All Rights Reserved, Duke Medicine 2007 Cardiovascular Data Analysis Model HL7 Balloting (September 22, 2011) Salvatore Mungal Duke Bioinformatics Shared.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Cardiology Special Interest Group Presentation to Technical Steering Committee September 12, 2005.
Advertisements

Tuberculosis & Cardiology Projects Anita Walden & Brian McCourt RCRIM Presentation HL7 WGM January 2007 (San Diego)
2006 European Interchange: RCRIM Meeting RCRIM Vocab & CDISC CT Initiative: Overview and Update Bron Kisler, CDISC Terminology Team Lead.
Presentation to RCRIM San Antonio, TX January 15, 2008 Meredith Nahm, M.S. CV/TB Global Data Standards Efforts Therapeutic Area Data Standards: Cardiovascular.
1 HL7 Jan 2010 Working Group MeetingsCTLAB Pharmacogenomics Update JOINT RCRIM and CG Session CTLAB Message Pharmacogenomics Results Overview.
Pediatric Data Standards SIG Overview Atlanta, GA September 20, 2007.
Tuberculosis & Cardiology Projects Anita Walden & Brian McCourt RCRIM Presentation HL7 WGM September 2007 (Atlanta)
BRIDG Overview Clinical Observation Interoperability March 18, 2008.
Domain Analysis Model Development Guidelines Clinical Interoperability Council Working Group.
Terminology for a Centralized Biobank Information Management System Mary-Beth M. Joshi, MPH 2, Aenoch J. Lynn 1, Anita C. Walden 3, and Helena J. Ellis.
National Cardiovascular Research Infrastructure (NCRI) Summary Slide Set May 5, 2010.
Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v.4: Updating a Cancer Research Standard Ann Setser 1, Ranjana Srivastava 2, Lawrence Wright 1,
Healthcare Link Initiatives: Bridging Clinical Research and Healthcare May 29, 2008 Bay Area Users’ Group Landen Bain CDISC Liaison to Healthcare.
5/10/2015DRAFT1 Public Health & Clinical LOINC - Feb 17 th 2012 CDC Vocabulary Team Office of Surveillance, Epidemiology and Laboratory Services (OSELS)
BRIDG Update Project Description/Scope As a catalyst for productive collaboration, CDISC brings together individuals spanning the healthcare continuum.
All Rights Reserved, Duke Medicine 2007 Duke Cancer Institute Involvement with Data Standards and Semantics (May 6, 2011) Salvatore Mungal Duke Bioinformatics.
William B Munier, MD, MBA, Director Center for Quality Improvement and Patient Safety Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality AHRQ Annual Conference.
Specimen-Related Classes in BRIDG BRIDG Overview for HL7 O&O WG Conference Call July 1, 2015 Wendy Ver Hoef NCI Contractor.
Riki Merrick, APHL Anna Orlova, PhD, PHDSC Lise Stevens, FDA Nikolay Lipskiy, MD, DrPH, MBA – CDC CSTE Conference June 5 th, 2012 The findings and conclusions.
1 Federal Health IT Ontology Project (HITOP) Group The Vision Toward Testing Ontology Tools in High Priority Health IT Applications October 5, 2005.
Overview and feed-back from CDISC European Interchange 2008 (From April 21 st to 25 th, COPENHAGEN) Groupe des Utilisateurs Francophones de CDISC Bagneux.
 BRIDG R3.0.2 was released in August 2010  The BRIDG Model passed the initial ISO Joint Initiative Council ballot as a Draft International Standard (DIS)
NCICB Jamboree February 25, 2005 NCICB Clinical Trials Modeling Activities.
National Cancer Institute Common Data Element (CDE) Activities and Plans September 8, 2015 Dianne M. Reeves Denise Warzel Center for Biomedical Informatics.
Second Annual Japan CDISC Group (JCG) Meeting 28 January 2004 Julie Evans Director, Technical Services.
Michael F. Huerta, Ph.D. Associate Director for Program Development National Library of Medicine, NIH BD2K CDE Webinar – September 8, 2015 Common Data.
1 RCRIM Vocab-BRIDG Session Wednesday, Session Q2 19 September 2007.
Proposed S&I Public Health Reporting Initiative 1 Challenge There is a lack of harmonized activities to enable electronic data exchange between clinical.
Proposed S&I Public Health Reporting Initiative Proposed Dissemination and Outreach Strategy for Public Comments & Timeline.
