A Vision for Science Education in South Dakota Sam Shaw NGSS Network Meeting Atlanta, Georgia Feb. 18, 2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SCHOOL LEADERS: THE KEY TO SUCCESSFUL INDUCTION
Advertisements

Designing School Level Professional Development. Overview Assessing prior knowledge of professional development Defining professional development Designing.
Understanding by Design Stage 3
TWS Aid for Supervisors & Mentor Teachers Background on the TWS.
A Guide to Implementation
PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
North Carolina Educator Evaluation System. Future-Ready Students For the 21st Century The guiding mission of the North Carolina State Board of Education.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
Schema for Professional Development to Implement the Framework and NGSS BCSSE Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania June 7, 2013 Presenters: Juan-Carlos Aguilar, Georgia.
Steve Klass, Nadine Bezuk & Jane Gawronski
A Mathematics Specialist Program: Its Structure and Impact on Practicing Elementary Teachers Nadine Bezuk & Susan Nickerson.
Grade 12 Subject Specific Ministry Training Sessions
Clara Fowler University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
Matt Moxham EDUC 290. The Idaho Core Teacher Standards are ten standards set by the State of Idaho that teachers are expected to uphold. This is because.
+ Hybrid Roles in Your School If not now, then when?
CYCO Professional Development Packages (PDPs) Teacher Responsiveness to Student Scientific Inquiry 1.
Next Generation Science Standards Update Cheryl Kleckner Education Specialist.
Supporting the CCSS in the Science Classroom through the Science and Engineering Practices of the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) John Spiegel.
Experiences and requirements in teacher professional development: Understanding teacher change Sylvia Linan-Thompson, Ph.D. The University of Texas at.
The Framework for Teaching and the Student-Led Classroom
Differentiating Instruction Professional Development.
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC)
Asynchronous Discussions and Assessment in Online Learning Vonderwell, S., Liang, X., & Alderman, K. (2007). Asynchronous Discussions and Assessment in.
A Framework for Inquiry-Based Instruction through
All Standards All Students
Mission The faculty and staff of Pittman Elementary School are committed to providing every student with adequate time, effective teaching, and a positive.
Full Implementation of the Common Core. Last Meeting Performance Tasks Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium Upcoming Accountability Measure Strong teaching.
Introduction to Working Portfolios Educator Effectiveness System Training.
Hollywood High School Testing Data Results WASC Goals and Instructional Focus October 6, 2009.
Laying the Groundwork for the New Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System TPGES.
LIVE INTERACTIVE YOUR DESKTOP 1 Start recording—title slide—1 of 3 Introducing the Next Generation Science Standards Originally presented by:
Introducing the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS)
THE DANIELSON FRAMEWORK. LEARNING TARGET I will be be able to identify to others the value of the classroom teacher, the Domains of the Danielson framework.
Committee on the Assessment of K-12 Science Proficiency Board on Testing and Assessment and Board on Science Education National Academy of Sciences.
Putting Research to Work in K-8 Science Classrooms Ready, Set, SCIENCE.
1 Historical Perspective... Historical Perspective... Science Education Reform Efforts Leading to Standards-based Science Education.
Urban Mathematics Education Leadership Academy Session 1 February 4-6, 2009 Dallas, TX.
Chapter 1 Defining Social Studies. Chapter 1: Defining Social Studies Thinking Ahead What do you associate with or think of when you hear the words social.
Teresa K. Todd EDAD 684 School Finance/Ethics March 23, 2011.
by Noverene Taylor EDD 9100-OL8 Leadership Seminar Nova Southeastern University October 19, 2006 Dr. Ron Parlett.
Standards-Based Curricula Dr. Dennis S. Kubasko, Jr. NC Teach Summer 2009.
Expeditionary Learning Queens Middle School Meeting May 29,2013 Presenters: Maryanne Campagna & Antoinette DiPietro 1.
Teaching to the Standard in Science Education By: Jennifer Grzelak & Bonnie Middleton.
LESSON PLANNING What? Why? And How?. Goals of this session Participants will be able to identify and explain: 1.What is a lesson plan and how to develop.
Roles and Responsibilites of the Mentor Teacher Thank you for participating in our Mentor/Mentee Program! Parkway School District Summer 2010.
How People Learn – Brain, Mind, Experience, and School (Bransford, Brown, & Cocking, 1999) Three core principles 1: If their (students) initial understanding.
Qualities needed among science teachers- A perspective from Taiwan Huann-shyang Lin National Sun Yat-sen University, Taiwan.
Instructional Strategies Teacher Knowledge, Understanding, and Abilities The online teacher knows and understands the techniques and applications of online.
Session Objectives Analyze the key components and process of PBL Evaluate the potential benefits and limitations of using PBL Prepare a draft plan for.
NCATE STANDARD I STATUS REPORT  Hyacinth E. Findlay  March 1, 2007.
NOVA Evaluation Report Presented by: Dr. Dennis Sunal.
STANDARD 4 & DIVERSITY in the NCATE Standards Boyce C. Williams, NCATE John M. Johnston, University of Memphis Institutional Orientation, Spring 2008.
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
Conducting Professional Development Programme LEADING TO LEARN, LEARNING TO LEAD.
Writing a Professional Development Plan.  Step 1–Identify Indicators to be Assessed  Step 2 –Determine Average Baseline Score  Step 3 –Develop a Growth.
Webinar NGSS Earth and Space Science: Needs and a Call to Action April 9, pm Eastern | 3pm Central | 2pm Mountain | 1pm Pacific Dr. Ed Robeck, American.
Relationships in the 21 st Century Parent Teachers Students Association (PTSA) Goals, Membership, Participation.
Creative Intervention Planning through Universal Design for Learning MariBeth Plankers, M.S. CCC-SLP Page 127.
Inquiry Primer Version 1.0 Part 4: Scientific Inquiry.
Five Tools & Processes for NGSS Tool 3: Using the 5E instructional model to develop a conceptual flow.
Instructional Leadership and Application of the Standards Aligned System Act 45 Program Requirements and ITQ Content Review October 14, 2010.
Authentic service-learning experiences, while almost endlessly diverse, have some common characteristics: Positive, meaningful and real to the participants.
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation Panorama High School March
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
Equity and Deeper Learning:
Professional Development: Imagine Difference Shapes and Sizes
All Standards All Students
Philippine Professional Standards for Teachers
Leveraging DI Through Curriculum Implementation
Twenty Questions Competency 10.
Presentation transcript:

A Vision for Science Education in South Dakota Sam Shaw NGSS Network Meeting Atlanta, Georgia Feb. 18, 2014

South Dakota Profile Population: 833,354 (2012 estimate US Census) About 126,128 public school students – US Average is 970,278 (more than our state population) 156 School Districts Served by 9,511 public school teachers 875 MS/HS teachers with science assignments

Where is South Dakota? 7/2011 – April / / s-2009 Phase IIPhase I Informing Vision for: 1990s

South Dakota Science Academies Governor Dennis Daugaard’s Investing in Teachers Package To create a shift in instructional practice to challenge students to higher levels of understanding and performance. – Higher-order thinking – Student performance doe.sd.gov

“Shift” Teaching science facts 3-D student performance doe.sd.gov “an important role of science education is not to teach ‘all the facts’ but rather prepare students with sufficient core knowledge so that they can later acquire additional information on their own.” - Framework for K-12 Science Education

Summer 2012 Trained 12 Middle School “Lead Teachers” One week initial training on: – Ready, Set, Science (Classroom Environment, Making thinking visible) – Specific Core Ideas – Science Instruction Strategies Left with a set of lessons to implement in the upcoming school year.

SY Filmed initial footage One day reflection session 12 weeks into school – Analyzed footage – Adjusted expectations Filmed post-reflection session footage Teachers responded to questions on EdModo throughout/following the process to reflect and to share strategies.

