Fair participant selection Dr Enoka Corea. Inclusion criteria Exclusion criteria Where the study will be conducted How the participants will be recruited.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Role of the IRB An Institutional Review Board (IRB) is a review committee established to help protect the rights and welfare of human research subjects.
Advertisements

Respect for participants Dr Enoka Corea. maintaining the privacy of the participant by ensuring confidentiality ensuring that participants may withdraw.
Research methodology & Ethical considerations
ETHICS OF CONSENTING IMPAIRED INDIVIDUALS THERAPEUTICS Col Xolani Currie, Nat Dipl Rad, BA, HED, MPH Regulatory Oversight Manager Project Phidisa.
Criteria For Approval 45 CFR CFR Minimized risks Reasonable risk/benefit ratio Equitable subject selection Informed consent process Informed.
Tri-Council Policy Statement 2010 Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans.
VA Requirements for Vulnerable Subjects Kevin L. Nellis, M.S., M.T. (A.S.C.P.) Program Analyst Program for Research Integrity Development and Education.
Exception from Informed Consent in Emergency Research Designed for implementation of research in emergency settings when exception from informed consent.
24 April Elements of Research Ethics Review II Social Value Malik Fernando M.B.,Ch.B. (Bristol)
Ethical Considerations when Developing Human Research Protocols A discipline “born in scandal and reared in protectionism” Carol Levine, 1988.
Evaluating Risk 1 IRB CELT Presentation Colleen Donaldson – IRB Administrator Julie Wilkens – IRB Coordinator.
Human Subjects & Research Understanding the protection of human subjects, HSRC, and the nature of the process.
Bioethics What’s in a question?. What is “ethics”? Ethics: “the rules of conduct recognized in respect to a particular class of human actions of a particular.
THE ETHICS OF HUMAN PARTICIPANT RESEARCH Office for Research Protections The Pennsylvania State University.
Post-trial Access to Treatment by Patients participating in Clinical Trials Presented by Dr T K S Letlape Chairman: South African Medical Association President-Elect:
Subject Selection and Recruitment David Wendler Department of Clinical Bioethics NIH, USA.
Use of Children as Research Subjects What information should be provided for an FP7 ethical review?
PPA 691 – Seminar in Public Policy Analysis Lecture 1d – The Belmont Report.
Ethical Guidelines for Research with Human Participants
8 Criteria for IRB Approval of Research 45 CFR (a)
Ethical Issues in Research
Human Subject Research Ethics
1 Wheaton College INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD (IRB)
A History of Human Research Protections and Institutional Review Boards Roger L. Bertholf, Ph.D. Associate Professor of Pathology Chair, University of.
What makes Clinical Research Ethical? Dr Enoka Corea Co-secretary, ERC Faculty of Medicine, Colombo.
1 Copyright © 2011 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. Chapter 9 Examining Populations and Samples in Research.
Regulatory criteria for approval Bob Craig, July 2007.
Institutional Review Board (IRB) for Human Subject Protections: Working with the IRB Erin McClure, PhD Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences.
1 How to Review a Protocol. 2 Reference Documents WHO/TDR Operational Guidelines for Ethical Committees that Review Biomedical Research, International.
Planned Emergency Research Exception from Informed Consent Requirements September 2007.
How to Successfully Apply to the IRB Richard Gordin, IRB Chair True Rubal, Administrator / Director For the Protection of Human Participants in Research.
IRB BASICS: Issues in Ethics and Human Subject Protections Prepared by Ed Merrill Department of Psychology November 12, 2009.
“ Research with human subjects ” SUA IRB Committee OrientationIRB Committee.
Institutional Review Board (IRB) What is our Purpose and Role for Ethical Research.
Slide 1 Mosby items and derived items © 2006, 2002 by Mosby, Inc. LEGAL AND ETHICAL ISSUES: Informed Consent Chapter 13.
Tri-Council Guidelines.  Between 1932 and 1972, 412 men with untreated syphilis compared with 204 disease-free men to study the natural course of the.
Human Subject Protection Research Imperatives. History World War II - Nuremberg Tuskegee Study Belmont Report Modern Problems - Inadequacy of “Good Intentions”
Module VI. Moral Reasoning in Addiction Publishing.
Deception in Human Research Learning Objectives Define Deception and Incomplete Disclosure Understand when Deception or Incomplete Disclosure are allowable.
Institutional Review Board Issues for Classroom Research Sharon McWhorter IRB Administrator, The University of Akron (With assistance from Phil Allen,
ETHICS OF NEONATAL RESEARCH John L. Sever, MD, PhD. Children’s National Medical Center George Washington University Medical Center Washington, DC.
NAVIGATING THE IRB PROCESS University Institutional Review Board California State University, Stanislaus.
How To Design a Clinical Trial
What Institutional Researchers Should Know about the IRB Susan Thompson Senior Research Analyst Office of Institutional Research Presented at the Texas.
CUNY Human Research Protection Program (HRPP) School of Professional Studies April 18, 2013
Frequently Asked Questions About Psychology Module 8.
APPROVAL CRITERIA AN IRB INFOSHORT MAY CFR CRITERIA FOR IRB APPROVAL OF RESEARCH In order for an IRB to approve a research study, all.
Donna B. Konradi, DNS, RN, CNE GERO 586 Understanding the Ethics of Research.
Donna B. Konradi, DNS, RN, CNE GERO 586 Populations and Samples.
- Social and Scientific Values - Social and Scientific Values - Scientific Validity - Scientific Validity - Fair Subject Selection - Fair Subject Selection.
ETHICAL ISSUES AND INFORMED CONSENT Juan M. Lozano, MD, MSc Department of Paediatrics and Clinical Epidemiology Unit School of Medicine, Javeriana University.
Elements of Ethical Review of Study Documents Dr.C.H.Shashindran Director-Professor & Head Department of Pharmacology JIPMER.
Defining the Research Ethics Research ethics involves the application of fundamental ethical principles to a variety of topics involving research, including.
HPTN Ethics Guidance for Research: Community Obligations Africa Regional Working Group Meeting, May 19-23, 2003 Lusaka, Zambia.
Chapter 5 Ethical Concerns in Research. Historical Perspective on Ethics Nazi Experimentation in WWII –“medical experiments” –Nuremberg War Crime Trials.
Copyright © 2008 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Chapter 7 Generating Research Evidence Ethically.
Copyright c 2001 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.1 Chapter 5 Research Ethics All researchers, even students, have a responsibility to conduct ethical research.
Institutional Review Board (IRB) for Human Subject Protections: Working with the IRB Erin A McClure, PhD Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences.
Protecting Human Subjects Overview of the Issues Applications to Educational Research The IRB Process.
Investigator Initiated Research Best Practices for IRB: SBER Corey Zolondek, Ph.D. IRB Operations Manager Wayne State University.
Research ethics Rachel H. Ellaway
Susan Sonne, PharmD, BCPP Chair, MUSC IRB II
Back to Basics – Approval Criteria
Enrolling in Clinical Trials
Ethical Principles of Research
Greg Nezat CRNA, PhD CDR/NC/USN Chairman, IRB II
CUNY Human Research Protection Program (HRPP)
The Need for Ethical Principles
Exploring 45 CFR , Criteria for IRB Approval of Research
Frequently Asked Questions About Psychology
Presentation transcript:

Fair participant selection Dr Enoka Corea

Inclusion criteria Exclusion criteria Where the study will be conducted How the participants will be recruited.

Inclusion criteria Exclusion criteria Where the study will be conducted How the participants will be recruited.

Inclusion criteria Exclusion criteria Where the study will be conducted How the participants will be recruited.

 Study participants should be chosen so as to minimize risk while maximizing benefits.

Groups who bear the risk and burdens of research should be in a position to enjoy its benefits and those who benefit should share some of the risks and burdens

The vulnerability of the study group should be determined.

Vulnerable groups Can this research be equally well carried out in another less vulnerable group? Is the purpose of the research to obtain knowledge relevant to the health needs of this group? Are the informed consent or proxy consent procedures adequate? Will the prospective subjects’ refusal to participate (dissent) be always respected? Is their a favourable risk/ benefit ratio? Will the group have access to adequate medical and psychological support? Will the benefits of the research be made reasonably available to the inhabitants of the vulnerable community?

Fair participant selection Has the study population been determined, primarily, based on the scientific goals of the study (and not on convenience, ethnicity, gender, age, literacy, culture or economic status)? Are the inclusion criteria of research participants appropriate to minimize risk while maximizing benefits? Are the exclusion criteria of research participants appropriate to minimize risk while maximizing benefits? What are the means by which initial contact and recruitment is to be conducted? Does the selection of subjects favour any group to have an advantage over others or exclude any group?