Concept and Design for a Pilot Demonstration Ground-based Remote Icing Detection System Roger. F. Reinking*, Robert A. Kropfli*, Sergey Y. Matrosov**,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Radar/lidar observations of boundary layer clouds
Advertisements

POLARIMETRIC RADAR IMPROVEMENTS
Introduction to Radar Meteorology
Cloud Radar in Space: CloudSat While TRMM has been a successful precipitation radar, its dBZ minimum detectable signal does not allow views of light.
Polarimetric Radar Observations of Hydrometeor Refreezing in Winter Storms Matthew R. Kumjian 1,2, Alexander V. Ryzhkov 1,2, Terry J. Schuur 1,2, and Heather.
7. Radar Meteorology References Battan (1973) Atlas (1989)
Allison Parker Remote Sensing of the Oceans and Atmosphere.
X-band About the CSU-CHILL Radar The CSU-CHILL National Weather Radar Facility, located in Greeley, CO, is an advanced, transportable dual-polarized, dual-wavelength.
Water vapor estimates using simultaneous S and Ka band radar measurements Scott Ellis, Jothiram Vivekanandan NCAR, Boulder CO, USA.
21 September th Southwest Hydrometeorology Symposium, Tucson, AZ Future QPE: Dual-Pol and Gap-Filler Radars Kevin Scharfenberg University of Oklahoma/CIMMS.
Clear air echoes (few small insects) -12 dBZ. Echoes in clear air from insects Common is summer. Watch for echoes to expand area as sun sets and insects.
The ASCII 2012 campaign: overview and early results AgI Seeding Cloud Impact Investigation Bart Geerts presented by: Xia Chu contributions by: Katja Friedrich,
DUAL-POLARIZATION OF WSR-88D NETWORK
Rainfall Monitioring Using Dual-polarization Radars Alexander Ryzhkov National Severe Storms Laboratory / University of Oklahoma, USA.
Atmospheric structure from lidar and radar Jens Bösenberg 1.Motivation 2.Layer structure 3.Water vapour profiling 4.Turbulence structure 5.Cloud profiling.
IRCTR: International Research Centre for Telecommunications and Radar Evaluation of particle shape and orientation within ice clouds using the S-band Doppler.
Bredbeck Workshop, 7 – 10 July 2003 Jörg Schulz Meteorological Institute, University of Bonn Harald Czekala RPG Radiometer.
COPS-GOP-WS3 Hohenheim 2006_04_10 Micro- Rain- Radar Local Area Weather Radar Cloud Radar Meteorological Institute University Hamburg Gerhard Peters.
1 Radar Displays PPI - Plan position Indicator Maps the received signals on polar coordinates in plan view. The antenna scans 360° at fixed elevation angle.
What can Dual-Polarization Doppler Radar Do for You? Neil Fox Department of Atmospheric Science University of Missouri - Columbia.
Dual Polarization Radars
A perspective on aircraft icing weather research Marcia K. Politovich National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO For Icing TIM Washington, DC.
CASA – Collaborative Adaptive Sensing of the Atmosphere NWRT/PAR – National Weather Radar Testbed / Phased Array Radar Kurt D. Hondl DOC/NOAA/OAR National.
Surveillance Weather Radar 2000 AD. Weather Radar Technology- Merits in Chronological Order WSR-57 WSR-88D WSR-07PD.
Basic RADAR Principles Prof. Sandra Cruz-Pol, Ph.D. Electrical and Computer Engineering UPRM.
NASA Icing Remote Sensing Andy Reehorst NASA Glenn Research Center Dave Serke NCAR.
Review Doppler Radar (Fig. 3.1) A simplified block diagram 10/29-11/11/2013METR
Radar equation review 1/19/10. Radar eq (Rayleigh scatter) The only variable is h, the pulse length Most radars have a range of h values. Rewrite the.
Remote-sensing of the environment (RSE) ATMOS Analysis of the Composition of Clouds with Extended Polarization Techniques L. Pfitzenmaier, H. Russchenbergs.
