1 Fuel Cycle Analysis Methods for Advanced Reactor Concepts Yunlin Xu T.K. Kim D. Tinkler T.J. Downar Purdue University Sept. 12, 2001 The 2001 ANS International.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The PMBR steady-state and Coupled kinetics core thermal-hydraulics benchmark test problems PBMR (Pty) Ltd. – NRG – Penn State Univ. – Purdeu Univ. - INL.
Advertisements

TRANSIENT EVALUATION OF A GEN-IV LFR DEMONSTRATION PLANT THROUGH A LUMPED-PARAMETER ANALYSIS OF COUPLED KINETICS AND THERMALHYDRAULICS ANALYSIS OF COUPLED.
Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory SCWR Preliminary Safety Considerations Cliff Davis, Jacopo Buongiorno, INEEL Luca Oriani, Westinghouse.
Nuclear Reactor Theory, JU, First Semester, (Saed Dababneh). 1 Reactor Model: One-Group That was for the bare slab reactor. What about more general.
2008 RELAP5 Users Seminar, Nov, Idaho Falls, USA 1 Coupled Thermal-hydraulic and Neutronic Model for the Ascó NPP using RELAP5- 3D/NESTLE L. Batet,
Lesson 17 HEAT GENERATION
Conceptual Design of Mixed- spectrum Supercritical Water Reactor T. K. Kim T. K. Kim Argonne National Laboratory.
PHYSICS DESIGN OF 30 MW MULTI PURPOSE RESEARCH REACTOR Archana Sharma Research Reactor Services Division BHABHA ATOMIC RESEARCH CENTRE, INDIA.
Preliminary T/H Analyses for EFIT-MgO/Pb Reactor Design WP1.5 Progress Meeting KTH / Stockholm, May 22-23, 2007 G. Bandini, P. Meloni, M. Polidori Italian.
EUROTRANS – DM1 RELAP5 Model Evaluation with SIMMER-III Code and Preliminary Transient Analysis for EFIT Reactor WP5.1 Progress Meeting KTH / Stockholm,
HTTF Analyses Using RELAP5-3D Paul D. Bayless RELAP5 International Users Seminar September 2010.
NucE 431W Core Design Presentation
EUROTRANS – DM1 Preliminary Transient Analysis for EFIT with RELAP5 and RELAP/PARCS Codes WP5.1 Progress Meeting Empresarios Agrupados - Madrid, November.
Thermo-fluid Analysis of Helium cooling solutions for the HCCB TBM Presented By: Manmeet Narula Alice Ying, Manmeet Narula, Ryan Hunt and M. Abdou ITER.
New PARCS Cross Section Model
1 Depletion Code System. 2 Yunlin Xu T.K. Kim T.J. Downar School of Nuclear Engineering Purdue University March 28, 2001.
PUMA : Purdue University Multi-Dimensional Integral Test Assembly Scientific Design of the Scaled Facility for GE SBWR Design SBWR : Simplified Boiling.
Nuclear Reactors Chapter 4
Multi-physics coupling Application on TRIGA reactor Student Romain Henry Supervisors: Prof. Dr. IZTOK TISELJ Dr. LUKA SNOJ PhD Topic presentation 27/03/2012.
ANALYSIS AND SENSITIVITY STUDIES OF EXERCISE 1 OF THE OECD/NRC BWR TT BENCHMARK 2002 ANS Winter Meeting Bedirhan Akdeniz and Kostadin Ivanov Pennsylvania.
Investigation into the Viability of a Passively Active Decay Heat Removal System In ALLEGRO Laura Carroll, Graduate Physicist Physics & Licensing Team,
Argonne National Laboratory 2007 RELAP5 International User’s Seminar
INSTANT/PHISICS – RELAP5 coupling A. Epiney, C. Rabiti, Y. Wang, J. Cogliati, T. Grimmett, P. Palmiotti.
А Е Ц “К О З Л О Д У Й” - Е А Д N P P K O Z L O D U Y – P L C 17 th Symposium of AER Y alta, Crimea, September 24-28, 2007 WWER-1000 SPENT FUEL NUCLIDE.
Thermal hydraulic analysis of ALFRED by RELAP5 code & by SIMMER code G. Barone, N. Forgione, A. Pesetti, R. Lo Frano CIRTEN Consorzio Interuniversitario.
Nuclear and Radiation Physics, BAU, 1 st Semester, (Saed Dababneh). 1 Nuclear Fission Q for 235 U + n  236 U is MeV. Table 13.1 in Krane:
17th Symposium of AER, Yalta, Crimea, Ukraine, Sept , 2007.
THERMAL HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS FOR THE OREGON STATE REACTOR USING RELAP5-3D Wade R. Marcum Brian G. Woods 2007 TRTR Conference September 19, 2007.
Nuclear Research Institute Řež plc 1 DEVELOPMENT OF RELAP5-3D MODEL FOR VVER-440 REACTOR 2010 RELAP5 International User’s Seminar West Yellowstone, Montana.
3D Coupled Fault Modelling for the Gas- cooled Fast Reactor Jason Dunstall KNOO PhD Student (EPSRC Funded) Applied Modelling and Computation Group (AMCG)
LEADER, Task 5.5 ETDR Transient Analyses with SPECTRA Code LEADER Project JRC, Petten, February 26, 2013 M.M. Stempniewicz NRG-22694/
DESIGN SUMMARY AND T-H R&D NEEDS OF THE GT-MHR Workshop on R&D in the Areas of Thermal Fluids and Reactor Safety C. B. Baxi General Atomics, San Diego,
Nuclear Thermal Hydraulic System Experiment
3. Core Layout The core loading pattern for the proliferation resistant advanced transuranic transmuting design (PRATT) was optimized to obtain an even.
Development of a RELAP5-3D thermal-hydraulic model for a Gas Cooled Fast Reactor D. Castelliti, C. Parisi, G. M. Galassi, N. Cerullo (San Piero A Grado.
EUROTRANS – DM1 ENEA Activities on EFIT Safety Analysis ENEA – FIS/NUC Bologna - Italy WP5.1 Progress Meeting Tractebel / Brussels, March 17, 2006 G. Bandini,
IAEA Meeting on INPRO Collaborative Project “Performance Assessment of Passive Gaseous Provisions (PGAP)” December, 2011, Vienna A.K. Nayak, PhD.
1 Kaspar Kööp, Marti Jeltsov Division of Nuclear Power Safety Royal Institute of Technology (KTH) Stockholm, Sweden LEADER 4 th WP5 MEETING, Karlsruhe.
Concept of a HIGH PRESSURE BOILING WATER REACTOR HP-BWR Frigyes Reisch KTH, Royal Institute of Technology, Nuclear Power Safety, Stockholm, Sweden 1. Safety.
Advanced Heavy Water Reactor Amit Thakur Reactor Physics Design Division Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, INDIA.
RELAP5 Analyses of a Deep Burn High Temperature Reactor Core
AERB Safety Research Institute 1 TIC Benchmark Analysis Subrata Bera Safety Research Institute (SRI) Atomic Energy Regulatory Board (AERB) Kalpakkam –
Nuclear Reactors, BAU, 1st Semester, (Saed Dababneh). 1 Controlled Fission Note that  is greater than 2 at thermal energies and almost 3 at.
Physics Design of 600 MWth HTR & 5 MWth Nuclear Power Pack Brahmananda Chakraborty Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, India.
Simulations of Coupled Core and Steam Generator Dynamics (Contribution to Task 4.4: “Preliminary definition of the Control Architecture” Status Report)
Modeling a Steam Generator (SG)
СRCD NSC KIPT DiFis 2.0 – 3D Finite Element Neutron Kinetic Code A.I. Zhukov and A.M. Abdullayev NSC Kharkov Institute of Physics and Technology September.
Nuclear Reactors, BAU, 1st Semester, (Saed Dababneh).
Institute of Safety Research Member Institution of the Scientific Association Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz DYN3D/ATHLET AND ANSYS CFX CALCULATIONS OF THE.
Status of Attila for the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) D. Scott Lucas INL.
Italian National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Environment Advanced Physics Technology Division Via Martiri di Monte Sole 4, Bologna, Italy.
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF DIFFERENT METHODS OF MODELING OF MOST LOADED FUEL PIN IN TRANSIENTS Y.Ovdiyenko, V.Khalimonchuk, M. Ieremenko State Scientific.
School of Mechanical and Nuclear Engineering North-West University
NEAR-COMPLETE TRANSURANIC WASTE INCINERATION IN THORIUM-FUELLED LIGHT WATER REACTORS Ben Lindley.
LOW PRESSURE REACTORS. Muhammad Umair Bukhari
Nuclear Battery Battery.  Reactor –Core Metallic fuel core (U-10%Zr) –Reactivity control Movable reflectors –Shutdown system Shutdown rod and reflectors.
RRC “Kurchatov Institute”, Russia NEUTRONIC AND THERMAL HYDRAULIC CODE PACKAGE PERMAK-3D/SC-1 IN 3D PIN-BY-PIN ANALYSIS OF THE VVER CORE P.А. Bolobov,
Validation of Traditional and Novel Core Thermal-Hydraulic Modeling and Simulation Tools Issues in Validation Benchmarks: NEA OECD/US NRC NUPEC BWR Full-size.
Thermodynamics Thermal Hydraulics.
Overview of Serpent related activities at HZDR E. Fridman
THERMAL HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS FOR THE OREGON STATE REACTOR USING RELAP5-3D Wade R. Marcum Brian G. Woods 2007 TRTR Conference September 19, 2007.
The University of Missouri Research Reactor
Analysis of Reactivity Insertion Accidents for the NIST Research Reactor Before and After Fuel Conversion J.S. Baek, A. Cuadra, L-Y. Cheng, A.L. Hanson,
Vattenfall’s use of FRAPCON for PWR cycle-specific verification
SCWR Thermal-Hydraulic Instability Analysis
Jordan University of Science and Technology
Transient modeling of sulfur iodine cycle thermo-chemical hydrogen generation coupled to pebble bed modular reactor Nicholas Brown, Volkan Seker, Seungmin.
Safety Demonstration of Advanced Water Cooled Nuclear Power Plants
Nuclear Reactors, BAU, 1st Semester, (Saed Dababneh).
Egyptian Atomic Energy Authority (EAEA), Egypt
Presentation transcript:

1 Fuel Cycle Analysis Methods for Advanced Reactor Concepts Yunlin Xu T.K. Kim D. Tinkler T.J. Downar Purdue University Sept. 12, 2001 The 2001 ANS International Topic Meeting on Mathematics and Computation

2 Content Motivation Depletion Code system Verification Application on SBWR Further Improvements

3 Motivation NERI/DOE projects at Purdue SBWR: evolutionary “Generation III+” HCBWR: revolutionary “Generation IV” We need a ‘depletion code system’ for Neutonic designing: Fuel cycle analysis Safety analysis (throughout core life)

4 Total Height 24.6 m Internal Diameter 6.0 m Fuel Length 2.74 m Chimney Height 9 m SBWR Reactor Vessel

5 SBWR Containment (GE) Gravity Driven Coolant System (GDCS) Automatic Depressurizatio n System (ADS) Passive Containment Cooling System (PCCS) Suppression Pool

6 HCBWR--principle HCBWR FBR LWR

7 HCBWR- strategy

8 HCBWR- Purdue/BNL design Tight lattice hard spectrum long cycle length Thorium as fertile negative void coefficient all through the cycle

9 Basic Depletion Code system Lattice Code (HELIOS /CASMO) Cross Section Library (PMAXS) Neutron Flux Solver (PARCS) Depletion Code (DEPLETOR) T/H code (RELAP /TRAC) ΦΣ GENPXS

10 HELIOS Gadolinium pin BP1 BP2 The octant of fuel assembly HELIOS is a comercial (Studsvik Scandpower) lattice physics code for solving Boltzmann equation with fine energy group, heterogeneous, two-Dimensional models of the fuel lattice HELIOS uses consistent fuel assembly homogenization and energy group collapsing methods to produce few group cross sections at all fuel assembly conditions throughout the burnup cycle.

11 GENPXS and PMAXS The PMAXS file structures GENPX read the outputs of HELIOS and generate PMAXS files PMAXS tabulates the XS’s of the base state and the derivatives or difference of XS of the branches and related information

12 Base state and Branches Base stateBranches 0GWD/T Fuel temp. T f1, T f2 … mod temp. T m1, T m2 … Mod. den. D m1, D m2 … Soluble B. ppm 1, … Control rod … 5GWD/T 4GWD/T 3GWD/T 1GWD/T 2GWD/T Fuel temp. T f1, T f2 … mod temp. T m1, T m2 … Mod. den. D m1, D m2 … Soluble B. ppm 1, … Control rod …

13 PARCS Purdue Advanced Reactor Core Simulator A Multidimensional Multigroup Reactor Kinetics Code Based on the Nonlinear Nodal Method Under NRC Contract T. J. Downar etc

14 PARCS Validation Boiling Water Reactor –OECD Peach Bottom Turbine Trip Benchmark –OECD Ringhalls Stability Benchmark (Ongoing) Pressurized Water Reactor: –Reactivity Initiated Transients (CEA, etc.) –OECD TMI Main Steam Line Break (PARCS coupled to RELAP5 and TRAC-M)

