FOCUS MODEL OVERVIEW Denver Regional Council of Governments June 24, 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
THURSTON REGION MULTIMODAL TRAVEL DEMAND FORECASTING MODEL IMPLEMENTATION IN EMME/2 - Presentation at the 15th International EMME/2 Users Group Conference.
Advertisements

Overview Examples of TranSight Applications What Does TranSight Analyze? Model Structure.
Parsons Brinckerhoff Chicago, Illinois GIS Estimation of Transit Access Parameters for Mode Choice Models GIS in Transit Conference October 16-17, 2013.
TRAVEL DEMAND FORECASTING FOR THE OLYMPIC GAMES ATHENS 2004 ATTIKO METRO S.A. Anna Anastasaki.
Jeannie Wu, Planner Sep  Background  Model Review  Model Function  Model Structure  Transportation System  Model Interface  Model Output.
Denver’s Activity-Based Model Project: Status Report Erik Sabina, P.E., DRCOG Thomas Rossi, Principal, Cambridge Systematics TRB Transportation Planning.
SUZANNE CHILDRESS, ERIK SABINA, DAVID KURTH, TOM ROSSI, JENNIFER MALM DRCOG Focus Activity-Based Model Calibration/Validation Innovations in Travel Modeling.
The transition to activity-based models in the U.S. Mark Bradley Bradley Research & Consulting Santa Barbara, CA.
FOCUS MODEL OVERVIEW CLASS TWO Denver Regional Council of Governments June 30, 2011.
The Current State and Future of the Regional Multi-Modal Travel Demand Forecasting Model.
Presented to presented by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Transportation leadership you can trust. Comparison of Activity-Based Model Parameters Between Two.
FOCUS MODEL OVERVIEW CLASS THREE Denver Regional Council of Governments July 7, 2011.
Time of day choice models The “weakest link” in our current methods(?) Change the use of network models… Run static assignments for more periods of the.
Modal Split Analysis.
Chapter 4 1 Chapter 4. Modeling Transportation Demand and Supply 1.List the four steps of transportation demand analysis 2.List the four steps of travel.
Session 11: Model Calibration, Validation, and Reasonableness Checks
Sequential Demand Forecasting Models CTC-340. Travel Behavior 1. Decision to travel for a given purpose –People don’t travel without reason 2. The choice.
CE 2710 Transportation Engineering
Transportation Planning CE 573 Course Introduction and Four-Step Travel Demand Moding (FSTDM)
Agenda Overview Why TransCAD Challenges/tips Initiatives Applications.
CEE 320 Fall 2008 Trip Generation and Mode Choice CEE 320 Anne Goodchild.
Practical Application of Activity-Based Models
San Francisco Bay Area Activity-Based Models Specification & Training Study Chuck Purvis Metropolitan Transportation Commission Oakland, California Workshop.
Building and Learning Activity-Based Models Erik Sabina Jennifer Malm Jennifer Malm Suzanne Childress John Bowman DeVon Culbertson.
FOCUS MODEL OVERVIEW CLASS FIVE Denver Regional Council of Governments July27, 2011.
Source: NHI course on Travel Demand Forecasting (152054A) Session 10 Traffic (Trip) Assignment Trip Generation Trip Distribution Transit Estimation & Mode.
SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY San Francisco DTA Project: Model Integration Options Greg Erhardt DTA Peer Review Panel Meeting July 25 th,
Transport Modelling– An overview of the four modeling stages
BALTIMORE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL MODEL ENHANCEMENTS FOR THE RED LINE PROJECT AMPO TRAVEL MODEL WORK GROUP March 20, 2006.
Transit Estimation and Mode Split CE 451/551 Source: NHI course on Travel Demand Forecasting (152054A) Session 7.
From Academia to Application: Results from the Development of the First Accessibility-Based Model Mike Conger, P.E. Knoxville Regional Transportation Planning.
In this presentation, we will: 1.Describe each step the Compass model and show comparable steps in the IRM. Compass = What,, Where, How IRM= Who, What,
ARC ABM Visualization & Reporting ARC – Nov 12, 2010 Activity-Based Model (Java, Cube) Activity-Based Model (Java, Cube) Database (SQL Server) Visualization.
June 15, 2010 For the Missoula Metropolitan Planning Organization Travel Modeling
A New Policy Sensitive Travel Demand Model for Tel Aviv Yoram Shiftan Transportation Research Institute Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering.
Act Now: An Incremental Implementation of an Activity-Based Model System in Puget Sound Presented to: 12th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications.
