1 Domain Name Disputes Rami Olwan Bibliotheca Alexandrina IP and the Digital Age Workshop 20-22 December 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 11: Domain Names and Other Trademark Issues on the Internet By: Adrian Lui.
Advertisements

Use of Trademarks in Domain Names & Domain Name Disputes.
CYBERSQUATTING: PREVENTION AND REMEDIATION STRATEGIES NET2002 – Washington, DC April 18, 2002 Scott Bearby NCAA Associate General Counsel Copyright Scott.
Dispute Settlement Services offered by the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center Heike Wollgast, WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center.
Governmental Advisory Committee New gTLD Program Briefing 19 June 2010.
Protecting internet domain names, recent cases Nicholas Smith Barrister, Blackstone Chambers, Panellist at WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Dispute Settlement and Effective Enforcement of IP.
™ May 8, 2015 Copyright
Cairo 2 November Agenda  Guidebook overview  Supporting and explanatory materials  Guidebook Module detail  Probable timelines 2.
Cyprus – Nicosia October, 2003 The management of domain names and metatags within a company Cyprus – Nicosia October, 2003 Etienne Wéry, Attorney - Brussels.
Legal Unit National Information Technology Development Agency gov ng.
“ICANN and the Global Internet” ICANN Workshop Wednesday, October 9, 2002 Mexico City.
Intellectual Property Boston College Law School April 11, 2008 Trademark – Domain Names.
Trademark and Unfair Comp. Boston College Law School April 9, 2008 Domain Names.
Intellectual Property Boston College Law School April 1, 2009 Trademark – Domain Names.
Johannes Christian Wichard Deputy Director WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center WIPO and ccTLDs ccTLD Best Practices: Latest and Future developments Luxembourg,
Domain Disputes Overview of UDRP Procedures 6/5/2015.
Dublin, May 2, 2003 Corporate Domain Names Management Dublin, May 2, 2003 Etienne Wéry, Attorney - Brussels and Paris bars Teacher at « Université Paris.
WIPO update - Intellectual Property Issues in the Digital Agenda Lucinda Jones World Intellectual Property Organization International Conference on the.
Trade Marks and Domain Names: new developments UNSW: Cyberspace regulation Patrick Gunning 24 May 2001.
Resolving Domain Name Disputes Sean M. Mead Mead, Mead & Clark, P.C. Salem, Indiana.
WIPO Internet Domain Name Process Francis Gurry Legal Counsel WIPO.
Chapter 5 E- Commerce and Dispute Resolution. 2 Chapter Objectives 1. Describe how the courts are dealing with jurisdictional issues with respect to cyberspace.
Domain Names Ferenc Suba LLM, MA Chairman of the Board, CERT-Hungary, Theodore Puskás Foundation Vice-Chair of the Management Board, European Network and.
Implementation Recommendation Team (IRT) Proposal Comments Sue Todd, Director, Product Management Monday 11 May 2009, San Francisco.
Trademark II Infringement. Article 57 Infringement Article 57 Any of the following conduct shall be an infringement upon the right to exclusively use.
The Case Against Cybersquatting A Discussion of Domain Name Trademark Protection By Matt Poole.
I DENTIFYING AND P ROTECTING I NTELLECTUAL P ROPERTY Tyson Benson
WIPO-SCIPS Training Program November 28, 2008 IP Disputes and Conflicts Management Sarah Theurich WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center.
Report of the WIPO Internet Domain Name Process. Genesis USG White Paper, June 5, 1998: –“The U.S. Government will seek international support to call.
Amber Bennett Cybersquatting. Introduction What is cybersquatting? Cyber: Internet Squatting: to live in a building or on land without the owner’s permission.
A Critique of Online Dispute Resolution : Case Study of Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP) Downloaded from
Domain Name Panelists Meeting October 20, Registrars and the UDRP – registrars as registrants, and other conundrums Peter L. Michaelson, Esq.
Real and Virtual Identities Francis Gurry Assistant Director General World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO)
Sam Funnell Managing Principal Solicitor Commercial & Property Branch Government Branding.
Trademarks IV Domain Names & Trademarks Class 23 Notes Law 507 | Intellectual Property | Spring 2004 Professor Wagner.
Domain Names & Domain Names Dispute Resolution Downloaded from
1 ICANN’s New gTLD Program: Trademark-related Concerns Arbitration and Mediation Center World Intellectual.
1 Alternative Dispute Resolution in Intellectual Property Adam Rattray WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center.
Chapter 17 E-Commerce and Digital Law
Domain Name Registration Sanjay Gupta August 29, 2008.
CYBERLAW CLASS 14 Regulating Domain Name Disputes – ICANN and the International System Oct. 15, 2002.
ELECTRONIC BUSINESS TRANSACTIONS Issues Covered in Chapter –Jurisdiction –Infringement and Cybersquatting –Internet Privacy and Database Protection –E-Commerce.
OECD - HCOPIL - ICC Conference on Building Trust in the Online Environment The Hague, December 11-12, 2000 THE ONLINE DISPUTE RESOLUTION EXPERIENCE OF.
Trademark Cases And now for something confusingly similar
Trademark Cases And now for something confusingly similar
Trademarks IV Domain Names & Trademarks Class Notes: April 9, 2003 Law 507 | Intellectual Property | Spring 2003 Professor Wagner.
1 WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center Rome Conference, December 11, 2009 Theme 6: Dispute Settlement and Enforcement of IP Rights by MSMEs WIPO Arbitration.
1 1 The GNSO Role in Internet Governance Presented by: Chuck Gomes Date: 13 May 2010.
Chapter 5 Trademark and the Internet. Trademarks and the Internet Concerns Cybersquatting Cybergriping Keyword advertising-courts disagree on what is.
Implementation of the.eu Top Level Domain Marko Bonač Arnes.
Essentials Of Business Law Chapter 27 Conducting Business In Cyberspace McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2007 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
1 Trademark Infringement and Dilution Steve Baron March 6, 2003.
International Intellectual Property Profs. Atik and Manheim Fall, 2006 Cybersquatting [slides by David Steele]
Trademark Law1  Nov. 20, 2006  Week 12 Chapter 11 – Trademarks and the Internet.
Module workshop 5B IP Enforcement Name of speakerVenue & date.
International Treaties regarding the Protection of Trademark.
Use of Trademarks in Domain Names & Domain Name Disputes
.CR DOMAIN ELIMINATION EXPERIENCE
Trademark and the Internet
ICANN’s Policy Development Activities
Rights Protection Mechanism Report to the ICANN Governmental Advisory Committee
PROTECTING YOUR BRAND ONLINE
Trademark Law Meets The Internet
E-Contracts and Internet Law
Chapter 13 E-Commerce Contracts
EE DNS FORUM / UADOM Domain name dispute resolution: challenges and alternatives Kateryna Oliinyk Head of Arzinger IP practice, Patent and Trademark Attorney.
Overview & Guideline for Dispute Resolution Mechanism
Overview & Guideline for Dispute Resolution Mechanism
Presentation transcript:

1 Domain Name Disputes Rami Olwan Bibliotheca Alexandrina IP and the Digital Age Workshop December 2008

2 Outline  Definition and types of domain names  Why domain names are important?  ICANN and its functions  Conflicts over domain names  Resolving conflicts

3 What is a domain name and DNS?  A human- friendly form of internet address, and is commonly used to find a certain web site.  Before having the Domain Name System (DNS), it was difficult for people to remember numbers, and to overcome this, a new system was created to translate IP numbers to letters. The system that we use when we surf the net is called the DNS.

4 Types of Domains Names  gTLDs: (There are currently 21 gTLDs).com,.edu,.aero,.org.int,.mil,.gov,.net.coop,.pro,.info,.museum,.tel,.cat,.jobs.name,.travel.asia,.mobi,.biz,.apra  ccTLDs: (WIPO is responsible for 56 ccTLDs).AU (Australia),.BS (Bahamas),.CY (Cyprus).GT (Guatemala),.NA (Namibia).PH (Philippines),.SH (St. Helena),.ES (Spain).TT (Trinidad and Tobago),.TV (Tuvalu),.VE (Venezuela),.WS (Western Samoa) ….

5 Why domain names are important?  Domain name are important assets to business since more effective search is done through brands, products, and services related to domain names than through a search engine.  Having the right domain name allow customers to visit a business, and this increases website traffic and business for these corporations.  Usually customers can predict the domain name related to a company or a famous mark. If the domain names does not resolve to the intended corporation, this may lead to confusion in the mind of the public and loss of revenues.

