IP Management at Massey 1.national collaborative infrastructure.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SOME KEY ISSUES FOR CONSIDERATION IN A NATIONAL IP STRATEGY PART SIX – IP Policy for R&D Institutions and Universities OGADA TOM Innovation and Technology.
Advertisements

Intellectual Property HEY Trusts New IP Policy and Role of Medipex Will it enable me to turn this…. into.
Final Report Presentation By Mohammad Saber Sakhizada March,26 – 2009.
Dr Brendan McGuckin Head Commercial Services “The University as an enabling employer in IP Management”
Implementing NSERC’s IP Policy June 30 th, 2010 CAURA Webinar Stéphanie Michaud.
Commercialisation at Curtin September 2007 Policy and Process.
Intellectual Property Rights (IPR)
1 © Copyright and other Intellectual Property. 2 What is intellectual property? Patents Trade Marks Designs Plant Breeders Rights Copyright Confidential.
1 RIT: Support Infrastructure, Policies and Procedures – Perceptions, Myths and Reality Varda Main Director Technology Licensing Office.
Technology and Economic Development Intellectual Property Issues in Research Jim Baker Director Office of Technology and Economic Development
IP Issues in Research Jim Baker, Executive Director Innovation, and Industry Engagement.
Intellectual Property Rights Margaret Lawlor Business Development Manager Faculty of Medical Sciences 2015 copyright©NewcastleUniversity 2015.
Creation of IP Culture in Universities & Advantages of Universities having an IP Culture Dr Duncan Matthews Queen Mary University of London.
Intellectual Property and Technology Transfer Ron Huss, Ph.D., Associate Vice President of Research and Technology Transfer Michael Brignati, Ph.D., J.D.,
Intellectual Property and CRDs February 19, 2015.
FP7 Regler för deltagande 18 december 2006 Monica Hjertman, Enheten för Europaprogrammen, VINNOVA
History 2002 – Director of research and sponsored program develops IP policy Fall 2002 – Referral to review the policy February 2003 – Faculty affairs.
N Intellectual Property Rights and Research in the Digital Age CRASSH 2 February 2011 Dr Richard Jennings, Deputy Director Cambridge Enterprise Limited,
Technology Transfer at UIC © 2009 by the Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois Presentation to the Software Commercialization Symposium April.
Industrial Partnerships & Technology Transfer Keeping Your Name Out Of The Gossip Columns Of Nature and Science BC Cancer AgencyJ. D. Litster March 24,
February 25, 2014 SERIES 4, SESSION 2 OF AAPLS APPLICANTS & ADMINISTRATORS PREAWARD LUNCHEON SERIES Material Transfer and Confidentiality Agreements.
Introduction to confidentiality Diana Galpin Research and Innovation Services (R&IS)
Intellectual Property: Kenneth Kirkland, Ph.D. Executive Director, Iowa State University Research Foundation (ISURF) Director, Office of Intellectual Property.
Intellectual Property and Senior Design Projects.
Legal Considerations For Commercializing Technology and Intellectual Property Presentation for the Nikola Tesla Memorial Conference January 11, 2014, New.
RESEARCH PRODUCTS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS OGADA T. and MBAYAKI A. CAMPUS BASED RESEARCH WORKSHOPS TOWN CAMPUS 3 May 2006.
Understanding Intellectual Property IP Australia Seminar August 6, 2003 Kimberley Heitman, B.Juris, Llb, AACS Director, Legal Services Office, UWA.
Cern.ch/knowledgetransfer. Knowledge Transfer | Accelerating Innovation Charlyne Rabe CONTRACTS FOR TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER Charlyne RABE KT Legal Advisor.
UNIVERSITY OF NAIROBI Training Workshop on Intellectual Property Rights (Jun17-18,2013, Heads Dept, sonu, champs) Intellectual Property Management Office.
Wyoming Research Products Center Intellectual Property and Licensing Services Senator Enzi’s Inventors Conference April 12, 2008 Davona K. Douglass, Acting.
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY POLICY FOR KNUST (DRAFT DOCUMENT) 2ND KNUST SUMMER SCHOOL.
Tech Launch Arizona Tech Transfer Arizona Rakhi Gibbons, Asst. Director for Biomedical and Life Sciences Licensing.
Overview OTL Mission Inventor Responsibility Stanford Royalty Sharing Disclosure Form Patent View Inventor Agreements Patent.
Commercialisation at Griffith Dorina Caccamo Manager, Contracts and Administration Griffith Enterprise Value through.
A Dual Role Principal (Rector) of Heriot-Watt University Chair of the regional economic development company.
OK Ewan?. COORDINATION AND SUSTAINABILITY OF INTERNATIONAL MOUSE INFORMATICS RESOURCES WORKPACKAGE 6: Data acquisition, curation and ownership Nadia Rosenthal.
THE ROLE OF CIRCUMSTANCES AND AGREEMENTS IN DETERMINING OWNERSHIP OF COPYRIGHT AND OTHER INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY IN FACULTY CREATED WORKS. Faculty Created.
University Technology Transfer: Issues and Opportunities Mark Crowell Research Administration for Scientists (T. Quigg) 7 December 2001.
Introduction to the Offices of Biotechnology & Business Development John L. Harb Director, Office of Biotechnology __________________________________ October.
Intellectual Property and Senior Design Projects.
Intellectual Property and Senior Design Projects.
Policies Promoting IP Development in Universities and Higher Institutions of Learning In Africa OGADA Tom WIPO National Workshop on Intellectual Property.
Elements of a Workable Intellectual Property Policy OPIC IP Roundtable Noel Courage Bereskin & Parr November 21, 2007.
An introduction to The University of Auckland’s Knowledge Transfer Company Dr Peter Lee, CEO.
“IP Universities” Istanbul, May 16 to 18, 2012 Albert Long Hall, BOGAZICI UNIVERSITY IP Policy for Universities Tamas Bene, IP manager University.
Intellectual Property Dr Laura Rush Business Development Manager Research Enterprise Services copyright©NewcastleUniversity 2015.
WP1: IP charter Geneva – 23rd June 2009 Contribution from CERN.
Ignite Technology Transfer NUI Galway Technology Transfer Office Seamus Coyne, Ph.D Neil Ferguson, Ph.D Commercialisation Executives Technology Transfer.
Moscow, Russia, 10 September 2012 HSE Intellectual Property Policy Aliya Ermakova, Head of IP Department, Innovation and Enterprise Office, HSE
Wyoming Research Products Center Technology Transfer and Licensing Senator Enzi’s Inventors Conference April 20, 2013 Phillip Wulf, Intellectual Property.
NATIONAL CONFERENCE Intellectual Property Policies for Universities and Innovation dr. sc. Vlatka Petrović Head, Technology Transfer Office Acting Head,
Policy on the Management of Intellectual Property in Technology Transfer Activities at CERN CERN/FC/5434/RA Technology Transfer Network Meeting – 10 th.
Who, what, where and when. UCC Office of Technology Transfer.
Why an Intellectual Property Policy? Sofia, November 24 and 25, 2015 Mr. Evgeniy Sesitsky, Department for Transition and Developed Countries, World Intellectual.
© 2004 The IPR-Helpdesk is a project of the European Commission DG Enterprise, co-financed within the fifth framework programme of the European Community.
Intellectual Property – a brief introduction 19 th October 2011 Andrew Wilson Technology Transfer Project Manager.
WIPO Guidance – Intellectual Property Policy for Universities and Research Institutions for Countries in Transitions Prague, April 21 and 22, 2016 Mr.
Intellectual Property …at The University of Manchester Kaisa Mattila, Intellectual Property Lawyer Eversheds LLP 19 May 2010.
Patent Review Overview Summary of different types of Intellectual Property What is a patent? Why would you want one? What are the requirements for patentability?
Copyright Intelllectual Property and Thesis Maria Rehbinder,LL.M.
UTS Library 2016 workshop Copyright for Researchers
Protecting and exploiting research results at Newcastle University Geraint Lewis – Business Development Manager, Research and Enterprise Services
Technology Commercialization Office
Protecting and exploiting research results at Newcastle University Lynda Speed Business Development Manager Research and Enterprise Services
University & Industry Collaborative IP Development
Capturing Creativity: Intellectual Asset Management and IP Strategy.
KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT (KM) Session # 20
Protecting and exploiting research results at Newcastle University Dr Catrina Mullan Business Development Manager Research and Enterprise Services 0191.
Protecting and exploiting research results at Newcastle University Matt Abbott Business Development Manager Research and Enterprise Services
Presentation transcript:

IP Management at Massey 1.national collaborative infrastructure

Intellectual Property Policy Ensures IP rights generated by Massey staff and students are used to maximise the flow of benefits to the community, enhance the reputation and wealth of the University, encourage staff and students to benefit from their commercially viable activities and to protect the rights of staff, student and the University where IP rights are concerned. The Commercialisation Office evaluates the exploitation of IP

Ownership of IP rights Legal and beneficial ownership in all new IP rights vests with the University except for: – Copyright in scholarly works – Copyright in Student works – Moral rights – Where otherwise agreed in writing by the Commercialisation Office Ownership may change as a consequence of the – Terms and conditions of the Research Contract that generated the IP – Results of commercialisation evaluation

Allocating the benefits of IP Net revenue from the Commercialisation will be shared equally between the: – Creators – College – University Allocation of shares in spin-out companies – In some circumstances the creators may negotiate to receive shares in entities into which the new IP has been licensed or assigned. Where there are multiple creators a benefit sharing agreement needs to be negotiated

Students Participation in research should not interfere with the assessment of the students academic performance Any delays in the publication of the students thesis as a result of a confidentiality agreement should be consistent with the Universities embargo policy University has a “Duty of Care” to its students

Scenarios Student has bright idea, normal supervision from University and technician support plus $300 from SEAT. – University owns IP – Student likely to be dominant Creator – Commercialisation pathway options

Scenarios Student has bright idea, supervisor makes significant creative contribution and technician support plus $300 from SEAT. – University owns IP – Student and Supervisor likely to be equal Creators – Commercialisation pathway options

Scenarios Student works on project, supervisor has the bright idea and makes creative contribution and technician support plus $300 from SEAT. – University owns IP – Supervisor dominant Creator – maybe 95:05 – Commercialisation pathway options

Scenarios Company X has bright idea and they want confidentiality and IP benefits and fund direct expenses – University agree to assign IP to company – Report/thesis likely to be embargoed – Creators of IP would have patent in their name – Commercialisation managed by Company X – No benefit share to University & Creators unless agreed upfront often as a result of background IP

Scenarios Company X has bright idea and they want confidentiality and IP benefits and fund direct expenses – University agree to assign IP to company – Report/thesis likely to be embargoed – Creators of IP would have patent in their name – Commercialisation managed by Company X – No benefit share to University & Creators unless agreed upfront often as a result of background IP