EHR-S Functional Requirements IG: Lab Results Interface Laboratory Initiative.
RCRIM Off-cycle Meeting Barbara Tardiff, Randy Levin and Ed Tripp, co-chairs.
Health Domain Value Proposition Briefing. health SCOPE Support information sharing and promote interoperability between healthcare organizations including.
Dave Iberson-Hurst CDISC VP Technical Strategy
HL7 Child Health Work Group Update HL7 EHR-Public Health Task Force Andy Spooner, MD CMIO, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital & Medical Center Co Chair, HL7.
Briefing: HL7 Working Group Meeting Update for the VCDE Community Dianne M. Reeves Associate Director, Biomedical Data Standards NCI CBIIT VCDE Meeting.
CaBIG ® VCDE Workspace Tactics thru June 14, 2010: How working groups fit together, and other activities Brian Davis April 1, 2010 VCDE WS Teleconference.
Clinical Data Interchange Standards Consortium (CDISC) uses NCIt for its Study Data Tabulation Model (SDTM) and other global data standards for medical.
Networking and Health Information Exchange Unit 5b Health Data Interchange Standards.
Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 1.0 Fall Networking and Health Information Exchange Unit 3b National and International Standards Developing.
Public Health Data Standards Consortium
© 2012 Health Level Seven ® International. All Rights Reserved. HL7 and Health Level Seven are registered trademarks of Health Level Seven International.
This material was developed by Duke University, funded by the Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information.
Interchange vs Interoperability Main Entry: in·ter·op·er·a·bil·i·ty : ability of a system... to use the parts or equipment of another system Source: Merriam-Webster.
FDA Standards Development and Implementation Randy Levin, M.D. Director, Office of Information Management Center for Drug Evaluation and Research Food.
1 Dianne Reeves VCDE Presentation December 15, 2011 NCI caBIG® CRF Standards use in NCI CDMS MediData Rave.
Healthcare Information Standards Panel 2007,2008, and Beyond John D. Halamka MD Chair, HITSP.
CDISC – 17/12/2012 Carine Javierre Nathalie SABIN.
Protégé 3.4 Plug-in for Editing and Maintaining the NCI Thesaurus Protégé Conference June 23, 2009 Amsterdam Sherri de Coronado, Gilberto Fragoso.
Proposed S&I Public Health Reporting Initiative 1 Challenge -There is a lack of harmonized activities to enable electronic data exchange between clinical.
Defining & Managing Data Elements and Permissible Values or CDISC Terminology - A Use Case BACUN Barrie Nelson.
BRIDG Update May HL7 Working Group Meeting 5 May
Sherri de Coronado Enterprise Vocabulary Services NCI Center for Bioinformatics and Information Technology March 11, 2009 A Terminology.
BRIDG Update RCRIM Working Group Meeting Rio de Janeiro 17 May 2010 Julie Evans Senior Director, Technical Services, CDISC Wendy Ver Hoef Senior Analyst,
HL7-NLM Project Vocabulary Component Member and Contractors Update Orlando, Jan 2005.
BRIDG Overview and Ballot Results ISO TC 215 Rio de Janeiro 11 May 2010 Julie Evans Senior Director, Technical Services, CDISC Wendy Ver Hoef Senior Analyst,
BiomedGT Wiki support for CTCAE update/ Creating a pre-coordinated OWL file Sherri de Coronado NCI CBIIT/ EVS May 1, 2009.
Submission Standards: The Big Picture Gary G. Walker Associate Director, Programming Standards, Global Data Solutions, Global Data Management.
Dave Iberson-Hurst CDISC VP Technical Strategy
Structured Data Capture (SDC)
SNOMED CT® in Surgical Pathology and Cancer Registry Work
Clinical Interoperability Council Working Group (CIC)
Federal Health IT Ontology Project (HITOP) Group
Rob Savage, EDS Kimiko Gosney, Arizona Department of Health Services
Networking and Health Information Exchange
Structured Data Capture (SDC)
Sandy Jones, Public Health Advisor
Clinical Observation Interoperability March 18, 2008
API 17H TASK GROUP January 15, 2013.
Carolina Mendoza-Puccini, MD
API 17H TASK GROUP June 26, 2013.
Presentation transcript:

All Rights Reserved, Duke Medicine 2007 Cardiovascular Data Analysis Model HL7 Balloting (September 22, 2011) Salvatore Mungal Duke Bioinformatics Shared Resources (DBSR) Duke Cancer Institute (DCI)

All Rights Reserved, Duke Medicine 2007 Agenda Background: –Stakeholders –Harmonization of the data elements HL7 Balloting –Converting to the RIM (RIM mapping) –HL7 Balloting Future Plans –Including CDISC terminology –Update model from balloting comments –Loading the CV DAM to caDSR Acknowledgements Questions

All Rights Reserved, Duke Medicine 2007 Stakeholders Duke Clinical Research Institute (DCRI) American College of Cardiology (ACC) Clinical Data Interchange Standard Consortium (CDISC) Federal Drug Agency (FDA) NCI CBIIT (EVS and caDSR) HL7 (RIM) v3 messaging - (CCHIT certification for EHR)

All Rights Reserved, Duke Medicine 2007 Harmonization of Data Elements Harmonization of the Data elements was coordinated by the ACC and DCRI via a governance group that consisted of practicing cardiologists Data was collected from all over the USA DCRI also has international clinical studies The focus of the harmonization effort was from the following registries (from 23,000 hospitals across the country) using >10.5 million records (data several years old): –Cath PCI (CAD) –Action(STEMI) –ICD (Devices) –ACC top 100 data elements

All Rights Reserved, Duke Medicine 2007 High Level View of the CV DAM

All Rights Reserved, Duke Medicine 2007 RIM Mapping Published with permission

All Rights Reserved, Duke Medicine 2007 HL7 Balloting Story Board/Use Case(s) Activity Diagram Data elements EA file Class Models Description of Project May 2009 Ballot site ycle_id=520&ballot_voter_id= ycle_id=520&ballot_voter_id=5082 Published with permission

All Rights Reserved, Duke Medicine 2007 HL7 Balloting We needed 27 affirmative votes to pass ballot and we received 35 We received very constructive comments from several voters. At the HL7 working group meeting in San Diego, the team reviewed the comments and determined they would add considerable value to the model. Our team in collaboration with members of the HL7 Clinical Interoperability Council, decided to incorporate the revisions into an updated version of the DAM and submit it as CV DAM version V2.1 for review later this fall. A follow-up review or ballot cycle is customary when structural changes to the model and/or changes to the clinical content of the model are made. This cycle will give all stakeholders an opportunity to review and accept the updates before the model is published as an informative standard. Published with permission

All Rights Reserved, Duke Medicine 2007 Future Plans CDISC terminology Loading the CV DAM to caDSR –Currently working on Semantics Creation of a Cardiovascular ontology Published with permission

All Rights Reserved, Duke Medicine 2007 Acknowledgements CDISC DBSR William Barry, Director Chris Tolk, Director Terminologies ACC Dana Pinchotti Arsalan Khalid Ganesan Srinivasan DCRI Brian McCourt, Assoc. Director David Kong Rebecca Wilgus HL7 (CIC) Mead Walker Dianne Reeves Anita Walden NCI CBIIT Sherri De Coronado, Director Semantic Services Margaret Haber Dianne Reeves

All Rights Reserved, Duke Medicine 2007 Q & A