Crab Cavities in IR1 and IR5 Some considerations on tunnel integration What will be the situation in the tunnel after the LHC IR Phase-1 Upgrade. What.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Energy deposition in Q0 Elena Wildner 19/04/07. Strategy 1. Define a TAS to protect the Q0 2. Optics:  *= 0.25m 3. Calculate, with some optimization.
Advertisements

Study of the Luminosity of LHeC, a Lepton Proton Collider in the LHC Tunnel CERN June F. Willeke, DESY.
Quadrupole Magnetic Design for an Electron Ion Collider Paul Brindza May 19, 2008.
24/01/08Energy deposition, LIUWG, Elena Wildner1 Upgrade phase 1: Energy deposition in the triplet Elena Wildner Francesco Cerutti Marco Mauri.
Recirculating pass optics V.Ptitsyn, D.Trbojevic, N.Tsoupas.
Luminosity Prospects of LHeC, a Lepton Proton Collider in the LHC Tunnel DESY Colloquium May F. Willeke, DESY.
Overview of Possible LHC IR Upgrade Layouts CARE HHH-2004 Workshop CERN 8-11 November 2004 J. Strait, N.V. Mokhov, T. Sen Fermilab bnl - fnal - lbnl -
R. Ostojic, WAMSDO, 19 May 2008 LHC Insertion Region Upgrade Phase I 1.Upgrade goals and milestones 2.Review of IR systems: main findings 3.The emerging.
Consolidation and Upgrade of the LHC Experimental Vacuum Sectors
The HiLumi LHC Design Study (a sub-system of HL-LHC) is co-funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme 7 Capacities Specific Programme,
E. Todesco PROPOSAL OF APERTURE FOR THE INNER TRIPLET E. Todesco CERN, Geneva Switzerland With relevant inputs from colleagues F. Cerutti, S. Fartoukh,
The HiLumi LHC Design Study (a sub-system of HL-LHC) is co-funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme 7 Capacities Specific Programme,
LHC Insertions Upgrade Working Group (LIUWG) Space available in tunnel Y. Muttoni.
Technical agreement n 3 New SC Magnets activities P. Fessia (G. De Rijk), D. Reynet, J.M Rifflet.
LHC upgrade plans Lucio Rossi CERN Acc.&Tech Sector, TE Dept.
Accelerator Group for LHeC LHeC Meeting at CERN; October Questions raised by Max  does the e-ring fit into the tunnel?  can one bypass ATLAS and.
Review of Quench Limits FermilabAccelerator Physics Center Nikolai Mokhov Fermilab 1 st HiLumi LHC / LARP Collaboration Meeting CERN November 16-18, 2011.
Guido Sterbini CERN – MCS - MA Section Meeting, 8 th February 2007.
General Considerations for the Upgrade of the LHC Insertion Magnets
Experimental Sectors Ray Veness / AT-VAC With many thanks to G.Foffano + W.Cameron TS/MME Patrick Lepeule / AT-VAC.
Thursday Summary of Working Group I Initial questions I: LHC LUMI 2005; ; ArcidossoOliver Brüning 1.
Update on LHC Upgrade Plans Frank Zimmermann ATLAS Upgrade Week Tuesday 10 November 2009.
View From CERN Summary of Upgrade Projects:  Phase 1 IR upgrade: construction project  LINAC4: construction project  Phase 2 collimation: design finalization.
Thursday 28 January 2010 Session 8 - LHC Upgrade Plans for the first long Shutdown (Convener: Oliver Bruning, Paolo Fessia )
D. Trbojevic, N. Tsoupas, S. Tepikian, B. Parker, E. Pozdeyev, Y. Hao, D. Kayran, J. Beebe-Wang, C. Montag, V. Ptitsyn, and V. Litvinenko eRHIC and MeRHIC.
Integration studies – Part 1 Inner triplet Y. Muttoni TS-ICC-LI 31 July 2008.
