Phase 2 of new ARVs BMS-663068, prodrug of BMS-626529 (attachment inhibitor) - AI438011 Study.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Switch to ATV + r-containing regimen - SWAN - SLOAT.
Advertisements

Comparison of INSTI vs PI  FLAMINGO  GS  ACTG A5257.
Phase 2 of new ARVs TAF (TFV prodrug) - Study Study
Phase 2 of new ARVs TAF (TFV prodrug) - Study Study
Phase 2 of new ARVs BMS (maturation inhibitor)
Comparison of INSTI vs EFV  STARTMRK  GS-US  SINGLE.
Comparison of NNRTI vs PI/r  EFV vs LPV/r vs EFV + LPV/r –A5142 –Mexican Study  NVP vs ATV/r –ARTEN  EFV vs ATV/r –A5202.
Comparison of PI vs PI  ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089  LPV/r mono vs LPV/r + ZDV/3TCMONARK  LPV/r QD vs BIDM M A5073  LPV/r + 3TC vs LPV/r + 2 NRTIGARDEL.
Comparison of RTV vs Cobi  GS-US Gallant JE. JID 2013;208:32-9 GS-US  Design  Objective –Non inferiority of COBI compared with RTV.
Phase 2 of new ARVs  Fostemsavir, prodrug of temsavir (attachment inhibitor) –AI Study  TAF (TFV prodrug) –Study –Study  Doravirine.
Switch to ATV/r-containing regimen  ATAZIP. Mallolas J, JAIDS 2009;51:29-36 ATAZIP ATAZIP Study: Switch LPV/r to ATV/r  Design  Endpoints –Primary:
Comparison of INSTI vs PI  FLAMINGO  GS  ACTG A5257  WAVES.
Switch to ATV/r monotherapy  ATARITMO  Swedish Study  ACTG A5201  OREY  MODAt Study.
Switch to ATV-containing regimen  ARIES Study  INDUMA Study  ASSURE Study.
1 Atazanavir (ATV) With Ritonavir (RTV) or Saquinavir (SQV) vs Lopinavir/Ritonavir (LPV/RTV) in Patients With Multiple Virologic Failures 24-Week Results.
Comparison of INSTI vs INSTI  QDMRK  SPRING-2. Eron JJ, Lancet Infect Dis 2011;11: QDMRK  Design  Objective –Non inferiority of RAL QD: % HIV.
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy  Pilot LPV/r  M  LPV/r Mono  KalMo  OK  OK04  KALESOLO  MOST  HIV-NAT 077.
Comparison of NNRTI vs PI/r  EFV vs LPV/r vs EFV + LPV/r –A5142 –Mexican Study  NVP vs ATV/r –ARTEN  EFV vs ATV/r –A5202.
Comparison of PI vs PI  ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089  LPV/r mono vs LPV/r + ZDV/3TCMONARK  LPV/r QD vs BIDM M A5073  LPV/r + 3TC vs LPV/r + 2 NRTIGARDEL.
Comparison of PI vs PI  ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089  LPV/r mono vs LPV/r + ZDV/3TCMONARK  LPV/r QD vs BIDM M A5073  LPV/r + 3TC vs LPV/r + 2 NRTIGARDEL.
NRTI-sparing  SPARTAN  PROGRESS  NEAT001/ANRS 143  MODERN.
Phase 2 of new ARVs  Fostemsavir, prodrug of temsavir (attachment inhibitor) –AI Study  TAF (TFV prodrug) –Study –Study  Doravirine.
Switch to ATV- or ATV/r-containing regimen Switch to ATV/r-containing regimen  ATAZIP Switch to ATV ± r-containing regimen  SWAN Study  SLOAT Study.
Comparison of PI vs PI  ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089  LPV/r mono vs LPV/r + ZDV/3TCMONARK  LPV/r QD vs BIDM M A5073  LPV/r + 3TC vs LPV/r + 2 NRTIGARDEL.
Comparison of NRTI combinations  ZDV/3TC vs TDF + FTC –Study 934  ABC/3TC vs TDF/FTC –HEAT Study –ACTG A5202 Study –ASSERT Study  FTC/TDF vs FTC/TAF.
Comparison of PI vs PI  ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089  LPV/r mono vs LPV/r + ZDV/3TCMONARK  LPV/r QD vs BIDM M A5073  LPV/r + 3TC vs LPV/r + 2 NRTIGARDEL.
SAILING Efficacy and safety of dolutegravir (DTG) in treatment- experienced INI-naïve patients DK/DLG/0041/14c September 2015.
NRTI-sparing  SPARTAN  PROGRESS  NEAT001/ANRS 143  MODERN.
Comparison of RTV vs Cobi  GS-US Gallant JE. JID 2013;208:32-9 GS-US  Design  Objective –Non inferiority of COBI compared with RTV.
NRTI-sparing  SPARTAN  PROGRESS  RADAR  NEAT001/ANRS 143  A  VEMAN  MODERN.
Switch to low dose ATV/r  LASA Study.  Design  Endpoints –Primary: proportion of patients with HIV RNA < 200 c/mL at W48 (ITT-E) ; non-inferiority.
Switch from TDF to TAF GS-US Study GS-US Study
Comparison of PI vs PI ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089
Comparison of INSTI vs INSTI
Comparison of INSTI vs PI
NRTI-sparing SPARTAN PROGRESS RADAR NEAT001/ANRS 143 A VEMAN
ARV-trial.com Switch to ATV/r + 3TC ATLAS-M Study.
Comparison of INSTI vs INSTI
No cirrhosis or compensated cirrhosis** No HBV or HIV co-infection
Switch to DTG + RPV Switch to DTG + RPV SWORD Study
ARV-trial.com Switch to LPV/r + RAL KITE Study 1.
Switch ABC/3TC to TAF/FTC
Switch to BIC/FTC/TAF GS-US GS-US GS-US
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI
Switch to BIC/FTC/TAF GS-US GS-US GS-US
Comparison of PI vs PI ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089
Switch to BIC/FTC/TAF GS-US GS-US GS-US
Comparison of NNRTI vs PI/r
Comparison of PI vs PI ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089
Comparison of INSTI vs EFV
Comparison of PI vs PI ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089
Switch to ATV- or ATV/r-containing regimen
Comparison of INSTI – Phase 2
Comparison of INSTI vs INSTI
Comparison of INSTI vs INSTI
Comparison of NNRTI vs PI/r
Comparison of NRTI combinations
Switch to RAL-containing regimen
Switch to BIC/FTC/TAF GS-US GS-US GS-US
Comparison of PI vs PI ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089
Switch to INSTI + NNRTI Switch to DTG + RPV SWORD Study
Comparison of INSTI vs PI
Switch to ATV/r monotherapy
Switch to ATV/r monotherapy
NRTI-sparing SPARTAN PROGRESS RADAR NEAT001/ANRS 143 A VEMAN
ARV-trial.com Switch to DTG/ABC/3TC STRIIVING NEAT
Comparison of PI vs PI ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089
DTG + 3TC vs DTG + TDF/FTC GEMINI.
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI
Presentation transcript:

Phase 2 of new ARVs BMS , prodrug of BMS (attachment inhibitor) - AI Study

Start of combination therapy AI Study : BMS Phase II BMS mg bid + RAL + TDF N=50 BMS mg bid + RAL + TDF n = 49 BMS mg qd + RAL + TDF n = 51 BMS mg qd + RAL + TDF n = 50 ATV/r 300/100 mg qd + RAL + TDF n = 51 D1 W24 W48 Primary endpoints Secondary endpoint 7 days of BMS monotherapy : 10 patients per study arm W96 Long-term follow-up on selected dose  Design – Phase IIb, randomised, active-controlled, blinded-to-BMS dose – ARV-experienced patients, > 18 years, HIV RNA > 1,000 c/mL, CD4 cell count > 50/mm 3 – Susceptibility to RAL, TDF and ATV – BMS IC 50 < 0.1 μM (100 nM) by screening Phenosense ® entry assay Partial blind (BMS dose) AI Study Lalezari J, CROI 2014, Abs. 86; Thompson M, CROI 2015, Abs. 545

 Objective –Primary endpoints (W24) : –% HIV-1 RNA < 50 c/mL –% of SAEs and AEs leading to discontinuation –Secondary endpoints (W48) : –%HIV-1 RNA < 50 c/mL –Change in CD4 T-cell count from baseline –% SAEs and AEs leading to discontinuation AI Study Thompson M, CROI 2015, Abs. 545 AI Study : BMS Phase II

BMS TDF + RAL TDF + RAL + ATV/r N = mg BID N = mg BID N = mg QD N = mg QD N = 50 Median age, years Female38 %43 % 32 %43 % HIV RNA (log 10 c/mL), median HIV RNA > 100,000 c/mL46 %51 %45 %36 %35 % CD4 cell count/mm 3, median CD4 < 200 per mm 3 38 %33 %41 %42 %37 % HIV subtype B / C70 % / 16 %59 % / 25 %69 % / 22 %64 % / 20 %67 % / 18 % Discontinuation by W486 (12 %)17 (35 %)9 (18 %)16 (32 %)14 (28 %) For lack of efficacy-5152 For adverse event12-22 Lost to follow-up21252 Non-compliance142-1 Consent withdrawal12-23 Other13424 Baseline characteristics and patient disposition AI Study AI Study : BMS Phase II Lalezari J, CROI 2014, Abs. 86; Thompson M, CROI 2015, Abs. 545

