Draft NOAA Catch Share Policy Marine Fisheries Advisory Committee February 23, 2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Overview of Alaska Ecosystem Indicators Relative to EAM/EAF Objectives
Advertisements

Groundfish Management Policy Objectives Diana Evans NPFMC staff North Pacific Fishery Management Councils.
Fishery management and interested parties
U.S. Marine Fisheries Management Dr. Louis B. Daniel III Director N.C. Division of Marine Fisheries.
North American Fish Trax Community Seafood Initiative Heather Mann.
How did we get here and where do we go now? Lessons Learned.
1 Full Accounting for Catches An increasing necessity for sustainable fisheries management.
The Common Fisheries Policy
“Managing for Maximum Sustained Benefit” … is a challenging process that typically requires balancing competing and conflicting goals and interests, and.
5. MOVING TOWARD EAFM Essential EAFM Date Place 5. Moving towards EAFM Version 1.
June 3, 2015 NOAA Ecosystem Goal Fisheries Management Program Performance Measures and Strategic Planning.
KEY ISSUES OF IMPLEMENTATION AND EFFICIENT STRUCTURES FOR COMMUNITY FISHERIES Susan Hanna.
Can property rights solve fisheries collapse? Christopher Costello* Associate Professor – Resource Economics Bren School Advisory Board Address: April.
Regional Electronic Monitoring and Reporting (EM/ER) Implementation Plan CFMC Rio Grande, PR August 13, Scott Baker, NC Sea Grant.
NROC Commercial Fisheries Characterization, Phase II Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council 9 June
NMFS Overview National SSC Workshop - IV Richard D. Methot Jr. Office of Science & Technology 1.
OBLIGATIONS TO PROTECT MARINE ECOSYSTEMS UNDER INTERNATIONAL CONVENTIONS AND OTHER LEGAL INSTRUMENTS Transform Aqorau Scientific Symposium of the Reykjavik.
MAFMC 5-Year Strategic Plan Public Comments August 14, 2013.
NOAA Fisheries: Mission Stewardship of living marine resources through science-based conservation and management and the promotion of healthy.
Data Services Prioritization Process Alaska Regional Office.
1 Proposed Revisions to the National Standard 1 Guidelines: Adding Guidance on Annual Catch Limits and Other Requirements Presentation to the Regional.
Snapper Grouper Amendment 35 (Removal of Species & Golden Tilefish Endorsements) Prepared by Myra Brouwer January 2015.
United States Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration NOAA Ecosystem Goal Fisheries Management Program CCC Briefing February.
PROJECT UPDATE Electronic Technologies and Fisheries Data Collection George Lapointe George Lapointe Consulting September 23, 2013 Pacific States Marine.
May 13, 2009 Marine Fisheries Advisory Committee: Regional Ocean Governance Mark C. Holliday, Ph.D. Office of Policy.
Ecosystem Management Workshops Michael Jepson, Ph.D. Facilitator.
Marine Recreational Information Program Fisheries Data Collection for Sustainable Recreational Fisheries Workshop Monmouth University Gordon C. Colvin.
 Definition: “ Catch share” is a general term for several fishery management strategies that allocate a specific portion of the total allowable fishery.
Federal Fisheries in the North Aleutian Basin Diana Evans North Pacific Fishery Management Council November 27, 2006.
Development of Practices for Ecosystem-based Fishery Management in the United States: the North Pacific CAPITOL HILL OCEANS WEEK JUNE 9-10, 2004 David.
Social/Community Impact Assessment Discussion Presentation to Pacific Fishery Management Council Workshop on Trawl IQs Mike Downs April 2006.
Recreational Catch Shares Earl W. Comstock Comstock Consulting LLC
West Coast Region September 12-14, 2015 Salmon Consultation on the Pacific Coast Groundfish Fishery: Salmon Consultation on the Pacific Coast Groundfish.
Presented By: Bernt O. Bodal Chairman & CEO American Seafoods Group Ecosystem Considerations In Fisheries Management October 1, 2001 Reykjavik, Iceland.
