International Economics Lecture 11 What Determines Exchange Rates?

Fixed vs floating – government policies Fixed, Semi-fixed, Managed, Dirty Floating and Clean floating. Short-run vs long run PPP Real exchange rates Some extensions 2

Sometimes countries decide to use a fixed exchange rate Fixed against what? Choice of a) major currency, b) basket of (actual currencies), and c) synthetic currency (e.g. ECU, SDR) Decision about whether to fix and what to fix against also affects monetary policy, as fixing exchange rates limits interest rate movements

Whole spectrum of exchange rate regimes: Clean float – no intervention Dirty float – (non-explicit) intervention Managed float – explicit intervention At non-specific levels At specific levels – e.g. upper and lower levels (target zone) Crawling peg – fixed exchange rates that change by a specified amount over time Pegged exchange rates – fixed exchange rates Currency boards – fixed exchange rate backed up by fixed currency Dollar/Euroization – replacement of national currency by another currency

dark green - free float regime light green - Managed float regime blue - different types of currency peg red – dollarized or euroized

Choice of exchange rate regime will depend on: amount of monetary policy autonomy that is desired trade strategy independence or otherwise of central bank trade concentration tourism similarity of business cycle behavior past inflation experience desire to tie hands of policymakers

Flex rates: change in rate is depreciation/appreciation Fixed rates: change in rate is devaluation/revaluation Previous currency = legacy currency Dual currency regimes = 2 currencies circulating simultaneously Dual exchange rate regimes = 2 different exchange rates depending on whether transaction is trade related or financial.

In short run: With flexible exchange rates interest rates and capital flows determine the movement of exchange rates With fixed exchange rates interest rates have to remain at the same level as country being fixed to and any capital flows have to be offset by intervention In long run: With both fixed and flexible exchange rates there must be some “benchmark” as to what exchange rates should be Any departure from this under flex rates is called “misalignment” and for fixed rates will cause a “speculative attack”

The law of one price simply says that the same good in different competitive markets must sell for the same price, when transportation costs and barriers between markets are not important. Why? Suppose the price of pizza at one restaurant is $20, while the price of the same pizza at a similar restaurant across the street is $40. What do you predict to happen? Many people would buy the $20 pizza, few would buy the $40. Due to the increased demand, the price of the $20 pizza would tend to increase. Due to the decreased demand, the price of the $40 pizza would tend to decrease. People would have an incentive to adjust their behavior and prices would tend to adjust to reflect this changed behavior until one price is achieved across markets (restaurants). 12-9

12-10 Consider a pizza restaurant in Seattle one across the border in Vancouver. The law of one price says that the price of the same pizza (using a common currency to measure the price) in the two cities must be the same if barriers between competitive markets and transportation costs are not important: P pizza US = (E US$/Canada$ ) x (P pizza Canada ) P pizza US = price of pizza in Seattle P pizza Canada = price of pizza in Vancouver E US$/Canada$ = US dollar/Canadian dollar exchange rate

12-11 Purchasing power parity is the application of the law of one price across countries for all goods and services, or for representative groups (“baskets”) of goods and services. P US = (E US$/Canada$ ) x (P Canada ) P US = price level of goods and services in the US P Canada = price level of goods and services in Canada E US$/Canada$ = US dollar/Canadian dollar exchange rate

12-12 Purchasing power parity implies that E US$/Canada$ = P US /P Canada The price levels adjust to determine the exchange rate. If the price level in the US is US$200 per basket, while the price level in Canada is C$400 per basket, PPP implies that the US$/C$ exchange rate should be US$200/C$400 = US$ 1/C$ 2 Purchasing power parity says that each country ’ s currency has the same purchasing power: 2 Canadian dollars buy the same amount of goods and services as does 1 US dollar, since prices in Canada are twice as high.

12-13 Purchasing power parity comes in 2 forms: Absolute PPP: purchasing power parity that has already been discussed. Exchange rates equal price levels across countries. E $/€ = P US /P EU Relative PPP: changes in exchange rates equal changes in prices (inflation) between two periods: (E $/€,t - E $/€, t –1 )/E $/€, t –1 =  US, t -  EU, t where  t = inflation rate from period t-1 to t

12-14

12-15 Reasons why PPP may not be a good theory: 1.Trade barriers and non-tradable goods and services 2.Imperfect competition 3.Differences in price level measures

12-16 Trade barriers and non-tradables Transport costs and governmental trade restrictions make trade expensive and in some cases create non- tradable goods or services. Services are often not tradable: services are generally offered within a limited geographic region (e.g., haircuts). The greater the transport costs, the greater the range over which the exchange rate can deviate from its PPP value. One price need not hold in two markets.

12-17 Imperfect competition may result in price discrimination: “pricing to market”. A firm sells the same product for different prices in different markets to maximize profits, based on expectations about what consumers are willing to pay. Differences in price level measures price levels differ across countries because of the way representative groups (“baskets”) of goods and services are measured. Because measures of goods and services are different, the measure of their prices need not be the same.

12-18 The Fisher effect (named affect Irving Fisher) describes the relationship between nominal interest rates and inflation. Derive the Fisher effect from the interest parity condition: R $ - R € = (E e $/€ - E $/€ )/E $/€ If financial markets expect (relative) PPP to hold, then expected exchange rate changes will equal expected inflation between countries: (E e $/€ - E $/€ )/E $/€ =  e US -  e EU R $ - R € =  e US -  e EU The Fisher effect: a rise in the domestic inflation rate causes an equal rise in the interest rate on deposits of domestic currency in the long run, when other factors remain constant. As we assume that prices only change in the long run, here we use the interest parity condition in a long run context

12-19 Because of the shortcomings of PPP, economists have tried to take a different approach to the long run exchange rate from PPP. The real exchange rate is the rate of exchange for real goods and services across countries. In other words, it is the relative value/price/cost of goods and services across countries. It is the dollar price of a European group of goods and services relative to the dollar price of a American group of goods and services: q US/EU = (E $/€ x P EU )/P US

12-20 According to PPP, exchange rates are determined by relative price ratios: E $/€ = P US /P EU According to the more general real exchange rate approach, exchange rates may also be influenced by the real exchange rate: E $/€ = q US/EU x P US /P EU Q: What influences the real exchange rate? A: Just rearrange above equation