© 2014 Djaghe LLC The New WTO Government Procurement Agreement – Its Impact on World Procurement Markets The George Washington University Law School 13.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Session 6 : SCOPE AND COVERAGE OF GOVERNMENT PROCUREMENT RULES January 2003, Dar es Salaam Vesile Kulaçoglu, WTO Secretariat.
Advertisements

December 2005 EuP Directive : A Framework for setting eco-design requirements for energy-using products European Commission.
General introduction to Community legislation in the field of Public procurement the classical sector – Directive 2004/18/EC Mr. Jari Kallio DG MARKT Directorate.
An Overview of China ’ s Industrial Statistical Methodology Xiaohui WANG Department of Industrial and Transport Statistics National Bureau of Statistics,
Context In the EU CSR strategy from October 2011 „A renewed EU strategy for Corporate Social Responsibility“, the EU Commission announced to „present.
BRAZIL AND THE WTO GOVERNMENT PROCUREMENT AGREEMENT CHALLENGES FOR GPA-ACCEDING NATIONS GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY LAW SCHOOL COLLOQUIUM 4 November 2014,
© OECD A joint initiative of the OECD and the European Union, principally financed by the EU CONCESSIONS IN TURKISH LAW İbrahim BAYLAN Legal Adviser Public.
Public Procurement in Albania in the framework of recent reforms PUBLIC PROCUREMENT AGENCY 1.
1 The WTO Agreement on Government Procurement (GPA): overview and the accession process* Robert Anderson Counsellor, WTO Secretariat (Team leader for government.
© 2014 Djaghe LLC BRICS AND THE WTO GOVERNMENT PROCUREMENT AGREEMENT George Washington University Law School Colloquium November 4, 2014 Jean Heilman Grier.
Regional Trade Agreements and EU Trade Policy CETA and Public Procurement Prof. Dr. Marc Bungenberg, LL.M. University of Siegen / visiting Professor University.
Taiwan’s Accession to the Agreement on Government Procurement Jen-Ni Yang Deputy Chief Representative Office of Trade Negotiations.
« The voice of the European Service Industries for International Trade Negotiations in Services » The New Economic and Free Trade Agreement between the.
European Investment Bank Group
ICC Ukraine Ukrainian National Committee of the International Chamber of Commerce.
EFTA Seminar on the EEA Agreement – 4 September 2014 How EU law becomes EEA law Tore Grønningæter Senior Information and Communication Officer EFTA Secretariat.
Procurement Lobbying Legislation New York State Bar Association December 9, 2005 (revised January 4, 2006)
The New Rules: Flexibility, Legality, Accountability Reform of the European Public Procurement Rules Legal and Practical Implications 15 May 2014 Bucharest.
Public Procurement in The Rep. of Maldives
1 ITU-WTO WORKSHOP ON TELECOM & ICT REGULATION AGREEMENT ON GOVERNMENT PROCUREMENT (GPA) Roger Kampf WTO Secretariat Geneva, 2 December 2004.
1 “Summary results of the comparative survey on the transposition of Directive 2009/81” Col. Paolo LIZZA IT MoD SGD-DNA Rome, 12 july 2011”
0 - Press Conference - Introduction by Mr. Willy Bosmans, President of Eurogas 19 May, 2005, Hotel Hilton Vienna.
Copyright © 2008 by West Legal Studies in Business A Division of Thomson Learning Chapter 7 The Legal Environment of International Trade Twomey Jennings.
Essentials Of Business Law Chapter 5 Administrative Law McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2007 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
CTPL & the University of Ottawa CETA Negotiations simulation February 2, 2011.
Public Procurement in the Republic of Cyprus By: Theodosis Tsiolas Public Procurement Directorate Treasury of the Republic.
Sustainable Procurement and Community Benefits Getting ready for Procurement Reform in Scotland Jennifer Marshall.
Legal Environment for Doing Business in China
The business environment in the Czech Republic Viktorie Klímová
Our Profile Fortsakis, Diakopoulos, Mylonogiannis & Associates ("FDMA") is a leading Greek law firm, which provides legal services covering all areas.
Agreement on Government Procurement -Experience in Japan- March 2, 2015 Madoka Shimada Nishimura & Asahi 1.
FIDIC MDB Conference Brussels June 2012 © European Bank for Reconstruction and Development 2010 | EBRD Procurement considerations when financing.
