Sarit Kraus Bar-Ilan University

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Thinking Skills and Personal Capabilities Unit 1
Advertisements

The Enterprise Skills Story
Empirical Studies in Computer-Mediated Interest-Based Negotiations Sohan Dsouza MSc IT, 2009 British University in Dubai.
The Roles of a Sports Coach
Galit Haim, Ya'akov Gal, Sarit Kraus and Michele J. Gelfand A Cultural Sensitive Agent for Human-Computer Negotiation 1.
The following sides have been taken from a presentation on Assessment Centres by the Suncorp Graduate Recruitment Team 1 Leadership, Culture & Talent HR.
Cognitive Systems, ICANN panel, Q1 What is machine intelligence, as beyond pattern matching, classification and prediction. What is machine intelligence,
Department of Mathematics and Science
BPUG Workshops at Project Challenge are supported by: Soft Skills for Project and Programme Managers Melanie Franklin, CEO, Maven Training.
1
Chapter Thirteen Conclusion: Where We Go From Here.
Chapter 8: Foundations of Group Behavior
© 2012 Autodesk Design Thinking: A Pathway to Innovation in Education Dr. Brian Donnelly Lecturer UC Davis School of Education, K-12 Education Consultant.
1 * Culture sensitive agent – takes the culture of the other agent into consideration when making decisions.
MY OPTIONS : PLANNING FOR A BRIGHT FUTURE YEAR 8 : OPTIONS FORM ACTIVITY BOOKLET.
Ariel Rosenfeld, Amos Azaria, Sarit Kraus, Claudia V. Goldman, Omer Tsimhoni Ariel Rosenfeld et al. AAAI-15 (WAIT-15 Austin, TX USA. January.
Modeling Human Reasoning About Meta-Information Presented By: Scott Langevin Jingsong Wang.
Chapter 4 DECISION SUPPORT AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Talbert House Project PASS Goals and Outcomes.
Decision Making Upul Abeyrathne, Dept. of Economics, University of Ruhuna, Matara.
Sarit Kraus Bar-Ilan University
1 Enviromatics Decision support systems Decision support systems Вонр. проф. д-р Александар Маркоски Технички факултет – Битола 2008 год.
1
Developing a Personal Development Plan
“How” We Do It An Introduction to NSLIJ’s Behavioral Expectations Model.
A Study of Computational and Human Strategies in Revelation Games 1 Noam Peled, 2 Kobi Gal, 1 Sarit Kraus 1 Bar-Ilan university, Israel. 2 Ben-Gurion university,
Applying Research on Cultural Differences in Negotiation to a Negotiation Simulation Phani Radhakrishnan PhD Cross Cultural Differences in Org Behaviour.
Decision Making Dr Vasuprada Kartic NAC Batch IX PGDCPM.
When integrated models meet stakeholders and data (& vice-versa) WATER BASIN MODELS DATA STAKEHOLDERS POPULATION MODELLERS.
1 General Opponent* Modeling for Improving Agent-Human Interaction Sarit Kraus Dept. of Computer Science Bar Ilan University AMEC May 2010.
Performance Assessments. Students construct responses and knowledge Create products, or perform demonstrations to provide evidence of their knowledge.
Coalition Formation between Self-Interested Heterogeneous Actors Arlette van Wissen Bart Kamphorst Virginia DignumKobi Gal.
Team Formation between Heterogeneous Actors Arlette van Wissen Virginia Dignum Kobi Gal Bart Kamphorst.
SYSTEM DYNAMICS MODELING OF AGILE CONTINUOUS DELIVERY PROCESS 資工 4A 鄭鈞輿.
Home 1 Career Counseling and Services: A Cognitive Information Processing Approach James P. Sampson, Jr., Robert C. Reardon, Gary W. Peterson, and Janet.
Ms. Eberhard HGD – Spring What is teamwork? A joint action by a group of people, in which each person subordinates his or her individual interests.
Experimental Economics and Neuroeconomics. An Illustration: Rules.
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE [INTELLIGENT AGENTS PARADIGM] Professor Janis Grundspenkis Riga Technical University Faculty of Computer Science and Information.
Automated Agents that Interact Proficiently with People Sarit Kraus Bar-Ilan University
LEVEL 3 I can identify differences and similarities or changes in different scientific ideas. I can suggest solutions to problems and build models to.
1 CS 2710, ISSP 2610 Foundations of Artificial Intelligence introduction.
Design Principles for Creating Human-Shapable Agents W. Bradley Knox, Ian Fasel, and Peter Stone The University of Texas at Austin Department of Computer.
1 CHAPTER 2 Decision Making, Systems, Modeling, and Support.
1/27 CRESST/UCLA DIAGNOSTIC/PRESCRIPTIVE USES OF COMPUTER- BASED ASSESSMENT OF PROBLEM SOLVING San-hui Sabrina Chuang CRESST Conference 2007 UCLA Graduate.
Modeling Reasoning in Strategic Situations Avi Pfeffer MURI Review Monday, December 17 th, 2007.
Chapter 4 Developing and Sustaining a Knowledge Culture
Chapter 4 Developing and Sustaining a Knowledge Culture
Job Analysis - Competency Modeling MANA 5322 Dr. Jeanne Michalski
Agents that Reduce Work and Information Overload and Beyond Intelligent Interfaces Presented by Maulik Oza Department of Information and Computer Science.
Technical Seminar Presentation Presented By:- Prasanna Kumar Misra(EI ) Under the guidance of Ms. Suchilipi Nepak Presented By Prasanna.
Social skills Soft skills Hard skills _____________________________________________ definition and difference Presentation by: Anna Iordanskaya November.
Lifelong Learning: Construction of competencies and knowledge.
16469 Low Energy Building Design Conflict and Interaction in Environmental Engineering Design.
Boeing-MIT Collaborative Time- Sensitive Targeting Project July 28, 2006 Stacey Scott, M. L. Cummings (PI) Humans and Automation Laboratory
Artificial Intelligence: Research and Collaborative Possibilities a presentation by: Dr. Ernest L. McDuffie, Assistant Professor Department of Computer.
1 By: Ms. Adina Malik (ALK) Agents, Constituencies, Audiences Coalitions Multiple Parties and Teams By: Ms. Adina Malik (ALK)
Distinguishing humans from robots in web search logs preliminary results using query rates and intervals Omer Duskin Dror G. Feitelson School of Computer.
The Roles of a Sports Coach Dr. paed. Prakash Pradhan.
CHAPTER 5 Transfer of Training.
Cognitive Modeling Cogs 4961, Cogs 6967 Psyc 4510 CSCI 4960 Mike Schoelles
Technology Teams Chapter 2 - Part 1. The Value of Teamwork A team is a group of people who work together toward a common goal. A team is a group of people.
Decision Support and Business Intelligence Systems (9 th Ed., Prentice Hall) Chapter 12: Artificial Intelligence and Expert Systems.
BEHAVIOR BASED SELECTION Reducing the risk. Goals  Improve hiring accuracy  Save time and money  Reduce risk.
BEHAVIORAL INTERVIEWS
Educational Communication & E-learning
Human-Computer Negotiation in Three-Player Market Settings
Introduction Characteristics Advantages Limitations
Chapter 14 organizational change and development Michael A. Hitt
Promoting Inclusion with Classroom Peers
NextGen STEM Teacher Preparation in WA State
Presentation transcript:

Sarit Kraus Bar-Ilan University

Multi-issue Negotiation Employer and job candidate. Objective: reach an agreement over hiring terms after successful interview. Chat based negotiations 3

Training People in Negotiations 4

5/19 The Training Methods Classical role playing with another human counterpart:  simple  scheduling, requires other people Agent role playing  accessible and available 24/7  modeling different counterparts no significant differences were found between the different training methods ( 148 human subjects)

Virtual Suspect to Train Investigators

7

Culture Sensitive Agents for Culture related Studies The development of standardized agents to be used in the collection of data for studies on culture and negotiation Bargaining

Automated Mediators for Resolving Conflicts

Automated Speech Therapist

11 First place of the TedMed 2014 innovation competition for startups in medicine

Language Tele-Rehabilitation: Monitoring and Intervention 12 Patient: Currently in use by patients. Cyndi:גם זה פרי Patient:תפוח טפוך האותיות השניה והשלישית נכונות

Past deliberations accumulative data Agent Current deliberation Update Offer arguments = Obtains information Agent Supports Deliberation 13

15 Supporting Robots-Human Teams

Sustainability: Reducing Fuel Consumption Persuasion

Why not use only game theory? Game theory is a study of strategic decision making: "the study of mathematical models of conflict and cooperation between intelligent rational decision- makers“ Results from the social sciences suggest people do not follow game theory strategies.