15 Coupling of Code System D2NIR P2DIR DEPLETOR Depletor Input Nuclide Field/ Burunup PARCS Neutronics Input Thermal Hydraulics Field Thermal Hydraulics Input PDMRRDMR RELAP /TRAC Neutron Field Q Q T,ρ

16 Coupling of Code System EOC D2NIR(1) D2NIR(2) D2NIR(4) D2NIR(3) DEPLETION READINP DEPLETOR INITIAL XSB y n D2NIR(2)XSB End RELAP/TRAC R(T)DMR(1) R(T)DMR(2) R(T)DMR(3) End done y n PARCS CHANGECOMI EOC P2DIR(3) P2DIR(4) P2DIR(2) P2DIR(1) depl PREPROC INPUTD depl SSEIG depl extth INIT PDMR(2) PDMR(3) PDMR(1) Thconv SCANINPUT CHANGEDIM depl y y y y y y n n n n n n P2DIR(2) End

17 Algorithm for Depletion code system Read inputs Initialize PVM Calculate XS Receive XS Send XS Neutron Flux Calc Burnup Clac Send FluxesReceive Fluxes END EOC END PARCS DEPLETOR XS & Derivatives Flux & XS Nodalization Exchange ID

18 PARCS Cross Section The Cross Section representation used in PARCS Where Σ r : XS at reference state ppm : soluble boron concentration (ppm) Tf : fuel temperature (k) Tm : moderator temperature (k) D : moderator density (g/cc)

19 Burnup and History Calculation in Depletor Burnup Distribution. ΔB(i) : burnup increment of ith region ΔBc : Core average burnup increment G(i) : the heavy metal loading in ith region Gc : total heavy metal loading in the core P(i) : Power in ith region Pc : Total power in core. History( moderator density)

20 Multidimension linear interpolation History 1 History 2 Burnup

21 Reference XS and Derivatives x0x0 xrxr No branch x1x1 x0x0 xrxr One branch x i+1 x0x0 xrxr xixi x xixi x0x0 xrxr x More than One branch for(ppm,Tf,Tm)

22 Reference XS and Derivatives x2x2 x0x0 xrxr x1x1 Two branches for D More than Two branches for D x i x i+1 x i+2 x 0 x r x x i x i+1 x 0 x r x i+2 x

23 Gadolinium pin BP1 BP2 The octant of fuel assembly Verification Maximum Difference 2×10 -5 Comparison with HELIOS Problem 1: Single Assembly with reflective B.C.

24 Verification Maximum Difference 0.3% Compared with MASTER (KEARI) Problem 2 Checkerboard small core with vaccum B.C.

MWe SBWR Design Fresh fuel, 69 Once burned Fuel, 69 Twice burned Fuel, 45 Total 732 Fuel Assemblies

26 Fuel Assembly Design (GE 8x8) (8 Gd Rods) Percent Enrichments (3.95 wt% average) –2.4 –3.3 –3.7 –4.2 –5.3 –5.6 –Gd (1.8)

27 RELAP5 Model Currently uses 63 Core channels Models Vessel Only –From Cold to Hot Leg –Inlet: Feedwater Tank –Outlet: Turbine Side Similar Models built for 200 and 1200 MWe

28 Neutronics to TH Mapping Neutronics Channels 732 (Fuel), 124(Reflector) 63 TH Fuel Channels, 2 Bypass

29 Preliminary Comparison of 600 MWe Core TH Properties ABWRGE SBWRPurdue SBWR (BOC) Power3926 MWt2000 MWt Core Flow Rate52.2X10 6 kg/hr27.2X10 6 kg/hr27.0X10 6 kg/hr Power Density50.6 kW/liter41.5 kW/liter MCPR Average Core Void Fraction Core Pressure7.274 MPa7.239 MPa7.22 MPa Core Pressure Drop0.168 MPa0.048 MPa0.038 MPa Average Exit Quality

30 Axial/Radial Power Profiles (BOC)

31 Depletion Results B (GWd/MT) C.R. Notches (798) Max PeakRadial PeakAxial PeakB Average (GWd/MT)

32 Other Related Works VIPRE as a T/H solver for Depletion system An EPRI code, with steady state option Used for 200MW and 1200 MW SBWR design Used for HCBWR analysis Used for Ringhalls Benchmark problem Successfully treat the history effect

33 Further improvements Predictor-corrector Time integration method Microscopic depletion?

34 Thank You !