Copyright © 2009 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 3-1 Leah Marcal Education:  B.A. in Economics –UC Santa Cruz  M.S. and PhD in Economics.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Slides prepared by Thomas Bishop Copyright © 2009 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. Chapter 5 The Standard Trade Model.
Advertisements

The Ricardian Theory of Trade
Overview Introduction Setting up the Model Adding trade into the Model
Unit 1: Trade Theory Ricardian Model 1/30/2012.
Supplementary notes Chapter 3. Unit Labor Requirements CWLabor supply Home12120 Foreign63240.
Eco Slide 4 After Midterm Exam 3. Opportunity Cost (OC) OC of X in terms of Y is the amount of Y you have to give up when producing one unit of.
International Factor Movements
The Standard Trade Model
International Trade and Comparative Advantage
Why trade? Buy/import resources one is lacking, sell/export those one has in abundance Buy/import goods which are relatively inefficient to produce, sell/export.
3 Gains and Losses from Trade in the Specific-Factors Model 1
1 of 62 Copyright © 2011 Worth Publishers· International Economics· Feenstra/Taylor, 2/e. Chapter 2: Trade and Technology: The Ricardian Model Trade and.
International Economics: Theory and Policy, Sixth Edition
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 3-1 Chapter 3 Labor Productivity and Comparative Advantage: The Ricardian Model.
The Instruments of Trade Policy
Copyright © 2006 South-Western/Thomson Learning. All rights reserved. ●Education: ♦B.A. in Economics –UCSC ♦M.S. and PhD in Economics –UW Madison ●Background:
Output and the Exchange Rate in the Short Run
Slides prepared by Thomas Bishop Chapter 4 Resources, Comparative Advantage and Income Distribution.
Resources, Comparative Advantage, and Income Distribution
Slides prepared by Thomas Bishop Copyright © 2009 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. Chapter 16 Output and the Exchange Rate in the Short Run.
Chapter 4 Resources, Comparative Advantage and Income Distribution
International Trade between Countries (T-2)
Slides prepared by Thomas Bishop Chapter 3 Labor Productivity and Comparative Advantage: The Ricardian Model.
EC 355 International Economics and Finance
Econ 355: International Economics
Chapter 3 Ricardian Model
The Standard Trade Model
The Classical Model of International Trade
Slides prepared by Thomas Bishop Chapter 11 Controversies in Trade Policy.
Slides prepared by Thomas Bishop Copyright © 2009 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. Chapter 7 International Factor Movements.
The Standard Trade Model
Labor Productivity and Comparative Advantage: The Ricardian Model
Chapter 18: International Trade. McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright  2007 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved Trade Facts Principal.
Labor Productivity and Comparative Advantage:
Overview Introduction Setting up the Model
Labor Productivity and Comparative Advantage: The Ricardian Model
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 3-1 Do Wages Reflect Productivity? Do relative wages reflect relative productivities of the.
1 Ch. 3: Labor Productivity and Comparative Advantage – The Ricardian Model.
© 2007 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved Chapter 4 Technology and International Income Distribution: The Ricardian Model.
Slides prepared by Thomas Bishop Copyright © 2009 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. Chapter 7 International Factor Movements.
Chapter 3 Labor Productivity and Comparative Advantage: The Ricardian Model.
Chapter 3 Chapter 4 Ricardian Model Factor Inputs Income Distribution.
Chapter 2 Labor Productivity and Comparative Advantage: The Ricardian Model International Economics: Theory and Policy International Economics: Theory.
The Classical Model of International Trade
C OMPARATIVE ADVANTAGE. C OMPARATIVE A DVANTAGE AND O PPORTUNITY C OST The Ricardian model uses the concepts of opportunity cost and comparative advantage.
1-1 © Pearson Education Limited All rights reserved. Chapter 3 Labor Productivity and Comparative Advantage: The Ricardian Model.
Slides prepared by Thomas Bishop Chapter 3 Labor Productivity and Comparative Advantage: The Ricardian Model.
Chapter 4 Resources, Comparative Advantage, and Income Distribution.
The Standard Trade Model
Slides prepared by Thomas Bishop Copyright © 2009 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. Chapter 4 Resources, Comparative Advantage, and Income Distribution.
Slides prepared by Thomas Bishop Copyright © 2009 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. Chapter 3 Labor Productivity and Comparative Advantage:
Slides prepared by Thomas Bishop Copyright © 2009 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. Chapter 4 Resources, Comparative Advantage, and Income Distribution.
Chapter 3 Labor Productivity and Comparative Advantage: The Ricardian Model.
ESA International Economics, 2 Lecture 7 Giorgia Giovannetti Professor of Economics, University of Firenze
Slide 2-1Copyright © 2003 Pearson Education, Inc. 解釋 RD' Q'Q' 2 解釋 解釋 RD 解釋 解釋 1 解釋 解釋 a LC /a LW a * LC /a * LW RS 解釋 解釋 Figure 2-3: World Relative Supply.
Chapter 2 Labor Productivity and Comparative Advantage: The Ricardian Model Prepared by Iordanis Petsas To Accompany International Economics: Theory and.
Chapter 2 Labor Productivity and Comparative Advantage: The Ricardian Model 湖南大学经济与贸易学院 刘 志 忠.
Slide 2-1Copyright © 2003 Pearson Education, Inc. PPF H PPF F R S R D Relative price The pattern of trade The gains from trade equilibrium The Ricardian.
University of Papua New Guinea International Economics Lecture 12 - Revision Lecture: Trade Models.
Labor Productivity and Comparative Advantage: The Ricardian Model
The Standard Trade Model
Economics and Development International trade
Labor Productivity and Comparative Advantage: The Ricardian Model
The Standard Trade Model
International Economics: Theory and Policy, Sixth Edition
Asst. Prof. Dr. Serdar AYAN
Labor Productivity and Comparative Advantage: The Ricardian Model.
International Economics: Theory and Policy, Sixth Edition
Labor Productivity and Comparative Advantage: The Ricardian Model
Presentation transcript:

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 3-1 Leah Marcal Education:  B.A. in Economics –UC Santa Cruz  M.S. and PhD in Economics –UW Madison Background:  Bass Lake Teaching Experience:  ECON 160, 310, 406, and 500

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 3-2 Leah Marcal (cont.) Research:  College Assessment Director Employer, alumni, and student satisfaction surveys Returns to college education Interests:  Hiking  Texas Hold’em

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 3-3 Your Introductions: Name Home Employment Favorite movie

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 3-4 Syllabus Preparation:  Completion of ECON 309 and 310, and passed UDWPE Textbook:  Krugman and Obstfeld, International Economics: Theory and Policy, 8 th edition

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 3-5 Syllabus (cont.) Review:  Class website: PPT slides for each topic/lecture Answers to selected questions at the end of each chapter

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 3-6 Syllabus (cont.) Presentation:  Teams of 4 or 5 students  50 min analysis of a current topic using PPT slides  Preference form (with team members) due next week!

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 3-7 Syllabus (cont.) Assessment:  Presentation (20%)  Midterm (40%)  Final (40%) Exams contain T/F, multiple choice, and essay questions No make-up presentations or exams

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 3-8 Syllabus (cont.) Office Hours:  JH 4250 on Wednesday from 6:00 to 6:50; or by appointment  your questions: Classes:  14 meetings: 10 lectures, 2 exams, and 2 student presentations

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 3-9 Date TopicChapters to International Trade3, 4, 5, 8, and Student Presentations on Trade Topics Midterm Exam to International Finance12 through Student Presentations on Finance Topics Final Exam---

Slides prepared by Thomas Bishop Copyright © 2009 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. Topic 1 Labor Productivity and Comparative Advantage: The Ricardian Model

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved Preview Opportunity costs and comparative advantage A one factor Ricardian model Production possibilities Gains from trade Wages and trade Misconceptions about trade Empirical evidence

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved Introduction Why trade?  Differences in resources (e.g., L, K, T, natural resources, and technology)  Economies of scale

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved Comparative Advantage and Opportunity Cost Ricardian model: differences in productivity of L between countries cause productive differences, leading to gains from trade. Ricardian model uses the concepts of opportunity cost and comparative advantage. The opportunity cost of producing good X is the cost of not being able to produce good Y because resources have already been used to produce good X.

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved Comparative Advantage and Opportunity Cost (cont.) A country faces opportunity costs when it uses resources to produce goods and services. E.g., a limited number of workers could be employed to produce roses or PCs.  Opportunity cost of producing PCs is the amount of roses not produced  Opportunity cost of producing roses is the amount of PCs not produced  How many PCs or roses should a country produce with the limited resources it has?

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved Comparative Advantage and Opportunity Cost (cont.) Suppose U.S. can produce 10 million roses with the same resources that could produce 100,000 PCs. Ecuador can produce 10 million roses with the same resources that could produce 30,000 PCs. Workers in Ecuador are less productive than those in U.S. in manufacturing PCs. Question: what is the opportunity cost of roses in Ecuador?

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved Comparative Advantage and Opportunity Cost (cont.) Ecuador has a lower opportunity cost of producing roses. U.S. has a lower opportunity cost of producing PCs.  Ecuador: 10 million roses or 30,000 PCs  US: 10 million roses or 100,000 PCs

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved Comparative Advantage and Opportunity Cost (cont.) A country has a comparative advantage in producing a good if the opportunity cost of producing that good is lower in the country than it is in other countries. A country with a comparative advantage in producing a good uses its resources most efficiently when it produces that good compared to producing other goods.

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved Comparative Advantage and Opportunity Cost (cont.) U.S. has a comparative advantage in the production of PCs. Ecuador has a comparative advantage in the production of roses. Suppose initially that Ecuador produces PCs and U.S. produces roses, and that both countries want to consume PCs and roses. Can both countries be made better off?

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved Comparative Advantage and Trade Millions of Roses Thousands of Computers U.S Ecuador Change0+70

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved Comparative Advantage and Trade (cont.) Example shows that when countries specialize in the good in which they have a comparative advantage, more goods can be produced and consumed.  Initially both countries could only consume 10 million roses and 30,000 PCs.  With specialization, they could still consume 10 million roses, but could consume 70,000 more PCs.

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved A One Factor Ricardian Model Example with roses and PCs explains the intuition behind the Ricardian model. Ricardian model assumes: 1.L is the only resource for production. 2.Supply of L in each country is fixed. 3.Only 2 goods are produced and consumed: wine and cheese. 4.L is not specific to either industry. 5.Only 2 countries: home and foreign.

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved A One Factor Ricardian Model (cont.) a LW and a LC are the unit labor requirements to produce wine and cheese. Each reflects the number of L hours required to produce 1 unit of output.  E.g., if a LW = 2, then it takes 2 hours to produce 1 gallon of wine.  E.g., if a LC = 1, then it takes 1 hour to produce 1 lb of cheese.  A high unit labor requirement means low labor productivity.

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved Production Possibilities PPF of a country shows the maximum amount of goods that can be produced with a fixed amount of resources. PPF has the equation: a LC Q C + a LW Q W = L Labor used in cheese production Labor used in wine production Total labor supply

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved Fig. 1: Home’s Production Possibility Frontier

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved Production Possibilities (cont.) a LC Q C + a LW Q W = L Q C = L/a LC when Q W = 0 Q W = L/a LW when Q C = 0 Slope of the PPF = ∆Qw / ∆Qc = – (a LC /a LW ) → opportunity cost of cheese Note: slope of any PPF reflects the opportunity cost of the good that is graphed on the x-axis (in terms of the good that is graphed on the y-axis).

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved Production Possibilities (cont.) The amount of the economy’s production is defined by: a LC Q C + a LW Q W ≤ L This equation describes what an economy can produce, but to determine what the economy does produce, we must determine the price of goods.

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved Production, Prices and Wages Let P C = price of cheese and P W = price of wine. Hourly wages reflect the value of what a worker can produce in 1 hour.  Hourly wage in cheese industry = P C /a LC  Hourly wage in wine industry = P W /a LW Workers will work in the industry that pays a higher hourly wage.

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved Production, Prices and Wages (cont.) If P C /a LC > P W /a LW (or P C /P W > a LC /a LW ) workers will make only cheese.  Economy specializes in cheese production if the relative price of cheese > opportunity cost of cheese. If P C /a LC < P W /a LW (or P C /P W < a LC /a LW ) workers will make only wine.  Economy specializes in wine production if the relative price of cheese < opportunity cost of cheese.

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved Production, Prices and Wages (cont.) If a country wants to consume both goods (without trade), relative prices must adjust so that wages are equal in both industries.  If P C /a LC = P W /a LW (or P C /P W = a LC /a LW ) workers have no incentive to work solely in the cheese industry or wine industry, so production of both goods can occur.  Production (and consumption) of both goods occurs when the relative price of a good = the opportunity cost of producing that good.

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved Trade in the Ricardian Model Suppose home has a comparative advantage in cheese production. Its opportunity cost of producing cheese is lower than in foreign. a LC /a LW < a * LC /a * LW where * indicates the foreign country

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved Trade in the Ricardian Model (cont.) Suppose home is more efficient in wine and cheese production. It has an absolute advantage in both goods:  a LC < a * LC and a LW < a * LW A country can be more efficient in producing both goods, but it will have a comparative advantage in only 1 good—the good that uses resources most efficiently.

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved Trade in the Ricardian Model (cont.) Even if a country is the most (or least) efficient producer of all goods, it still can benefit from trade. To see how all countries can benefit from trade, we calculate relative prices when trade exists.  Without trade, the relative price of a good equals its opportunity cost. To calculate relative prices with trade, we must use relative supply and relative demand curves.

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved Relative Supply First we consider relative supply of cheese: the Qc supplied by all countries relative to the Qw supplied by all countries at each price of cheese relative to the price of wine, P c /P W.

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved Fig. 2: Relative Supply Curve a LC /a LW a * LC /a * LW RS Relative price of cheese, P C /P W Relative quantity of cheese, Q C + Q * C Q W + Q * W L/a LC L * /a * LW

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved Relative Supply (cont.) There is no supply of cheese if its relative price falls below its opportunity cost.  Why? because home will specialize in wine whenever P C /P W < a LC /a LW  And we assumed that a LC /a LW < a * LC /a * LW so foreign won’t produce cheese either. When P C /P W = a LC /a LW, home will produce both goods, but foreign will produce only wine.

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved Relative Supply (cont.) When a * LC /a * LW > P c /P W > a LC /a LW, home specializes in cheese and foreign specializes in wine.  Here home produces L/a LC lbs of cheese and foreign produces L* /a * LW gallons of wine. This, the relative supply of cheese = L/a LC / L* /a * LW When P C / P W = a * LC /a * LW, foreign produces both goods, but home produces only cheese. When P c /P W > a * LC /a * LW, there is no supply of wine.

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved Relative Demand Relative demand for cheese is the Qc demanded in all countries relative to the Qw demanded at each P C /P W. As P C /P W rises, consumers in all countries will tend to purchase less cheese and more wine so that the relative Qc demanded falls.

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved Fig. 3: World Relative Supply and Demand

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved Determination of Prices After Trade Equilibrium (P C /P W ) t is determined by the intersection of RS and RD. In Fig. 3, point 1, each country specializes in the production of the good in which it has a comparative advantage. Home produces cheese and foreign produces wine. In Fig. 3, point 2, home produces both goods and foreign produces wine.

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved Gains From Trade Gains from trade come from specializing in the type of production which uses resources most efficiently, and using the income generated from that production to buy the goods and services that countries desire.  where “using resources most efficiently” means producing the good in which a country has a comparative advantage.

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved Gains From Trade (cont.) Think of trade as an indirect method of production or a means of converting cheese into wine or vice versa. Without trade, a country has to allocate resources to produce all of the goods that it wants to consume. With trade, a country can specialize its production and trade (“convert”) produced goods for the goods that it wants to consume.

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved Gains From Trade (cont.) Without trade, consumption is restricted to what is produced. With trade, consumption possibilities expand beyond the PPF. Easier to understand gains from trade by using a numerical example.

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved A Numerical Example a LC /a LW = 1/2 < a * LC /a * LW = 2 Unit labor requirements for both countries CheeseWine Homea LC = 1 hour/lba LW = 2 hours/gal Foreigna * LC = 6 hours/lba * LW = 3 hours/gal

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved A Numerical Example (cont.) Home has an absolute advantage in both goods, but it has a comparative advantage in cheese production. Foreign is less efficient in both goods, but it has a comparative advantage in wine production. Question: what is home’s opportunity cost of producing wine? What is its opportunity cost of producing cheese?

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved A Numerical Example (cont.) With trade, (P C /P W ) t must be between a LC /a LW = 1/2 and a * LC /a * LW = 2. Why? What if (P C /P W ) t = 3? Then foreign would refuse to trade as it must give up 3 gal of wine to purchase 1 lb of cheese. Suppose that (P C /P W ) t = 1.  In words, 1 lb of cheese trades for 1 gallon of wine.

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved Fig. 4: Equilibrium Price with Trade RS RD 3 (Pc/Pw)t = 1 a LC /a LW = 1/2 0 a LC */a LW * = 2 (Qc + Qc*)/(Qw + Qw*) Pc/Pw Assumes L = L* = 30

Fig. 5: Gains from Trade Trade L/a LW = 15 Qc Qw Home L/a LC = 30 CPFt PPF Qc* Qw* Foreign L*/a* LC = 5 CPFt* PPF* 10 0 L*/a* LW = 10 Note: Slope of the PPF in each country is the opportunity cost of cheese in terms of wine (i.e., ½ for home and 2 for foreign) and the slope of the CPFt for both countries is the traded price (i.e., 1). Assumes each country has 30 hours of labor available (i.e., L = L* = 30).

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved Gains from Trade (cont.) Question: What drives the two countries to specialize?  Home views (Pc/Pw)t = 1 which is greater than its opportunity cost of cheese (1/2), so it increases its production of cheese.  Foreign also views (Pc/Pw)t = 1 which is lower than its opportunity cost of cheese (2), so it decreases its production of cheese and increases its production of wine.

Gains from Trade (cont.) Home before trade after trade in 1 hr could produce 1 C or ½ W in 1 hr produces 1 C and trades for 1 W before trade after trade in 1 hr could produce 1/6 C or 1/3 W in 1 hr produces 1/3 W and trades for 1/3 C Foreign Labor is used twice as effectively when trading for what it needs instead of producing everything itself.

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved Wages Although the Ricardian model predicts that relative prices equalize across countries after trade, it does not predict that relative wages will equalize. Productivity differences determine wage differences in the Ricardian model.

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved Wages (cont.) wage = 1 lb cheese/hr or ½ gal of wine/hr wage* = 1/6 lb of cheese/hr or 1/3 gal of wine/hr Before trade: wage = 1 lb cheese/hr exchange for 1 gal of wine/hr wage* = 1/3 gal of wine/hr exchange for 1/3 lb of cheese/hr After trade: Before trade (in terms of cheese) wages are 6x higher at home. After trade, wages are only 3x higher at home.

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved Wages (cont.) Recall: home has an absolute advantage in both goods as it is 6x more productive in cheese and 1.5x more productive in wine. Foreign wages are 1/3 of home’s wages with trade. Foreign has a cost advantage in making wine (even though home is 1.5x as productive in wine) because of its low wages.

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved Wages (cont.) Because foreign workers have a wage that is only 1/3 the wage of domestic workers, they are able to attain a cost advantage (in wine production), despite low productivity. Because domestic workers have a productivity that is 6 times that of foreign workers (in cheese production), they are able to attain a cost advantage, despite high wages.

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved Misconceptions About Trade 1.Free trade is beneficial only if a country is more productive than foreign countries.  The least efficient country can still gain from trade by specializing in its least inefficient (i.e., comparative advantage) industry. Our example shows home has an AA in both goods. Yet, foreign still gains by producing wine (its least inefficient good).  The benefits of free trade do not depend on absolute advantage. They depend on comparative advantage: specializing in industries that use resources most efficiently.

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved Misconceptions About Trade (cont.) 2.Free trade with countries that pay low wages hurts high wage countries.  Our example shows home is more productive in both goods and therefore has higher wages than foreign.  Foreign’s lower wages are irrelevant to the question of whether home gains from trade.  Home gains from trade because it is cheaper in terms of its own labor for home to produce cheese and trade for wine rather than produce wine itself.

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved Misconceptions About Trade (cont.) 3.Free trade exploits less productive countries. Bob Herbert in NY Times (1995): wages CEO of Gap = $2 million/year vs. wages of its workers in Central America = $0.56/hr. Free trade does not make poor workers worse off. What are their alternatives? Our example shows (with trade) foreign workers are paid 1/3 of what home workers are paid, Yet, without trade, foreign workers earn only 1/6 of home’s workers.

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved Empirical Evidence Ricardian model predicts that countries tend to export goods in which their productivity is relatively high. World trade in textiles/apparel illustrates the principles of comparative advantage.  By any measure, the U.S. has a higher labor productivity in manufacturing than that of newly industrialized countries (e.g., China or Mexico).  Technology of manufacturing clothing is relatively simple, so the productivity advantage of advanced countries in textiles is less than their advantage in many other industries.  In 1992, average U.S. worker was 5x as productive as a Mexican worker but only 1.5x as productive in textiles.  Thus, textiles/apparel are a major export from low-wage to high-wage countries.