Teacher Reflection Percentage of information retained… – “Big Ideas” Talk Moves – evident in teaching strategies Practices – evident in student performance Classroom Environment – evident in overall culture Video footage was planned for use in the trainings…

Spring 2013 Creation of training with 3 of the highest performing teachers. – The selection of the teachers was based on footage, discussion and teacher involvement in overall reflection – Utilized teacher footage (sparingly) – Embedded performances to investigate phenomena 3-dimensional, scaffolded Outcome of instruction always included a mechanism of making student’s thinking visible

Summer 2013 Summer Science Academies for MS/HS – 3 dimensions – Conceptual shifts – Engineering – Utilization of NGSS materials Trained approximately 400 teachers (~50%)

Teacher Interpretations… Feedback: – (Course Survey) Engineering is foreign to most teachers – (Lead Teacher Observation) Facilitation requires practice – (Human Graph) Real-world applicability and College/Career Readiness were most important shifts. Misconceptions: – “Framework is all about hands-on and will be expensive to implement” – “My concern is that ACT, SAT and colleges are not going to follow suit and our students will be ill prepared.”

Suggestions “Would have been nice to have developed a lesson plan of our own that met the requirements of [the Framework] during this workshop.” From this suggestion, we have molded our next iteration of the Science Academies for K-5 teachers. – Can train up to 1120 K-5 teachers – Created lesson plan template to reflect an instructional sequence identified by work with Lead Teachers (expectations for student performance varied) Future training will feature big ideas as they exist within a 3-D student performance.

Framework and the NSES “Explicit standards for teaching, professional development, education programs, and the education system were included in the original National Science Education Standards (NSES) published by the NRC in 1996 [7]. Although many of these standards are still relevant to K-12 science education today, the committee did not undertake a thorough review of these portions of the NSES.” Framework Page 242

STANDARD A: Professional development for teachers of science requires learning essential science content through the perspectives and methods of inquiry. Science learning experiences for teachers must : Involve teachers in actively investigating phenomena that can be studied scientifically, interpreting results, and making sense of findings consistent with currently accepted scientific understanding. Address issues, events, problems, or topics significant in science and of interest to participants. Introduce teachers to scientific literature, media, and technological resources that expand their science knowledge and their ability to access further knowledge. Build on the teacher’s current science understanding, ability, and attitudes. Incorporate ongoing reflection on the process and outcomes of understanding science through inquiry. Encourage and support teachers in efforts to collaborate. NSES Page 59

STANDARD B: Professional development for teachers of science requires integrating knowledge of science, learning, pedagogy, and students; it also requires applying that knowledge to science teaching. Learning experiences for teachers of science must: Connect and integrate all pertinent aspects of science and science education. Occur in a variety of places where effective science teaching can be illustrated and modeled, permitting teachers to struggle with real situations and expand their knowledge and skills in appropriate contexts. Address teachers’ needs as learners and build on their current knowledge of science content, teaching, and learning. Use inquiry, reflection, interpretation of research, modeling, and guided practice to build understanding and skill in science teaching. NSES Page 62

STANDARD C: Professional development for teachers of science requires building understanding and ability for lifelong learning. Professional development activities must: Provide regular, frequent opportunities for individual and collegial examination and reflection on classroom and institutional practice. Provide opportunities for teachers to receive feedback about their teaching and to understand, analyze, and apply that feedback to improve their practice. Provide opportunities for teachers to learn and use various tools and techniques for self-reflection and collegial reflection, such as peer coaching, portfolios, and journals. Support the sharing of teacher expertise by preparing and using mentors, teacher advisers, coaches, lead teachers, and resource teachers to provide professional development opportunities. Provide opportunities to know and have access to existing research and experiential knowledge. Provide opportunities to learn and use the skills of research to generate new knowledge about science and the teaching and learning of science.

STANDARD D: Professional development programs for teachers of science must be coherent and integrated. Quality pre-service and in-service programs are characterized by: Clear, shared goals based on a vision of science learning, teaching, and teacher development congruent with the National Science Education Standards. Integration and coordination of the program components so that understanding and ability can be built over time, reinforced continuously, and practiced in a variety of situations. Options that recognize the developmental nature of teacher professional growth and individual and group interests, as well as the needs of teachers who have varying degrees of experience, professional expertise, and proficiency. Collaboration among the people involved in programs, including teachers, teacher educators, teacher unions, scientists, administrators, policy makers, members of professional and scientific organizations, parents, and business people, with clear respect for the perspectives and expertise of each. Recognition of the history, culture, and organization of the school environment. Continuous program assessment that captures the perspectives of all those involved, uses a variety of strategies, focuses on the process and effects of the program, and feeds directly into program improvement and evaluation. NSES page 70