Technology Transfer Commercial Opportunities in Research J. Heidjer Staecker Partner.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Marketing University Technologies : Linking University Research and Industry Interests Heidjer Staecker, J.D., LLM TreMonti Consulting LLC
Advertisements

Technology Transfer 101 An Overview of the Process
Invention Disclosures Kenneth Kirkland, Ph.D. Executive Director, Iowa State University Research Foundation, Inc. (ISURF) Director, Office of Intellectual.
Technology and Economic Development Intellectual Property Issues in Research Jim Baker Director Office of Technology and Economic Development
CONFIDENTIAL © 2012 Barnes & Thornburg LLP. All Rights Reserved. This page, and all information on it, is confidential, proprietary and the property of.
IP Issues in Research Jim Baker, Executive Director Innovation, and Industry Engagement.
Stretch Your TTO’s Budget Michael Rondelli, J.D., M.B.A Director, Technology Transfer Office San Diego State University Research Foundation.
So you’ve invented something? A Guide for UMass Faculty, Researchers and Students.
Air Force Materiel Command I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e Developing, Fielding, and Sustaining America’s Aerospace Force INTELLECTUAL.
Intellectual Property and Technology Transfer Ron Huss, Ph.D., Associate Vice President of Research and Technology Transfer Michael Brignati, Ph.D., J.D.,
Industry – University Transactions: Protecting Competitive Corporate Advantage Varda N. Main Director, Technology Licensing Rochester Institute of Technology.
1 University Based Technology Transfer Steve Bauer Director, RERC on Technology Transfer State of the Science Conference RERC on Advancing Cognitive Technologies.
Welcome and Introduction: Market Timing and Licensing Options
Introduction to Intellectual Property using the Federal Acquisitions Regulations (FAR) To talk about intellectual property in government contracting, we.
1 Technology Transfer Seminar Series Patent Licensing : A Pathway to Commercialization Karen Hersey Senior Counsel for Intellectual Property, MIT. Ret.
February 25, 2014 SERIES 4, SESSION 2 OF AAPLS APPLICANTS & ADMINISTRATORS PREAWARD LUNCHEON SERIES Material Transfer and Confidentiality Agreements.
Cochran Law Offices, LLC Patent Procedures Presented by William W. Cochran.
Vilnius Lithuania BSc.: Biochemistry Neuropsychology J.D.: University of Oregon LL.M.:University College London Pacific Northwest National Laboratory.
OFFICE OF TECHNOLOGY COMMERCIALIZATION Title of Invention Invention Disclosure Form Date Name Department School CONFIDENTIAL.
Intellectual Property: Kenneth Kirkland, Ph.D. Executive Director, Iowa State University Research Foundation (ISURF) Director, Office of Intellectual Property.
Iowa State University Research Foundation, Inc. (ISURF) and the Office of Intellectual Property and Technology Transfer (OIPTT) Kenneth Kirkland, Executive.
1 Wildcat Venture Management Technology Transfer Tactics Audio Panel September 30, 2008 Chicago, IL Copyright © 2008 Wildcat Venture Management, Inc.
Wyoming Research Products Center Intellectual Property and Licensing Services Senator Enzi’s Inventors Conference April 12, 2008 Davona K. Douglass, Acting.
Management of Intellectual Property at Iowa State University Contributing to Economic Development Kenneth Kirkland, Ph.D. Executive Director, Iowa State.
Technology Transfer at Rice
WIPO Dispute Resolution in International Science & Technology April 25, 2005 Ann M. Hammersla Senior Counsel, Intellectual Property Massachusetts Institute.
Tech Launch Arizona Tech Transfer Arizona Rakhi Gibbons, Asst. Director for Biomedical and Life Sciences Licensing.
Intellectual Property, Nondisclosure agreements, Electronically Monitored Workplaces, And high level thinking questions.
Overview OTL Mission Inventor Responsibility Stanford Royalty Sharing Disclosure Form Patent View Inventor Agreements Patent.
A Dual Role Principal (Rector) of Heriot-Watt University Chair of the regional economic development company.
PROMOTING TECHNOLOGY TO INDUSTRY Technology transfer objectives: enhance commercial value of invention promote technology to partner / investor identify.
“Today, the Department of Veterans Affairs takes credit for the work our researchers did in the past and will do in the future.” Anthony J. Principi Secretary.
10/19/2011F. B. Bramwell1.  Thanks to conversations with: ◦ HU Office of General Counsel  John Gloster  Dan McCabe ◦ University of Kentucky Intellectual.
Investing in research, making a difference. Patent Basics for UW Researchers Leah Haman Intellectual Property Associate WARF 1.
+ Faculty Orientation UAMS BioVentures September 23, 2015 Christopher A. Fasel Associate Director of Licensing Patent Attorney UAMS BioVentures.
Invention Disclosure FITT (Fostering Interregional Exchange in ICT Technology Transfer)
Invention Disclosure Analysis / Triage. Overview Decision making Components of an invention disclosure Review process Qualitative factors – art vs. science.
Organizing a Technology Licensing Office (TLO) Jon Sandelin Senior Associate Emeritus
Technology Transfer Consulting Assisting in Innovation Heidjer Staecker, J.D., LLM TreMonti Consulting LLC 9302 Lee Highway, Suite 306 Fairfax, VA
Dr. Marie Talnack, Director, TechnologyTransfer Office and Industry Clinic.
Introduction to the Offices of Biotechnology & Business Development John L. Harb Director, Office of Biotechnology __________________________________ October.
Policies Promoting IP Development in Universities and Higher Institutions of Learning In Africa OGADA Tom WIPO National Workshop on Intellectual Property.
How Commercial Firms Protect Intellectual Property In Transactions Daniel J. Mazella Celera Genomics Group, An Applera Corporation Business.
Elements of a Workable Intellectual Property Policy OPIC IP Roundtable Noel Courage Bereskin & Parr November 21, 2007.
Market Assessment FITT (Fostering Interregional Exchange in ICT Technology Transfer)
1 Columbia University Office of the General Counsel March 2012 Columbia University Office of the General Counsel Patenting Biotech: Strategies and Tips.
Academic Technology Transfer Operations and Practice Knowledge Economy Forum IV Istanbul, Turkey March 22-25, 2005 Alistair Brett Oxford Innovation.
1 Gary Williams – Director Jeni Clark – Associate Director New Product Development May 16,2012.
Wyoming Research Products Center Technology Transfer and Licensing Senator Enzi’s Inventors Conference April 20, 2013 Phillip Wulf, Intellectual Property.
Stephanie Roof, CRA Proposal Manager Sponsored Projects Administration BALL STATE UNIVERSITY INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER.
Intellectual Property Right Bernard Denis, DG-KTT.
NATIONAL CONFERENCE Intellectual Property Policies for Universities and Innovation dr. sc. Vlatka Petrović Head, Technology Transfer Office Acting Head,
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY 101 CHASE KASPER, DIRECTOR OFFICE OF TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT
Top 10 Legal Minefields A University Perspective October 8, 2009 Catherine Shea Associate University Counsel University of Colorado.
Intellectual Property at USC October 27, 2003 Dr. Michael Muthig.
Technology Transfer in The United States Paul Zielinski Director, Technology Partnerships Office, National Institute of Standards and Technology Chair,
Review of Research-Related Agreements Between Academic Institutions and Other Entities. Manoja Ratnayake Lecamwasam, PhD Intellectual Property and Innovation.
Bygrave & Zacharakis, Entrepreneurship, New York: Wiley. © Chapter 13 Intellectual Property.
ip4inno Case Study Concentrate Design – design products for schools SpeakerLocation, date.
OTC FELLOWS PROGRAM INFORMATION SESSION Fall 2016.
Intellectual Property for start-ups Innovation ACT Canberra - 23 August 2016 Matthew Lee Assistant Director – Start-up and small business engagement.
Technology Transfer Office
Taking Discoveries from Lab to the Market
Technology Transfer Office
Technology Management Activities and Tools
Technology Transfer 101 An Overview of the Process
Protection of Intellectual Property Resulting from STCU Projects
MSU’s place for connecting to the private sector
MSU’s place for connecting to the private sector
Presentation transcript:

Technology Transfer Commercial Opportunities in Research J. Heidjer Staecker Partner

What is Technology Transfer?  The process of transferring scientific findings from one organization to another for the purpose of further development and commercialization.  The process typically includes: Identifying new technologies Protecting technologies through patents and copyrights Forming development and commercialization strategies such as marketing and licensing to existing private sector companies or creating new startup companies based on the technology

Prior to law  Government held title to ~30,000 patents  Less than 5% were licensed and operating  All inventions and patents were available on a non-exclusive basis  Government rarely relinquished title after a lengthy, petition process  The public, as taxpayers, did not benefit from investment in research and its outcome Bayh-Dole Act

 P.L , Patent and Trademark Act Amendments of 1980  Established that Universities, not the gov't, own the rights to IP developed under federal research funding  Universities required to have written agreements with faculty/staff for disclosures and assignments  University must disclose to funding agency w/in 2 months of receiving disclosure  Decision to retain title to ownership must be made w/in 2 years of disclosure  Decision to patent must be made w/in 1 year of decision to retain title  Preference given to small companies for licenses  Must share royalties with inventors  Limited government march-in rights Bayh-Dole Act

 Promote utilization of federally-funded inventions  Encourage small business engagement in federally-funded R&D  Promote collaborations between universities and industry  Promote commercialization in the U.S. of U.S.- made federally-funded inventions  Protect the government’s rights to federally-funded inventions Bayh-Dole Objectives

 Publication prior to filing creates IP issues  Cannot assign IP  Cannot provide unjust enrichment to a sponsor  Data is not IP unless agreed in contract  Publication rights critical  IP allows research to impact communities Important Things to Remember

Technology Transfer Process Lifecycle Research Technology Disclosure Commercialization Evaluation Protection Marketing License/Sponsored Research Agreement

 Disclosure  Assignment  Patent Prosecution  Spin-out/license  Negotiate Transaction  Distribute royalties TTO – basic functions for faculty

 MTA  CDA/NDA  IIA  Assignment Agreements  Licenses Common Agreements

 Ownership of IP  IP Protection  Licensing  Compliance  Help with sponsored research  Start up formation TTO Activities

 Applied Research as a Goal  Funding Sources  Impact on Communities  Notoriety  Build on Past Work  Publications  Freedom to Operate Importance to Research

 Technologies are evaluated from a commercial perspective  This differs from a legal or scientific evaluation The scientific and creative side of inventions are generally top-notch Science alone does not create a market Similarly just because a technology can be patented does not mean there is a market need for the innovation  For successful commercialization efforts, it is important to match innovation value with market need Commercialization Evaluation - Purpose

 Commercial Application Relationship of the invention to a product-commercial application What problem does it solve?  Technical Technology Summary  Competitive Landscape and Commercial Benefits -What are the top competing technologies? -How does this new invention compare to competing technologies? More efficient Less expensive Better, Stronger, Faster, Cheaper, Greener Commercialization Evaluation – Content

 Market Size and Trend Define target industry/industry sectors Describe size and current trend of the target industries  Technical Development Direction Develop a recommended pathway to development Suggest additional applications or features for optimization Identify regulatory/commercialization hurdles and provide advice for ways to overcome them  Potential Partners Include Industry Partners Investors/VCs Community/Economic Development Groups Commercialization Evaluation – Content Continued

Marketing

Packaging The Technology – The Summary

 Exclusive right to disallow use by others  Provides the holder exclusive right to disallow use  20 years from date of filing  Public domain if public disclosure = not patentable  1 year grace in US  PCT = foreign patents  First to file in US as of March 2013 (AIA) Packaging The Technology – The Summary

 Potential partners will want to see additional, non-confidential information: Publications Abstracts Presentations Video Data  When marketing, this information is needed to fill in the gaps in the marketing summary  Also keep in mind additional applications Packaging The Technology – Additional information

 Passive – Putting out a technology/discovery/ offer and wait for people to find it i.e., Websites & publication  Semi-Passive (or semi-active) – Putting out a technology/discovery/offer to a specific group of people i.e., Social Media, conference presentations, etc.  Active – Active engagement of targeted, potential partners Phone calls, introductions, etc. Types of Marketing: Passive, Semi-Passive, Active

 Research contacts  Peer publications  Knowledge of the field  Social media (i.e., Linked In)  Proprietary Databases (i.e., OneSource, Salesforce, Hoovers etc.)  Office of Patents & Licensing  Internet Research Resources: How does one find companies & contacts?

 Personal interaction is most important way to establish first contact  Phone call is easiest way to do it  Meeting at a conference  Contact through a relation  and mail is too easily ignored, lost, or forgotten Pick up the Phone … and dial

 Non-confidential information first  After NDA, confidential information and discussions  Inventor availability and involvement very important  Remember research requirements  Be realistic about development Someone wants to talk

 How much money does you need to accomplish your (and the company’s) research goal?  Defined actions  Have you taken into account the university’s overhead?  Do not fudge the costs! Let’s talk about Cash

 Does not mean that it is bad science Market timing may be wrong Market may be too small Path to market may be difficult  Focus on research opportunities around technology  Think about alternative applications No one is interested

 Interaction with industry (and others) is based around a series of legal constructs (concepts), whose goal is to protect the owners (inventors, university, and industry) IP – intellectual property – patents, copyrights, trademarks, trade secrets, know how NDA/CDA – Non-disclosure agreement – keeps secrets MTA – Material Transfer Agreement – Keeps track of materials coming in and out of labs Sponsored Research Agreement – Contract that outlines a specific line of research that is paid for by one of the parties Option – Keeps a piece of intellectual property off the open market for a period of time License – A contractual transfer of rights between parties  Some or all of these may come into play IP, NDAs, MTAs, and other Nonsense

Questions?