Linepack ‘Park and Loan’ Quantity - Influencing Factors Review Group 291 – July 2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
Advertisements

Hybrid Option(s) Ritchard Hewitt – August Fundamentals  Parameters – Cost Reflective, Incentive, Value  Cost – What does it cost the service provider.
Review Group 0166 Review of Necessary Reform of NTS Offtake Arrangements 20 th September 2007 Beverley Grubb SGN.
Application of User Pays Principles to Existing Service Lines 22nd November 2006.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
National Grid: Gas Transmission System Operator
DESIGN GUIDE FOR GAS CENTRALISED HOT WATER SYSTEMS
Exit Reform Review Transmission Workstream 07 January 2010.
UNC Modification Proposal 0116 Reform of the NTS Offtake Arrangements Transmission Workstream 5 th October 2006.
Operating Margins. 2 Competitive Provision of Operating Margins Change to National Grid Gas’s Transporter Licence which:  Introduced Special Condition.
Project Planning and Capital Budgeting
NTS Update Gas Customer Forum 25 th September 2006.
Network Analysis - Introduction Transmission Planning Code Workshop 2 1 st May 2008.
20 September 2015 GAZ DE FRANCE ESS Introduction of Gas Reserve Arrangements Mark Bailey Gaz de France ESS.
SO Incentives from April 2010 John Perkins. 2 Gas System Operator (SO) Incentives National Grid operates the high pressure Gas Transmission System in.
RG0291 – NTS Licence SC27 – Balancing Arrangements Linepack – Commercial Considerations/Options Review Group 291 – 19 th July 2010.
So… How does Smartcool achieve savings??.  Compressors use 70% of the energy in refrigeration and air conditioning systems.  The cooling cycle is dynamic.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
Review Group 291 – Balancing Arrangements Default Cashout Workshop 3 – 21 st June 2010.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
Flow Variations at Entry Transmission Workstream Martin Watson 1 st November 2007.
Flow Margin Assumptions for NTS Planning and Development Transmission Planning Code Workshop 3 5 th June 2008.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
Mod 0333: Update of default System Marginal Prices Review Group August 2010 Transmission Workstream 07/10/2010.
UNC (Urgent) Modification Proposal 0044: “Revised Emergency Cash-out & Curtailment Arrangements” UNC Transmission Workstream 11 th August 2005.
UNC Proposal 329 – Review of Industry Charging & Contractual Arrangements - DM SHQs and DM SOQs Joel Martin – 21/09/10.
Information provision for winter 09/10 Jenny Phillips – GNCC Strategy & Support Manager.
OPNs & LDZ Demand Forecasts Chris Shanley & Nick Reeves.
10 November 2015 GAZ DE FRANCE ESS Modification Proposal 0086 “Introduction of gas demand management reserve arrangements” 1 st June 2006 Phil Broom and.
Review Group Modification Proposal Introduction of Enduring NTS Exit Capacity Arrangements.
Transmission Planning Code – Design Margin Update Transmission Workstream, 4 th February 2010.
1 Operating Margins – Request for Proposals Transmission Workstream 6 th April 2006 Dave Smith, National Grid NTS.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
Flow Flexibility Capacity Joint Office 7 th December 2006.
DN Operation Iain Ward DNCC Manager. Responsibilities  Licence Holder  Obligation For 1 In 20 Capacity  DNCC Operates Networks Under Direction of The.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
Enduring Exit Regime & NTS Risk Management Processes Offtake Arrangement Workstream – OAD Section I Review Group 316.
Pamela Taylor, Head of European Strategy, Ofgem Madrid Forum, March 2011 ERGEG’s draft framework guideline for gas balancing.
Draft for discussion1 Daily Outlook Gas Day : Wednesday, 15/01/06 Todays Opening Linepack296mcm Predicted Closing Linepack (PCLP1)293mcm Change in Linepack-3mcm.
MIPI European Transparency Project (ETP) Transmission Workstream 7 th October 2010.
Transmission workstream 6 April Overview of TPCR Third Consultation UNC transmission workstream – 6 April Mark Feather.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
Gas Storage – the DTI perspective John Havard Energy Markets Unit, DTI Presentation to the Geological Society 19 th October 2004.
Supply Assumptions for Investment Planning Transmission Planning Code Workshop 1 3rd April 2008.
Demand Side Investment Planning Transmission Planning Code Workshop 2 1 st May 2008.
RIIO Gas Transmission Workshop - 5 th Sept Supplementary information 1 Hypothetical examples to illustrate the impact of combining the constraint management.
Review Group -140 Thoughts on additional information requirements.
MOD0164 Bi-Directional Connection Point Overrun Charge Calculation Stuart Waudby (Centrica Storage Ltd.)
Gas Transit Workshop Brussels, 24th January 2007 Milan Sedlacek, SPP - preprava, Slovak Republic Gas transit regulation ( Slovakia as a country with standard.
Development Modification Proposal: Introduction of an Inter-day Linepack Product Review Group August 2010 Transmission Workstream 07/10/2010.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
The Role of TSO. Madrid, 7-8 Feb The Role of TSO2 The roles of industry players First vision of role of TSO in GTE position paper Industry players.
System Operator information transparency. As Transmission System Transporter National Grid Gas undertakes responsibility for safe, effective and efficient.
Aligning the Gas and Electric Markets: EDF Solutions
Fuel Cost Components in the Fuel Adder
Fuel Cost Components in the Fuel Adder
Fuel Cost Components in the Fuel Adder
Inter-day Energy Transfer – Opportunity and Risk
System information provision
MIPI Energy – Daily Reports
SO Incentives from April 2010
Linepack ‘Park and Loan’ Quantity – Scenario Analysis
Perfect Competition part III
Stevenson 5 Capacity Planning.
Flow Swap Scenarios – Agreed Logic
Ritchard Hewitt – September 2010
Stefan Leedham Transmission Workstream 2nd November 2006
Presentation transcript:

Linepack ‘Park and Loan’ Quantity - Influencing Factors Review Group 291 – July 2010

Summary  Pre-assessment of available quantity for park and loan is complex.  Competing needs for flexibility and contingency impact on the operating range of linepack.  This motivates discretionary release, with appropriate incentive.

Operational Range of Linepack Flexibility Maximum operating pressures Contractually agreed pressures Linepack Flexibility day Demand / supply pattern Flexibility + contingency NTS set-up

System Flexibility  NTS has historically been built to transport gas efficiently, based on flat supply and demand, within a range of operating pressures.  System flexibility is inherently a “by-product” of operating the NTS within a range of pressure limits.  Current “limits” of flexibility entirely dependent on the daily NTS setup and the supply/demand pattern and therefore quite complex to define and model outer-boundary and maxima of available flexibility.  National Grid is incentivised to minimise day-on-day linepack changes but has no incentive on within-day linepack ‘release’ or ‘use’

Flow Pattern Volatility – “Time of flight” The ability to profile energy within day across a number of entry/exit points whilst maintaining an energy balance in aggregate across the day.  Supply patterns responding to demand and market changes.  Plant issues and Portfolio balancing.  Price-responsive supplies and demands. Supply A Offtake Supply B 200km 50km Flows from Supply A switch to Supply B. Linepack levels at Offtake will drop due to the inherent lag of flow from Supply B taking time to reach the Offtake

Single Entry/Exit Point Flexibility The ability to profile an entry or exit flow above and below a flat rate.  DN offtake profiles.  Power station changes driven by electricity market interaction.  Storage and interconnector within-day switching.  Within-day entry flow fluctuations driven by demand changes and nomination changes. Flow Time Removing Linepack from NTS Replenishing Linepack to NTS Average flow (1/24th rate) Example: DN Offtake Flows vary within day due to domestic demand

(2) NTS Flow, Pressure & Flexibility Time Flow Average flow (1/24 th rate) Pressure Time Max Daily Pressure Min Daily Pressure 22:00 06:00 Start of Day 06:00 Minimum pressure at point where depletion of linepack ceases Flow profile varying about the 1/24 th rate Finite limit of flexibility linked to compression/ flow rates required to return to start of day pressure Increases the severity of NTS pressure drop Increasing Linepack Usage Replenishing Linepack to NTS Removing Linepack from NTS DN Offtake

Example Day – 9 th January (Actual Data)

Operational Range of Linepack Flexibility Maximum operating pressures Contractually agreed pressures Linepack Flexibility  Compressor trip risk day

Operational Range of Linepack Flexibility Maximum operating pressures Contractually agreed pressures Linepack Flexibility  Within-day exit flexibility  Compressor trip risk day

Operational Range of Linepack Flexibility Maximum operating pressures Contractually agreed pressures Linepack Flexibility  Within-day exit flexibility  Compressor trip risk  Within day entry flexibility day

Within-day Linepack Utilisation Within-day Max-Min Range of NTS Linepack 30 day rolling average

Operational Range of Linepack Flexibility Maximum operating pressures Contractually agreed pressures Linepack Flexibility  Within-day exit flexibility  Compressor trip risk  Within day entry flexibility day  Information uncertainty, EOD imbalance

Day-to-day linepack change

Within-day PCLP swings PCLP = Opening linepack + System Inputs (Daily Flow Nominations and Storage Flow Nominations) – System Demand (Offtake Profile Notifications) This graph shows ranges of hourly PCLP values during the gas day.

Operational Range of Linepack Flexibility Maximum operating pressures Contractually agreed pressures Linepack Flexibility  Within-day exit flexibility  Compressor trip risk  Within day entry flexibility day  Information uncertainty, EOD imbalance  Supply loss risk

Example Day – 4 th January (Supply Loss)

4 th January - Continued

 Within-day entry flexibility Operational Range of Linepack Flexibility Maximum operating pressures Contractually agreed pressures Linepack Flexibility  Within-day exit flexibility  Compressor trip risk  Inter-Day Linepack ‘park and loan’ day  Information uncertainty, EOD imbalance  Supply loss risk

Release volume  Competing requirements for flexibility and contingency, and varying conditions day to day, determines the release will be discretionary if the quantity is to be maximised.  The risks and rewards inherent in linepack release leads to an incentivised regime.