The importance of tackling discards: A fisheries policy perspective Luke Warwick – Defra, Environmentally Responsible Fishing.
1 Overview of Minerals Management Service’s Alternative Energy Program Ocean Law Conference May 22, 2008 Seattle, WA Walter D. Cruickshank Deputy Director.
Council Coordination Committee Meeting Budget Issues Presentation Office of Management and Budget Gary Reisner NMFS CFO/CAO FEBRUARY, 2009.
MSA – Catch Shares - Economics Eric Thunberg Northeast Fisheries Science Center, Social Sciences Branch, NOAA Fisheries Office of Science and Technology,
FY2010 President’s Budget Request Overview May 13, 2009.
Magnuson-Stevens Reauthorization Act of 2006 March 2007.
Overview of Restructured Observer Program and Observer Fees Alaska Region.
The Design and Use of Fishing Community And Regional Fishery Association Entities in Limited Access Privilege Programs Joshua Stoll School of Marine Sciences.
WHY IT MATTERS AND WHAT COMES NEXT Becca Robbins Gisclair Alaska Marine Conservation Council/ Yukon River Drainage Fisheries Association Bycatch Accounting.
Federal Permit Program for the Caribbean EEZ Options and Ideas.
Draft South Coast MPA Monitoring Plan California Fish and Game Commission Stockton, 29 June 2011.
1 NOAA Priorities for an Ecosystem Approach to Management A Presentation to the NOAA Science Advisory Board John H. Dunnigan NOAA Ecosystem Goal Team Lead.
National Standard 10 - UPDATE Commercial Fishing Safety Advisory Committee Meeting Seattle, WA November 14-16, 2011.
Rationalizing the Irrational. Observer Program considerations for a fishery transitioning to a multi-species individual fishing quota system. Jim Benante.
PROVISIONS OF H.R SECTION 3: SCIENCE BASED IMPROVEMENTS TO MANAGEMENT [303(a )] Page 3, lines 22-25, Page 4, Page 5, lines 1-9 Paragraph 15 is.
Supporting Community Participation in U.S. Arctic Ocean Governance Strengthening Institutions Strategies for Cooperative Management in the Marine Environment.
Development of Fishery Management Programs Fishery management is necessarily complicated because of the nature of the industry and the need to safeguard.
1 Magnuson-Stevens Act Reauthorization A Presentation to the NOAA Science Advisory Board Dr. William T. Hogarth Assistant Administrator for Fisheries National.
The Fishery Resource: Biological and Economic Models Wednesday, April 12.
MSRA Implementation Status Update. 2 Implementation Strategy Divide tasks Priority 1 – Due date specified in the Act Priority 2 – Required, but no due.
Deerin Babb-Brott, Director National Ocean Council Office National Boating Federation 2013 Annual Meeting.
Economics of the West Coast Groundfish Trawl Catch Share Program Erin Steiner, Amanda Warlick, Marie Guldin, Lisa Pfeiffer, Jerry Leonard Economic and.
West Coast Groundfish Quota Program Workshop PLANNING FOR A REVIEW OF THE WEST COAST GROUNDFISH TRAWL CATCH SHARE PROGRAM CHUCK TRACY, PACIFIC FISHERY.
Consolidation April 2006 Marcus Hartley Presentation to Pacific Fishery Management Council Workshop on Trawl IQs.
U.S. Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration NOAA Fisheries A Priority in motion at NOAA Recreational Fisheries.
North Pacific Fishery Management Council Update on salmon and halibut bycatch in groundfish fisheries Dan Hull, Chairman March 4, 2016 Presentation to.
BERING SEA FISHERIES INFORMATION Frank Kelty, City of Unalaska.
Alternative Gear Pilot Proposal In consultation with DFO and Industry, GTAC has developed a number of objectives for the BC Groundfish Trawl Fishery that.
Fisheries Management: Principal Methods, Advantages and Disadvantages
PROVISIONS OF S Section 3 Definitions
Magnuson-Stevens Act – Ending Overfishing and Rebuilding the Nation’s Valuable Marine Fisheries Eric Schwaab Assistant Administrator.
EMFF Funding opportunities for the environment
PROVISIONS OF H.R
The use of Data in Fisheries Management
Ecosystem-Based Fisheries Management
North Shore Streamkeepers February 23, 2019
Presentation transcript:

Draft NOAA Catch Share Policy Marine Fisheries Advisory Committee February 23, 2010

2 What is a Catch Share?  Catch share is a generic term used to describe fishery management programs that allocate a specific portion of the total allowable fishery catch to individuals, cooperatives, communities, or other entities.  Includes specific programs defined in Magnuson-Stevens Act such as Limited Access Privilege (LAP) programs and Individual Fishing Quotas (IFQs), and other exclusive allocative measures.  The recipient of a catch share is directly accountable to stop fishing when their specific share allocation is reached.

3 Why Catch Shares?  Difficulty controlling catch to an overall limit – overfishing  A race to catch as much fish as fast as possible leading to overcapitalization – too many boats, too few fish, lower profits, poor product quality  No incentive to reduce bycatch  Seasonal gluts of fish in markets  Fishermen go out in unsafe conditions  US fisheries are not currently producing their full economic value and employment  Requests for economic assistance are increasing Current Fisheries Management Challenges…

4 Outcomes of Catch Shares  Help achieve conservation objectives, such as ending overfishing  Reduce overcapacity in the harvesting sector  Improve the overall economic performance of the fishery  Improve product quality (e.g., fresh vs. frozen)  Improve safety at sea  Increase participants’ responsibility for monitoring and management  Move away from command-and-control management toward approaches where participants play a greater management role Both U.S. & global Catch Shares experience shows they…

5 Catch Shares in Context National ocean policy Healthy resilient ecosystems Sustainable fisheries - an essential component Catch Shares a powerful tool to manage fisheries to sustainable levels & improve their economic performance Ecosystem-based science & mgt., emphasizing transparency & public participation

6 14 Current Programs Surf Clam/Ocean Quahog Wreckfish Halibut & Sablefish Western Alaska CDQ Bering Sea AFA Pollock Cooperatives Pacific Sablefish Permit Stacking Georges Bank Cod Hook Gear Sector Georges Bank Cod Fixed Gear Sector Bering Sea King & Tanner Crab Gulf of Mexico Red Snapper IFQ Central Gulf of Alaska Rockfish Pilot Bering Sea Groundfish (Non-Pollock) Cooperatives Mid-Atlantic Golden Tilefish IFQ Gulf of Mexico Grouper & Tilefish IFQ Scallop General Category IFQ Northeast Multispecies Sectors West Coast Trawl Groundfish TIQ 3 Programs in Development Catch Share Programs

7 New England: Georges Bank Cod – Hook Gear (2004) Georges Bank Cod – Fixed Gear (2007) Mid-Atlantic: Surf Clam & Ocean Quahog (1990) Golden Tilefish (2009) South Atlantic: Wreckfish (1991) Gulf of Mexico: Red Snapper (2007) Red Grouper (2010) Pacific: Pacific Sablefish Permit Stacking (2001) Western Pacific None currently North Pacific: Halibut & Sablefish (1995) Western Alaska CDQ (1992) Bering Sea AFA Pollock Cooperative (1999) Groundfish (non-Pollock) Cooperatives (2008) Bering Sea King & Tanner Crab (2005) Central Gulf of Alaska Rockfish Pilot (2007) Caribbean: None currently Highly Migratory Species: None currently Current Catch Share Programs

8 Examples of U.S. Catch Shares

9  June 22, 2009 – NOAA Under Secretary Lubchenco announced the formation of the Catch Shares Task Force  18 Participants : - 10 NOAA participants - 8 Regional Council participants (recreational & commercial sectors)  Held four Task Force Conference calls plus electronic work via intranet

10 Process for Draft Policy  NOAA presentations to all Regional Councils  Input on a draft catch share policy sought  Stakeholder briefings by NOAA Commercial Groups Recreational Groups Environmental Groups  NOAA catch shares website (  NOAA drafted policy for release December 10, 2009  Draft policy open for public comment until April 10, 2010

11 Experiences Considered, Lessons Learned…  Community sustainability & participation  Performance metrics, monitoring, adaptation  Transferability  Council support and resource limitations  Criteria for assessing catch share suitability  Fair & equitable treatment for recreational and commercial sectors  Cost recovery and resource rent  Stakeholder knowledge/engagement  Impacts on small entities, skippers, crew

12 Catch Share Questions… “Loss of small boat fleets and communities?” Use available design features to ensure sustained participation of small boat, owner-operator fleets and preservation of fishing communities through eligibility, participation, allocation and transferability choices “Government giveaway of public resources?” All limited access programs recover costs (up to 3% ex vessel value); M-S Act gives Council authority to decide policy on collecting resource rent “Unfairly treats recreational sector?” No sector mandated to adopt catch shares; shares simply distribute Council allocation decisions within a sector; include allocation review in FMP; set asides, transferability can modify initial allocations

13 Draft Catch Share Policy To achieve long-term ecological and economic sustainability of the Nation’s fishery resources and fishing communities: NOAA encourages the consideration and adoption of catch shares wherever appropriate in fishery management and ecosystem plans and amendments, and will support the design, implementation, and monitoring of catch share programs.

14 Objectives of the Policy 1.Reduce any administrative or organizational impediments to the consideration of catch shares; 2.Inform and educate stakeholders of the different options and capabilities of catch share programs; and 3. Help organize collaborative efforts with interested Councils, states, communities, fishermen and other stakeholders on the design and implementation of catch shares to meet their specific needs. - This is a high-level policy guidance; not a rulemaking - Catch shares are NOT mandated / no specific numerical targets - Encourage broad consideration of catch shares; provide NOAA support

15 Specific Management Goals - All fishery management programs, including catch shares, should identify specific goals for management - Councils should develop explicit management goals such that a uniquely tailored catch share program can be designed (e.g., eliminate overfishing, race-to-fish or derby fishing behavior; bycatch reduction; improve socio-economic conditions for fishery participants and/or communities, etc.). Desired Program Features

16 Transferability: NOAA recommends Councils thoroughly assess the net benefits of allowing transferability of catch shares. - The choice of whether, when and to whom to allow transfers (by sale or lease) of catch shares is one of the most significant Council design options to be evaluated. - NOAA is committed to providing technical advice and support to the Councils and affected stakeholders in evaluating the transferability option. Desired Program Features

17 Review Process: NOAA recommends that Councils periodically review all catch share and non-catch share programs, including ensuring the specific goals chosen are measurable and tracked to gauge whether a program is in fact meeting its goals and objectives. - Performance metrics may include fishery stock status, impacts on fishing communities, dynamics of participation and entry into the fishery, prices, financial performance. Desired Program Features

18 Distinctions Among Sectors: The policy does not require any fishery or sector (e.g., commercial or recreational) to adopt catch shares. - Under MSA, Councils should consider the appropriateness of catch share programs and decide which, if any, sectors may benefit from their use. The MSA does not require catch shares to be adopted in any particular sector. - Councils and NOAA should evaluate the effects of catch shares on all sectors associated with a fishery. Desired Program Features

19 Fishing Community Sustainability: NOAA encourages Councils to take advantage of the special community provisions in the MSA to help assure sustainability of fishing communities, including the preservation of working fishery waterfronts and fishery infrastructure. - MSA section 303A provides unique community sustainability design options for LAPs. - NOAA will work collaboratively to establish programs to help communities design and invest in catch share fishery management options. Desired Program Features

20 Resource rent: NOAA will assist Councils if and when they determine that it is in the public interest to collect royalties in connection with the initial or any subsequent allocations of exclusive harvest privileges. - MSA section 303A(d) requires Councils to consider collection of royalty payments; receipts are deposited in a special fund to be expended only in the fisheries from which they came. Desired Program Features

21 NOAA Program Support  NOAA will provide leadership, technical advice and support for the consideration & use of catch share programs. This includes collaboration with its many federal, state and constituency partners to support catch share programs in the following four categories:

22 1. NOAA will reduce technical and administrative impediments to designing catch share programs. For example: - Assist Councils in evaluating catch share applicability - Resolve outstanding statutory questions on LAPs - Promote a common catch share infrastructure - Identify enforcement “best practices” - Create a model catch share program design process NOAA Program Support

23 2. NOAA will provide expertise and support to design/adopt catch share programs For example: - Prioritize funds for catch share programs - Help Councils design cost recovery programs - Identify staff/external experts to aid Councils & regions - Develop business decision tools for use by industry - Establish programs for fishermen’s/community groups - Promote programs for purchase of quota shares NOAA Program Support

24 3. NOAA will help and support stakeholders so that they can best participate in the design and implementation of catch share programs. For example: - Implement a long term education & outreach strategy - Create a catch shares information center/web portal - Conduct regional workshops and webinars - Provide access to other fishermen/expertise to share experiences & lessons learned NOAA Program Support

25 4. NOAA will coordinate data collection, research and performance monitoring of catch share programs. For example: - Establish a nationwide electronic reporting goal - Promote observer coverage standardization - Collect & publish catch share market data - Conduct catch share research program - Establish relevant performance measures NOAA Program Support

26 NOAA FY2011 Budget Request NOAA has requested an increase of $36M (to $54M total)  +12.4M for analysis, evaluation, development of new programs  +$24.2M for implementation of pending/recent catch share programs in NE, Mid-Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico, and Pacific Coast regions  Observing / monitoring at-sea and on-shore  Enforcement activities  Further implementation of electronic log books, dockside data collection and information management  Performance evaluation of catch share programs

27 Public Comment Period The draft NOAA Catch Share policy will be open for public comment until April 10, 2010 Public comments can be submitted electronically via the NMFS catch shares comment website: or ed to