Regents Finance Committee Meeting Project Overview
Irene Khan – Secretary General Building effective and responsive INGOs, the strategic role of HR: The IS Job Value Review 8 February 2008.
PROMOTING HUMAN RESOURCES IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR: CRITICAL ROLE OF HUMAN CAPITAL IN THE PERFORMANCE OF PUBLIC SERVICES IN AFRICA Africa’s Human Resources.
HR Practices For I/T Success. THIS REPORT PRESENTS I/S HUMAN RESOURCE PRACTICE RESEARCH FINDINGS WITH THE FOLLOWING OBJECTIVE Understand HR practices.
TOTAL REWARDS ANNUAL ACTION ITEM #2. 2 AGENDA  Purpose of the Presentation  Our Approach  Total Rewards Philosophy Review  Compensation- Current State/Future.
Lecture 11: Compensation. Strategic Issues and Compensation  Why do dome employers pay more than other employers?  Why are different jobs within the.
Briefing to Portfolio Committee on Public Enterprises On Performance Management of SOE Senior Management 10 November 2009.
Talent Management.
Chapter 9 Managing Compensation
Compensation Study Preliminary Results Overview Presented by: CBIZ Human Capital Services October 26, 2015.
Copyright © 2015 by The Segal Group, Inc. All rights reserved. STAFF CLASSIFICATION AND COMPENSATION STUDY Compensation Philosophy and Comparison Market.
Alberta Association of Immigrant Serving Agencies 8 th Biennial Settlement Conference The Future of Labour Market Integration Gosia Cichy-Weclaw Alberta.
ORGANIZATION OF AMERICAN STATES XIV INTER-AMERICAN CONFERENCE OF MINISTERS OF LABOR Employment Services and Labor Market Observatories: Opportunities and.
HEALTH WEALTH CAREER April 28, 2016 STRICTLY PRIVATE & CONFIDENTIAL The information included in this report is strictly confidential and is proprietary.
Staff Compensation Update Staff Council Meeting Eduardo Salaz AVP Human Resources May 10, 2016 Saint Mary’s College “Confidential” 5/10/20161.
Managing Talent – Maximizing Your Employee’s Potential 3 rd SACCO LEADERS’ FORUM Monique DunbarLorri Lochrie Communicating Arts Credit UnionCentral 1 Credit.
COMPENSATION 101 CREATING & ADMINISTERING YOUR BASE PAY STRATEGY Consulting Inc.
1– 1 MGT-351 Human Resource Management Chapter-11 MGT-351 Human Resource Management Chapter-11 Establishing Strategic Pay Plans.
Staff Compensation Structure
Salary Survey based on Hay Method
Compensation Program Update
Grade and pay structures
Fox, Lawson & Associates Compensation Study Summary Findings
A Compensation Analysis For Human Resources Professionals
Pay Structure Chapter 9 HRM-300.
Senior Leaders Talent Map
Agenda • Introductions • Project Objectives • Project Steps
Compensation 101 A Primer for HR Professionals
Presentation transcript:

Management Forum Presentation November 3, 2008 Lynne Gervais, Associate Vice-Principal Human Resources 1

M group vital to McGill’s operations, key player in growth and development of McGill as a World Class Institution Desire to align Human Resource practices with “Best Practices”. Commitment made to management and professional staff in December 2007 to review the current M Compensation framework 2

Current M salary structure not systematically benchmarked since the implementation of the Pay Equity Program in 2002 Current structure lacks flexibility to adapt to market conditions for attraction and retention of key talent Pay scales are narrow; salary progression is slow and a promotion is needed in order to obtain a significant salary increase Does not allow for sufficient recognition of individual contribution No clear market reference point to validate competitiveness 3

Current Benchmark Excercise Two (2) consulting companies were selected to conduct this benchmarking exercise: Normandin-Beaudry : Mercer, Watson Wyatt, Hewitt The Hay Group 4

Levels 1 & 2 (grades 5 & below)  McGill’s salaries are overall competitive Levels 3 & 4 (grades 6 & above)  McGill’s salaries are generally less competitive SAF positions: The maxima of McGill’s current salary scale is in line with the median salary of our reference market ; Actual salaries are on average 5% lower than market median Note: This study was conducted only on base salaries, and does not take into account the other components of the total rewards (benefits, holidays, etc.) offering of the University 5

