MICE hydrogen review Summary of system hardware. System function To provide 22 litres of liquid hydrogen for use as a muon absorber within a superconducting.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 CM24 – 2 nd June 2009 LH2 Infrastructure M Hills M Courthold T Bradshaw I Mullacrane P Warburton.
Advertisements

Hydrogen Pre-Operation Safety Review 4 th October 2011 Hydrogen R&D System Operational Procedures and Test Plan M Courthold.
The Use of Small Coolers for Hydrogen and Helium Liquefaction
MICE OsC – 22 nd June 2010 Liquid-hydrogen system and absorber M Hills T Bradshaw M Courthold S Ishimoto W Lau I Mullacrane P Warburton.
MICE hydrogen review Commissioning, testing and operations.
1 MICE Hydrogen System Elwyn Baynham, Tom Bradshaw, Iouri Ivaniouchenkov RAL MICE / RAL Safety RAL, 30 October 2003.
1 Cooling the Hydrogen (Helium) Absorbers with Small Coolers Michael A. Green University of Oxford Department of Physics Oxford OX1 3RH, UK MICE Video.
Hydrogen Hazard Summary and Preliminary FMECA and HAZOP Yury Ivanyushenkov Elwyn Baynham Tom Bradshaw.
1 Status of Hydrogen System Development MICE Collaboration Meeting, Frascati, June 26-29, 2005 Yury Ivanyushenkov, Tom Bradshaw, Elwyn Baynham, Mike Courthold,
MICE Hazard Overview and Analysis Elwyn Baynham Tom Bradshaw Yury Ivanyushenkov.
CM26 – 26 th March 2010 Step IV: Liquid Hydrogen Infrastructure M Hills M Courthold T Bradshaw I Mullacrane P Warburton.
1 MICE Absorber working group Columbia, 13 June 2003 MICE Hydrogen System. Preliminary HAZOP. Elwyn Baynham, Tom Bradshaw and Iouri Ivaniouchenkov,
MICE Safety System DE Baynham TW Bradshaw MJD Courthold Y Ivanyushenkov.
MICE AFCSWG Safety Review Summary Mary Anne Cummings Dec. 17, 2003 MICE Video Conference.
LH2 Absorber Design Mary Anne Cummings MICE Safety Review LBL Dec 9, 2003.
MICE Project Board 23 rd September 2010 Liquid Hydrogen and General Infrastructure M Hills T Bradshaw M Courthold S Griffiths T Hayler S Ishimoto A Lintern.
MICE Hydrogen System Implementation Tom Bradshaw Elwyn Baynham Iouri Ivaniouchenkov Jim Rochford.
A presentation at the MICE Video Conference on Wednesday the 5 th of May 2004 Response to the Safety review comments by Wing Lau -- Oxford.
1 Infrastructure at RAL Iouri Ivaniouchenkov, RAL MICE Collaboration CERN, 29 March 2003.
Matthew Hills Hydrogen System – Piping and Instrumentation Diagram.
Hydrogen R&D system HAZOP and failure analysis Yury Ivanyushenkov, Elwyn Baynham, Tom Bradshaw, Mike Courthold, Matthew Hills and Tony Jones.
1 Technical Arguments in Favor of using the Cryomech PT-415 Cooler for Cooling the LH 2 Experiment Michael A. Green Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory Berkeley.
Hydrogen Delivery System – R&D Activities T W Bradshaw M Courthold M Hills J Rochford Daresbury Controls Group etc…
Hydrogen system status Yury Ivanyushenkov for Elwyn Baynham, Tom Bradshaw, Mike Courthold, Matthew Hills and Tony Jones.
MICE Hydrogen System Design Tom Bradshaw Iouri Ivaniouchenkov Elwyn Baynham Columbia Meeting June 2003.
MICE Hydrogen System MICE Collaboration Meeting, CERN, 29 March-2 April 2004 Elwyn Baynham, Tom Bradshaw, Yury Ivanyushenkov Applied Science Division,
Mechanical Safety Systems and DSEAR Compliance
MICE hydrogen review System modifications. Relief circuit repair During leak testing of R&D tests, the insulating vacuum would not go lower than
MICE Hydrogen System Tom Bradshaw Yury Ivanyushenkov Elwyn Baynham Meeting October 2004 – Coseners House.
Fcal upgrade for sLHC: Cryogenics modifications – TE-CRG/ C.Fabre 1 ATLAS FCal Upgrade for sLHC: Modifications to the Calorimeter Cryogenic.
Patrick Thornton, SNS/FPE June 9, 2008
MICE Hydrogen Control System MICE H2 Review Meeting RAL 15 th Jan 2015 PJ Warburton – STFC Daresbury Lab.
The MICE Hydrogen System Summary Tom Bradshaw, Yury Ivanyushenkov, Elwyn Baynham, Tony Jones, Mike Courthold and Matthew Hills Rutherford Appleton Laboratory.