March 14, 2006Intl FFF Workshop, Costa Rica Weather Decision Technologies, Inc. Hydro-Meteorological Decision Support System Bill Conway, Vice President.
Pat Arnott, ATMS 749 Atmospheric Radiation Transfer CH4: Reflection and Refraction in a Homogenous Medium.
Remote Sensing Microwave Remote Sensing. 1. Passive Microwave Sensors ► Microwave emission is related to temperature and emissivity ► Microwave radiometers.
Characterization of Arctic Mixed-Phase Cloudy Boundary Layers with the Adiabatic Assumption Paquita Zuidema*, Janet Intrieri, Sergey Matrosov, Matthew.
A Doppler Radar Emulator and its Application to the Detection of Tornadic Signatures Ryan M. May.
Dual Polarization Martin Hagen, Elena Saltikoff Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt (DLR) Oberpfaffenhofen, Germany Finnish Meteorological Institute.
NARVAL South Lutz Hirsch, Friedhelm Jansen Sensor Synergy While Radars and Lidars provide excellent spatial resolution but only ambiguous information on.
Dan Satterfield, Chief Meteorologist WHNT-TV, Huntsville James-Paul Dice Meteorologist WHNT-TV Walt Peterson Senior Atmospheric Scientist UAH We Really.
Remote Sensing of Inflight Icing Conditions Dr. Charles C. Ryerson Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory Engineering Research and Development.
National Weather Service Dual-Polarization Radar Technology Photo courtesy of NSSL.
Technical Interchange Meeting Spring 2008: Status and Accomplishments.
Radar Palet e Home Dual Polarized Analysis & Diagnosis 1 Precipitation Phase – Radar Signatures Radar characteristics of precipitation types –Stratiform.
Charles L Wrench RCRU FMCW radar performance and cost.
RAdio Detection And Ranging. Was originally for military use 1.Sent out electromagnetic radiation (Active) 2.Bounced off an object and returned to a listening.
Dual-Polarization and Dual-Wavelength Radar Measurements Vivek National Center for Atmospheric Research Boulder, Colorado I.Polarization and dual- wavelength.
Robin Hogan Ewan O’Connor The Instrument Synergy/ Target Categorization product.
Matthew Shupe Ola Persson Paul Johnston Duane Hazen Clouds during ASCOS U. of Colorado and NOAA.
WEATHER SIGNALS Chapter 4 (Focus is on weather signals or echoes from radar resolution volumes filled with countless discrete scatterers---rain, insects,
Radiometer Physics GmbH
2 HS3 Science Team Meeting - BWI - October 19-20, 2010HAMSR/Lambrigtsen HAMSR Status Update (2015) Bjorn Lambrigtsen (HAMSR PI) Shannon Brown (HAMSR Task.
KNMI 35 GHz Cloud Radar & Cloud Classification* Henk Klein Baltink * Robin Hogan (Univ. of Reading, UK)
Northeast Winter C&V Program Roy Rasmussen NCAR Wes Wilson MIT/LL.
Dual-Polarization Radars
Retrieval of Cloud Phase and Ice Crystal Habit From Satellite Data Sally McFarlane, Roger Marchand*, and Thomas Ackerman Pacific Northwest National Laboratory.
ASAP In-Flight Icing Research at NCAR J. Haggerty, F. McDonough, J. Black, S. Landolt, C. Wolff, and S. Mueller In collaboration with: P. Minnis and W.
CRL’s Planned Contribution to GPM Harunobu Masuko and Toshio Iguchi Applied Research and Standards Division Communications Research Laboratory 4-2-1, Nukkui-kita-machi,
Radar Requirements David J. Stensrud NOAA/National Severe Storms Laboratory 2013 Warn-on-Forecast Workshop and Technical Guidance Meetings.
94-GHz Doppler Radar Observations of Mammatus in Tropical Anvils During Crystal- Face Experiment Ieng Jo Radar Meteorology Group Univ. of Miami.
Mark Ratzer February 26 th, 2011 WFO Chicago 2 nd Annual Aviation Weather Workshop.