LER Workshop, October 11, 2006LER & Transfer Line Lattice Design - J.A. Johnstone1 LHC Accelerator Research Program bnl-fnal-lbnl-slac Introduction The.
LHC-CC Validity Requirements & Tests LHC Crab Cavity Mini Workshop at CERN; 21. August Remarks on using the LHC as a test bed for R&D equipment.
MEIC Detector and IR Integration Vasiliy Morozov, Charles Hyde, Pawel Nadel-Turonski MEIC Detector and IR Design Mini-Workshop, October 31, 2011.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
Interaction Region Design and Detector Integration V.S. Morozov for EIC Study Group at JLAB 2 nd Mini-Workshop on MEIC Interaction Region Design JLab,
Detector / Interaction Region Integration Vasiliy Morozov, Charles Hyde, Pawel Nadel-Turonski Joint CASA/Accelerator and Nuclear Physics MEIC/ELIC Meeting.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
AT-VAC SPC Nicolaas KOS Beam Screens for Inner Triplet Magnets LHC Upgrade Phase 1 Nicolaas KOS  LHC Upgrade phase 1  Inner triplet BS Requirements.
08/11/2007M. Giovannozzi – CARE-HHH-APD IR’071 Optics issues for Phase 1 and Phase 2 upgrades Massimo Giovannozzi, CERN Outline: –Option for Phase 1 and.
Energy Deposition Issues in LHC IR Upgrades LHC IR Upgrades Workshop Pheasant Run, St. Charles, IL October 3-4, 2005 Fermilab LHC IR 2005 Nikolai Mokhov,
A liner in the Corrector package A Cu liner has been inserted in the gap between the CBT and the coil aperture of all the corrector package elements (see.
Layout and Arcs lattice design A. Chancé, B. Dalena, J. Payet, CEA R. Alemany, B. Holzer, D. Schulte CERN.
31/07/08Review new IRs: Energy Deposition1 Energy Deposition in the New IRs Francesco Cerutti, Marco Mauri, Alessio Mereghetti, Ezio Todesco, Elena Wildner.
R. Ostojic, IRP1 CD Review, 31 July 2008 LHC IR Upgrade Phase I Goals and Constraints 1.Upgrade goals and milestones 2.Upgrade of IR systems: main constraints.
Ranko Ostojic AT/MEL 1.Beam heat loads 2.Magnet design issues related to heat loads.
ENERGY DEPOSITION AND TAS DIAMETER
CERN, 11th November 2011 Hi-lumi meeting
Operating IP8 at high luminosity in the HL-LHC era
Interaction Region and Detector
contribution to the round table discussion
SLHC –PP WP6 LHC IR Upgrade - Phase I.
LHC IR Upgrade Phase-I: Goals and Conceptual Design
LHeC interaction region
Overview Summer student lectures 2016
Arc magnet designs Attilio Milanese 13 Oct. 2016
Large Booster and Collider Ring
Main magnets for PERLE Test Facility
DEBRIS IMPACT IN THE TAS-TRIPLET-D1 REGION
Beam-Induced Energy Deposition Studies in IR Magnets
Progress of SPPC lattice design
Upgrade phase 1: Energy deposition in the triplet
LHC (SSC) Byung Yunn CASA.
Optic design and performance evaluation for SPPC collimation systems
Collider Ring Optics & Related Issues
1st HiLumi LHC / LARP Collaboration Meeting 2011 Nov 17th
SLHC-PP kick-off meeting, CERN 9 April 2008
Muon Collider Magnet Technologies/Challenges
Thursday Summary of Working Group I
Review of Quench Limits
Electron Collider Ring Magnets Preliminary Summary
MEIC Shifting Magnet Tim Michalski August 6, 2015.
IR Beam Transport Status
LHC Machine Advisory Committee, CERN 12th June 2008
Fanglei Lin MEIC R&D Meeting, JLab, July 16, 2015
Presentation transcript:

Crab Cavities in IR1 and IR5 Some considerations on tunnel integration What will be the situation in the tunnel after the LHC IR Phase-1 Upgrade. What are the space and services requirements for crab cavities and related equipment. R. Ostojic, LHC-CC09, Sep 2009

sLHC projects and design studies CMS/ATLAS Upgrade Phase

LHC IR Upgrade – Phase-1 Goal of the upgrade: Enable focusing of the beams to  *=0.25 m in IP1 and IP5, and reliable operation of the LHC at 2 to cm -2 s -1 on the horizon of the physics run in Scope of the Project: 1.Upgrade of ATLAS and CMS interaction regions. The interfaces between the LHC and the experiments remain unchanged. 2.The cryogenic cooling capacity and other infrastructure in IR1 and IR5 remain unchanged and will be used to the full potential. 3.Replace the present triplets with wide aperture quadrupoles based on the LHC dipole (Nb-Ti) cables cooled at 1.9 K. 4.Upgrade the D1 separation dipoles, TAS and other beam-line equipment so as to be compatible with the inner triplets. 5.Modify matching sections to improve optics flexibility and machine protection, and introduce other equipment relevant for luminosity increase to the extent of available resources.

The ATLAS and CMS interaction regions Dispersion suppressor Matching sectionSeparation dipoles Final focus Triplet PositionL* = 23 m Quad gradient 120 T/m Coil aperture120 mm  *, L 25 cm, cm -2 s -1 Dissipated power K

Triplet layout LHC triplet Phase-I triplet

Constraints Interfaces with the experiments: Very tight interfaces between the triplet, TAS, shielding, vacuum and survey equipment, and beam instrumentation; no possibility of reducing L* (23m). Cryogenics: Ultimate cooling capacity is 500 in each triplet. Replacement of triplets in IR1/5 requires at present warm- up of 4 sectors. Chromatic aberrations: Reduction of  * drives chromatic aberrations all around the LHC. A new optics solution for all arcs and insertions is necessary. Accessibility and maintenance: All electronics equipment for the triplets should be located in low-radiation areas. Severe space constraints around IP1 and IP5 for any new equipment. New magnets must be similar in size to the LHC main dipole. Upgrade implementation: during the extended shutdown, compatible with CERN-wide planning (Linac4 commissioning, phase-1 upgrade of the experiments).

Protection against particle debris Protection against particle debris is the single most serious issue of the upgrade. Energy deposition in the coils and magnet lifetime. Equipment protection in the tunnel (TAS, TAN). Protection of electronic equipment in underground areas. Maintenance and interventions … All magnets built for a lifetime ~ 1000 fb -1, greater than the lifetime of ATLAS and CMS before their phase-2 upgrade. Max power density = 4.3 mW/cm ) Average dose 1.5 MGy/100 fb -1

Hadron fluence in IP1 vertically averaged over the -60cm < y< 60cm interval (beam axis at y=0) cm -2 /100fb cm -2 /100fb -1 as in UJ – cm -2 /100fb -1

LHC tunnel in IR1

Phase-1 Upgrade Equipment in IR1 Service module (QDXS) DFX Link (DSX) Length ~28 m 3 sharp (~ 1.5 m radius) bends plus some curves DFX Link Cryo Service Module (QDXS) DSX

Phase-1 Upgrade Equipment in IR1

LHC tunnel in IR5

Phase-1 Upgrade Equipment in IR5 Length ~95 m One 180 degree curve plus some longer curves DFX Link Cryo Service Module (QDXS) DSX

Phase-1 Upgrade Equipment in IR5 Length ~50m 5 sharp bends DFX Service Module (QDXS) DSX

Phase-1 Upgrade Equipment in IR5 DFX Power convertors DSX

Phase-1 Upgrade Equipment in IR5 3.4m 3.15m USC55 UL55 DFX 1.15m TRANSPORT VOLUME 1.45m

LHC tunnel in IR1 D11D12D2D2D1CC

Separation dipoles D1, Phase-1 Upgrade

Separation dipoles Potential problem with beam separation (too small for separate aperture magnets) Yoke diameter too large D1 Phase-1 (Phase-2) D11D12 D2 (nom LHC) Strength (Tm)30 (70) Field (T)4 (7)744.1 Operating temp (K) Beam stay-clear (mm)140 (134) /53 Coil aperture (mm) Beam separation (mm) Eff. Coil-coil separation (mm) Yoke diameter (mm) Cryostat diameter (mm)914

Crab cavity requirements Two strings of SC per IR side, about 20 m long. Cavities cooled at 2 K. Space for RF power tube and PS – In RF shielded zone – ~ 8 racks per system – Minimal footprint 1.8x2 m – Two systems per IR side Power tubes and controls in low-radiation areas – But less than 100 m from CC Radiation hardness of in-tunnel equipment

Some conclusions The Phase-1 Upgrade of the LHC interaction regions relies on the mature Nb-Ti magnet technology, while maximising the use of the existing infrastructure. Any new equipment in IR1 and IR5 (CC and separation dipoles) must conform in size with the transport zone. Phase-2 triplets will require new cryogenic plants in IR1 and IR5. Additional requirements from CC and separation dipoles need to be developed to optimize their design. It seems that additional tunnel alcoves in IR1 and IR5 for Phase-2 cryogenics and machine equipment (and moving power convertors from the RRs) is unavoidable.