Environmental Decision Making in India Environment Support Group Bangalore India.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Child Rights Toolkit Comprehensive Toolkit To Address Children's Rights In Development & Humanitarian Cooperation And Government Programming.
Advertisements

Evaluating administrative and institutional capacity building
Module 4 Planning SP. What’s in Module 4  Opportunities for SP  Different SP models  Communication plan  Monitoring and evaluating  Working session.
Rule-Making Book II EU Administrative Procedures – The ReNEUAL Draft Model Rules 2014 Brussels, May th Herwig C.H. Hofmann University of Luxembourg.
THE APRM MONITORING PROCESS MOZAMBIQUE EXPERIENCE Workshop on Harmonizing the Zambian APRM NPoA with the NDP and MTEF Oct. 2014, Lusaka 1.
Vision: A strong and capable civil society, cooperating and responsive to Cambodia’s development challenges Host of the 2nd Global Assembly for CSO Development.
1 Legal Empowerment of the Poor: An Action Agenda for the World Bank Ana Palacio April 19, 2006.
CHILD WELFARE REFORM PROJECT COMMUNICATION STRATEGY.
The Treaties, Institutions and Policies of the EU
Diversity in Policing Project & Beyond.
Use of Tools for Sustainable Development Planning in Asia-Pacific – An Assessment based on India case study George C Varughese President, Development Alternatives.
Improving the Energy Efficiency of the Heat and Hot Water Supply Presenter: Bayramgul Garabaeva, Programme Officer Decentralization and Community Development.
OPTIONS AND REQUIREMENTS FOR ENGAGEMENT OF CIVIL SOCIETY IN GEF PROJECTS AND PROGRAMMES presented by Faizal Parish Regional/Central Focal Point GEF NGO.
Aboriginal Justice Strategy Action Plan.
Non-governmental Actors in the Compliance with and Monitoring of Multilateral Environmental Decisions.
How can citizen’s participate? Purpose and levels of participation: approach, methods, techniques, tools. Technical Assistance for Civil Society Organisations.
BACKGROUND NOTE FOR THE NATIONAL ADVOCACY AND TRAINING WORKSHOPS IN KENYA, UGANDA, TANZANIA, BURUNDI AND RWANDA ON ACCELERATING THE IMPLEMENTATION OF EAC.
UNICEF Turkey Country Programme
Project Citizen Center for Civic Education
Evaluation Office 1 Evaluating Capacity Development David Todd Senior Evaluation Officer GEF Evaluation Office.
CSO engagement in policy process Hille Hinsberg State Chancellery Government Communication Officer
The Aarhus & Espoo Conventions Making implementation work for stakeholders.
Empowering People The Electricity Governance Initiative PRAYAS- PUNE ENERGYGROUP Smita Nakhooda 11 May 2007 New York CSD 15.
Guidance for AONB Partnership Members Welsh Member Training January 26/
Civil Society – A key to UNSCR 1540 Success Irma Arguello NPSGLobal Foundation – Vienna – Jan 2013.
EVALUATION Evaluation of UNDP Assistance to Conflict-affected Countries UNDP Executive Board Informal Session 4 January 2007.
Course Conclusion Who Governs? To What Ends?. Who Governs?
FORUM ON END OF LIFE IN IRELAND: WORKING TO INFLUENCE POLICY Sarah Murphy, Forum on End of Life in Ireland and Irish Hospice Foundation.
Headwaters Communities in Action Building A Better Quality of Life Together.
National Caring for Country Strategy. Indigenous Advisory Committee (IAC) Statutory Committee established under the Environment Protection Biodiversity.
Regulatory Impact Analysis – Lebanon Working Group IV: Focus Group on Public Service Delivery, Public-Private Partnership and Regulatory Reform Amman,
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION IN LEGISLATIVE PROCESS. The regulatory framework in Romania allows the civil society to impact public decision making. There are.
Commissioning Self Analysis and Planning Exercise activity sheets.
1 ILO Convention What Convention No. 144 means Consultation on what? Five specific ILO matters.
Environmental Management System Definitions
Communication Paper on Smart Regulation COM(2010) 543, 8 October 2010 Presentation by Savia Orphanidou 3 rd November 2010.