Way Forward- Best Practices 6

Best Practices : Salary Benchmarks Current Practice Going Forward Para Public & Public Sectors primarily Yet we recruit from a range of sectors including Private Industry Local Markets- Montreal Yet we occasionally recruit within the Province and other provinces in Canada Internal Equity focus Yet best practices indicate focus should be both external & internal 7 Private Industry data in addition to Public and Para Public Based on Local & National reference Market Focus on external market as well as internal references

Wider ranges for each grade; allows for: Growth in the role ; Increased complexity, scope; Correct positioning of roles based on market. Target Pay as a main reference point Based on the market; Slope Increase Between all grades; Recognizes the complexity of roles 8 Best practices: Salary Scale

Movement in Salary Ranges Capacity to pay Growth in the role Acquiring additional competencies, skills, qualifications Achieving/exceeding objectives; Greater impact on the institution Unusual market pressure – example, retention of hot skills i.e. C.A.’s now, IT during Y2K 9

10

Now Effective December 1 2 reference points : Minimum and Maximum; Market reference point not clear Single Zone: Min Max Narrow scales- little or no room to move ; pay compression; red circle situations resulting in lump sum payments. Linear slope between pay grades 11 Introduction of Target Pay as main reference point for competitive pay. Based on McGill Competitive market. Three Zones Min Target Max Zone 1, Zone 2, Zone 3 Increase in the difference between min & max to provide more movement within each salary range at all levels. Increasing slope between target pay points to reflect increasing complexity

Current Structure 12

New Structure 13

14

New incumbents.. Recent promotion… Acquiring new skills… Meeting most requirements Meets all requirements… Sustained achievements… Possesses key competencies, both technical and behavioral 15 Significantly exceeds requirements consistently… Possesses high demand skills… Recognized as an expert in their field Zone 2 – Target (95-110%) Zone 1 Development/Transition Zone 3- Exception $ Min $$$ Job Max Salary Management The range associated with each grade is divided into three zones Target 100% The division of each grade into 3 zones provides increased flexibility and enables the University to place a fair value on the competencies, responsibilities and contribution of each employee

16 Ensure McGill’s competitive salary positioning on the broader reference market Reinforce the link between contribution and rewards Support employee growth & development Foster accountability/ownership at local managerial level

Next Steps Develop competency framework for each job family Technical competencies & behavioral competencies for each role in each job family Review current salary policies and define specific criteria for moving within and between the ranges in new structure Develop specific merit guidelines to support the implementation of the salary policy 17

18

Salary Freeze in 1995 Catch-up exercise begun in 2001 New “M” Compensation Structure implemented in Actual Year CPI2.2%2.8%1.8%2.2%2.0% 2.2% ???? Market Avg. Increase*3.5% to 4% 3.5% McGill Budget5% **4.5% 2.5%3.0% * Source: Conference Board of Canada. Aggregate national & local (Québec) data for all industries, as well as public, para-public and not-for-profit organizations. Average increase = overall increase budget, including scale increase, across the board, progressions, merit. ** 2002 included the 2nd and final phases of a catch-up exercise begun in 2001 to compensate for freezes and lower budgets in previous years. Note: The University uses the annual CPI of previous December as a reference when determining salary policy

2008: 3% 2% minimum increase for all employees meeting requirements of job 1% additional budget given to each unit to recognize leading performance 2009: 3% 1% minimum increase for all employees meeting requirements of job 2% additional budget given to each unit to recognize leading performance 2010: 3.5% % of minimum increase and performance increase to be defined 20

Performance levels Performance Categories—4 levels LEVEL OF PERFORMANCEMINIMUM INCREASE 1. Leading2% + 2. Strong2%-3% 3. Building Consistency0-2% 4. Immediate Improvement Required0% 21

Performance Definitions Leading Consistently outstanding performance exceeds expectations Strong Solid performance and consistently meets job requirements Building Consistency Performance does not consistently meet job requirements Requires Immediate Improvement Performance consistently fails to meet job requirements 22

Questions / Comments 23