Avoided Cost and E3 Calculator Workshops Energy and Environmental Economics, Inc. October 3, 2005.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Draft National TDV Values 3/20/09 Contact Information Snuller Price, Partner Energy and Environmental Economics, Inc. 101 Montgomery Street, Suite 1600.
Advertisements

1 CPUC Avoided Cost Workshop Generation Avoided Costs.
BG&E’s PeakRewards SM Demand Response Program Successful Approaches for Engaging Customers August 20, 2014.
1 CPUC Avoided Cost Workshop Environmental Externality Avoided Cost.
Avoided Cost and E3 Calculator Update Workshop March 14-15, 2006.
A Comparison of Measure Avoided Cost Calculations using Utility TOU Load Shapes and DEER Hourly Measure Savings 14 March 2006.
1 Illustrative Results Based on E3’s Avoided Cost Model Thursday, April 19, 2012 Marginal Generation Costs.
1 CPUC DEER, Cost-Effectiveness Calculators and Avoided Costs Peter Lai, Energy Division Jeff Hirsch, JJ Hirsch & Associates June 24, 2009.
Automated Demand Response Pilot 2005/2004 Load Impact Results and Recommendations Final Report © 2005 Rocky Mountain Institute (RMI) Research & Consulting.
Electrical Engineering Department, Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, Iran M. Poursistani N. Hajilu G. B. Gharehpetian M. Shafiei CHP Systems.
CPUC Procurement Policies Robert L. Strauss California Public Utilities Commission Energy Division - Procurement Section.
Capacity Valuation.
Valuing Load Reduction in Restructured Markets Supply Cost Curve Regressions Market Price vs. Value of Load Reduction Photovoltaic Case Study William B.
COMBINED HEAT & POWER J.R. Simplot Mountain Home, Idaho.
Energy and Environmental Economics 1 Avoided Cost and E3 Calculator Workshops Energy and Environmental Economics, Inc. October 3, 2005.
Electrical Billing and Rates MAE406 Energy Conservation in Industry Stephen Terry.
Copyrighted © 2000 PG&E All Rights Reserved CASE Initiative Project TDV Economic Update Brian Horii and Snuller Price Energy & Environmental Economics,
1 Wealth Transfers Under Real-time Electricity Pricing Severin Borenstein Haas School of Business, UC Berkeley University of California Energy Institute.
Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reductions from Wind Energy : Location, Location, Location? Duncan Callaway SNRE & Department of Mechanical Engineering
Least Cost System Operation: Economic Dispatch 1
1 Quality Control Review of E3 Calculator Inputs Comparison to DEER Database Brian Horii Energy and Environmental Economics, Inc. November 16, 2006.
National Renewable Energy Laboratory Innovation for Our Energy Future * NREL July 5, 2011 Tradeoffs and Synergies between CSP and PV at High Grid Penetration.
Opportunities for capturing the peak load reduction and conservation potential of energy storage and permanent load- shifting technologies California Energy.
Hybrid Cooling for Data Centers
Cost of Service Indiana Industrial Energy Consumers, Inc. (INDIEC) Indiana Industrial Energy Consumers, Inc. (INDIEC) presented by Nick Phillips Brubaker.
Northwest Power and Conservation Council 6 th Plan Conservation Resource Supply Curve Workshop on Data & Assumption Overview of Council Resource Analysis.
Avoided Costs of Generation
0 CPUC / CEC Workshop Reporting and Tracking GHG Emissions for a Load Based Cap PG&E Reporting Emissions and Estimating Emissions from Unspecified Purchases.
Highlights of AESC 2011 Report Vermont Presentation August 22, | ©2011 Synapse Energy Economics Inc. All rights reserved.
Jenell Katheiser Doug Murray Long Term Study Scenarios and Generation Expansion Update January 22, 2013.
California SONGS\OTC Plants Assumptions TEPPC – Data Work Group Call Tuesday, September 15, 2015.
Net Metering Technical Conference Docket No PacifiCorp Avoided Costs October 21, 2008 Presented by Becky Wilson Executive Staff Director Utah.
1 CPUC Avoided Cost Workshop Introduction and Overview.
California Energy Commission California Energy Demand Preliminary Electricity Forecast July 7, 2015 Chris Kavalec Energy Assessments Division.
1 Issues summary Pre workshop comments. 2 Scope of the 2006 Update 1. Common definition of peak 2. Avoided cost and E3 Calculator updates for peak and.
OVERVIEW OF ISSUES DR AND AMI HELP SOLVE Dr. Eric Woychik Executive Consultant, Strategy Integration, LLC APSC Workshop on DR and AMI.
Avoided Cost and E3 Calculator Workshops Energy and Environmental Economics, Inc. October 4, 2005.
Energy Analysis Department Cost-Effectiveness Valuation Framework for Demand Response Resources: Guidelines and Suggestions Chuck Goldman Lawrence Berkeley.
“Demand Response: Completing the Link Between Wholesale and Retail Pricing” Paul Crumrine Director, Regulatory Strategies & Services Institute for Regulatory.
Rate Design Indiana Industrial Energy Consumers, Inc. (INDIEC) Indiana Industrial Energy Consumers, Inc. (INDIEC) presented by Nick Phillips Brubaker &
Sixth Northwest Conservation & Electric Power Plan Draft Wholesale Power Price Forecasts Maury Galbraith Northwest Power and Conservation Council Generating.
California Energy Commission Plug Loads in the Residential and Commercial Forecasts June 18, 2015 Tom Gorin Energy Assessments Division
National Action Plan for Energy Efficiency eeactionplan The Role of Energy Efficiency in Utility Energy Planning Snuller Price Partner Energy.
2009 Impact Evaluation Concerns ESAP Workshop #1 October 17, 2011.
September 21, 2005 ICF Consulting RGGI Electricity Sector Modeling Results Updated Reference, RGGI Package and Sensitivities.
California’s Proposed DR Cost-Effectiveness Framework January 30, 2008.
Northwest Power and Conservation CouncilProCost Version 2.2 RTF July 2007.
Avoided Cost and E3 Calculator Update Workshop March 14-15, 2006.
Avoided Cost Calculator Workshop Day 2 October 4, 2005 Energy and Environmental Economics, Inc.
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation Calculator Walkthrough Energy and Environmental Economics, Inc. April 8, 2005.
Analysis of Demand Response Modeling in GridView Andy Satchwell and Sarah Smith Modeling Work Group December 21, 2015 The work described in this presentation.
1 Cross-Cutting Analytical Assumptions for the 6 th Power Plan July 1, 2008.
An Overview of Demand Response in California July 2011.
Extra electricity slides
2015 California Statewide Critical Peak Pricing Evaluation DRMEC Spring 2016 Load Impact Evaluation Workshop San Francisco, California May, 2016 Prepared.
San Diego Gas & Electric February 24 th, 2016 Energy Matinee Pricing Tariff Proposal.
CPUC Avoided Cost DRAFT Results CEWG Workshop May 31, 2016 Brian Horii, Senior Partner Snuller Price, Senior Partner Zach Ming, Consultant Kiran Chawla,
2015 SDG&E PTR/SCTD Evaluation DRMEC Spring 2016 Load Impact Workshop George Jiang May 11 th, 2016 Customer Category Mean Active Participants Mean Reference.
Sixth Northwest Conservation & Electric Power Plan Draft Wholesale Power Price Forecasts Maury Galbraith Generating Resource Advisory Committee Meeting.
May 9 th, 2016 California Public Utilities Commission Power Charge Indifference Adjustment (PCIA) Workshop.
LNBA Subgroup: Avoided Transmission Value
SEIA Perspective on Marginal/Avoided CAISO Transmission Costs
Mike Jaske California Energy Commission
Allegheny Power Residential Demand Response Program
Chuck Goldman Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
California Energy Demand (CED) IEPR Forecast:
2018 VELCO IRP Forecast Preliminary results
Integrated Resource Planning and Load Flexibility Analysis
Avoided Cost and E3 Calculator Update Workshop
THE STUDY OF SOLAR-WIND HYBRID SYSTEM PH301 RENEWABLE ENERGY
Presentation transcript:

Avoided Cost and E3 Calculator Workshops Energy and Environmental Economics, Inc. October 3, 2005

Review of E3 Avoided Costs Background Overview of the Methodology Valuation of Peak Hours Utility-specific Data

Information on New Avoided Costs Spreadsheets and reports can be downloaded free from the E3 website:

Avoided Cost Objectives Goals:  Provide objectively derived estimates of avoided costs that are suitable for evaluating PUC funded programs  Develop a transparent and repeatable costing methodology that does not rely on either proprietary data or models Deliverables:  Transparent and defensible avoided cost methodology Separate presentations with proposals for each cost component Make use of existing studies and data to the extent possible  Provide software to update estimates of avoided costs  Provide a report describing methodology, results, and data to support estimates

Summary of Project Requirements Forecast values ( ) for: X = RFP Requirement; R = E3 Recommendation Annual Values Monthly Values Hourly Values Vary by Location Traditional avoided costs Electric generationXR Electric T&DXRR Natural gas procurementXR R Natural gas transportationXRR Environmental externalityX R Reliability adderX Demand Reduction BenefitXR Additional avoided costs (gas and electric)

Electric Avoided Cost Dimensions Utilities PG&E SCE SDG&E Voltage Level Transmission Primary Secondary Dimensions of the Electric Avoided Cost (8760 Hours from 2004 to 2023) PG&E: 9 | 18 SCE: 8 | 5 SDG&E: 4 | 1 Climate Zones | Planning Areas