State of implementation of the decision III/6f regarding Ukraine (MOP 2, June, , 2008, Riga, Latvia)
DETERMINE Working document # 4 'Economic arguments for addressing social determinants of health inequalities' December 2009 Owen Metcalfe & Teresa Lavin.
Infrastructure Development Bill [B ] Submission by the Centre for Environmental Rights to Portfolio Committee on Economic Development 14 January.
Faisal Naru Head of Better Regulation DAI Europe Ltd November 2007 Washington London Johannesburg Ramallah RIA – An Art and not a Science.
Working Group Four Regional Norm-building: considering regional instruments and standards In light of the existing regional instruments, this group considered.
Title of Presentation in Verdana Bold Managing the Government Agenda Priorities and Planning Presentation Canada School of Public Service August 1, 2007.
Introduction to advocacy. Objectives Understand what is meant by the enabling environment Understand the important and purpose of dialogue and advocacy.
Kathy Corbiere Service Delivery and Performance Commission
Mbombela Climate Change Workshop 2 5 November 2015 Civic Centre Hall, Mbombela.
DEVELOPING THE WORK PLAN
EU human rights policy on indigenous peoples International expert Dialogue on MDG7 8 April 2010.
Engaging the Judiciary/Policy makers in advocating for rights based approaches to HIV and TB Johannesburg, South Africa April 2015.
DEVELOPMENT OF A WHITE PAPER ON CORRECTIONAL SERVICES Ministry of Correctional Services.
“RIA in EU Harmonization” 4 June 2009 EuropeAid/125317/D/SER/TR Session 4 RIA in accession negotiatons.
Albania - Identification and notification of the public concerned in Decision Making : Best practices and Challenges Aarhus Convention Task Force on Public.
Council of Europe Child Participation Assessment Tool Agnes von Maravic Children’s Rights Division Council of Europe Based on slides prepared by Gerison.
New approach in EU Accession Negotiations: Rule of Law Brussels, May 2013 Sandra Pernar Government of the Republic of Croatia Office for Cooperation.
Overview of Good Regulatory Practice Kent Shigetomi Office of the U.S. Trade Representative.
Participatory Environmental Governance : Role of Communities in Europe and Asia Jona Razzaque Reader in Law Bristol Law School, UWE, Bristol, UK Bristol.
Draft Engagement Framework and Action Road-Map Nairobi, Kenya  5 November, 2015.
The Role of Public Participation in Advancing Environmental Justice.
ISO Session 3 Environmental Management and Ethics in Management.
Developing reporting system for SDG and Agenda 2063, contribution of National Statistical System, issues faced and challenges CSA Ethiopia.
Civil society demands for key changes in GEF 5 Faizal Parish GEC, Central Focal Point GEF NGO Network GEF-NGO Consultation Washington DC 9 November.
Business environment in the EU Prepared by Dr. Endre Domonkos (PhD)
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT TOOLS
9/16/2018 The ACT Government’s commitment to Performance and Accountability – the role of Evaluation Presentation to the Canberra Evaluation Forum Thursday,
Council of Europe Child Participation Assessment Tool
Policy Process and Extension Communication Methods:
Presentation on National Evaluation Policy and Political Participation for Policy Intervention in Nepal: July, 2013.
Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA)
‘ Children as Agents of Social Change  Opening Seminar
EUROPEAN UNION CITIZENSHIP
Overview of Good Regulatory Practice
Presentation transcript:

Environmental Decision Making in India Environment Support Group Bangalore India

Environmental Decision Making In India Although Public participation is a fundamental and important aspect of many administrative and legislative decision making of environmental governance in democratic countries, yet the very terms ‘Public’ and ‘Participation’ are continuously being redefined in increasingly constricting ways.

