Special Education Updates John Payne, Interim Director Office of Exceptional Children.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Understanding Student Learning Objectives (S.L.O.s)
Advertisements

Progress Towards Reading Success: The Reading First Evaluation Prepared by: Amy Kemp, Ph.D. Research Associate and Patricia A. Muller, Ph.D. Associate.
Administrators Meeting April 21, Key Areas of Grant-Based Monitoring Schools to be Served Instructional Assessments Instructional Strategies and.
Lynda Lupp Richard Maraschiello Amy Morton Adam Schott John Weiss.
STAAR Alternate is the state assessment for students with significant cognitive disabilities.
Office of Exceptional Children. SC Enrich will replace SC Excent.
On The Road to College and Career Readiness Hamilton County ESC Instructional Services Center Christina Sherman, Consultant.
OAPSA Fall Conference Sue Zake, Director of OEC September 26, 2014.
August 15, 2012 Fontana Unified School District Superintendent, Cali Olsen-Binks Associate Superintendent, Oscar Dueñas Director, Human Resources, Mark.
Targeted Efforts to Improve Learning for ALL Students.
New Era MMSR- Maryland Model for School Readiness ends. Maryland’s Early Learning Framework begins… begins transition:
NYS Assessment Updates & Processes for New Social Studies Regents Exams September 18, 2014 Candace Shyer Assistant Commissioner for Assessment, Standards.
Kansas accreditation is:  1.A school improvement plan  2.An external assistance team  3.Local assessments aligned with state standards  4.Teachers.
Making preparations in Ohio: Common Core and Ohio’s Revised Academic Content Standards New System of Assessments.
Office of Special Education Services Instructional Leaders Roundtable Oct. 16, 2014 John R. Payne, Director.
Next Generation IEPs.
State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness Alternate STAAR Alternate September 1, 2010 TETN # 7960 Handouts Copyright © 2011 Texas Education Agency.
Linda Nickel EPSB Project Specialist 1.
Challenging All Students to Meet High Expectations: Supporting Schools in Raising the Bar for Students with Disabilities Office of Special Education Programs.
Common Core Standards Norwalk – La Mirada Unified School District.
Alternate Assessment on Alternate Achievement Standards Aligned to Common Core State Standards 1.
Common Core State Standards & Assessment Update The Next Step in Preparing Michigan’s Students for Career and College MERA Spring Conference May 17, 2011.
Common Core Standards Norwalk – La Mirada Unified School District April 30, 2012 Principal Meeting.
April 11, 2012 Comprehensive Assessment System 1.
Critical Information SAGE Critical Information 1 Judy Park, Ed.D. Associate Superintendent Utah State Office of Education.
The Five New Multi-State Assessment Systems Under Development April 1, 2012 These illustrations have been approved by the leadership of each Consortium.
Strategic Planning Board Update February 27, 2012 Draft - For Discussion Purposes Only.
NEXT GENERATION BALANCED ASSESSMENT SYSTEMS ALIGNED TO THE CCSS Stanley Rabinowitz, Ph.D. WestEd CORE Summer Design Institute June 19,
November 7,  Provisos are in annual Appropriations Bills  Proviso 1A.60 included in bill  Very prescriptive.
Understanding California’s New State Assessment Cambrian School District August 20, 2015.
Curriculum Update January What are the big projects? Fall 2013 – Math Common Core Implementation Fall 2014 – English/Language Arts Common Core Implementation.
1 Executive Limitation 12: Curriculum and Instruction Darlene Westbrook Chief Academic Officer Denise Collier Executive Director for Curriculum Monitoring.
January 11, A few FAQS from districts regarding the 2013 pilot.
Office of Child Development & Early Learning Project MAX: Maximizing Access and Learning Tom Corbett, Governor Carolyn C. Dumaresq, Ed.D., Acting Secretary.
Assessment Update Testing Students with Disabilities District Test Coordinator Meeting Douglas Alexander Anne Mruz Suzanne Swaffield June 11,