Prior Electric and Gas Avoided Costs

Electric ($/kWh) Gas ($/Therm) Source: Energy Efficiency Policy Manual p /29/01

The New Costing Framework 200?: 2.84% * $60.00/MWh = $1.70/MWh of load

Conceptual Framework Electric Avoided Costs / Benefits Gas Avoided Costs / Benefits Where a = area, t = time dimension (e.g., hour, TOU period), y = year. TotalBenefit a,h,t =GenMC a,t,y + Externality a,t,y + TransMC a,t,y + DistMC a,t,y + Reliability a,t,y + DemandReductionBenefit a,t,y TotalBenefit a,t,y =Commodity a,t,y + Transportation a,t,y + Externality a,t,y + DistMC a,t,y + DemandReductionBenefit a,t,y (if available)

Formulation of Avoided Cost Electric Period 1 ( ) Platt’s / NYMEX Period 2 Transition Period 3 ( ) LRMC 1 + Ancillary Services (A/S) Period 1 ( ) NYMEX Period 2 Transition Period 3 ( ) Long-run Forecast 1 + LUAF + Compression Commodity Natural Gas Commodity Market Multiplier 1 + Energy Losses T&D Costs  (1 + Peak Losses ) Environment  (1+ Energy Losses) T&D Costs Environment     “NYMEX” = “New York Mercantile Exchange” “LRMC “ = “Long-run marginal cost” = all-in cost of a combined cycle gas turbine (CCGT) “LUAF “ = “Loss and unaccounted for”

Components that Contribute to Shape

Components with Peak Shape Energy and capacity Ancillary Services Market Elasticity Transmission and Distribution Capacity Losses Emissions

Inputs that Vary by Utility Energy and capacity (A/S, environment)  Northern and Southern California T&D  Varies by 16 climate zones in the State Losses  Average and peak losses by IOU

Commodity Shape: Example NP15 Average of Hourly Values by Month Average of period 4/1/1998 through 3/31/2000 – Matched by Daytype

Market Price Forecast Results Annual Average Forward Price Estimate Market LRMC Market Prices Updated as of October 15, 2003

Example of Capacity Separation Integral of the light blue area is the capacity cost.

Energy Losses by TOU Period

A/S Cost Computation Average of A/S costs as share of total energy costs, during non-crisis period (8/99-5/00, 8/01- 7/03): 2.84% Apply 2.84% to shaped hourly energy price  2004: 2.84% * $45.57/MWh = $1.29/MWh of load  2005: 2.84% * $46.65/MWh = $1.32/MWh of load A/S Costs are the same multiplier for the entire state.

Market Elasticity Estimates On-Peak: 8am to 6pm, Working Weekdays, May to October Off-Peak: All Other Hours Market Elasticity Market Multiplier (On Peak RNS = 5%)

T&D Formulation T&D Capacity Cost ($/kW-yr) YearUtility Planning Area PeakAllocationHour Climate Zone (1 + Losses) Utility Voltage level T&D Capacity Cost ($/kW-hr) YearHourUtility Planning Area Climate Zone Voltage Level ** = Item Dimension

Climate zones and planning areas Dominguez Hills Foothill Rural Santa Ana Ventura CEC Title 24 Climate Zones

T&D Avoided Costs by Planning Division SDG&E $77.76 SCE $36.00 $21.00 $5.00 PG&E $70.00 $38.00 $5.00

Calculation of the PCAFs is based on Load Duration Curve of Each Area PCAF weights are assigned proportionally to how high the load is compared to the peak. Load Duration Curve Only highest load hours (top standard deviation) receive any weight.

Allocation of T&D Based on Temperature by Climate Zone Temperature Loads T&D Capacity Cost Drives Load Information Missing or Difficult to Obtain in Many Areas Temperature Use temperature as a proxy for load, and as the basis for allocating costs to hours of the year. T&D Capacity Cost

T&D Allocation Actual Load vs. Temperature Fresno Yellow 8am to 10pm Similar analysis done on 33 PG&E areas as part of CEC Title 24 development

PCAF / Load Relationship Shown Chronologically

Example Results for PG&E Stockton based on TMY Weather

Peak Losses

Environmental Cost Formulation

Emission Prices & Plant Heat Rates Includes NOx, PM-10, and CO 2 emission credit prices Lower bound of heat rate is set at a 6,240 heat rate, upper bound is set at a 14,000 heat rate

Putting the Components Together: Base Case Results

Total Electric Avoided Costs Shape is Based on PG&E’s San Jose Planning Division

3 Day Snapshot of Disaggregated Electric Avoided Costs Avoided Cost is Based on PG&E’s San Jose Planning Division

Comparison of Efficiency Programs Levelized Avoided Cost ($/MWh) over 16 Year Life for All Devices AC Load Shape Based on SEER 12 to SEER 13 Change in Fresno New Avoided Costs are based on PG&E, Climate Zone 13, Secondary Based on hourly simulated AC data, proxy outdoor lighting, flat refrigeration