Environmental Decision Making In India The potential benefits of Public participation are multifold as it can bring important information, innovative approaches and solutions and enhance public perception of plans and helps make projects viable. But Public needs and grievances are not of concern to the state or project proponents. Accepting genuine public participation in design and implementation of projects is normally perceived as a nuisance by decision-makers and investors. Adverse project impacts such as displacement, enviornmental destruction and consequent depression in quality of life amongst the affected fail to cause any distress to the expert decision makers

Environmental Decision Making In India Public Participation at Statutory Public Hearings - A Nightmare Merely a public relations exercise with no commitment to comprehending concerns of affected communities. PR Skills and strategies applied with different degrees of sophistication to mystify issues and distract attention from real concerns. Panel generally biased - in future no involvement of local government representatives or eminent citizenry Hearing are procedural and tend to justify decisions already made Not all voices are heard Level of Public engagement varies based on degree of comfort allowed with the presence of police and goons hired serving role of intimidation. Limited possibility of conflict resolution No feedback provided to Public with rationale for decisions – results in polarising debate

Environmental Decision Making In India Information for participation – A closely guarded secret Public inadequately informed (EIA’s mostly fraudulent, plagiarized, not comprehensive and of poor quality) Not available in time Not available widely Available mainly on websites Often times deliberate choice of Hearing location to make participation inconvenient to affected communities Announcement restricted to newspaper ads and no innovative approaches of community communication adopted. Information presented in highly sophisticated and expert driven language, with little appreciation of communicating to a diverse and often illiterate population.

Environmental Decision Making In India Other challenges Regulatory Agencies unfriendly to public Help lines, FAQs, lacking No assistance after office hours Public outreach, citizen training initiatives absent Public representations often not acknowledged, and issues ignored in consideration of final decisions Audio/video aids, training programs, completely lacking

Environmental Decision Making In India No accountability- PCBs, State or Ministry Laws not suitably amended to appreciate public needs No Evaluation Process either at the State or central levels

Environmental Decision Making In India Quality of Information … Dandeli Mini Hydel Dam EIA –EIA Ernst & Young plagiarized EIA of another dam (Tattihalla dam). Got caught but no criminal action taken. Susequently TERI prepared another EIA which was found to be fraudulent. Yet no action initiated. Consultants generally get away with supplying rubbish: In the BMIC EIA Socio-Economic impact survey data included only the name of Head of affected family and his address. Today this has resulted in widespread conflict and mass litigation.

Environmental Decision Making In India Stories from experience……. Bangalore’s Master plan 2015 finalized despite protests against poorly presented information Public participation limited to commenting on colorful maps, displayed only in one location, and with minimal participation of Panchayats, Town Councils and communities across a large metropolis. Maps difficult to comprehend without any effort to process information for ease of understanding by the public. French consortium which prepared the plans unaware of local considerations.

Environmental Decision Making In India Bangalore Namma Metro (our metro) but for who? The residents and traders have been demanding Bangalore Metro Rail Corporation Ltd. (BMRCL) should hold public hearings to know the socio economic and environmental impacts of the project. Alignment fixed by Judicial Commission following conflict – but without widespread empirical evidence for appropriate alignments.

Environmental Decision Making In India Administrative attitudes to limit public understanding of project impacts increasing conflict and misunderstanding. The widespread resistance to projects in Kalinganagar and Nandigram are only the most profiled of a whole range of conflicts. Projects thrive while people are driven out of their homes, their livelihoods snatched, arrested, jailed and even killed for raising their concerns

Environmental Decision Making In India While International treaties move progressively to enable Public Participation our domestic laws are being diluted to limit and restrict public participation The European Aarhus Declaration mandates involvement of the public from the initial stage of projects and extended involvement beyond the completion of projects.

