School Report Cards: Considerations and State Examples Va Board of Education Committee on School and Division Accountability Feb. 25 2015 Laurie McCullough.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Understanding the North Carolina School Report Card.
Advertisements

Challenge to Lead Southern Regional Education Board Kentucky Challenge to Lead Goals for Education Kentucky is On the Move Progress Report 2008 Challenge.
Challenge to Lead Southern Regional Education Board Tennessee Challenge to Lead Goals for Education Tennessee is On the Move Progress Report 2008 Challenge.
ESEA Reauthorization and Waivers AFT Teachers PPC Meeting March 13, 2012 New York, NY.
The Evolution of the Virginia School Report Card Board of Education School & Division Accountability Committee February 25, 2015.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY WAIVER Overview of Federal Requirements August 2, 2012 Alaska Department of Education & Early Development.
District Report Cards: A Useful Tool for Parents? May 12, 2014 Arkansas General Assembly Joint Committee on Education.
House Education Committee Summit November 11, 2014 Update on 2014 Legislation Regarding the A-F School Grading System Shelley Loving-Ryder Assistant Superintendent.
Woodland Park School District Educator Effectiveness 101 August 2014.
1 Proposed Changes to the Accreditation Process CDE Briefing for the Colorado State Board of Education March 5, 2008.
TIMELESS LEARNING POLICY & PRACTICE. JD HOYE President National Academy Foundation.
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION. Title I - Part A In a nutshell….a primer.
Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS) Annual Report and Public Hearing Grapevine-Colleyville ISD
LOUISIANA 1 Goals for Education Challenge to Lead 2003 Louisiana.
The Common Core: Moving Ohio Forward Stan W. Heffner Superintendent of Public Instruction February 15, 2012.
MONITORING INDISTAR® STATE-DETERMINED IMPROVEMENT PLANNING TOOL.
PA School Performance Profile January 13, 2013 Superintendent Advisory Council 1.
School Performance Index School Performance Index (SPI): A Comprehensive Measurement System for All Schools Student Achievement (e.g. PSSA) Student Progress.
What is the SQRP?  The School Quality Rating Policy (SQRP) is the Board of Education’s policy for evaluating school performance.  It establishes the.
Measuring Charter Quality Eric Paisner, NAPCS Anna Nicotera, NAPCS Lyria Boast, Public Impact.
Ensuring a Highly Qualified Teacher for Every Classroom With Support From the Pew Charitable Trusts Q U A L I T Y C O U N T S “If I can’t learn.
Making Demonstrable Improvement: Request for Feedback (Updated) July 2015 Presented by: Ira Schwartz Assistant Commissioner of Accountability.
Welcome to the Inquiry to Action Teams. 1) Build system-wide instructional and organizational capacity at the central, network, and school levels. 2)
Principal Professional Learning Team August 2012.
End of Course Assessments School Year English Language Arts, Math, Biology, and Government.
MCC PTA September 28, 2010 Chris Minnich, CCSSO. Common Core State Standards Initiative  Why Common Core?  Adoption status  High-level implementation.
1 Longitudinal student data is data that allows the user to match individual student records across datasets and years. What is Longitudinal Student Data?
State Board Update: Accountability System March 2013.
School Performance Framework Sponsored by The Colorado Department of Education Summer 2010 Version 1.3.
What’s going on in Richmond? Items of Interest to VESIS March 21, 2012 Bethann H. Canada Director of Educational Information Management Virginia Department.
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Special Education Advisory Committee Virginia Department of Education.
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Virginia Association of School Superintendents Annual Conference Patty.
July,  Congress hasn’t reauthorized Elementary & Secondary Education Act (ESEA), currently known as No Child Left Behind (NCLB)  U.S. Department.
Commission on Teacher Credentialing Ensuring Educator Excellence 1 Biennial Report October 2008.
MI-SAAS: Michigan School Accreditation and Accountability System Overview of Key Features School Year.
10/25/ Title I Program Hart County School District Provides schoolwide Title I learning for all students in grades K-8.
Woodland Park School District Educator Effectiveness 101 September 2015.
Hastings Public Schools PLC Staff Development Planning & Reporting Guide.
Standards IV and VI. Possible Artifacts:  School Improvement Plan  School Improvement Team  North Carolina Teacher Working Conditions Survey  Student.
11/5/2015 Michigan’s School Accreditation System : From Education YES to MI-SAS.
Tuesday, October 13, The purpose of the State of the School and Title I Annual meeting is to:  Provide information about the current state.
What you need to know about changes in state requirements for Teval plans.
Michigan School Report Card Update Michigan Department of Education.
Virginia Board of Education Diane Atkinson Member, Virginia Board of Education.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction January 2015 Jenny Singh, Administrator Academic Accountability.
Public School Accountability System. Background One year ago One year ago –100 percent proficiency required in –AMOs set to increase 7-12 points.
ESEA Federal Accountability System Overview 1. Federal Accountability System Adequate Yearly Progress – AYP defined by the Elementary and Secondary Education.
Understanding AzMERIT Results and Score Reporting An Overview.
ELL Program Advisory Group December 1, TWO PHASES of WORK ELL Program Advisory Group PHASE ONE 1/1/2016As Specified in HB Criteria Determine.
Illinois report cards Project introduction to the P-20 Council April 27, 2011.
Education Level. STD RATE Teen Pregnancy Rates Pre-teen Pregnancy Rate.
Public School Accountability System. Uses multiple indicators for broad picture of overall performance Uses multiple indicators for broad picture of overall.
Measuring Turnaround Success October 29 th, 2015 Jeanette P. Cornier, Ph.D.
NCLB Conference 2016 Utilizing the Enhanced Illinois School Report Card and Looking Forward Illinois State Board of Education James T. Meeks, Chairman.
South Carolina Succeeds
Tift County High School ANNUAL TITLE I MEETING SY16 Tap Knowledge – Capture Wisdom - Harness Talents -Sculpt Minds.
Education 2018: Excellence for Every Student Presented to the Board of Education August 27,
Accountability & Program Assessment Governing Board Online Training Module.
Emporia State University - Computer and Business Teacher’s Conference February 20, 2013 Diane DeBacker, Commissioner of Education.
Corona-Norco Unified School District Accountability Update RAN Meeting May 15, 2015.
Kansas Association of School Boards ESEA Flexibility Waiver KASB Briefing August 10, 2012.
Every Student Succeeds Act of 2015: Highlights and
Objectives Define what Title I is and why it is important to be a Title I school Highlight your rights as a Title I parent Describe ways you can be involved.
Accountability in Virginia: Revisions to the Standards of Accreditation and Virginia’s Federal Programs Application under ESSA Virginia Department of Education.
New Statewide Accountability System
A Dialogue on Education Innovation: The Administration's Perspective VASS 2016 Fall Conference PROGRAM OUTLINE: Holly will begin with introductions.
Overview of the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) and
WAO Elementary School and the New Accountability System
A Dialogue on Education Innovation: The Administration's Perspective VASS 2016 Fall Conference PROGRAM OUTLINE: Holly will begin with introductions.
Presentation transcript:

School Report Cards: Considerations and State Examples Va Board of Education Committee on School and Division Accountability Feb Laurie McCullough Executive Director, VaASCD Chair, Accountability Subcommittee of the SOL Innovation Committee

Sources: Rating States, Grading Schools, Aug Report of the Education Commission of the States Key Elements for Accountability, 2010 Report from CCSSO ASCD Policy Positions Innovation Committee discussions And MANY THANKS to Melany Stowe! 1.Report card considerations: PurposeContentDesign 2. Features and examples of report cards

Purpose Student measures: To assess progress toward important learning goals. Educator measures: To target professional development needs. School measures: To support improvement and inform the public.

Content: HB 1672 / SB 727 No later than July 1, 2016, the Board of Education, in consultation with the Standards of Learning Innovation Committee, shall redesign the School Performance Report Card so that it is more effective in communicating to parents and the public the status and achievements of the public schools and local school divisions in the Commonwealth. The Board, in redesigning the School Performance Report Card, may consider (i) the standards of accreditation, (ii) state and federal accountability requirements, (iii) state- mandated assessments, (iv) any alternative assessments developed or approved for use by the relevant local school board, (v) student growth indicators, (vi) student mobility, (vii) the experience and qualifications of school staff, (viii) total cost and funding per pupil, (ix) school safety, and (x) any other factors that the Board deems necessary to produce a full and accurate statement of performance for each public elementary and secondary school and local school division in the Commonwealth.

Content: Two questions 1.What should we measure and how? – Ex: College and Career Readiness state test scores? nationally-normed test scores? % of students who are test takers? 9 th graders on track for graduation? graduation rate? – Ex: School Climate student surveys? staff surveys? discipline incidents?

Report Card Data Collection Teacher Licensure Pupil-Teacher Ratio Salary Information “Counts” for accreditation: Test data Grad Rates Etc. Test data in “off”years Strengths and OFIs Family Engagement Content: Two questions Content: Two questions 2. What gets measured vs. what gets reported?

9 Socioeconomic & demographic data Growth of highest achievers Class size Attendance rate What Could Be Reported? 9 th Graders on track to graduate Student survey results Parent & community involvement % taking higher level coursework Revenues Expenditures School climate Counseling, support services Health and wellness programs

Design: Interpreting and Communicating Things like A rating or estimate of school quality. Comparisons to……..state averages or composites? peer groups? Format for ease of use. Annual static snapshot or dynamic interface?

Design: Interpreting and Communicating

Online Accessibility Ability to Print Emphasis of Ranking (if any) Peer Rankings within State Graphics Explanations Ability to Drill Down Tabs (Dashboard) Design: Interpreting and Communicating

Stars (3) ECS Database & Online Research Currently 30 Different Rating Systems # A-F ? Number Variations (9) Colors (1) None (5) Letters (13) Descriptors (18)

Sample Descriptors Excelling, Progressing, Transitioning, Review, Focus, and Turnaround (Connecticut) Recognition, Continuous Improvement, Focus, Priority, Superintendent’s Zone (Hawaii) Exemplary, Exceeds Standard, Meets Standard, Approaches Standard, Academic Warning (Kansas) Distinguished, Proficient, Needs Improvement, Progressing School (Kentucky) Reward, Celebration Eligible, Continuous Improvement, Focus, Priority (Minnesota) Accredited with Distinction, Accredited Provisionally, Accredited, Unaccredited (Missouri)

Fully Accredited, Provisionally Accredited-Graduation Rate, Accredited with Warning, Accreditation Denied, Conditionally Accredited (Virginia) Exemplary, Very Good, Good, Fair, Struggling (Washington) Exceeding Expectations, Meeting Expectations, Partially Meeting Expectations, Not Meeting Expectations (Wyoming) Accredited with Distinction, Accredited Provisionally, Accredited, Unaccredited (Missouri) Exceeds Standards, Meets Standards, Below Standards (Nebraska) Reward School, Good Standing, Local Assistance Plan, Focus, Priority (New York) Sample Descriptors

Recommend that the Board of Education and the General Assembly revise the Standards of Accreditation to add accreditation ratings which 1) recognize the progress of schools that do not meet the accreditation benchmarks but have significantly improved their pass rates, and 2) recognize schools that did not meet accreditation benchmarks but have demonstrated significant growth for the majority of students. Innovation Committee, Interim Recommendation

August 2014 Report: Rating States, Grading Schools Education Commission of the States (ECS) RESEARCHERS Are the report cards easy to find? PARENTS Are they easy to understand? EXPERTS What indicators are essential for measuring performance?

Top Three According to Researchers Easy to understand Did not like printable (pdf) version Arizona Good use of graphics Data points are explained well Use of tabs Noted “data coming” Ohio Good use of graphics Links to data drill down Inclusion of survey results Illinois According to ECS researchers, based upon the following criteria: findable, readable, understandable, and graphics. 8 Report Cards Ranked Above Average in all 4 Categories: Arizona, Delaware, Illinois, Kentucky, Louisiana, Massachusetts, Maine, and Ohio

Ability to explore data District of Columbia Fast facts Clear graphics Illinois Parents also ranked the following report cards above average: Delaware, Arkansas, Ohio, and Wisconsin. Note: There were inconsistencies: one parent ranked a report card excellent (5) and another ranked the same report card unacceptable (1). According to ECS selected parents, based upon the following criteria: easy to read, useful, provides sufficient data. Top Two According to Parents

2 1. Student Achievement 5 Essential Indicators from Experts According to ECS Report 2. Student Academic Growth 3. Achievement Gap Closure 4. Graduation Rates 5. Postsecondary and Career Readiness 23 states currently include these 5 indicators, including Virginia.

Louisiana: Interesting Features A snapshot, but shows improvement One static page, with access to backup data Jena High School in LaSalle Parish

Ohio: Interesting Features Madison South Elementary A-F system (2015) Achievement vs. Progress Early Literacy Madison South Elementary

Illinois: Interesting Features ILLINOIS REPORT CARD No rating system, yet highly ranked by parents in ECS study. User survey 1 ½ minute video Mather High School