© Cengage Learning – Purchasing & Supply Chain Management 4 ed ( ) Practice 19. Public procurement and EC directives.
The Voice of the Industry Water and Wastewater Equipment Manufacturers Association.
EuropeAid 1 Delegation Agreements: 2011 templates “Regards Croisés” on Aid Effectiveness Practitioners’ Network for European Development Cooperation -
A project implemented by the HTSPE consortium This project is funded by the European Union SECURITY AND CITIZENS SECURITY AND CITIZENSHIP CONSUMER
CHILEAN SCENARIO ON FREE TRADE OR ASSOCIATION AGREEMENTS 1.FTA CURRENTLY IN EFFECT: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (negotiations began in The FTA became.
European Commission –Cabinet of Commissioner Andris Piebalgs EU Energy Efficiency Initiatives Stina Soewarta, European Commission Prague, June 2, 2005.
« The voice of the European Service Industries for International Trade Negotiations in Services » The New Economic and Free Trade Agreement between the.
Legal Framework Analysis for Municipal Financing Brad Johnson President Resource Mobilization Advisors
Modernisation of EU public procurement policy Proposal of the Commission Directive on public procurement (replacing Directive 2004/18/EC) NB: The information.
Geoffrey Hale Political Science 3170 University of Lethbridge November 16, 2010.
1. Main types: 1. Formal International and Supranational Organizations -WTO: the world trade agreements provide for binding obligations of the Member.
Review of national implementing legislation in the GPA accession process and post- accession monitoring: current practice and future developments Anna.
Chapter 01 An Introduction to Dynamic Business Law McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
GPA INITIAL OFFER STEP BY STEP: HOW TO USE EXISTING PARTIES’ SCHEDULES AS GUIDANCE & RECIPROCITY Anna Caroline Müller Legal Affairs Officer, WTO Secretariat.
PPP Legal & Regulatory Framework. PPP Policy In July 2008 GOK approved the PPP policy directive through which: PPPs are identified as a method for investing.
Legal Framework and Structure. Public Internal Financial Control Strategy ( ) focuses on three activities Institution of a Centralized Harmonization.
1 ARMENIA Public Procurement Reforms Seventh Regional Public Procurement Forum May , 2011 Mr. Karen Brutyan, PhD Head of the PIFC and PP methodology.
UNCTAD 1 CHECKLIST OF ISSUES FOR THE NEGOTIATIONS ON TRADE IN SERVICES UNCTAD, Commercial Diplomacy Programme.
EMTA General Meeting Prague May 2012 Round table on PSO Regulation 1370/2007 “Two years after enforcement, where are we? How efficient is the regulation?
Johannes S. Schnitzer, EBRD Consultant 27 May 2015, Kiev, Ukraine Status of Ukraine’s accession to the WTO GPA PUBLIC PROCUREMENT REFORM IN UKRAINE: REVIEW.
The institutional system of public procurement in Hungary Dr. András Nagy Public Procurement Council Hungary.
© OECD A joint initiative of the OECD and the European Union, principally financed by the EU THE EU UTILITIES PROCUREMENT REGIME A COMPARISON WITH THE.
The World Bank General Legal Framework for PPPs Katja Kerschbaumer.
Georg Roebling European Commission DG Trade, 14 June 2005 Government Procurement - a regional and international perspective.
1 The 7 th Annual International Industrial Organization Conference April 3-5, 2009 Boston, MA, USA Measuring the Barriers to Trade and Investment in Telecoms.
Government Procurement Negotiations NORBERTO IANELLI LAURA ROJAS Trade, Integration and Hemispheric Issues Division BID.
Bouchemla Lanouar & Associés - BL&A In association with the Algerian law firm of Me Fatima-Zohra Bouchemla 1 Algeria - UK Investment Forum El Aurrassi.
March 2013 CPO Training Jan Hall, Contracts Manager.
Diplomatic Academy of Vienna
Marek Stavinoha Legal officer DG MOVE A4 European Commission
Russia for investors: the key points 2016.
European Union Delegation to Iceland
Draft Law of Ukraine “On Amendment of the Law of Ukraine “On Accounting and Financial Statements in Ukraine” (Improvement of Some Provisions)”
PRESENTATION OF MONTENEGRO
Jean Heilman Grier Principal Trade Consultant Djaghe, LLC
Andrea Sundstrand Associate Professor
Christopher R. Yukins Lynn David Research Professor in
The EU-US Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP)
Presentation transcript:

© 2014 Djaghe LLC The New WTO Government Procurement Agreement – Its Impact on World Procurement Markets The George Washington University Law School 13 May 2014 Jean Heilman Grier Principal Consultant on Trade Djaghe, LLC

© 2014 Djaghe LLC Introduction  Work programs  Arbitration process  Expansion of market access under revised GPA

© 2014 Djaghe LLC Work Programs  Work Program on Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (SMEs)  Work Program on the Collection and Reporting of Statistical Data  Work Program on Sustainable Procurement  Work Program on Exclusions and Restrictions in Parties’ Annexes  Work Program on Safety Standards in International Procurement  For more information, see Work Programs for Unfinished Business in Revision of GPA, Trade Blog: Programs for Unfinished Business in Revision of GPAhttp://trade.djaghe.com

© 2014 Djaghe LLC GPA Arbitration Process  New approach to facilitate resolution of disputes over whether a Party should be allowed to withdraw an entity from coverage  Will be implemented after WTO Committee on Government Procurement adopts:  Arbitration procedures  Indicative criteria that demonstrate effective elimination of government control or influence over an entity's covered procurement  For more information, see Need to Initiate GPA Arbitration Process, Trade blog: to Initiate GPA Arbitration Processhttp://trade.djaghe.com

© 2014 Djaghe LLC Covered Procurement under Revised GPA  Incorporates concept of covered procurement to simplify references to procurement covered under the GPA  Means procurement for government purposes:  Of goods and services as specified in each Party’s annexes to Appendix I and not for commercial sale or resale  By any contractual means, including purchase, lease, and rental or hire purchase, with or without option to buy  For which the value is estimated to equal or exceed relevant threshold  By a procuring entity (an entity covered under Party’s annexes)  Not otherwise excluded from coverage.

© 2014 Djaghe LLC Thresholds under GPA  Annex 1: Central government goods and services  130,000 SDRs (before some reductions in revised GPA)  Annex 2: Sub-central government goods and services  Most Parties: 200,000 SDRs  Canada and United States: 355,000 SDRs; Israel: 250,000 SDRs  Annex 3: Other entities goods and services  Most Parties: 400,000 SDRs  U.S.: $250,000 threshold for federal government enterprises  Construction services procured by all entities  Most Parties: 5,000,000 SDRs  Japan & Korea: 15,000,000 (for Annexes 2 & 3); Israel: 8,500,000 SDRs

© 2014 Djaghe LLC Thresholds Reduced under Revised GPA  Israel: Will lower central government threshold for construction services from 8,500,000 SDRs to 5,000,000 SDRs in 2019  Japan and Netherlands with Respect to Aruba: Reduced central government threshold for goods and services from 130,000 SDRs to 100,000 SDRs  Aruba: Reduced central government threshold for construction services from 5,000,000 to 4,000,000 SDRs  Korea: Reduced Annex 3 threshold for goods and services from 450,000 SDRs to 400,000 SDRs

© 2014 Djaghe LLC Annex 1: Central Government Scope of Coverage  Annex 1 coverage based on:  Positive lists (most Parties specify entities covered)  Description/category coverage  Executive/administrative entities: Parties cover all or most central government entities  Judiciary: Several Parties cover courts  Legislature: Several Parties cover legislatures  Coverage varies based on governmental system

© 2014 Djaghe LLC Expansion of Central Government Coverage under Revised GPA  European Union: Added 1 EU-wide entity - the European External Action Service plus Member State entities  Hong Kong China: Added Chief Executive’s Office and Secretariat, Commissioner on Interception of Communications and Surveillance  Israel: Added 5 central government entities, including Small and Medium Business Agency; and removed several product exclusions for Ministry of Health  Korea: Added 8 entities, including National Emergency Management Agency, Defense Acquisition Program Administration, Korea Communications Commission and Fair Trade Commission  Liechtenstein: Added courts and Parliament  Aruba: Added 9 entities, including Parliament  Switzerland: Added federal judicial and criminal prosecution authorities, including Federal Supreme Court, Federal Criminal Court, Federal Administrative Court, Federal Patent Court and the Office of the Attorney General; and 3 federal assembly entities: National Council, Council of States and Parliamentary Services  United States: Added 11 federal entities, including Social Security Administration, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and Millennium Challenge Corporation; covered Transportation Security Administration

© 2014 Djaghe LLC EU “Catch-all” Central Government Coverage for Member States  Offers comprehensive “catch all” coverage of all central government entities of its Member States – both existing and future entities  Only provides comprehensive coverage to 5 Parties: Iceland, Aruba, Norway, Liechtenstein and Switzerland  Gives Israel 2 nd best coverage: access to all listed entities (not future entities)  Provides 3 rd level of coverage (all listed entities, except those marked by asterisk) to 8 Parties, including Armenia and U.S.  Refined its coverage with 4 th category for U.S., Japan and Chinese Taipei: access to entities marked by double asterisk

© 2014 Djaghe LLC Annex 2: Approaches to Sub-central Coverage  All GPA Parties cover their sub-central entities  Two approaches to coverage of sub-central entities  Positive list of specific entities, used by Armenia, Canada, Israel, Japan, Korea, Switzerland and United States  Coverage by description or definition (may include partial list of entities), includes EU, Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway  Type of coverage depends on governmental structure  Centralized procurement systems, such as EU  Federal systems such as U.S.