Environmental Decision Making In India The Boston Metro story – An interesting lesson from a bold decision in 1972 not to follow the American model of continued expansion of metropolitan expressways. Instead a major investment in rail transit was made. Boston’s Southwest Corridor Project illustrates how a process of community participation in the design of a new below-grade railroad and rapid transit line, along with a linear park and new public facilities, has strengthened neighborhoods and is part of a renewed focus on cycling, walking, public transportation and healthy communities.

Environmental Decision Making In India New Zealand – The Resource Management Act 2001 is based on the Maori Philosophy It states two key principles 1.Decisions on environmental matters are most appropriately made by the communities most affected by those decisions 2. community participation is vital to effective resource management

Environmental Decision Making In India Sri Lanka- Scoping process has recently included formal and informal meetings with people who may be affected by the project directly or indirectly or who may have special knowledge of the project area and its environment South Africa- ten years after the abolishment of Apartheid and more than five years after the adoption of a new Environment policy, lessons learnt from public involvement were incorporated in the Environmental law reform Process and today SA has a very progressive law building capacity for Public Participation

Environmental Decision Making In India Non Statutory Public participation Relatively open Public intervention and lobbying effective Mechanisms and Procedures controlled by public. Public creativity through actions, protests and rallies draw widespread attention, widens interest and debate, attracts media attention that decision makers cannot ignore

Environmental Decision Making In India Widespread public protests, rallies, street plays, human chains, watchdogs perched on trees, marked citizens efforts to protect trees in Bangalore. Resulted in High Court orders that mandates public involvement in decisions to cut trees in Bangalore.

Environmental Decision Making In India The Handi Gondi Rocks of Ramnagar: Sanghamitra Buddha Foundation proposed plans to carve a Buddha statue to compensate the loss of Bamian Buddha detroyed in Afghanistan. This on an impressive rock face formed during the lower proterozoic era threby destroying the million years of natural history. The project also aimed at a film city, resorts and amusement park. Public protests, repeated meetings with PCCF, Karnataka Forest Department, widespread campaign resulted in the Forest Department withdrawing the clearance s and declaring the area as a Santcuary for sloth bears.

Environmental Decision Making In India Reengineering of the Environmental Clearance process: Draft National Environmental Policy and Amendment to the EIA notification Civil Society Groups Lobby with Members of Parliament, chief Ministers of State, Leaders of opposition, Law Ministry, Prime Minister's Office groups from across the country came together and held a two day campaign MOEF SUNO & MOEF CHALO. A jury listened to people’s voices

Environmental Decision Making In India MOEF CHALO: People stormed into the Ministry despite all security and declared the MOEF Dead 2006:Policy issued despite protests. Notification finalised only in consultation with industries and disregarding protests from Parliamentarians and environmental groups

Environmental Decision Making In India

The way forward…………. With a Legal framework that has Failed to guarantee the right of public participation in Environmental decision making Initiate an Environmental law reform process to enhance public participation in decision making Involve District Planning Committees (per Article 243ZD), and thereby Panchayats and Municipalities in accordance with Constitutional 73 rd and 74 th amendments

Environmental Decision Making In India Increased Access to Information Advertisements Press releases News Paper Inserts Public Displays on hoardings, etc Field Visits Videos made with Local community involvement Public debates and discussions Media support in building public opinion

Environmental Decision Making In India Providing support to public on Legislation and its implementation Bringing necessary changes in practice with public opinion Increased resources for skill training in public and staff Redistribution of power in decision making Directives and lessons from Aarhus, Indigenous practices and the spirit of Principle 10 of Rio Declaration should be integrated Greater public awareness of their rights,greater willingness of ministries, bureaucrats, regulators, Industry to reach out proactively and work together with their communities, and local governments

Environment Support Group 105,East end B Main Jayanagar 9 th Block Bangalore Tel: / Website: