PUBLIC SECTOR ECONOMICS

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
13. Production Varian, Chapter 31.
Advertisements

General Equilibrium (Welfare Economics). General Equilibrium u Partial Equilibrium: Neglects the way in which changes in one market affect other (product/factor)
TOOLS OF NORMATIVE ANALYSIS
Chapter 16. GENERAL EQUILIBRIUM AND MARKET EFFICIENCY McGraw-Hill/IrwinCopyright © 2011 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter.
Equity, Efficiency and Need
Demystifying Efficiency in the Economics Classroom David A. Anderson Centre College.
Chapter Twenty-Nine Exchange. u Two consumers, A and B. u Their endowments of goods 1 and 2 are u E.g. u The total quantities available and units of good.
General Equilibrium Analysis
Chapter Thirty Production. Exchange Economies (revisited) u No production, only endowments, so no description of how resources are converted to consumables.
1 Chapter 3 – Tools of Normative Analysis Public Finance McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.
General Equilibrium Theory
General Equilibrium and Efficiency. General Equilibrium Analysis is the study of the simultaneous determination of prices and quantities in all relevant.
Microeconomics General equilibrium Institute of Economic Theories - University of Miskolc Mónika Kis-Orloczki Assistant lecturer.
MICROECONOMICS: Theory & Applications Chapter 19 General Equilibrium Analysis and Economic Efficiency By Edgar K. Browning & Mark A. Zupan John Wiley.
Neoclassical Revival 1920s and “Empty Economic Boxes” debate Developments in the 1930s –Demand Theory –Theory of Production and Cost –Welfare Economics.
Chapter 7 General Equilibrium and Market Efficiency
Chapter 5 A Closed- Economy One-Period Macroeconomic Model Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education Canada.
Chapter Twenty-Nine Exchange. u Two consumers, A and B. u Their endowments of goods 1 and 2 are u E.g. u The total quantities available and units of good.
© 2008 Pearson Addison Wesley. All rights reserved Review Perfect Competition Market.
1 General Equilibrium APEC 3001 Summer 2006 Readings: Chapter 16.
A Closed- Economy One-Period Macro-economic Model
Assoc. Prof. Y.KuştepeliECN 242 PUBLIC ECONOMICS1 TOOLS OF NORMATIVE ANALYSIS.
Robinson Crusoe model 1 consumer & 1 producer & 2 goods & 1 factor: –two price-taking economic agents –two goods: the labor (or leisure x 1 ) of the consumer.
Externalities © Allen C. Goodman 2009 Ideal Market Processes are desirable if … We accept the value judgment that “personal wants of individuals should.
UNIT II:Firms & Markets Theory of the Firm Profit Maximization Perfect Competition Review 7/15 MIDTERM 7/6.
General Equilibrium and Market Efficiency Production Economy.
© 2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc Chapter 13 Competitive General Equilibrium.
Equity, Efficiency and Need
1. The Market Economy Fall Outline A. Introduction: What is Efficiency? B. Supply and Demand (1 Market) C. Efficiency of Consumption (Many Markets)
Chapter 32 Production We now add production into the economy. Two goods: foods and clothes (F and C). Two inputs: L and K. Two firms: one producing F and.
Unit 16 – General equilibrium analysis and Economic efficiency.
General Equilibrium and Economic Welfare
1 Exchange Molly W. Dahl Georgetown University Econ 101 – Spring 2009.
General Equilibrium and Market Efficiency
1 Chapter 10: General Equilibrium So far, we have studied a partial equilibrium analysis, which determines the equilibrium price and quantities in one.
“The Price System As A Mechanism For Using Knowledge”
Ch 4 THE THEORY OF PRODUCTION
 General Equilibrium and Welfare.  Partial vs. General equilibrium analysis  Partial Equilibrium: narrow focus  General equilibrium: framework of.
