Joerg Tiede, Assembly of State Conferences/Committee A Liaison.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
UNLV FACULTY SENATE TENURE & PROMOTION FORUM Oct. 2, 2012 Oct. 2, 2012 Thanks to the Past Chairs: Dr. John Filler Dr. Ceci Maldonado Dr. Nasser Daneshvary.
Advertisements

Faculty Grievance Committee Training October 26, 2012.
DIFFERENCES BETWEEN Old and New A & P Grievance Procedures.
Faculty Forum: March 5, 2008 Shall the Collected Rules and Regulations be revised to adopt the revised Pilot Faculty Grievance Procedure recommended by.
Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2007 Human Resources Administration in Education Chapter 7: Performance Evaluation Ronald W. Rebore This multimedia product and.
Procedures Tenured v. Non-Tenured Tenured Have a property interest in their continued employment. Property interest is a substantive right and procedural.
HEARINGS COMMITTEE 6 elected members Must have permanent tenure when elected.
PEER REVIEW OF TEACHING WORKSHOP SUSAN S. WILLIAMS VICE DEAN ALAN KALISH DIRECTOR, UNIVERSITY CENTER FOR ADVANCEMENT OF TEACHING ASC CHAIRS — JAN. 30,
Jenn Nichols, AAUP This PowerPoint Presentation was initially designed by long-time AAUP activist Glenn Howze ( ) Faculty Governance: Definitions.
What to do when the learning environment is jeopardized?
Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2008 Chapter 10 Tenure, Dismissal, and Due Process This multimedia product and its contents are protected under copyright law.
Chapter 10: Recruitment, Tenure, Dismissal and Due Process EDAD 859
Using Your Faculty Manual …Talking Manual With Your Chair - Dr. Rasoul Saneifard.
What to do when the learning environment is jeopardized?
The Adjudication Process Virginia Department of Health Professions New Board Member Training October 2008.
The Division of Student Affairs University of North Carolina Wilmington.
“Student Due Process” School Administrators of South Dakota April 7, 2015.
Current Legal Issues in Risk Management February 16, 2011 Presented by: Phillip L. Hartley Harben, Hartley & Hawkins, LLP.
New Academic Administrators Workshop August 8, 2013 FACULTY EVALUATION ANNUAL AND COMPREHENSIVE REVIEWS.
2015 Workshop Permanent Status and Promotion Policy and Procedures Overview.
FACULTY EVALUATION ANNUAL AND COMPREHENSIVE REVIEWS Janet Dukerich, Senior Vice Provost for Faculty Affairs August 18, 2014.
B. Proposed Revisions to UT HOP 3.16 Threatened Faculty Retrenchment (D )— Janet Staiger (professor, radio- television-film and committee chair).
Faculty Evaluation Policy Why: – Needed to comply with SACS accreditation guidelines – Must comply with UL System requirements – Needed to improve the.
Countywide Job Search and Voluntary Demotion RTW Protocol Approach Chief Executive Office Risk Management Return To Work Unit.
Adapted from a presentation by Mark Lieu Academic Senate for California Community Colleges - Leadership Institute 2006 Academic Senate for California Community.
Understanding decision making - Prosecuting complaints Karen Mobbs Director of Proceedings Health Care Complaints Commission Patrick Griffin Barrister.
The Education Act 2002 & School Staffing Regulations 2009 (as amended 2012 and 2013) Responsibilities for Governors in respect of Staff.
Salome Heyward & Associates Conference Services Clinicals, Internships Special Admissions Programs April , 2014 Presented by Salome Heyward, JD.
1 Effective Senates: The Key Ingredients of Collegial Consultation Angelica Bangle, Chris Hill, Wheeler North, Beverly Reilly, Cheryl Stewart.
Promotion and Tenure for Chairs, Heads, & Administrators: Twin Cities Arlene Carney Vice Provost for Faculty & Academic Affairs.
Duke Ellington “A problem is a chance for you to do your best.”
EMPOWERING LOCAL SENATES Kevin Bontenbal, South Representative Stephanie Dumont, Area D Representative.
School Law and the Public Schools: A Practical Guide for Educational Leaders, 5e © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 10 Tenure,
EDAD 520 Legal and Ethical Foundations of Educational Leadership.
College of Medicine Faculty Affairs Roundtable Faculty Letters of Non-Renewal August 2013.
1 Information session regarding tenure at McGill, 2007: general considerations Prof. Anthony C. Masi Provost Leacock 232, Robert Vogel Council Room 24.
Agenda Review of Faculty Tracks Mentoring Committees Third- and Sixth-Year Reviews Tenure Statistics Pre- and Post- “Artman”
Legal Issues in Administrator Evaluation, Dismissal and Nonrenewal Nancy Hungerford, The Hungerford Law Firm Dec. 3, 2015.
Welcome to LS 516, Unit Four Town Hall April 15, 2012 Are there any questions? Please remember that Kaplan units end at midnight on Tuesdays and new units.
Presented by: Theresa Elliot-Cheslek AVP & CHRO Terry Ryan Asst. Attorney General, AGO Dealing with Faculty Personnel Issues Revised October 2015.
CROSS TRAINING PRESENTATION OFFICE OF JUDICIAL AFFAIRS Presented By: K.R. Kennedy Associate Vice President Student Development DAYTONA STATE COLLEGE.
Purificación Martínez President, NC AAUP UNC Faculty Assembly January 21, 2011.
Managing Long-Term Leave of Absence Chief Executive Office Risk Management Return To Work Unit.
DOM Promotions Workshop Ashita Tolwani, M.D. Chair, DOM Appointment, Promotions and Tenure Committee Professor of Medicine, Division of Nephrology November.
Information from 2/11 meeting The Ad Hoc Budget Committee.
An Introduction to the ABCD For the Casualty Actuarial Society Course on Professionalism Copyright © 2015 American of Academy of Actuaries. All Rights.
Excellent Public Schools Act of 2013 Instructional Collaboration Day II January 3, 2014.
Resolution on selection, duties, and term of Department Heads/Chairs Steering Committee Resolution Information Item.
Safeguarding the public: Through ensuring Fitness to Practise.
1 Rose Hermodson Assistant Commissioner Minnesota Department of Education December 13, 2011 Teacher Evaluation Components in Legislation.
SEPRC Special Education Program Recommendation Committee
NTTF Rights and Responsibilities
Dutchess Community College Middle States Self-Study 2015
Dealing with Faculty Personnel Issues
NSHE proposed CODE Revisions
Evaluation of Tenure-Accruing Faculty
2017 Workshop Tenure and Promotion Policy and Procedures Overview
Topics How are things?  Concerns, questions, comments?
We’re going to follow the chronological order of the process.
Tenure Policies Q & A Session
Faculty Performance Reviews at MSU
The Departmental Performance Review (PR)
2016 Tenure and Promotion Workshop Policy and Procedures Overview
Resolution on selection, duties and term of Department Heads/Chairs
10+1 Governance and Union Issues: Similarities and Differences
Promotion and Tenure Workshop Fall Vice Provost for Faculty Affairs
Due Process and the Peace Officer Bill of Rights
Faculty Evaluation Policy
Faculty Governance at NU
Presentation transcript:

Joerg Tiede, Assembly of State Conferences/Committee A Liaison

 “After the expiration of a probationary period, teachers or investigators should have permanent of continuous tenure, and their service should be terminated only for adequate cause, except in the case of retirement for age, or under extraordinary circumstances because of financial exigencies.”

 Probationary or non-tenure-track faculty can be non-reappointed or non-renewed. There are standards of notice for non-reappointment; after two or more years of service, twelve- months notice are required.  Tenured and untenured faculty members can be dismissed for cause. This requires a hearing before a faculty committee.

 Tenured and untenured faculty members can be terminated due to financial exigency, program discontinuance, and physical.  Termination for medical inability to perform duties was recently withdrawn due to ADA violations.  Mandatory retirement for age is not illegal.

 Most important: Recommended Institutional Regulations on Academic Freedom and Tenure. It contains model language to include in faculty handbooks. Cited as RIR in the following:  1958 Statement on Procedural Standards in Faculty Dismissal Proceedings  Statement of Procedural Standards in the Renewal or Nonrenewal of Faculty Appointments

 Standards for Notice of Non-reappointment  On Institutional Problems Resulting from Financial Exigency: Some Operating Guidelines

 a. Not later than March 1 of the first academic year of service, if the appointment expires at the end of that year; or, if a one-year appointment terminates during an academic year, at least three months in advance of its termination;  b. Not later than December 15 of the second academic year of service, if the appointment expires at the end of that year; or, if an initial two-year appointment terminates during an academic year, at least six months in advance of its termination;

 c. At least twelve months before the expiration of an appointment after two or more years in the institution.

 Faculty who are not reappointed should have the right to request written reasons for their non-reappointment.  Faculty who allege that their non- reappointment was based significantly on considerations violating the faculty member’s academic freedom or on discrimination should have the right to make the case to the hearing committee that this was the basis of the decision. The burden of proof is on the faculty member to establish the case.

 Faculty who allege that their non- reappointment was based on inadequate consideration of the information provided should have a right to have their case reviewed by a review committee. If the review committee finds that inadequate consideration was given, the case should be returned for review to the tenure committee.

 “Adequate cause for dismissal will be related, directly and substantially, to the fitness of faculty members in their professional capacities as teachers or researchers.” (RIR)  It should “be restricted to (a) demonstrated incompetence or dishonesty in teaching or research, (b) substantial and manifest neglect of duty, and © personal conduct which substantially impairs the individual’s fulfillment of his institutional responsibilities.” 1973 AAUP/AAC&U Commission on Academic Tenure in Higher Education

 The essential elements of a dismissal proceeding, as set forth in AAUP documents, are:  An adequate statement of charges,\  The opportunity for a pre-termination hearing before an elected body of peers,  The burden of proving the charges resting on the administration, based on clear and convincing evidence in the record considered as a whole,  The right to present evidence and cross examine witnesses,

 A decision based on the record of the hearing, and  The right to appeal to the governing board.

 “Pending a final decision by the hearing committee, the faculty member will be suspended, or assigned to other duties in lieu of suspension, only if immediate harm to the faculty member or others is threatened by continuance. Before suspending a faculty member, pending an ultimate determination of the faculty member’s status through the institution’s hearing procedures, the administration will consult with the …

 …Faculty Committee on Academic Freedom and Tenure [or whatever other title it may have] concerning the propriety, the length, and the other conditions of the suspension. A suspension that is intended to be final is a dismissal, and will be treated as such. Salary will continue during the period of the suspension.” (RIR)

 Major sanctions short of dismissal (such as suspension) require the same procedural safeguards as dismissal for cause.  Minor sanctions (such as a letter of reprimand) can be imposed by the administration but can be appealed to the grievance committee.

 Definition: “an imminent financial crisis that threatens the survival of the institution as a whole and that cannot be alleviated by less drastic means.” (RIR)  So, financial exigency of programs, departments, or schools within an institution are not accepted as bona fide by the AAUP. Neither are minor financial shortfalls.

 “At institutions experiencing major threats to their continued financial support, the faculty should be informed as early and specifically as possible of significant impending financial difficulties.” (The Role of the Faculty in Budgetary and Salary Matters)  “[T]here should be a faculty body that participates in the decision that a condition of financial exigency exists or is imminent, and that all feasible alternatives to termination of appointments have been pursued.” (RIR)

 Given a decision to reduce the overall academic program, it should then become the primary responsibility of the faculty to determine where within the program reductions should be made. (On Institutional Problems Resulting from Financial Exigency)  The term “primary responsibility” is defined in the 1966 Statement on Government of Colleges and Universities to mean that in such matters…

 …”the power of review or final decision lodged in the governing board or delegated by it to the president should be exercised adversely only in exceptional circumstances, and for reasons communicated to the faculty.”

 “The decision to discontinue formally a program or department of instruction will be based essentially upon education considerations, as determined primarily by the faculty as a whole or an appropriate committee thereof.” (RIR)  “’Educational considerations’ do not include cyclical or temporary variations in enrollment. They must reflect long-range judgments that the educational mission of the institution as a whole will be enhanced by the discontinuance.” (RIR)

 “[T]he institution will make every effort to place the faculty member concerned in another suitable position. If placement in another position would be facilitated by a reasonable period of training, financial and other support for such training will be proffered.” (RIR)  “In all cases of termination of appointment because of financial exigency, the place of the faculty member concerned will not be filled by a replacement within a period of three years, unless the released faculty member has been offered reinstatement and a reasonable time in which to accept or decline it.” (RIR)

 Tenure, and thus academic freedom, is only as secure at an institution as the provisions in the faculty handbook that protects it.  The AAUP has established definitions and procedural standards to secure tenure – many of them jointly with other educational organizations, such as AAC&U.  Thank you!