For Model Users Group June 10, 2011 Kyeil Kim, Ph.D., PTP Atlanta Regional Commission.
1 The Aggregate Rail Ridership Forecasting Model: Overview Dave Schmitt, AICP Southeast Florida Users Group November 14 th 2008.
DVRPC TMIP Peer Review TIM 2 Model Oct. 29 th, 2014.
1 Activity Based Models Review Thomas Rossi Krishnan Viswanathan Cambridge Systematics Inc. Model Task Force Data Committee October 17, 2008.
TRANSIMS Version 5 Application Concepts January 20, 2011 David Roden – AECOM.
September, 2012An Activity Based Model for a Regional City1.
Travel Demand Forecasting: Trip Distribution CE331 Transportation Engineering.
NTERFACING THE MORPC REGIONAL MODEL WITH DYNAMIC TRAFFIC SIMULATION INTERFACING THE MORPC REGIONAL MODEL WITH DYNAMIC TRAFFIC SIMULATION David Roden (AECOM)
SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY San Francisco’s Dynamic Traffic Assignment Model Background SFCTA DTA Model Peer Review Panel Meeting July.
Transportation Planning, Transportation Demand Analysis Land Use-Transportation Interaction Transportation Planning Framework Transportation Demand Analysis.
TO THE BLACK BOX AND BACK – The TRANS Model October 2008.
Income-Based Work Trip Stratification within the Puget Sound Regional Council Travel Model Framework 20 th International Emme Users’ Conference Montreal,
Transit Service Quality and Transit Use: TBOT, Task 5.
Activity-Based Modeling How does it work?. CT-RAMP model Coordinated Travel – Regional Activity Based Modeling Platform (CT-RAMP) for the Atlanta Region.
Ying Chen, AICP, PTP, Parsons Brinckerhoff Ronald Eash, PE, Parsons Brinckerhoff Mary Lupa, AICP, Parsons Brinckerhoff 13 th TRB Transportation Planning.
FDOT Transit Office Modeling Initiatives The Transit Office has undertaken a number of initiatives in collaboration with the Systems Planning Office and.
Calgary Commercial Movement Model Kevin Stefan, City of Calgary J.D. Hunt, University of Calgary Prepared for the 17th International EMME/2 Conference.
Lecture 4 Four transport modelling stages with emphasis on public transport (hands on training) Dr. Muhammad Adnan.
How Does Your Model Measure Up Presented at TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference by Phil Shapiro Frank Spielberg VHB May, 2007.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to 12th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference presented by Arun Kuppam, Cambridge.
Comparison of an ABTM and a 4-Step Model as a Tool for Transportation Planning TRB Transportation Planning Application Conference May 8, 2007.
1 Components of the Deterministic Portion of the Utility “Deterministic -- Observable -- Systematic” portion of the utility!  Mathematical function of.
Estimation of a Weekend Location Choice Model for Calgary KJ Stefan, City of Calgary JDP McMillan, City of Calgary CR Blaschuk, City of Calgary JD Hunt,
FOCUS MODEL OVERVIEW CLASS FOUR Denver Regional Council of Governments July 7, 2011.
An AQ Assessment Tool for Local Land Use Decisio ns 13 th TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference May 9, 2011 Reno, Nevada Mark Filipi, AICP.
Impact of Aging Population on Regional Travel Patterns: The San Diego Experience 14th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference, Columbus.
TRANSIMS Version 5 Demand Files January 20, 2011 David Roden – AECOM.
Suzanne Childress Erik Sabina Robert Spotts Denver Regional Council of Governments Transportation Planning Applications Conference Reno May 2011.
ILUTE A Tour-Based Mode Choice Model Incorporating Inter-Personal Interactions Within the Household Matthew J. Roorda Eric J. Miller UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO.
Responses to Gas Prices in Knoxville, TN Vince Bernardin, Jr., Ph.D. Vince Bernardin, Jr., Ph.D. Bernardin, Lochmueller & Associates Mike Conger, P.E.
Peter Vovsha, Robert Donnelly, Surabhi Gupta pb
Travel Demand Forecasting: Mode Choice
Jim Lam, Caliper Corporation Guoxiong Huang, SCAG Mark Bradley, BB&C
Norman Washington Garrick CE 2710 Spring 2016 Lecture 07
Presentation transcript:

FOCUS MODEL OVERVIEW Denver Regional Council of Governments June 24, 2011

This presentation  Ask Erik, Shahida and me questions throughout  General Concepts  Break model into four “stages”  Then several steps within each stage  Describe each step- it’s inputs and outputs  Review stage inputs and outputs  Move onto to next stage

General Concept 1: What is a logit model? 2 minute version  A model that calculates the utility of each choice from a set of discrete choices for a decision maker based on characteristics of the choice and the decision maker  Suppose we have a trip we know is 3 miles long, it’s purpose is to eat a meal, it’s final location is the CBD, the person who made the trip is age 68, the person’s income is $28,000/year. What is the utility for this trip for various travel modes?  We calculate the utility of taking transit for example based on the above information and the cost of transit, the time on transit, etc

General Concept 1: Logit Models  Many types: we use multinomial logit and nested logit  Outcome is a simple closed form probability (not the choice) The choice must be randomly selected using a monte carlo process.  Anything to add?  Questions?

General Concept 2: Monte Carlo Simulation  If model only assign probabilities to a choice, how do we get a choice  Monte carlo simulation  Suppose you have three choices, one with probability 0.1, one with probably 0.4 and one with probability 0.5.  Arbitarily, you assign choice one the range on the number line from 0 to 0.1 to choice one, from 0.1 to 0.5 to choice two and 0.5 to 1 to choice three.  Then you generate a pseudo-random number from 0 to 1.  If the number lands on the range assigned to the choice: you pick that choice  For example, if you generate the number , you would select choice 3

General Concept 3: Tours and Trips HOMEWORK STORE TOUR-BASED MODEL 1 home-based work tour 1 shopping stop TRIP-BASED MODEL 1 home-based work trip 1 non-home-based trip 1 home-based non work trip Outbound, Away From Home Tour Half Inbound, toward home tour half

General Concept 4: Focus Model Flow: “Four” Steps STAGE 1: Make Population And Network STAGE 2: Run GISDK to Mode Choice STAGE 3: C# Logit Models to Create Trips STAGE 4: GISDK Assignment FEEDBACK

General Concept 5: Mechanics: Code Types used in Model C# Code Logit Model Running; Model Manager GISDK Code Skimming, Assignment, I-E/E-E DIA Trips SQL Server Database Queries Data Storage Java For Population Synthesizer

General Concept 6: Use of SQL Server

Households, Persons and Points in SQL Server

Persons, Trips, and Tours in SQL Server

General Concept 7: GISDK: Old Model Socio-economic Inputs Area Type Parking Cost Network Processing & Data Preparation Highway Skimming Transit Skimming Trip Generation Trip Distribution Mode Choice Highway Assignment Transit Assignment Highway Network Inputs Transit Network Inputs Time-of-Day

General Concept 8: Why are we doing this anyway?  Data on ANY geography: all data is at a point level  Using Most Demographic Characteristics of People  Walking, biking, and transit  Vehicle Miles Traveled households in LoDo in 2035  Average Bike Miles per persons age 70+ years old in 2020  Number of Cars owned by college students attending CU Boulder in 2015  Average Distance to Work by Restaurant Workers

Review of General Concepts  1. Logit Models are models that make assign probabilities to a set of choices for an individual from a list of discrete choices.  2. The actual choice is made using a monte carlo process.  3. Travel in the model is made on a tour-level, and then a trip level.  4. We can divide the model into four stages.  5. We use four types of code in the model: T-SQL, C#, GISDK, and Java.  6. Much of the input and output data is stored in SQL Server.  7. We still have to run parts of our old GISDK code for path building, skimming and assignment.  8. We are doing this because we can get much finer detail and answer planning questions better using the model.

Thinking points before we dive into the steps  How is the new model activity-based? How is it disaggregate?  How does the model actually do all this crazy stuff?  How is the old model different than the new model?  How does the model STILL simplify actual human behavior?

Focus Model Flow: 28 Steps FEEDBACK

User Interface: How the steps look

Focus Model Flow: Stage 1 STAGE 1: Make Population And Network STAGE 2: Run GISDK to Mode Choice STAGE 3: C# Logit Models to Create Trips STAGE 4: GISDK Assignment FEEDBACK

STAGE 1: Make Population and Network  Java: Population Synthesizer  C# to process in database: Size Sum Variable Calculator; PopSyn Output Processor  GISDK called from C#: GISDK Preprocess Creating networks for example

Population Synthesizer ACS or PUMS Disaggregate Data Aggregate Data that We Need to Match: Economic Forecasts, Land Use Forecasts Disaggregate Population With the Right Portions Matching the Economic and Land Use Forecasts Questions?