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Presented by Lily Roberts, Ph.D., Administrator, and Sheila.
Committee of Practitioners ESEA Flexibility Waiver Review June 25, 2014.
TOM TORLAKSON State Superintendent of Public Instruction National Center and State Collaborative California Activities Kristen Brown, Ph.D. Common Core.
Beyond Perkins Addressing the Needs of Students with Special Needs.
Maryland’s Journey— Focus Schools Where We’ve Been, Where We Are, and Where We’re Going Presented by: Maria E. Lamb, Director Nola Cromer, Specialist Program.
“A New Chapter and a New Day” An Update on the School Improvement Grant Staff Meeting Friday, August 5, :30 a.m. LHS Commons.
Designing Local Curriculum Module 5. Objective To assist district leadership facilitate the development of local curricula.
Full-Service Community Schools TASK FORCE Staff Lead: Jane Nicholson.
2013 Fall Forum State Assessment Update November 5, 2013 Linda Howley - OSA Joanne Winkelman - OSE.
Overview of Indiana’s Alternate Assessment October 2014 Karen Stein, IDOE.
Multi-Tiered System of Support (MTSS) Building Common Language and Understanding.
Wisconsin Standards for CTE. Timeline New accountability system begins & AYP ends (ESEA waiver) New proficiency benchmarks for WKCE reading & mathematics.
Regional Assessment Network (RAN) Update Chun-Wu Li, Ph.D. Assessment and Accountability Services Riverside County Office of Education November 22, 2013.
2 Louisiana Believes Objective: The Department is providing districts increased support in preparation for the school year. As districts plan for.
District Action Plan Strategic Planning for Student Success Board Meeting March 24, 2015 Dr. Rodney Thompson, Superintendent.
Assessments aligned to Common Core State Standards August 2012IDEA Partnership1.
SHERRI YBARRA, SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION SUPPORTING SCHOOLS AND STUDENTS TO ACHIEVE.
Rowland Unified School District District Local Education Agency (LEA)Plan Update Principals Meeting November 16, 2015.
Mount Vernon City School District Comprehensive Team Planning for Improved Student Achievement Presentation by Maureen Gonzalez Deputy Superintendent.
LEA TRANSITION PLANNING GUIDANCE RHODE ISLAND DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION READY, SET, GO COMMON CORE!
Introduction to the Pennsylvania Kindergarten Entry Inventory.
State Systemic Improvement Plan (SSIP) Office of Special Education January 20, 2016.
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation South East High School March 11, 2015.
“ Public education is open to all children - no matter their ability, heritage, or economic background. It is the promise of our future ” Denise Juneau,
South Carolina Department of Education Office of Special Education Services Office of Assessment New Directors Learning Academy (NDLA) Instructional and.
Patricia Williams & Anita Castro Special Education Team 1 Sample IEP Forms College and Career Ready.
Testing Students with Disabilities. Resources Appendix C of Test Administration Manuals – SCPASS Science and Social Studies – End-of-Course English 1.
1 Update on Teacher Effectiveness July 25, 2011 Dr. Rebecca Garland Chief Academic Officer.
Examining the Collaborative Process in Implementing the Common Core State Standards.
Diane Mugford – Federal Accountability, ADAM Russ Keglovits – Measurement and Accountability, ADAM Renewing Nevada’s ESEA Waiver Flexibility Request.
“All kids get to go to school and get a fair chance to learn. That’s the idea behind IDEA. Getting a fair chance to learn, for kids with disabilities,
August 28, Liz Jones Suzanne Swaffield Douglas Alexander Anne Mruz Chris Webster 2.
Federal Policy & Statewide Assessments for Students with Disabilities
Assessments aligned to Common Core State Standards
New Assessments and Accommodations
Presentation transcript:

Special Education Updates John Payne, Interim Director Office of Exceptional Children

SC Enrich IEP System  Goal: In the school year, SC Enrich will replace Excent Online as the State web-based system for development and implementation of individualized education programs for students with disabilities.  What has been done?  Most of the product configuration  Selection of pilot school districts (Lancaster, Greenwood 51, and Sumter)  Designation of school districts for each of the five groups/waves (pilots are in Group 1)  Determination on of number of trainers for each district (based on district size/number of schools in each district)  What must be completed to reach goal?  Finish product configuration  Kick-off meetings for each group (Superintendents, SE Directors, and IT Directors)(SCDE – 3 hrs)  Product installation at each school district  Configuration and system administration training for each group (Remotely – ½ day)  Training for school district trainers for each group (SCDE Rutledge Building and Career Development Center – 4 sessions/2 days each)

SC Enrich Project – Monthly Activities  January – rollout announcement to school districts; complete software configuration; complete portal for communicating information to school districts (group designations, kick-off meeting dates, training guides and dates, announcements, etc.)  February – Excent will train OEC Enrich team (4 staff members) on all aspects of Enrich; develop school district training plan; Excent and OEC Enrich team will train remaining OEC staff; kick-off meetings for Group 1 and Group 2; product installation for pilot sites  March – kick-off meetings for Groups 3-4; product installation for rest of Group 1; training for Group 1  April & May – kick off meeting for Group 5; pilot implementation  June through August 8 – input from pilot districts; product modifications; training for Groups 2-5 (SC Enrich Version of Groundhog Day); product installation for Groups 2-5  Rest of August – school districts trainers provide training to district staff; OEC prays for successful state wide launch

RDA: Moving from a Compliance- Focus to One Driven by Results “For too long we’ve been a compliance-driven bureaucracy when it comes to educating students with disabilities.” “We have to expect the very best from our students – and tell the truth about student performance – so that we can give all students the supports and services they need. The best way to do that is by focusing on results.” U.S. Secretary of Education Arne Duncan

General APR & SSIP Phase I Timeline

Accountability Goals Engage key stakeholders to identify and analyze key data. Stakeholders will help identify a focus for improvement (e.g. graduation rate, dropout rate) Work with LEAs and other stakeholders to identify evidence-based practices.

Standards for Evaluation and Eligibility Determination (SEED)  SEED is a non-regulatory guidance document developed in 2011 to assist districts in implementing state and federal special education regulations, particularly in the area of evaluation and eligibility for special education. This segment of the special education process was lifted from the more Comprehensive Process Guide.

SEED (cont’d)  After 3 years of use, the OEC has determined that the SEED document has not always had its intended effect, as it has been sometimes taken out of the context of the entire special education process. We will be removing SEED from our resources, and inserting its contents back into the Comprehensive Process Guide. The Comprehensive Process Guide will be revised to be more accessible and informative, giving better guidance to the entire special education process.

Students with Disabilities and The Common Core  As the Common Core Standards enter the full implementation year in , concern is growing regarding Students with Disabilities’ ability to meet those standards. This is a common occurrence anytime new standards or a more rigorous curricula are introduced. Although the CCS represent significant change, the role and function of special education remains the same. A few gentle reminders:

SWD and CCS  Students with disabilities are general education students first.  Special education is a supplemental service to general education, not a substitute.  The purpose of special education continues to be to assist in remediating specific skill deficits, and to help students access and progress in the general curriculum.  Students are deemed eligible for special education by having a disability which adversely affects their learning, not because new standards or curricula may be difficult for them.  The Office of Exceptional Children is dedicated to assisting general and special education staff in helping all students meet the Common Core Standards.

Project Goals:  To develop a comprehensive system of technically defensible summative assessments supported by  Evidence-based curriculum and instruction  Comprehensive professional development  To ensure that students with significant cognitive disabilities achieve increasingly higher academic outcomes and leave high school ready for post-secondary options (college and career ready) National Center and State Collaborative (NCSC) Alternate Assessment on Alternate Achievement Standards 12

 Community of Practice (CoP)  Regional Trainings; Research to Practice  SC Teachers participating in national study (Instructional materials)  Teacher Training Modules aligned to CCSS ready by end of month  Curriculum Alignment  Graduated Understandings  Curriculum Resource Guide  Curricular materials and instructional modules are available on the NCSC wiki NCSC Curriculum and Instruction Professional Development Update 13

NCSC Summative Assessment Update  Items have been developed.  SC teachers participated in content and bias review committee meetings across the summer with teachers from the other 25 states in the consortium.  Pilots/field tests of items with students and teachers will occur Spring  Pilots/field tests of complete forms will occur Fall  Operational assessment will occur Spring  SC-Alt will continue to be administered in science and social studies.

Questions? John Payne, Interim Director Office of Exceptional Childen