Challenges in PBL and Innovative Sensing Techniques Walter Bach Army Research Office
Kavaya-1 Coherent Doppler Lidar Roadmap to Both the NRC Decadal Survey “Science Demonstration” and “Operational” Missions Michael J. Kavaya Jirong Yu Upendra.
Ship-Based Measurements of Cloud Microphysics and PBL Properties in Precipitating Trade Cumuli During RICO Institutions: University of Miami; University.
High-Resolution Polarimetric Radar Observation of Snow- Generating Cells Karly Reimel May 10, 2016.
UNIVERSITY OF BASILICATA CNR-IMAA (Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche Istituto di Metodologie per l’Analisi Ambientale) Tito Scalo (PZ) Analysis and interpretation.
SIGMA: Diagnosis and Nowcasting of In-flight Icing – Improving Aircrew Awareness Through FLYSAFE Christine Le Bot Agathe Drouin Christian Pagé.
Observations of Specific Differential Phase, KDP Chris Collier Acknowledgements: Lindsay Bennett, Alan Blyth and David Dufton.
Travis Smith U. Of Oklahoma & National Severe Storms Laboratory Severe Convection and Climate Workshop 14 Mar 2013 The Multi-Year Reanalysis of Remotely.
A Moment Radar Data Emulator: The Current Progress and Future Direction Ryan M. May.
A dual-polarization QPE method based on the NCAR Particle ID algorithm Description and preliminary results Michael J. Dixon1, J. W. Wilson1, T. M. Weckwerth1,
Microwave Remote Sensing
Radiometer Physics GmbH
Presentation transcript:

Concept and Design for a Pilot Demonstration Ground-based Remote Icing Detection System Roger. F. Reinking*, Robert A. Kropfli*, Sergey Y. Matrosov**, W.Carroll Campbell*, M.J. Post*, Duane A. Hazen*, Janet S. Gibson*, Kenneth P. Moran*, and Brooks E. Martner* *NOAA / OAR / Environmental Technology Laboratory, Boulder, Colorado, USA **CIRES/NOAA-ETL Objective: Develop an operational- grade remote sensing technology that will detect in-flight aircraft icing hazards. For more than a decade, NOAA/ETL has participated in an FAA Aviation Weather Research Program to develop icing diagnostic remote sensors. Our most important on-going task has been to develop a dual-polarization Ka-band (8.66 mm) radar that will detect clouds of hazardous supercooled large droplets (SLD, microns) and distinguish them from clouds with ice particles. The team has succeeded. In tests including the 1999 Mt. Washington Icing Sensors Project (MWISP), ETL was able to demonstrate a radar capability for deterministic hydrometeor identification. By measuring one parameter, a depolarization ratio, DR, the technology was shown to be capable of distinguishing among the “regular” types of ice crystals and even the more spherical and irregular ice particles, and to differentiate all of these from clouds of SLD. The state of the transmitted polarization was key. Proof of concept was provided in the excellent agreement between scattering theory and field measurements. The radar technology is now ready to move toward an operational demonstration. A microwave radiometer will be integrated to measure the column liquid, so icing conditions will be detected by estimating particle type and the quantity of cloud liquid. An engineering design is being developed for a robust, unattended, continuously-operating, Ground-based Remote Icing Detection System (GRIDS) as an initial part of the FAA Icing Remote Sensors Testbed (FIRST). GRIDS will be built from a foundation of four existing ETL technologies: (1)The scanning Ka-band dual-polarization radar technology, (2)Microwave radiometery (now commercially available), (3)The operational CART-site 24/7/365 millimeter-cloud radar (MMCR), and (4)A state-of-the-art Radar Data and Acquisition System (RADS). Theory and field measurements match, and new theory shows that a circular or near-circular polarization will differentiate particles by 1-3 dB more than slant-linear. GRIDS will measure CDR. A fixed-beam measurement at an elevation angle near 40 degrees will accomplish the necessary differentiation of SLD from ice particles while minimizing path length and propagation effects. Ground-Based Remote Icing Detection System Faa Icing Remote Sensors Testbed (GRIDS / FIRST) Unattended Continuous Operation Automated warnings Under Development Radar: Ka-band (8.7 mm) * Doppler * Dual-polarization + Dual-channel Microwave radiometer Hydrometeors depolarize a radar signal according to their shape and orientation, and the polarization state of the transmission. Ice particles: Non-spherical, oriented. Droplets: Spherical. Depolarizations caused by hydrometeors can be linked with identity by measuring the magnitude of DR and its dependence on antenna elevation angle, when a polarization state is chosen that is not sensitive to variability of particle orientation. To detect and uniquely identify SLD, the depolarization must be measurable in low-reflectivity clouds ( dBZ). Slant-45 quasi-linear Polarization: A very good, field-tested selection*** Min. sensitivity to crystal canting* Very good separation by shape* Droplets vs. ice differ through wide arc of antenna elevation* Deterministic droplet I.D. above antenna cross-talk* Sensitive to lower reflectivity clouds* *(Not true of horizontal linear polarization) The GRIDS Design The Algorithm The simplest GRIDS algorithm uses four decision points based on the real-time slant-path measurements of column-liquid (LW), cloud reflectivity (Ze), and depolarization ratio (DR), plus the temperature profile ingested hourly from the rapid update cycle (RUC) or other operational model. A potentially hazardous cloud is identified as one that exhibits: (1) Measurable LW, (2) T -20 dBZ, and (4) a depolarization ratio DR equaling the minimum, spherical hydro- meteor signature (+/- 2dB), so indicating droplets, not ice crystals. This is the basis for a more sophisticated algorithm. The quantity of liquid from the radiometer will be assigned within the measured vertical boundaries of the cloud layers (if totally liquid clouds, to the layers of minimum-DR [droplets]; and if mixed phase, distributed through the depths of the existing layers). A scaled icing-hazard warning will be added (red for probable, yellow for caution, green for no hazard). Detection and use of the uniquely high DR of any bright band will confirm the altitude of the 0C boundary, and indicate rain below. Appropriate combinations of measured parameters will provide data quality control. GRIDS Product: A continuously-updated profile of the potential icing hazard Hazardous supercooled large droplets Clouds with ice crystals aloft, melting layer, warm drizzle below GRIDS will include the most sensitive K-band cloud radar ever built. 90% of icing events occur at 0C < T < -20C, below 6 km MSL, or within 10 km range at the selected 40-deg ant. elev. (An alternating zenith-pointing option will add a 2 nd DR point for ice particle I.D. and vertical velocity to show particle sorting and LW-producing convection). SLD clouds range down to about –20 dBZ, where the cross-polar reflectivity is about –50 dBZ. So GRIDS is required to have a main-channel sensitivity of –55 to –60 dBZ at 10 km Range, which will be achieved with a large antenna (3 m) long dwell time (60 s) and long pulse width(1.0 – 1.5 micro- sec). A 150-m range resolution will isolate hazardous cloud layers. (“quasi-” = slightly elliptical) Difference in CDR (dB), ice particles (aspect ratio < 1) vs. SLD (a.r. = 1) at ant. elev. of 40 deg. SLDR-45 vs. CDR DR Ze DR Ze LW > 0, T > 0C LW > 0, T < 0C To the web RADS, the systems integrator, will control the instruments, ingest external data, process data, compute products, and transmit the display of determined potential icing hazards to the users. The 2-channel mailbox microwave radiometer will be tilted to match the elevation of the radar antenna to provide continuous, independent verification of icing potential from the measured presence or absence of LW and the quantity, which can be allocated to the radar-observed cloud layer(s). Ze > -20 dBZ DR<-28dB at T<0C DR>-28 dB at T<0C Acknowledgments. The Federal Aviation Administration funded this research. The views are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official policy or position of the FAA. A description of GRIDS is published in the Proceedings of the International Conference on Radar Meteorology, Munich, Theory ***But a (quasi-)circular polarization will be slightly better (see “the GRIDS Design.”). columnar crystals planar crystals columnar crystals std. dev. of cant = 3 deg std. dev. of cant = 15 deg (droplets)