1 Theme 1 – The Foundation of Public Economics 11F251 Financial Theory, Policy and Institutions.
Chapter Thirty-Two Production. Exchange Economies (revisited)  No production, only endowments, so no description of how resources are converted to consumables.
1 Chapter 2 Appendix Welfare Economics. 2 Efficiency Resource Use Assumptions 2 inputs (capital and labor) 2 outputs (food and clothing)
Public Finance (MPA405) Dr. Khurrum S. Mughal. Lecture 2: Efficiency: Criterion and Government Public Finance.
Chapter 16 General Equilibrium, Efficiency, and Equity McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2008 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS Lecture 3 | Carlos Cuerpo | Why do countries trade? Some later answers.
Chapter 16 General Equilibrium, Efficiency, and Equity Copyright © 2014 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without.
1 Chapters 6 & 19.1 & 19.2: Exchange Efficiency, and Prices.
Lecture 8 Profit Maximization. Comparison of consumer theory with producer theory In consumer theory we learned that the main objective of consumer is.
1 Exchange. 2 Two consumers, A and B. Their endowments of goods 1 and 2 are E.g. The total quantities available and units of good 1 units of good 2. and.
Chapter 18W McGraw-Hill/IrwinCopyright © 2010 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Equity and Need © Allen C. Goodman, 2013 Remember the Trade-off Between Efficiency and Equity? They are not the same. We saw this in production. We’ll.
CHAPTER 31 PRODUCTION. The Robinson Crusoe Economy One consumer and one firm; The consumer owns the firm; Preference: over leisure and coconuts; Technology:
General Equilibrium Theory
Copyright © 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. Chapter 5 A Closed- Economy One-Period Macroeconomic Model.
General equilibrium & welfareslide 1 General Equilibrium & Welfare How should society organize the production and distribution of goods if the objective.
MICROECONOMICS: Theory & Applications By Edgar K. Browning & Mark A. Zupan John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 11 th Edition, Copyright 2012 PowerPoint prepared by.
EC PUBLIC SECTOR ECONOMICS 1 TOOLS OF NORMATIVE ANALYSIS Prof.Dr. Y.Kuştepeli.
Slide 1Copyright © 2004 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited Chapter 16 General Equilibrium and Market Efficiency.
© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 32 Production.
Chapter 32 Production. Exchange Economies (revisited) No production, only endowments, so no description of how resources are converted to consumables.
A P.O. Is a C.E. © 1998 by Peter Berck. What Is It Good? §Sum of surplus and profits allows for policies that make income less evenly distributed. §A.
Equity and Need © Allen C. Goodman, 2015 Remember the Trade-off Between Efficiency and Equity? They are not the same. We saw this in production. We’ll.
1 Production. 2 Exchange Economies (revisited) No production, only endowments, so no description of how resources are converted to consumables. General.
Lectures in By Prof. Dr. Younis El Batrik. THE FIELD OF PUBLIC FINANCE Fundamental Economic Facts  The Scarcity of Resources  The necessity of economizing.
2. Welfare economics and the rationale for public intervention (Stiglitz ch.3, 4, 5; Gruber ch.2,5,6,7; Rosen ch. 4,5,6 ) 2.1. The two fundamental theorems.
Chapter 5 A Closed-Economy One-Period Macroeconomic Model.
TOOLS OF NORMATIVE ANALYSIS
Efficiency and Equity in a Competitive Market
GENERAL EQUILIBRIUM AND WELFARE
2. Welfare economics and the rationale for public intervention (Stiglitz ch.3, 4, 5; Gruber ch.2,5,6,7; Rosen ch. 4,5,6 ) 2.1. The two fundamental theorems.
General Equilibrium, Efficiency, and Equity
Presentation transcript:

PUBLIC SECTOR ECONOMICS Lecture 3: The Fundamental Theorems of Welfare Economics

The Structure of the Model Assumptions: Two individuals: 1, 2 Two goods: X, Y Two factors of production: K, L Fundamental Elements of the Model: (1) Individual preferences: 1 & 2 get utility from consuming X & Y 1’s utility: U1 = U1(X,Y) 2’s utility: U2 = U2(X,Y) (2) Production technologies: X & Y made from combining K & L according to the production functions X = X(KX,LX) & Y = Y(KY,LY) → Assumed to be constant returns to scale (CRS)

(The Structure of the Model Continued…) (3) Market Clearance: Input and output markets must both clear → X = X1 + X2 & Y = Y1 + Y2 → K* = KX + KY & L* = LX + LY where K* = K1* + K2* & L* = L1* + L2* Why the CRS assumption? Guarantees that if all markets are perfectly competitive (1) Firm revenue equals firm expenditure (on K,L) → There is no economic profit (2) Consumer income equals consumer expenditure (on X,Y) → There is no individual saving

The First Fundamental Theorem of Welfare Economics A competitive economy can achieve a Pareto optimal allocation of resources Necessary conditions for a Pareto optimum: Consumption: Marginal rates of substitution between X & Y must be equal for 1 & 2 Production: Marginal rates of technical substitution between K & L must be equal for production of X & Y Consumption-production: Marginal rates of substitution between X & Y must also equal Marginal rates of transformation between X & Y

The Consumption Condition Intuition: To ensure Pareto-optimality, individuals 1 & 2 must X & Y in such combinations that their willingness to trade small amounts of Y for X are equal If this does not hold, individuals will be able to make trades that make both of them better off Example: Consider initial allocation (X1,Y1) & (X2,Y2) such that at that allocation MRS1X,Y > MRS2X,Y If 1 trades some Y to 2 in exchange for some X, then both individuals increase utility (i.e. move is Pareto superior) Initial allocation cannot have been Pareto-optimal

(The Consumption Condition continued) Pareto superior moves exist as long as MRS1X,Y > MRS2X,Y → Pareto superior moves only cease to exist when MRS1X,Y = MRS2X,Y Edgeworth Box Shows all potential Pareto optimal outcomes Bold line is contract curve All possible Pareto optimal allocations available to economy - If economy is not on contract curve, there is always a Pareto superior move available (A to B)

(The Consumption Condition continued) Further, to maximize utility, individuals consume until MRS1X,Y = Px / PY and MRS2X,Y = Px / PY MRSX,Y is rate at which individual values trade-off between X & Y PX / PY is rate at which market values trade-off between X & Y To maximize utility, these must be equal, otherwise, individuals could trade X for Y and make themselves better off At A, MRSX,Y = Px / PY Because both individuals face same prices (assuming perfect competition) it follows that it must be true that MRS1X,Y = MRS2X,Y

The Production Condition Marginal rates of technical substitution (MRTS) between K & L must be equal MRTS shows firm’ willingness to trade small amounts of K and L must be equal Bold line represents all efficient allocations of K & L Points on bold line correspond to points on PPF for X & Y If input markets are perfectly competitive, MRTSK,L are equal for X & Y

(The Production Condition continued) Further, to maximize utility, individuals consume until MRTSXK,L = PL / PK and MRTSYK,L = PL / PK MRTSXK,L is rate at which firms values trade-off between K & L PL / PK is rate at which firms value trade-off between K & L To maximize profit, these must be equal, otherwise, firms could trade K for L and make themselves better off → At A, MRTSK,L = PL / PK Because all firms face same input prices (assuming perfect competition) it follows that it must be true that MRTSXK,L = MRTSYK,L

The Consumption–Production Condition Combines previous two conditions MRS between two goods must be equal MRTS between two factors must be equal → economy must be on PPF for X & Y Requires that MRSX,Y = MRTX,Y MRTX,Y is slope of PPF for X & Y Economy must be on consumption contract curve (equal MRS → consumption efficiency) Economy must choose specific point on contract curve at which slope equals slope of PPF (i.e. MRSX,Y = MRTX,Y)

Perfect Competition and Production–Consumption Efficiency Under perfect competition PX = MCX & PY = MCY → MRTX, Y = (PX/PY) / (MCX/MCY) But we also know that MRSX,Y = PX/PY → Hence, MRS1X, Y = MRS2X, Y = MRTX, Y → A perfectly competitive market reaches its UPF when all of the assumptions for a well-functioning economy hold → This is simply a re-statement of the first fundamental theorem of welfare economics Note: This condition only holds if all consumers and firms face the same prices

The Second Fundamental Theorem of Welfare Economics Considers how society feels about end-results equity → Asks whether society is happy at C' C is on UPF so it is efficient, because all markets are competitive it satisfies process equity which should aid social mobility May not satisfy equity concerns as 2 has a lot more than 1 Society could accept C' but usually does not Usually taxes and transfers get more equitable outcome Second welfare theorem says that a new Pareto-optimal outcome can be achieved given existing resources