Other Measures of Student Academic Progress What should we know about how to include other measures of student academic progress? 0 August 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The SCPS Professional Growth System
Advertisements

Connecting Teacher Evaluation to Student Academic Progress Implementing Standard 7 0 August 2012.
Revised August 2011 Growing Success: Use of “I” and “R”
Understanding Stanford 10 Results
Virginia Teacher Performance Evaluation System 0 August 2012.
Teacher Practice in  In 2012, the New Jersey Legislature unanimously passed the TEACHNJ Act, which mandates implementation of a new teacher.
AchieveNJ: Teacher Evaluation Scoring Guide
Overview of the New Massachusetts Educator Evaluation Framework Opening Day Presentation August 26, 2013.
District Determined Measures aka: DDMs What is a DDM? Think of a DDM as an assessment tool similar to MCAS. It is a measure of student learning, growth,
Student Growth Percentile Model Question Answered
Implementing Virginia’s Growth Measure: A Practical Perspective Deborah L. Jonas, Ph.D. Executive Director, Research and Strategic Planning Virginia Department.
Student Growth Percentiles For Classroom Teachers and Contributing Professionals KDE:OAA:3/28/2014:kd:rls 1.
Overview of Wyoming Accountability in Education Act (WAEA)
Statement of Intent for Growth Metrics Presented to the PARCC Governing Board June 26, 2013.
Student Growth Percentile (SGP) Model
Virginia Teacher Performance Evaluation System
OverviewOverview Virginia Principal Performance Evaluation System February 2013.
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
99th Percentile 1st Percentile 50th Percentile What Do Percentiles Mean? Percentiles express the percentage of students that fall below a certain score.
Product Evaluation the outcome phase. Do the magic bullets work? How do you know when an innovative educational program has “worked”? How do you know.
Today’s website:
1 Connecting Principal Performance to Student Academic Progress February 2013.
Dr. Michael Flicek Education Consultant October 8, 2013 Wyoming School Performance Rating Model Report to: Wyoming State Board of Education.
Connecting Principal Evaluation to Student Academic Progress Student Academic Progress Goals 1.
Overall Teacher Judgements
Document Review STANDARDEVIDENCE Standard 1 - Professional KnowledgeDocumentation and Observation Standard 2 - Instructional PlanningDocumentation and.
STATE ACCOUNTABILITY OVERVIEW Back To School| August 19-22, 2013 Dean Munn Education Specialist Region 15 ESC.
SB : The Great Teachers and Leaders Act State-wide definition of “effective” teacher and principal in Colorado Academic growth, using multiple measures.
Hull Public Schools MCAS Presentation Kathleen I. Tyrell, Ed.D., Superintendent of Schools October 7, 2013 mko.
District Determined Measures aka: DDMs The Challenge: The Essential Questions: 1.How can I show, in a reliable and valid way, my impact on students’
Update on Virginia’s Growth Measure Deborah L. Jonas, Ph.D. Executive Director for Research and Strategic Planning Virginia Department of Education July-August.
SMARTR Goals for School-Based Administrators
Information for school leaders and teachers regarding the process of creating Student Learning Targets. Student Learning targets.
Awareness Raising for Principals/ Senior Managers November 2010 New Statutory Assessment Arrangements from 2012/13.
Professional Performance Process Presented at March 2012 Articulation Meetings.
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Special Education Advisory Committee Virginia Department of Education.
SGP Logic Model Provides a method that enables SGP data to contribute to performance evaluation when data are missing. The distribution of SGP data combined.
Steps for Using SGP Data in Performance Evaluation 1.Prepare and summarize data to show the number and percent of students demonstrating low growth, moderate.
Making Plans for the Future April 29, 2013 Brenda M. Tanner, Ed.D.
What Works? What Doesn’t? Overview of Teacher Compensation: What Works? What Doesn’t? James H. Stronge College of William and Mary Williamsburg, Virginia.
Student Growth Percentiles Basics Fall Outcomes Share information on the role of Category 1 assessments in evaluations Outline steps for districts.
Primary Purposes of the Evaluation System
[Insert faculty Banner] Consistency of Teacher Judgement Mathematics 7-10.
Consistency of Teacher Judgement Creative Arts 7-10.
Guidelines for Uniform Performance Standards and Evaluation Criteria for Teachers Virginia Department of Education Approved April 2011.
Summative Jeopardy Summing Up Summative Decision- Making.
Accuracy in assessment Evidence bundles: tracking Trainee achievement through pupil progress overtime.
Guidelines for Uniform Performance Standards and Evaluation Criteria for Teachers Virginia Department of Education Approved April 2011.
R IDGEFIELD P UBLIC S CHOOLS PARCC S CORE R EPORTS FOR P ARENTS J ANUARY 12, 2016 Janet Seabold.
AchieveNJ: Principal and Assistant/ Vice Principal Evaluation Scoring Guide
ASSESSMENT Parent Information Evening Wednesday 10 June 2015 JILL.
Implementation Year 2: Student Academic Progress (Rating Tables) Dr. Carrie L. Giovannone & Dr. Yating Tang Arizona Department of Education September 2013.
Student Growth Measures ODU Leadership Conference June 19, 2014.
CONNECT WITH CAEP | | Measures of Teacher Impact on P-12 Students Stevie Chepko, Sr. VP for Accreditation.
PRINCIPAL STATE GROWTH SCORES / Principal Performance/Visit= 50 Student Performance=50.
TEACHNJ Proposed Regulations. TEACHNJ Regulations Proposal  Two Terms that are very important to know: SGO – Student Growth Objective (Created in District)
Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
Every Student Succeeds Act in New Jersey
Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
House Bill 22 Overview ESC PEIMS Coordinator Summer Training | August 1, 2017 Texas Education Agency | Academics | Performance Reporting.
Understanding Stanford 10 Results
Teacher Evaluation “SLO 101”
Overview This presentation provides information on how districts compile evaluation ratings for principals, assistant principals (APs), and vice principals.
AchieveNJ: Teacher Evaluation Scoring Guide
Old (API State/AYP Federal) to New
Standard Four Program Impact
Birmingham City Schools Report Card Indicators
Administrator Evaluation Orientation
The matrix is a decision-making tool
Overview This presentation provides information on how districts compile evaluation ratings for principals, assistant principals (APs), and vice principals.
Presentation transcript:

Other Measures of Student Academic Progress What should we know about how to include other measures of student academic progress? 0 August 2012

Other Measures of Academic Progress Include measures with evidence of validity and reliability that are appropriate (e.g., Measures of Academic Progress) Outline measures that are acceptable and objective that the school division will use in providing data for student academic progress and/or achievement Include measures with evidence of validity and reliability that are appropriate (e.g., Measures of Academic Progress) Outline measures that are acceptable and objective that the school division will use in providing data for student academic progress and/or achievement 1

Standard 7: Student Academic Progress Rating How do we synthesize multiple measures of student academic progress to rate a teacher on Standard 7: Student Academic Progress? 2

Putting It All together: How to Synthesize Multiple Data Sources for a Rating on Standard 7 Teachers for Whom SGP Data Are Neither Available nor Appropriate 1.Review data from student achievement goal setting. 2.Review data from a second source such as a second goal or other measures of student academic progress. 3.Assign a performance level rating based on the preponderance of evidence (using data-informed professional judgment). Teachers for Whom SGP Data Are Neither Available nor Appropriate 1.Review data from student achievement goal setting. 2.Review data from a second source such as a second goal or other measures of student academic progress. 3.Assign a performance level rating based on the preponderance of evidence (using data-informed professional judgment). 3

Putting it all together: How to Synthesize Multiple Data Sources for a Rating on Standard 7 Teachers for Whom SGP Data Are Available and Appropriate 1.Follow the guidelines related to using student growth percentiles in teacher performance evaluation. According to this guidance, a rating may not always be possible to determine due to missing data. However, a range of appropriate ratings can be determined. 2.Review data from student achievement goal setting and determine a rating based on decision rules established. 3.Review data from student growth percentiles and from student achievement goal setting and make a determination based on the preponderance of evidence (using data-informed professional judgment) as to a final rating on Standard 7: Student Academic Progress. Teachers for Whom SGP Data Are Available and Appropriate 1.Follow the guidelines related to using student growth percentiles in teacher performance evaluation. According to this guidance, a rating may not always be possible to determine due to missing data. However, a range of appropriate ratings can be determined. 2.Review data from student achievement goal setting and determine a rating based on decision rules established. 3.Review data from student growth percentiles and from student achievement goal setting and make a determination based on the preponderance of evidence (using data-informed professional judgment) as to a final rating on Standard 7: Student Academic Progress. 4

Rating on Standard 7 (Student Academic Progress) ExemplaryProficientDeveloping/ Needs Improvement Unacceptable Student Growth Percentiles** More than 50% of students show high growth and no more than 10% show low growth At least 65% of students show moderate to high growth No more than 50% of students show low growth More than 50% of students show low growth Student Achievement Goal Setting** Exceed Goal > 50% Meet Goal > 40% Did Not Meet Goal < 10% Exceed and/or Meet Goal > 80% Did not meet goal < 20% Exceed and/or Meet Goal > 50% Did Not Meet Goal = 21%- 49% Exceed and/or Meet Goal < 50% Did Not Meet Goal > 50% Other Measures Other indicators of student achievement/ progress indicate exemplary student performance Other indicators of student achievement/ progress indicate on- target student performance Other indicators of student achievement/ progress indicate inconsistent student performance Other indicators of student achievement/ progress indicate overall low student performance Decision Rules for Judging Standard 7 ** SGPs can be considered a relative growth score in that it compares students across the state; Student Achievement Goal Setting can be considered an absolute measure in that it measures growth against a defined level. 5

Rating on Standard 7: Student Academic Progress Simulations 6

Rating on Standard 7 Simulations Simulation 1 – Fourth-Grade Teacher Simulation 2 – Seventh-Grade Mathematics Teacher Simulation 3 – Middle School Art Teacher Simulation 1 – Fourth-Grade Teacher Simulation 2 – Seventh-Grade Mathematics Teacher Simulation 3 – Middle School Art Teacher 7