© 2014 Djaghe LLC Expansion of Sub-central Coverage under Revised GPA  Canada: Extended to all Parties (except Iceland &Liechtenstein) coverage of provinces & territories that it had provided to U.S. in 2010  Japan: Added 7 designated cities: Saitama-shi, Shizuoka-shi, Sakai- shi, Niigata-shi, Hamamatsu-shi, Okayama-shi and Sagamihara-shi  Korea: Added Ulsan Metropolitan City and local governments entities in 3 metropolitan cities: Seoul (25 local governments); Busan (16 local governments); and Incheon (10 local governments)  Chinese Taipei: Added bureau-Level administrative units of Kaohsiung County Government, which merged with Kaohsiung City Government

© 2014 Djaghe LLC Annex 3: Coverage of Government Enterprises and Other Entities  Coverage includes utilities, government enterprises, state-owned entities, state-invested entities and other entities where government has control or influence  Coverage of specific entities  Canada, Hong Kong China, Israel, Japan, Korea, Netherlands with respect to Aruba, Singapore, Chinese Taipei and the United States  Coverage by sectors or general categories  Armenia, EU, Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway and Switzerland  Sectors covered include electricity, urban transport, airports, ports and water

© 2014 Djaghe LLC Expansion of Annex 3 Coverage under Revised GPA  Israel: Added 9 government enterprises, including Environmental Services Co. and three development companies  Japan: Added Japan Alcohol Corporation  Korea: Added Korean Rail Network Authority  Chinese Taipei: Added National Taiwan College of Physical Education  United States: Added financing of telecommunications projects by Rural Utilities Service (waived “buy American” requirement)  Aruba: Withdrew all Annex 3 entities due to privatization

© 2014 Djaghe LLC Annex 4: Expansion of Goods Coverage under Revised GPA  Annex 4 (Goods Annex) added  Israel: Removed exclusions for several goods procured by its Ministry of Health  United States: Removed exclusion of Transportation Security Administration, except for textile and apparel goods

© 2014 Djaghe LLC Annex 5: Coverage of Services  Positive list of services and construction services  Access provided only to listed services  Used by all Parties except United States  Negative list of services and construction services  Provides access to all services except those listed  Covers new services that are created  Only used by the United States

© 2014 Djaghe LLC Expansion of Services Coverage under Revised GPA  Telecommunication services: EU, Hong Kong China, Iceland, Aruba, Liechtenstein, Norway and Switzerland expanded partial coverage of telecommunications services to all of sector  Hong Kong China: Added 5 services categories  Israel: Added 6 categories of services, including commercial courier services, financial services (insurance, banking & investment) and armored car services.  Japan: Added 18 service categories, but only for its central government entities; New services include management consulting services and packaging services  Korea: Added 5 service categories, including computer services  Aruba: Added 12 categories of services, including all services related to management consulting, accounting, auditing and bookkeeping service and market research and opinion polling services  Singapore: Added executive search services.  Switzerland: Added more than 10 services, including certain legal advisory and taxation services

© 2014 Djaghe LLC Annex 6: Coverage of Construction Services  Positive list of construction services  Access provided only to listed services  Used by all Parties except United States  Negative list: U.S. uses  Parties cover all construction services, except for U.S. exclusion of dredging

© 2014 Djaghe LLC Expansion of Construction Services Coverage under Revised GPA  EU  Covered works concessions contracts under national treatment regime when the contracts are awarded by central or sub-central government entities covered under the GPA  Limited access to Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway, Aruba and Switzerland  Japan: Extended coverage to procurement based on its Private Finance Initiative  Korea: Covered build-operate-transfer contracts  Liechtenstein: Added several construction services so that it now covers all construction services

© 2014 Djaghe LLC Offsets Commitments under Revised GPA  Israel: Commitment to end its use of offsets  Will not apply offsets for procurement below 3,000,000 SDRs  Will phase-out use of offsets over a 15-year period by progressively reducing  Number of entities that apply offsets  Level of offsets from the current 20% level to zero

© 2014 Djaghe LLC ] Contact Information Jean Heilman Grier Principal Consultant on Trade Djaghe, LLC Website: Trade Blog: © 2014 Djaghe LLC