6 ICANN  ICANN stands for the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers.  ICANN is a public benefit, non-profit entity, international organization responsible for the management and oversight of the coordination of the Internets domain name system and its unique identifiers.  ICANN was created through a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) between the U.S. Department of Commerce and ICANN to transition management of the DNS from the U.S. government to the global community.

7 Types of Conflicts  There are different conflicts that occur over domain names,and the main ones are as follows: 1)Registering a domain names identical to a trademark (cybersquatting). 2)Registering a domain name confusingly similar to a Trademark (typosquatting). 3)Registering a domain name to express disatisfaction with a trademark or a corporation (cyber-smearing). 4) Other conflicts may arise such as : competing use, non competing use and internationalized domain names ….

8

9

10

11

12

13

14 Resolving Domain Name Disputes  Conflicts over domain names can be resolved as follows: 1) Negotiating (may lead to transfer if the registrant agrees) 2) UDRP (gTLDs and certain ccTLDs). 3) Registrars domain names dispute policies (ccTLDs). 4) Local courts (applying traditional trademarks laws or cases) 5) Arbitration and Mediation (in the even that both parties, agree).

15 What is the UDRP?  The UDRP is the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy, adopted by the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) on August 26,  Domain name registrants of gTLDs are required to submit to a mandatory administrative proceeding, according to the registration agreement singed between the registrant and the registrar (entity responsible for registering the domain name).

16 Approved Dispute Resolution Providers  ICANN approved the following dispute resolution providers: 1) e-Resolution (ceased working in December 2001 for financial reasons). 2) Asian Domain Name Dispute Resolution Center (ADNDRC). 3) WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center (WIPO). 4) CPR Institute for Dispute Resolution (CPR). 5) National Arbitration Forum (NAF).

17 Requirements for a Remedy under the UDRP  UDRP Paragraph 4(a) The three requirements for Complainant to obtain a remedy: (i) domain name is identical or confusingly similar to Complainant’s trademark or service mark. (ii) Registrant has no right or legitimate interest in respect of domain name. (iii) domain name was registered and is being used in bad faith.

18 Examples of “Bad Faith”  Circumstances indicate that defendant’s main purpose was to sell DN to TM owner for more than the direct costs of registration  History of registering DNs to prevent TM owners from registering  Registering a DN in order to disrupt the business of a competitor  attempting to divert Internet users to Defendant’s site for commercial gain by creating confusion concerning source or sponsorship  False whois details and pornography

19 Examples of “Legitimate Interests”  Pre-dispute use or demonstrable preparations to use the DN in bona fide offering of goods or services.  Defendant was commonly known by the name.  Legitimate, noncommercial or fair use of the DN without intent to misleadingly divert or tarnish.  The list is not exclusive, and the panelists decide based on the facts and circumstances of each case.

20 UDRP Advantages  Mandatory procedure- contractual basis (domain names registration agreement).  No Jurisdiction problem (either the principal office of the registrar or the the domain name holder address shown in Registrar’s who is database, see the rules of the UDRP)  Quick results (14 days within the appointment of the panelist).  Low costs ($ 1500: Panelist 1000,Center 500)  Direct enforcement (The registrar will enforce the outcome of the proceedings unless the registrant file a case with a competent court within 10 business days).  language is not a problem, proceedings can be conducted in different languages (11 languages are recognized under WIPO)  No need to appoint a lawyer (can do it yourself).

21 UDRP Disadvantages  No Discovery and monetary remedies.  No Attorneys’ Fees Awards.  Unpredictable outcomes.  Inconsistent decisions.  Forum shopping.  Excessive Impediments to freedom of speech  Too much power for trademarks owners; domain name owners too little.

22 Improved UDRP?  Disputes Assigned randomly to licensed providers.  Establish an internal appellate process with every provider.  add discovery system.  Recognize criticism as a legitimate use under the UDRP.  Define clearly what is considered “confusingly similar” and other concepts that may cause disagreement between panelists.  Broaden the scope of the UDRP to protect trade names and other identifier (see next slide).  The second WIPO process (2002) recommended to provide protection for geographical identifiers and names and acronyms of IGOs (Not for trade names, personal names and International nonproprietary names for phamaceutical identifiers (INNs).

23 References 1. Background materials  WIPO Advanced Workshop on Domain Name Dispute Resolution, Geneva, October 19 and 20,  William Fisher, Conflicts over domain name, internet law program, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, March Websites - ICANN at - WIPO at - IANNA at

24 Thank you

25 Any questions or comments ?