Results from Meditation 2

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
How do we know what exists?
Advertisements

The value of certainty. Foundationalists suppose that true beliefs held with certainty (indubitable) together with logical and linguistic analysis offer.
Meditation IV God is not a Deceiver, Truth Criterion & Problem of Error.
The ontological argument. I had the persuasion that there was absolutely nothing in the world, that there was no sky and no earth, neither minds nor.
The Cogito. The Story So Far! Descartes’ search for certainty has him using extreme sceptical arguments in order to finally arrive at knowledge. He has.
The Role of God in the Meditations (1) Context
Descartes God.
Descartes’ rationalism
Descartes’ rationalism
Descartes’ cosmological argument
Descartes’ trademark argument Michael Lacewing
Meditations on First Philosophy
Descartes’ Meditations. Suppose Descartes has proven his own existence as a thinking thing: Can he prove anything else with absolute certainty? Mathematics?
Bigquestions.co.uk1 meditation 3, the trademark argument perfection.
The first proof for God’s existence I have an idea of God (an infinite, perfect being. The cause of an idea must have as much formal reality as objectively.
Lecture Three “The Problem of Knowledge” Think (pp. 32 – 48)  Review last lecture  Descartes’ Clear and Distinct Ideas  “The Trademark Argument”  The.
Descartes on Certainty (and Doubt)
The Rationalists: Descartes Certainty: Self and God
Skepticism The Causal Argument. God A nd now I seem to discover a path that will conduct us from the contemplation of the true God, in whom are contained.
Sources of knowledge: –Sense experience (empiricism) –Reasoning alone (rationalism) We truly know only that of which we are certain (a priori). Since sense.
Descartes on scepticism
Knowledge empiricism Michael Lacewing
René Descartes The father of modern Western philosophy and the epistemological turn Methodological doubt, his dreaming argument and the evil.
LOCKE 2 An Argument that the External World [the world outside the mind] Exists.
Epistemology: the study of the nature, source, limits, & justification of knowledge Rationalism: we truly know only that of which we are certain. Since.
Descartes’ First Meditation
Knowledge, Skepticism, and Descartes. Knowing In normal life, we distinguish between knowing and just believing. “I think the keys are in my pocket.”
 According to philosophical skepticism, we can’t have knowledge of the external world.
In sum, 3 Arguments for God’s Existence are used by Descartes in Meditations: 1. The argument for the existence of God from the fact that I have an idea.
© Michael Lacewing Reason and experience Michael Lacewing
Philosophy 1050: Introduction to Philosophy Week 10: Descartes and the Subject: The way of Ideas.
Rene Descartes 1596—1650. Some dates 1543: publication of Copernicus’s De Revolutionibus 1543: publication of Copernicus’s De Revolutionibus 1633: Galileo.
Epistemology Section 1 What is knowledge?
Is God a Deceiver? (P1)The idea I have of God is of an infinitely perfect being. (P2)The cause of such an idea must itself be infinitely perfect. (P3)Therefore,
© Michael Lacewing Doubt in Descartes’ Meditations Michael Lacewing
1 The Rationalists: Descartes Rational Truth, God (the return), and the Cartesian Circle Soazig Le Bihan - University of Montana.
René Descartes ( AD) Meditations on First Philosophy (1641) (Text, pp )
 Doubt- to be uncertain about something, to hesitate to believe  Dualism- the belief that the mind and body are separate (but interact). Mind is a kind.
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 12 Minds and bodies #1 (Descartes) By David Kelsey.
Chapter 7 The Problem of Skepticism and Knowledge
René Descartes, Meditations Introduction to Philosophy Jason M. Chang.
Descartes’ Interactionist Dualism. Overview Descartes’ general project Descartes’ general project Argument for dualism Argument for dualism Explanation.
Descates Meditations II A starting point for reconstructing the world.
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 10 Epistemology #3 (Berkeley)
Meditation 3. Clear & Distinct Ideas Knows that he, “a thinking thing”, exists. Believes he exists because it is so “clearly and distinctly” so – this.
René Descartes Brandon Lee Block D.
Lauren Dobbs “Cogito ergo sum”. Bio  Descartes was a French born philosopher from the 1600’s.  He’s most famous for his “Meditations on First Philosophy”
Chapter 3: Knowledge The Rationalist’s Confidence: Descartes Introducing Philosophy, 10th edition Robert C. Solomon, Kathleen Higgins, and Clancy Martin.
Meditations: 3 & 4.
An Outline of Descartes's Meditations on First Philosophy
Cartesian Circle General Meaning: The veil of ideas that separates us from the external world in the Mind’s Eye Model, the general difficulty of trying.
Descartes II. First Argument for the Existence of God (P1)There must be at least as much reality and perfection in a cause as in its effect. (P2)If an.
WEEK 4: EPISTEMOLOGY Introduction to Rationalism.
DESCARTES: MEDITATION 3 OR: THE WORLD REGAINED — WITH CERTAINTY(?)
1. I exist, because I think. 2. I am a thinking thing 3
Meditation Three Of God: That He Exists.
Intuition and deduction thesis (rationalism)
The Trademark Argument and Cogito Criticisms
Skepticism Introduction.
Descartes’ trademark argument
Descartes’ proof of the external world
Major Periods of Western Philosophy
On your whiteboard: What is empiricism? Arguments/evidence for it?
Descartes -- Meditations Four
Rationalism: we truly know only that of which we are certain
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 7 Berkeley
Descartes -- Meditations Three
Philosophy Sept 28th Objective Opener 10 minutes
Meditation Three Of God: That He Exists.
Epistemology “Episteme” = knowledge “Logos” = words / study of
Presentation transcript:

Results from Meditation 2 I exist I am a thinking thing the mind can be understood independently of the body The mind is better and more easily understood than anything physical I can know the content of my mind (my ideas, my conscious states).

Ideas One important result from Meditation 2 is that I can know my ideas. Ideas are mental states that represent something, they are about something other than themselves (like a picture) Descartes does not know if the ideas represent things truly, but he knows he has them, and knows what they are about.

What is the cause of our ideas? Three possibilities: External cause (tree) Self-caused (unicorn) Innate (truth) Descartes does not yet know which of these possibilities is true, but he thinks that ideas need some kind of cause or explanation

Can we prove God exists? It’s important to prove God’s existence, because once we have God, we don’t have to worry about the evil deceiver. Descartes will use a non-deceiving God to reply to the skeptical arguments of Meditation I But you can’t use God, until you prove God exists.

Principles about causation Everything must have a cause The cause must have as much reality as the effect The cause of an idea must have as much formal reality as is found objectively in the idea. Descartes needs this last claim to prove God’s existence

Formal and objective reality Formal reality is just reality But objective reality refers only to ideas. An ideas objective reality is what the idea is about, what it represents. If we think of an idea as like a picture, the formal reality of an idea is what is pictured, represented by it.

Descartes thinks that if you have an idea, the cause of the idea must be as “real” as whatever the idea represents. IF this is true, and if I have an idea of God, then I can prove that God must exist. How?

The first proof for God’s existence I have an idea of God (an infinite, perfect being. The cause of an idea must have as much formal reality as objectively contained in the idea Only God has as much formal reality as is contained (represented by) the idea of God Therefore God exists.

Is the argument any good? Is it true that the only way you can get the idea of God is from God. What other ways might one construct an idea of God?

The proof is even worse given Descartes high standards Remember Descartes says that he will only accept beliefs that are so certain that even an extremely powerful demon cannot deceive him But if a demon can deceive him about 3+5=7, then that demon can surely also deceive him about “the cause must have as much formal reality as is objectively in the idea”

The Cartesian Circle After proving God exists, Descartes can say God is not a deceiver, God created me, so I can trust my cognitive faculties, at least those idea that I “clearly and distinctly perceive” But he can’t use this principle to justify the premises of the God argument. He needs God to prove God. But this is a circle.

Another argument for God I exist I require a cause Therefore God exists ??????? What is going on here?

Causation is not so simple “For because the entire span of one’s life can be divided into countless parts, each one wholly independent of the rest, it does not follow from the fact that I existed a short time ago that I must exist now, unless some cause, as it were, creates me all over again at this moment, that is to say, which preserves me” (p.78)

Time and Causation Descartes thinks each moment of time is separate from every other moment. Because they are separate, they cannot causally interact. In order to cause my existence, the cause must be here, with me to cause me to exist. IF its in the past it does not exist, and cannot create me

So we need a cause that can be co-present with the effect. God is outside of time, a divine projectionist creating the world over and over again at each instant.

How God helps with skepticism if God is a perfect being, then God is not a deceiver (deception is an imperfection) 2. If God created me so that I am systematically deceived, God would be a deceiver 3. According to (1) this is impossible. So I can trust my senses, my rational insight.