People Often Follow Suboptimal Decision Strategies Irrationalities attributed to sensitivity to context lack of knowledge of own preferences the effects of complexity the interplay between emotion and cognition the problem of self control

Why not Only Behavioral Science Models? There are several models that describe human decision making Most models specify general criteria that are context sensitive but usually do not provide specific parameters or mathematical definitions

Why not Only Machine Learning? Machine learning builds models based on data It is difficult to collect human data Collecting data on specific user is very time consuming. Human data is noisy “Curse” of dimensionality

Methodology Human Prediction Model Take action machine learning Game Theory Optimization methods Human behavior models Data (from specific culture) Human specific data

22

An Experimental Test-Bed Interesting for people to play: analogous to task settings; vivid representation of strategy space (not just a list of outcomes). Possible for computers to play. Can vary in complexity repeated vs. one-shot setting; availability of information; communication protocol; Negotiations and teamwork 25

CT Game 100 point bonus for getting to goal 10 point bonus for each chip left at end of game Agreement are not enforceable 26 Collaborators: Gal, Haim, Gelfand

An Influence Diagram- Two rounds interaction Probability of acceptance Probability of transfer

Methodology Human Prediction Model Take action machine learning Game Theory Optimization methods Human behavior models Data (from specific culture) Human specific data

Average Task dep. Task indep. Co-dep People (Lebanon) People (US) Prediction of Acceptance and Reliability Data Collection: Human playing against adaptive agent (PURB) 29 Reliability Measure

Personality, Adaptive Learning (PAL) Agent 30 Human Prediction Model Take action Machine Learning Optimization methods Optimization methods Data from specific culture In this data set the Lebanon people almost always kept the agreements  PAL never kept agreements “Nasty Agent”: Less reliable when fulfilling its agreement People adapt their behavior to their counterparts.

Pal vs Humans 31 The model’s used by PAL had a very low accuracy prediction of people actually played against PAL

Multi-issue Negotiation: The Negotiation Scenario Employer and job candidate Objective: reach an agreement over hiring terms after successful interview 32

33 Chat-Based Negotiation

34 NegoChat’s Offers Find a “good” offer to use as anchoring Predict which offers will be accepted using on past negotiation sessions and create clusters of possible offers per time period Aspiration Adaptation Theory (AAT) proposes issues sequentially based on aspiration scale learned from data retreat from previous values 34 Collaborators: Avi Rosenfeld, Zukerman, Dagan, Gelfand

NegoChat vs KBagent in Israel 35

NegoChat in Egypt Collect new data of human vs human (negotiations much longer) Build classifier Extract aspiration list Got many complaints on the agent. Challenges in running experiments. Results: slower than in Israel; lower score; almost the same happiness and fairness; females scored much lower. 36

One operator – Multiple robots Search And Rescue (SAR) Warehouse operation Automatic air-craft towing Fire-Fighting Military applications Etc..

Semi-Autonomous Robots Controls the robots Noisy signals

Agent Prioritize tasks Provide warnings Controls the robots Noisy signals Filtered signals

Agent design Provide Advice Machine Learning Optimization Data on robots performance Data on human behavior Robot model Human model 150 hours of simulations (no human operator). 30 human Operators in simulation

Evaluation: Three Environments 16 subjects 12 subjects

Objects found per condition Simulated officePhysical office Simulated warehouse yard

Relatively low impact Possible Reason: lack involvement of the teachers Better results with a human teachers in the loop. Computer Games for Learning

Capabilities for Agents in Learning Planning Monitoring Intervention Encouragement 45

Human-agent Working Together Planning: human forms the basic learning plan; agent adapts it to the student’s progress. Monitoring & Intervention: Agent performs M&I and asks the human for help when it is not sure. Encouragement: point up to the human that a student needs encouragements. 46

Team of Agents and Teacher Many automated agents provide service to many students. One human teacher supervises many students. Special agent supports the teacher. 47

Reducing Energy Consumption by Advising People on how to set the Climate Control System GM Chevrolet Volt 2011

Presenting Advice to User

~80% of drivers explicitly accepted.

Methodology Collecting data on 38 subjects for an hour session in the car) Predicting drivers reactions to offers Modeling the car and environment Integrating into an MDP Solving the MDP 51

Evaluation 45 drivers - 15 per condition, 3 rounds. The lower the better.

Why Did MDP Outperform the SAP? SAP was aggressive. Some subjects stopped clicking on the advice. AgentAvg. go eco %Avg. save %Avg. consumption MACS SAP agent

This does not look as a real person!! Remove the Avatar!!

AniMed evaluation

56 Agents interacting proficiently with people is important Human Prediction Model Take action machine learning Game Theory Optimization methods Human behavior models Data (from specific culture) Human specific data Challenges: Experimenting with people is very difficult !!! Working with people from other disciplines is challenging. Challenges: How to integrate machine learning and behavioral models? How to use in agent’s strategy?