BMS days of monotherapy Mean change in HIV RNA from baseline (log 10 c/ml) Lalezari J, CROI 2014, Abs mg bid (n = 7) 800 mg bid (n = 5) 600 mg qd (n = 10) mg qd (n = 10) Day 0,5 0,0 -0,5 -1,0 -1,5 -2, AI Study AI Study : BMS Phase II

Lalezari J, CROI 2014, Abs. 86 HIV RNA < 50 c/ml at W24 by baseline HIV RNA (observed) 400 mg bid 800 mg bid 600 mg qd mg qd ATV/r 300/100 mg qd BMS Baseline HIV RNA < 100,000 c/mL Baseline HIV RNA > 100,000 c/mL % BMS TDF + RAL ATV/r + TDF + RAL 400 mg bid800 mg bid600 mg qd1200 mg qd HIV RNA < 50 c/ml (mITT, snapshot)80%69,4%76,5%72%74,5% HIV RNA < 400 c/ml (mITT, snapshot)92%80%90%80%82% HIV RNA < 50 c/ml (observed)87%81%78%84% 86% HIV RNA < 50 c/mL or < 400 c/mL at W24 AI Study AI Study : BMS Phase II

BMS TDF + RAL ATV/r + TDF + RAL (n = 51) 400 mg bid (n = 50) 800 mg bid (n = 49) 600 mg qd (n = 51) mg qd (n = 50) HIV RNA < 50 c/mL, % HIV RNA > 50 c/mL, % Discontinued for lack of efficacy, % Discontinued for other reasons, % No virologic data at W48 Discontinued due to AE or death, % Discontinued for other reasons, % Missing data during window but on study, % HIV RNA < 400 c/mL, % AI Study AI Study : BMS Phase II HIV RNA < 50 c/mL or < 400 c/mL at W48, mITT snapshot Thompson M, CROI 2015, Abs. 545 HIV RNA < 50 c/ml, % HIV RNA < 50 c/mL at W48, observed

N (%) BMS TDF + RAL ATV/r + TDF + RAL (N = 51) 400 mg bid (N = 50) 800 mg bid (N = 49) 600 mg qd (N = 51) mg qd (N = 50) SAEs*3 (6.0)5 (10.2)4 (7.8)3 (6.0)5 (9.8) AEs leading to discontinuation**1 (2.0)2 (4.1)02 (4.0)2 (3.9) Grade 2-4 related clinical AEs4 (8.0)4 (8.2)3 (5.9)6 (12.0)15 (29.4) Present in > 2 subjects Abdominal pain Nausea Hyperbilirubinemia Jaundice Blood bilirubin increased Headache (2.0) (3.9) 4 (7.8) 2 (3.9) 3 (5.9) 2 (3.9) * Anal abscess, herpes encephalitis, overdose (3), extrapulmonary tuberculosis (2), herpes zoster, abdominal pain, myalgia, spontaneous abortion, acute renal failure, cellulitis (2), lymphangitis, chronic cholecystitis, back pain, pneumonia, pyelonephritis, diarrhea, cholelithiasis, migraine ** Illegal substance use, extrapulmonary tuberculosis (3), acute renal failure, abdominal distension, flatulence, nausea, jaundice ; 6/7 AE leading to discontinuation in first 24 weeks AI Study Safety data through W48 Thompson M, CROI 2015, Abs. 545 AI Study : BMS Phase II

Mean change from baseline at W48 in fasting lipids, mg/dL N (%) BMS TDF + RAL ATV/r + TDF + RAL (N = 51) 400 mg bid (N = 50) 800 mg bid (N = 49) 600 mg qd (N = 51) mg qd (N = 50) Neutrophils (absolute)1 (2.1)1 (2.0)2 (3.9)2 (2.1)1 (2.0) Alkaline phosphatase ALT AST Total bilirubin 0 1 (2.1) 0 1 (2.0) (2.1) 2 (4.2) 0 1 (2.0) 2 (4.0) 29 (58.0) Creatine kinase Glucose fasting serum Uric acid (2.0) 0 1 (2.0) 2 (3.9) 0 2 (4.2) 0 2 (4.2) 2 (4.0) 0 AI Study Grade 3-4 laboratory abnormalities (≥ 2 subjects) Thompson M, CROI 2015, Abs. 545 AI Study : BMS Phase II BMS armsATV/r Total cholesterol-7.39 to LDL-cholesterol-0.5 to Triglycerides-23 to

 Conclusion –Virologic response rates (mITT and observed) and immunologic responses were similar across the BMS and ATV/r arms through Week 48 –All BMS doses were generally well tolerated with no dose- response safety signals reported –Continuation dose of BMS mg QD for the Phase IIb study –Phase III study in heavily treatment-experienced patients with limited therapeutic options Phase III dose : 600 mg BID Subjects enrolled regardless of baseline susceptibility to BMS A retrospective analysis will be conducted to determine whether a baseline phenotypic assay is necessary in the future AI Study Thompson M, CROI 2015, Abs. 545 AI Study : BMS Phase II