Legal Aspects for Research Administrators. LEGAL ASPECTS FOR RESEARCH ADMINISTRATORS Mark Bohnhorst Associate General Counsel* * These materials are informational.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CIVIL LIABILITY Instructor: John M. Balloni. Duration: Two Hours Instruction Methods: Lecture, discussion, overheads and video.
Advertisements

A GIA is a contract between a surety company and a contractor (or subcontractor)/principal. A GIA is a standard, typical document in the construction.
THE ROLE OF INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS WITHIN AN ORGANIZATION By Aaron Hardiman, MBA, ARM.
Remedies Against Govt Defendants – Some Basics 11 th amendment bars suits against the State, unless Lawsuit is against state officer in their official.
LA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE LITIGATION DIVISION JANUARY 18, 2006 BY ELAINE B. PATIN INDEMNIFICATION OF STATE EMPLOYEES.
Conflict of Interest, Conflict of Commitment, and Outside Activities UTSA HOP 1.33 Non-covered UTSA staff 1.
“Can I Be Sued for That?” Liability and Liability Insurance Trey Allen NC Emergency Management Association 2014 Spring Conference March 24, 2014.
CARLIN LAW GROUP, APC (619) Know Your Indemnity Obligation Know Your Risk Know Your Insurance Company by KEVIN R. CARLIN, ESQ.
Exposure to Trustees, Officers Employees and The University Liability, Immunity, Indemnity and Fiduciary Issues 1.
Managing Risk and Liability for Student Organizations/Clubs and their Officers.
DRAFT AGREEMENT TEMPLATE Interjurisdictional cooperation and mutual aid.
Suing the Federal Government. 2 History Traditional Sovereign Immunity US Constitution "No Money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in Consequence.
Legal Responsibilities for Board Members of Nonprofit Organizations Or…all you need to know to stay out of trouble. Presented: July 2007 Prepared by: Elsbeth.
BlueCare Tennessee and BlueCare, Independent Licensees of BlueCross BlueShield Association How the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 Impacts BlueCare Tennessee.
Using Prevent Defense: Mitigating Legal Risk in Procurements Presented by Richard Pennington John Westrick.
LA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE LITIGATION DIVISION CIVIL RIGHTS SECTION – 2004 CLE SEMINAR March 10, 2004 INDEMNIFICATION OF STATE EMPLOYEES.
The New Mediation Regulation October 16, 2012 Commissioner Derrick L. Williams.
CIVIL & CRIMINAL LIABILITY Staff Development Emergency Operations Volunteer Training Legal Issues:
The Game of Risk Understanding Your Legal Liability as a Trustee NC Association of Community College Trustees April 9, 2015.
Burnslev.com © 2013 Burns & Levinson LLP Allocating and Mitigating Contractual Risk ACC – NE Corporate Counsel Institute June 12, 2013 Alan M. Block, John.
WASHINGTON STATE EMERGENCY WORKER PROGRAM State of Washington
© 2003 Rule 1.9. Duties to Former Clients (a) A lawyer who has formerly represented a client in a matter shall not thereafter represent another person.
Jeopardy The Sexual Harassment Edition. Definitions Rules, Regulations, Guidelines & Law What Next (or What’s Not Next)? Facts About Sexual Harassment.
Fiscal Compliance for Department Heads & Directors Daniel Adams Audit Services.
Evaluating the Impact of Heightened Enforcement of Anti- Corruption Legislation Around the World on your D&O Policies; Experience to Date, What Coverages.
Confidentiality & Privilege Kristen Blankley Assistant
Construction Contracts What You Need to Know March 19, 2015.
Office of Risk Management Annual Conference EMPLOYMENT LIABILITY WHAT THE AGENCY NEEDS TO KNOW.
Ethics – Dos and Don’ts Mary Garcia Melissa Miller Dennis McGuire Office of Regional Counsel.
1 Disclosures © HIPAA Pros 2002 All rights reserved.
CONTRACTS 101 FOR STATE UNIVERSITY PROCUREMENT OFFICERS.
WHAT EVERY NOT-FOR-PROFIT DIRECTOR SHOULD KNOW By REUBEN S. SEGURITAN 450 Seventh Avenue, Suite 1400, New York, NY Phone Fax
© 2009 Foley Hoag LLP. All Rights Reserved.Presentation Title Final Massachusetts Pharmaceutical and Medical Device Regulations Penalties and Enforcement.
New Firearms Regulations A Summary Amends §790.33, Florida Statutes Board of County Commissioners Worksession September 13,
Presented by David P. Schack, Partner June 29, 2006 Insurance Coverage For Multi- State Investigations: Can You Get Your Insurer to Pay for.
New NSF Awardee Checklist Requirements: WHY? November 19, 2014 joyce y. JOHNSON POST-AWARDS COORDINATOR OFFICE OF SPONSORED PROGRAMS.
Ethical Issues for Employment Investigations on Campus Carl Crosby Lehman, Gray Plant Mooty Brent Benrud, University of Minnesota.
Directors & Officers Liability Insurance against the decisions you make.
ETHICS: CONFIDENTIALITY OF IFTA DATA IFTA ATTORNEYS’ SECTION MEETING October 7, :30-10:00 a.m. Jim Clark Motor Carrier Services Attorney Indiana.
Government Data Practices and the Open Meeting Law August 2014.
Data Practices in Minnesota December Outline for this presentation Minnesota data practices laws Classification of government data Government entity.
Yes. You’re in the right room.. Hi! I’m David (Hi David!)
Session 171 Legal Issues in Utilizing Hazard Models and Mapping Hazard Mapping and Modeling.
Verification of truthful information. Require customer to notify in writing of any changed information. Credit amount may change with unilateral discretion.
1 The Public Interest Disclosure (Whistleblower Protection) Act.
Maximizing Directors’ & Officers’ Personal Protection: Indemnification and D&O Liability Insurance Presented by: Glen BaileyPeter McKenna Managing DirectorPresident.
OMB Circular A-122 and the Federal Cost Principles Copyright © Texas Education Agency
U.T. System Administration Delegation of Authority to Sign Contracts Dana Hollingsworth, Attorney The University of Texas System Office of General Counsel.
Christopher M. McNeill Indemnification—Real Life Stories from the Trenches.
2016 Overview of IEEE Indemnification IEEE Legal and Compliance Department Eileen M. Lach, Esq. IEEE General Counsel and Chief Compliance Officerer March.
School Law and the Public Schools: A Practical Guide for Educational Leaders, 5e © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 7 Liability.
GOVERNMENT LAWYER’S REPRESENTATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES Craig E. Leen City Attorney City of Coral Gables *** With special thanks to Yaneris Figueroa,
Four Ways Suppliers Limit Their Risk Contractually
Indemnification.
Indemnification 101 February 24, 2017
Troublesome Contract Clauses College of Liberal Arts
Directors & Officers Liability Insurance Review
Mandatory Child Abuse Reporting
Are You Covered? Risk Management & Insurance for Patent Practitioners
College of Nursing December 13, 2006 John O. Cates
WHAT THE AGENCY NEEDS TO KNOW
EMPLOYMENT LAW & PRACTICES STAYING OUT OF COURT
Ontario Association of Basketball Officials
Massachusetts Continuing Legal Education, Inc.
What Small and Emerging Contractors Need to Know Understanding General Agreements of Indemnity © Copyright 2017 NASBP.
Speaker: Sarah Chambers, Esq. Claims Counsel| Professional Liability
Federal Cost Principles & Compliance
Mandatory Child Abuse Reporting
Find the Problems with the Provisions May 11, 2016 Presented By:
Mandatory Child Abuse Reporting
Presentation transcript:

Legal Aspects for Research Administrators

LEGAL ASPECTS FOR RESEARCH ADMINISTRATORS Mark Bohnhorst Associate General Counsel* * These materials are informational and are not legal advice.

UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA –A top public research university –Privilege to support the research mission –Significant responsibility

YOU WORK FOR GOVERNMENT Philosophical Perspective: –State is a sovereign –John Locke, Second Treatise on Government, Chapter 205 Wisest of all constitutions: –Sovereign cannot be sued for wrongdoing –Sovereign’s officers can be sued for wrongdoing

WHAT LAWS CAN GET ME INTO TROUBLE? Federal False Claims Act –State cannot be sued –Individuals can be sued Intentional wrongdoing Willful or wanton wrongdoing –Ostrich “head in the sand”

FALSE CLAIMS ACT CONT. Causes another to submit a false claim RA in the chain of causation $10,000 per claim Three times the amount of the false claim

CRIMINAL LAWS Intentional false statements Defrauding the Federal Government Conspiracy Aiding and abetting Prosecutorial discretion

BOARD OF REGENTS POLICY Legal Defense of Employees (1): Subd. 1. Protection Described. Subject to subdivisions 2-4, the regents of the University of Minnesota shall defend, save harmless and indemnify any employee of the University against any threatened, pending or completed action, suit or proceeding, direct or indirect, whether civil, criminal, administrative, derivative or investigative, whether groundless or otherwise, wherever brought, arising out of an alleged act or omission occurring during the period of employment if the employee was acting within the scope of the employment or official capacity, against expenses, attorneys’ fees, judgments, fines, penalties, punitive damages and amounts paid in settlement, actually and reasonably incurred.

BOARD OF REGENTS POLICY Legal Defense of Employees (2) Subd. 3. Eligibility Criteria; Certain Conduct Not Protected. To be eligible under this policy an employee must have acted in good faith and in a manner reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the regents of the University of Minnesota, and, with respect to any criminal action or proceeding, the employee must have had no reasonable cause to believe the conduct was unlawful. There shall be no obligation either to defend or to indemnify in the event of malfeasance in office or willful or wanton neglect of duty or other actions...

BOARD OF REGENTS POLICY Legal Defense of Employees (3): Subd Furthermore, this policy shall only apply in those cases where employees seeking a defense and indemnification have given prompt written notice of the action, suit or proceeding to the regents of the University of Minnesota, have requested defense by the University and have provided complete disclosure and cooperation in the defense of the claim or demand. Subd. 4. Determination of Eligibility. The determination of the eligibility of an employee to the protection described above shall be made by the president of the University after appropriate investigation. A determination of eligibility may include limitations or exceptions.

QUESTIONS/ISSUES FROM OCT. ’01 (1) 1.Are there laws I need to know besides the agency rules? 2.Do I need to memorize A-21?

QUESTIONS/ISSUES FROM OCT. ’01 (2) 3.I’m covering for a CA in another department (other CA is on vacation, leave, etc.). I know nothing about the research, the PIs, materials authorized to be purchased, etc. What is my liability for approving transactions (e.g., large equipment purchase)? 4.Am I responsible for making sure the supplies are actually used on the grant?

QUESTIONS/ISSUES FROM OCT. ’01 (3) 5.Is my signature as a CA any more significant than my signature on any other documents?

Other Discussion Points from Oct. ’01 (1) Power relationship between PIs and RAs Realities of how busy everyone is, time pressures, PI travel

Other Discussion Points from Oct. ’01 (2) Gut checks: –Documenting reasons –Elevating issues Payroll as the major risk factor RA role in salary adjustments RA responsibility vs. responsibility for management of the grant as a whole