MICE CM30 7 th July 2011 Liquid Hydrogen Delivery System M Hills (STFC, RAL) T Bradshaw (STFC, RAL) M Courthold (STFC, RAL) S Ishimoto (KEK) A Muir (STFC,
Iouri Ivaniouchenkov RAL Safety considerations at RAL July 9, RAL MICE Collaboration Meeting 1.
Status and Integration of the Spectrometer Solenoid Magnets Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab MICE RAL June 15, 2007.
MTA Cryogenics: Where We Are The Work of Fermilab AD/Cryo Barry Norris, Christine Darve and a host of wonderfully talented Cryogenic Personnel John Thompson,
MICE Hydrogen Safety Functions IEC61508 Compliance & Emergency Procedures MICE Safety Review Meeting 4 th Oct 2011 PJ Warburton - Daresbury Lab.
1 Liquid Hydrogen R&D test report Video Conference – 23/08/12 S Watson P Warburton M Courthold.
MICE Hydrogen Control System MICE Collaboration Meeting CM33 27 th July 2012 PJ Warburton – STFC Daresbury Lab.
Hydrogen system R&D. R&D programme – general points Hydrogen absorber system incorporates 2 novel aspects Hydrogen storage using a hydride bed Hydrogen.
Conceptual Design Review of the NPDGamma Experiment in Beam Line 13 Seppo Penttila NPDGamma project manager September 25, 2007 at SNS.
Hydrogen Pre-Operation Safety Review 4 th October 2011 Results from Helium Commissioning M Hills.
The MICE Hydrogen System Safety Review Introduction Tom Bradshaw, Yury Ivanyushenkov, Elwyn Baynham, Tony Jones, Mike Courthold and Matthew Hills Rutherford.
MICE Hydrogen Control System MICE Safety Review Meeting 4 th Oct 2011 PJ Warburton - Daresbury Lab.
Exhaust to atmosphere G1 V1 V2 V3 LN2 Storage Vessel 150 l Dewar Cryostat Exhaust to atmosphere Nitrogen or helium gas bottle LN2 Circuit for MIT Test,
CM 28 – 6 th October 2010 LH2 Infrastructure M Hills M Courthold T Bradshaw I Mullacrane P Warburton.
Hydrogen Pre-Operation Safety Review 4 th October 2011 The Hydrogen Delivery System – An Introduction M Hills.
CM27 – 8 th July 2010 LH2 System Progress and Future Plans M Hills T Bradshaw M Courthold I Mullacrane P Warburton.
Johan Bremer, 22th-26th September 2008 Cryogenics Operations 2008, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland 1 CRYOGENICS OPERATIONS 2008 Organized by CERN Safety aspects.
MICE LH2 Absorber Safety Mary Anne Cummings Edgar Black (IIT) Abingdon, UK Oct. 30, 2003.
1 Small Coolers for MICE Michael A. Green University of Oxford Department of Physics Oxford OX1 3RH, UK MICE Collaboration Meeting RAL.
Hydrogen Control System MJD Courthold TW Bradshaw Y Ivanyushenkov D Baynham.
MAGNET#1MAGNET#2MAGNET#3 SATELLITE VB#1 SATELLITE VB#2 SATELLITE VB#3 PRECOOLER#1PRECOOLER#2 DISTRIBUTION VALVE BOX DVB CP#1CP#3CP#2 BUFFER DEWAR LHe 5m.
1 Liquid Hydrogen R&D test report CM34 – 17/10/12 S Watson P Warburton M Courthold.
1 Liquid Hydrogen update CM33 S Watson P Warburton M Courthold.
1 MICE absorbers work package MPB – 27/10/15 Mike Courthold Mark Tucker Phil Warburton Steve Watson.
1 MICE Hydrogen system Working group mtg – 01/09/14.
Replacing hydride bed with bottle Advantages No risk of diminished bed capacity Following jobs no longer necessary – Move pressure gauge – Replace cracked.
Working group meeting 07/05/15. Agenda Overview of review and current action list Relief system – Summary of problem – Details of analysis, testing and.
Spokesman's update.
Hydrogen System Update
Liquid Hydrogen Infrastructure Update
ARAC/H/F Air-cooled water chillers, free-cooling chillers and heat pumps Range: kW.
Absorber progress MICE-ISIS review of the liquid hydrogen system will be held in early January; guidance from Nominated Engineers on the imported absorber.
MICE Meeting at RAL, Oct-23, 2005
MICE Safety Review Meeting 4th Oct 2011 PJ Warburton - Daresbury Lab
Small Coolers for MICE MICE Collaboration Meeting RAL Michael A. Green
Status of Hydrogen System Development
Presentation transcript:

MICE hydrogen review Summary of system hardware

System function To provide 22 litres of liquid hydrogen for use as a muon absorber within a superconducting solenoid magnet Hydrogen is stored as gas and liquefied using an in-situ closed-cycle cryocooler System operation is remote and (mostly) automatic

Safety philosophy System is safe against two simultaneous failures – Keeping separation of hydrogen and oxygen – Avoiding ignition sources where explosive atmospheres could form Passive safety – Fail open/close valves where appropriate – Redundancy in pressure relief circuits Adherence to codes and regulations – DSEAR – IEC61508 – PED (97/23/EC) – Local SHE codes Operational procedures – Expert operators only – Monitor-only interaction with control system

System overview Hydride bed stores hydrogen gas Gas panel manages gas movement AFC hydrogen turret liquefies hydrogen Control system with dedicated PLC operates system autonomously Ventilation system mitigates any hydrogen leaks

General layout Gas panel inc hydride bed Charging station Ventilation fans Absorber Focus Coil Transfer line Vacuum pumps

Charging station Cabinet to house two hydrogen bottles – Ventilated via ductwork to plenum (see later) – Includes regulator and various hand valves – Incorporates a transparent hatch for access to valves – Pipework for R&D tests was a single continuous piece of ¼” stainless tube with VCR fittings inside the cabinet and gas panel – Protective guards were included where appropriate

Hydride bed Manufactured by Treibacher in m 3 gas max capacity in 0.25 m 3 vessel – At room temperature, pressure is < 30 bar Absorption/evolution controlled by glycol heater-chiller unit – Temperature range of -15°C – 65°C

Gas panel Instrumentation, pneumatic valves and relief components – all ATEX rated intrinsically safe Ventilated, sealed cabinet Pipework welded or VCR fittings

Ventilation systems - fans Ventilation of gas panel and charging station – Mitigates against any minor hydrogen leaks from demountable fittings etc – Filtered air inlet on gas panel – Bifurcated fans on roof powered via a UPS, sized for three systems 11,000 m 3 /hr flow – only 3,600 m 3 /hr required to limit time of persistence to 60s – Polypropylene ducting with blast panel Ventilation of pump enclosure – Ventilates zoned pump enclosure as pumps exhaust hydrogen during empty and purge sequences – Also keeps pumps cool – Similar set up to gas panel ventilation system

Ventilation system - ducting Plastic-welded polypropylene ducting – Plenum distributes ventilation to three gas panel locations and charging station – Incorporates non-return dampers and a gate valve for the charging station duct – Also provides a conduit for the vent line while inside the MICE Hall

Transfer line Gas panel to AFC – 2off welded 1” stainless pipes with VCR fittings – Jacketed by a welded 4” stainless pipe, flushed through with nitrogen gas – Rigid construction – accommodated by flexible connections within the gas panel Charging cabinet to gas panel – Single piece of ¼” stainless pipe with VCR fittings

Absorber Focus Coil Cryogenic turret integrated into Focus Coil magnet module – Single Cryomech PT415 coldhead, heater regulated – Thermal syphon circuit – Separate LN 2 pre-cool / He jacket circuit Absorber vessel with thin beam windows – Vessel machined from a 5000-series aluminium billet – Windows similarly machined from 6061 aluminium billet – Indium seals on absorber windows – O-ring seals on safety windows

Test cryostat Analogous cryogenic system to the AFC – Equivalent absorber was a thick-walled vessel without thin beam windows – Incorporates a radiation shield, so was able to achieve LHe temperatures

Other infrastructure Pump enclosure – Two oil-sealed, rotary vane pumps (one for purging, one to back turbo pump) – All electrical services ATEX rated Gas bottle pack platform – Space for 4 bottle packs Compressed air services – Originate in ISIS, separate isolation valve and regulator for LH2 system Hydride bed heater-chiller – Uses a closed glycol circuit to exchange heat with hydride bed

How it works?

GAS PANEL TEST CRYOSTAT / AFC BOTTLE PLATFORM VENTILATION FANS VENT LINES PUMP ENCLOSURE CHARGING CABINET RELIEF CIRCUIT VACUUM RELIEF CIRCUIT BUFFER TANK HYDRIDE BED

Bed charging

Purging

Hydrogen fill

Hydrogen empty

Emergency vent

R&D programme 6 weeks in mid-2012 of operation with 24/7 supervision – First-time charge of hydride bed – 3 hydrogen fill/empty cycles 1 st – Hydrogen freezing due to improperly implemented heater control loop 2 nd – Fill sequence completed with interruption 3 rd – Fill sequence completed – Purge and application of argon blanket to bed Outcomes – Heater-chiller not powerful enough to reduce temperature of hydride bed quickly enough to absorb hydrogen in the event of an emergency absorber empty – 1500 litres of hydrogen lost from each cycle due to remnant pressure in the buffer tank – Bed pressure unknown due to gauge being downstream of regulator, meaning bed control is open loop