Is there any proof that the Bible is true?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Geometry 2.3 Big Idea: Use Deductive Reasoning
Advertisements

1 Section 1.5 Rules of Inference. 2 Definitions Theorem: a statement that can be shown to be true Proof: demonstration of truth of theorem –consists of.
Chapter 2 Geometric Reasoning
A. What is Proof? Math 20: Foundations FM20.2
Logical Arguments in Mathematics. A proof is a collection of statements and reasons in a logical order used to verify universal truths. However… depending.
Lesson 2.1 Inductive Reasoning in Geometry
Logic 3 Tautological Implications and Tautological Equivalences
Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.
Chapter 1 The Art of Problem Solving © 2007 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.
Survey of Mathematical Ideas Math 100 Chapter 1 John Rosson Thursday January 18.
Artificial Intelligence Reasoning. Reasoning is the process of deriving logical conclusions from given facts. Durkin defines reasoning as ‘the process.
2.3 Deductive Reasoning and Angle Relationships. Traditional.
What is Critical Thinking?
Conditional Statements
SECTION 2-5 Angle Relationships. You have now experienced using inductive reasoning. So we will begin discovering geometric relationships using inductive.
Objective Understand the difference between inductive and deductive reasoning.
Logic. Logical progression of thought A path others can follow and agree with Begins with a foundation of accepted In Euclidean Geometry begin with point,
Section 1.1 Inductive Reasoning 1/16. DEDUCTIVE REASONING Two Types of Reasoning INDUCTIVE REASONING 2/16.
College Algebra Fifth Edition James Stewart Lothar Redlin Saleem Watson.
Geometry Unit 2 Power Points Montero to 2.3 Notes and Examples Patterns, Conditional Statements, and BiConditional Statements Essential Vocabulary.
Chapter 2.1 Common Core G.CO.9, G.CO.10 & G.CO.11 Prove theorems about lines, angles, triangles and parallelograms. Objective – To use inductive reasoning.
March 3, 2015Applied Discrete Mathematics Week 5: Mathematical Reasoning 1Arguments Just like a rule of inference, an argument consists of one or more.
Introduction to Geometric Proof Logical Reasoning and Conditional Statements.
Chapter 1 Logic Section 1-1 Statements Open your book to page 1 and read the section titled “To the Student” Now turn to page 3 where we will read the.
1 Sections 1.5 & 3.1 Methods of Proof / Proof Strategy.
Geometry Notes 1.1 Patterns and Inductive Reasoning
Holt McDougal Geometry 2-1 Using Inductive Reasoning to Make Conjectures 2-1 Using Inductive Reasoning to Make Conjectures Holt Geometry Warm Up Warm Up.
Section 2-3 Deductive Reasoning. Types of Reasoning:
Applying Deductive Reasoning Section 2.3. Essential Question How do you construct a logical argument?
Reasoning and Conditional Statements Advanced Geometry Deductive Reasoning Lesson 1.
Deductive Reasoning.  Conditional Statements can be written using symbolic notation  p represents hypothesis  q represents conclusion  is read as.
2.2 Inductive and Deductive Reasoning. What We Will Learn Use inductive reasoning Use deductive reasoning.
Inductive Reasoning, Conjectures, and Counterexamples
1.2 Patterns and Inductive Reasoning. Ex. 1: Describing a Visual Pattern Sketch the next figure in the pattern
Philosophical Method  Logic: A Calculus For Good Reason  Clarification, Not Obfuscation  Distinctions and Disambiguation  Examples and Counterexamples.
 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide Chapter 1 The Art of Problem Solving.
1.2 Logical Reasoning page 9. Inductive Reasoning: Reasoning that is based on patterns you observe. Conjecture: A conclusion that is reached using inductive.
2.1 Conditional Statements Ms. Kelly Fall Standards/Objectives: Students will learn and apply geometric concepts. Objectives: Recognize the hypothesis.
Ch. 2.3 Apply Deductive Reasoning
Proving Statements in Geometry Eleanor Roosevelt High School Geometry Mr. Chin-Sung Lin.
Deductive and Inductive Reasoning
Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. Sequences and Series.
p qp q q pq p p  q ~p  ~q ~q  ~p q p September 17, 2014.
1.What is the difference between a paragraph proof and a column proof? 2.True or False: If a quadrilateral is a square, then all four sides are congruent.
CONDITIONAL STATEMENTS Section 2-1. Objectives  To recognize conditional statements.  To write converses of conditional statements.
Overview of Sections 1.1, Sections 1.1, 2.1, 2,2 and 2.3 Combined like Transformers!
Lecture 10 Methods of Proof CSCI – 1900 Mathematics for Computer Science Fall 2014 Bill Pine.
Foundations of Discrete Mathematics Chapter 1 By Dr. Dalia M. Gil, Ph.D.
3/15/ : Deductive Reasoning1 Expectations: L3.1.1: Distinguish between inductive and deductive reasoning, identifying and providing examples of each.
Do NOW: 1.) Solve 2(x – 15) = 30. Write a justification for each step. 2.) Find the next number in this sequence: 3, 5, 8, … How is the reasoning different.
Inductive and Deductive Reasoning Reasoning is used in mathematics, science, and everyday life. When you reach a conclusion, called a generalization,
Geometry Chapter 2: Reasoning and Introduction to Proof We can do this dude!
LG 1: Logic A Closer Look at Reasoning
1.2 Reasoning Mathematically Two Types of Reasoning Remember to Silence Your Cell Phone and Put It in Your Bag!
PROOFS. Geometry "measuring the earth“ is the branch of math that has to do with spatial relationships.
Chapter 1 Logic and Proof.
Section 2-4 Deductive Reasoning.
Reasoning and Proof Unit 2.
Chapter 1 Lessons 1-4 to 1-8.
2.4 Deductive Reasoning 2.4 Deductive Reasoning.
CST 24 – Logic.
2-5 Reasoning in Algebra and Geometry
Applying Deductive Reasoning
M1 Lesson 4.4 January 21, 2009 Deductive Reasoning.
Inductive and Deductive Logic
Section 3-6 Inductive Reasoning.
2-4 Deductive Reasoning Deductive Reasoning: Using facts, rules, definitions, or properties to reach logical conclusions. Law of Detachment: A form.
2-1: Logic with Inductive Reasoning
TODAY’S OBJECTIVE: Standard: MM1G2
TODAY’S OBJECTIVE: Standard: MM1G2
Presentation transcript:

Is there any proof that the Bible is true?

Inductive Versus Deductive Reasoning TYPES OF REASONING   Inductive Versus Deductive Reasoning

There are two approaches to furthering knowledge Inductive Versus Deductive Reasoning There are two approaches to furthering knowledge reasoning from known ideas and synthesize observations.

You start with no prior assumptions. Inductive Versus Deductive Reasoning In inductive reasoning you observe the world, and attempt to explain based on your observations. You start with no prior assumptions. Deductive reasoning consists of logical assertions from known facts.

INDUCTIVE REASONING reaching a conclusion based on previous observation. It moves from the specific to the general 19-Apr-17 Types of reasoning

BASED ON THE GIVEN EXAMPLES, DRAW A CONCLUSION/S. 1² = 1 1 ≤ 1 2² = 4 2 ≤ 4 3² = 9 3 ≤ 9 (-1)² = 1 -1 ≤ 1 BASED ON THE GIVEN EXAMPLES, DRAW A CONCLUSION/S.

BASED ON THE EXAMPLES, WE NOTICED A PATTERN FROM WHICH WE DRAW A CONCLUSIONS. 1² = 1 1 ≤ 1 2² = 4 2 ≤ 4 3² = 9 3 ≤ 9 (-1)² = 1 -1 ≤ 1 19-Apr-17 Types of reasoning

THROUGH INDUCTIVE REASONING, IT MAY BE CONCLUDED THAT WHENEVER A NUMBER IS SQUARED, THE RESULT IS A NUMBER WHICH IS GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO THE ORIGINAL NUMBER. Examples 1² = 1 1 ≤ 1 2² = 4 2 ≤ 4 3² = 9 3 ≤ 9 (-1)² = 1 -1 ≤ 1 19-Apr-17 Types of reasoning

Examples 1² = 1 1 ≤ 1 2² = 4 2 ≤ 4 3² = 9 3 ≤ 9 (-1)² = 1 -1 ≤ 1 Inductive reasoning is making conclusions based on patterns you observe. The conclusion you reach is called a conjecture Examples 1² = 1 1 ≤ 1 2² = 4 2 ≤ 4 3² = 9 3 ≤ 9 (-1)² = 1 -1 ≤ 1 19-Apr-17 Types of reasoning

INDUCTIVE REASONING reaching a conclusion based on previous observation. b. Conclusions are probably TRUE but not necessarily TRUE. 19-Apr-17 Types of reasoning

Does the conclusion hold true? No. Because ½ is greater than ¼. 2² = 4 2 ≤ 4 3² = 9 3 ≤ 9 (-1)² = 1 -1 ≤ 1 Consider this example (½) ²= ¼ ½> ¼ Does the conclusion hold true? “WHENEVER A NUMBER IS SQUARED, THE RESULT IS A NUMBER WHICH IS GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO THE ORIGINAL NUMBER.” No. Because ½ is greater than ¼. 19-Apr-17 Types of reasoning

INDUCTIVE REASONING reaching a conclusion based on previous observation. b. Conclusions are probably TRUE but not necessarily TRUE. 19-Apr-17 Types of reasoning

Another example A BEGINNING OBSERVER OF AMERICAN BASEBALL MAY CONCLUDE, AFTER WATCHING SEVERAL GAMES, THAT THE GAME IS OVER AFTER 9 INNINGS. HE WILL ONLY REALIZE THAT THIS OBSERVATION IS FALSE AFTER OBSERVING A GAME WHICH IS TIED AFTER 9 INNINGS.

ONLY ONE OBSERVATION IS NEEDED TO PROVE THE CONCLUSION TO BE FALSE. INDUCTIVE REASONNG INDUCTIVE REASONING IS USEFUL BUT NOT CERTAIN. THERE WILL ALWAYS BE A CHANCE THAT THERE IS AN OBSERVATION THAT WILL SHOW THE REASONING TO BE FALSE. ONLY ONE OBSERVATION IS NEEDED TO PROVE THE CONCLUSION TO BE FALSE. 19-Apr-17 Types of reasoning

Try this.

Look carefully at the following figures Look carefully at the following figures. Then, use inductive reasoning to make a conjecture about the next figure in the pattern If you have carefully observed the pattern, may be you came up with the figure below: 19-Apr-17 Types of reasoning

Look at the patterns below Look at the patterns below. Can you draw the next figure or next set of dots using inductive reasoning? The trick is to see that one dot is always placed between and above two dots. Also, the next figure always has one more dot at the very bottom row keeping this in mind, your next figure should look like this: 19-Apr-17 Types of reasoning

Inductive reasoning is used often in life. Polling is an example of the use of inductive reasoning. If one were to poll one thousand people, and 300 of those people selected choice A, then one would infer that 30% of any population might also select choice A. This would be using inductive logic, because it does not definitively prove that 30% of any population would select choice A. 19-Apr-17 Types of reasoning

DEDUCTIVE REASONNG reaching a conclusion by combining known truths to create a new truth b. deductive reasoning is certain, provided that the previously known truths are in fact true themselves. 19-Apr-17 Types of reasoning

Examples 2. Mr. Samuel M. Gier is a math teacher. 1. An angle is congruent to itself. 2. Mr. Samuel M. Gier is a math teacher. 3. If 2x = 8, then x = 4. 19-Apr-17 Types of reasoning

FORMS OF DEDUCTIVE REASONNG There are a few forms of deductive logic. One of the most common deductive logical arguments is modus ponens, which states that: p ⇒ q read as “If p, then q”. p ∴ q read as “p, therefore q” 19-Apr-17 Types of reasoning

Example of modus ponens If I stub my toe, then I will be in pain. I stub my toe. Therefore, I am in pain. 19-Apr-17 Types of reasoning

FORMS OF DEDUCTIVE REASONNG Another form of deductive logic is modus tollens, which states the following. p ⇒ q read as “If p, then q”. ¬q ∴ ¬p read as “not q, therefore not p” 19-Apr-17 Types of reasoning

Example of modus tollens If today is Thursday, then the cafeteria will be serving burritos. The cafeteria is not serving burritos, therefore today is not Thursday. 19-Apr-17 Types of reasoning

FORMS OF DEDUCTIVE REASONNG Another form of deductive logic is known as the If-Then Transitive Property. Simply put, it means that there can be chains of logic where one thing implies another thing. The If-Then Transitive Property states: p ⇒ q read as “If p, then q”. (q ⇒ r) ∴ (p ⇒ r) read as ((If q, then r), therefore (if p, then r)) 19-Apr-17 Types of reasoning

Example of If-Then Transitive Property If today is Thursday, then the cafeteria will be serving burritos. If the cafeteria will be serving burritos, then I will be happy. Therefore, if today is Thursday, then I will be happy. 19-Apr-17 Types of reasoning

DEDUCTIVE REASONNG Deductive reasoning is based on laws or general principles. People using deductive reasoning apply a general principle to a specific example. 19-Apr-17 Types of reasoning

Use inductive reasoning to form arguments based on experience. Choosing a Strategy Use inductive reasoning to form arguments based on experience. Use deductive reasoning to form arguments based on rules or previously known facts. 19-Apr-17 Types of reasoning

How much do you know Answer orally

All vegetables are good for you. EXERCISES All vegetables are good for you. Broccoli is a vegetable. Therefore, broccoli is good for you. This is an example of what type of reasoning? DEDUCTIVE REASONING 19-Apr-17 Types of reasoning

Broccoli is a vegetable. EXERCISES Broccoli is a vegetable. Broccoli is a green. Therefore, all vegetables are green. Why is this conclusion invalid? 19-Apr-17 Types of reasoning

PROOF What is a proof? This is a form of logical reasoning from hypothesis to conclusion. In geometry it is defined as “a method of constructing a valid argument”. According to Thesaurus (synonyms) Evidence Testimony Verification Confirmation Subtantiation

KINDS OF PROOF Indirect proof And Direct proof An INDIRECT PROOF or proving by contradiction is a proof written in paragraph form. Indirect proof And Direct proof

HOMEWORK Give two examples using deductive and inductive reasoning. Write your answers in a paper (one-half crosswise)