STRUCTURAL & NOZZLE MATERIALS ASSESSMENT M.C. Billone (ANL) ARIES EVALUATION OF HYLIFE-II DESIGN October 10, 2002.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
3.1 STEEL Iron-carbon compounds Microstructure of steels
Advertisements

Metals and Alloys. Alloys Two definitions Combination of two or more elements Combination of two or more metallic elements Metallurgical Commercial.
MatSE 259 Exam 1 Review Session 1.Exam structure – 25 questions, 1 mark each 2.Do NOT forget to write your student I.D. on the answer sheet 3.Exams are.
NEEP 541 – Creep Fall 2002 Jake Blanchard.
CREEP FAILURE.
BMFB 4283 NDT & FAILURE ANALYSIS
Issues and considerations for fuel cladding materials of LFR reactor P. Agostini, A. Gessi, D. Rozzia, M.Tarantino – ENEA Contributions by participants.
Ti and its Alloys & their Heat Treatments Presented by Professor Ali H. ATAIWI 1.
Chemical composition and heat treatments
Be/FS joining for ITER TBM Ryan Matthew Hunt FNST Meeting August 18, 2009 A collaboration between UCLA, SNL-Livermore, Brush-Wellman, Axsys Inc. and Bodycote.
Nanostructured Metallic Materials Processing and Mechanical Properties Sung Whang.
Group 2 Steels: Medium Carbon Alloy Steels (0.25 – 0.55 %C)
ME 388 – Applied Instrumentation Laboratory Fatigue Lab.
Stainless Steels Stainless steels are iron base alloys that contain a minimum of approximately 12% Cr, the amount needed to prevent the formation of rust.
Nickel to Stainless Dissimilar Metal Welding
Views on Neutronics and Activation Issues Facing Liquid-Protected IFE Chambers L. El-Guebaly and the ARIES Team Fusion Technology Institute University.
January 8-10, 2003/ARR 1 IFE Structural Materials: ARIES Assessment M. C. Billone, A. R. Raffray, D. K. Sze, L. El-Guebaly and the ARIES team December.
DESIGNING UNDER HIGH T CONDITION The effect of service environment on material performance at elevated T can be divided into 3 main categories :  Microstructural.
University of Cambridge Stéphane Forsik 5 th June 2006 Neural network: A set of four case studies.
Summary of FS Lifetime Assessment and Activation Analysis L. El-Guebaly Fusion Technology Institute University of Wisconsin - Madison ARIES E-Meeting October.
Efficient Generation of Electricity
LECTURER6 Factors Affecting Mechanical Properties
Materials Science and Engineering --- MY2100 Chapters 1 and 2 Metals and Metal Structures Key Concepts  Major Engineering Alloy Systems  The Design Process.
Annealing Processes All the structural changes obtained by hardening and tempering may be eliminated by annealing. to relieve stresses to increase softness,
Pressure Vessels.
Development of modified SS 316 LN for SC magnet CICC jacket
Materials for Vacuum Vessel OF Fusion Grade Machine
MATERIAL CHALLENGES FOR ADVANCED STEAM PLANTS Dr. M. Shekhar Kumar Materials Technology Division Central Power Research Institute Bangalore.
Prototype Divertor System: Steels and Fabrication Technologies Sameer Khirwadkar (Prototype Divertor Development Division) 21-July-2008 Institute for Plasma.
Dr. G. Appa Rao Defence Metallurgical Research Laboratory
1 1) Japan Atomic Energy research Institute 2) Institute of Advanced Energy, Kyoto University 3) Japan Nuclear Cycle Development Institute Progress of.
Queen’s University Belfast Crest; Coat of Arms; Emblem.
US/Japan Workshop on Power Plant Studies and Related Advanced Technologies With EU Participation April 6-7, 2002, Hotel Hyatt Islandia, San Diego, CA Design.
- heating on at required temperature - dwell at temperature - cooling
-NETNUC- SCC Properties and Oxidation Behaviour of Candidate Materials at SCW conditions NETNUC/GEN4FIN meeting , VTT, Espoo Sami Penttilä.
NEEP 541 – Radiation Damage in Steels Fall 2002 Jake Blanchard.
Feasibility Study of Supercritical Light Water Cooled Fast Reactors for Actinide Burning and Electric Power Production NERI program funded by the U.S.
03/04/2000LHC Vacuum Design Meeting Karine COUTURIER/EST-SM C17110 and C17410 coppers  Chemical composition (wt%) : copper = alloy balance Be Ni Co Fe.
NEEP 541 – Material Properties Fall 2003 Jake Blanchard.
Identification of most promising candidate alloys for fuel cladding and core internal structures SCWR Information Meeting - April 29-30, 2003 UW-Madison.
Welding Inspection and Metallurgy
PROGRESS ON LOW ACTIVATION STRUCTURAL STEELS RECENT RESULTS ON NANOSTRUCTURED FERRITIC ALLOYS A.F.ROWCLIFFE (ORNL) ARIES PROJECT MEETING U.C.S.D. Jan 22.
EERA is an official part of the EU SET-Plan. Innovative ferritic-martensitic steels for future.
Mechanical properties Tensile test Hardness Toughness Fracture toughness Fatigue test Creep resistance Tensile test Hardness Toughness Fracture toughness.
Reactor pressure vessels of WWER (materials and technology) Janovec, J
1 SPIRE Project coordinated by CEA – Contractors : CEA, CIEMAT, CNRS, NRG, ENEA, PSI, KTH, SCK/CEN, FZK « IRRADIATION EFFECTS IN MARTENSITIC STEELS UNDER.
HEAT TREATMENT OF STEEL
Recent Progress on Ferritic Alloys for Fusion Structural Applications R.J Kurtz 1 & U.S. Fusion Materials Scientists 1 Pacific Northwest National Laboratory.
Bi2212 Conductor and YBCO Cable Programs Supercon, NCSU, MIT Bill Nachtrab, Justin Schwartz, Amir Kajbafvala, Golsa Naderi, Makoto Takayasu, Joe Minervini,
Contents Background Strain-based design concept Stress-strain curve
MatSE 259 Exam 1 Review Session 1.Exam structure – 25 questions, 1 mark each 2.Do NOT forget to write your student I.D. on the answer sheet 3.Exams are.
REACTOR PRESSURE VESSEL
FERROUS AND NON FERROUS ALLOYS
STAINLESS STEEL AND SPRING STEEL.
Dual Phase Steels Producing a new high strength steels without reducing the formability or increasing costs.
Reactor Pressure Vessel Cladding
Dynamic Property Models
Microstructures and Mechanical Properties
What are stainless steels?
FERROUS AND NON FERROUS ALLOYS
Date of download: 11/14/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Chapter 2 Material and Manufacturing Properties
Group 2 Steels: Medium Carbon Alloy Steels (0.25 – 0.55 %C)
By; Noor Azira binti Mohd Noor
1/18/2019 6:28 AM C h a p t e r 8 Failure Dr. Mohammad Abuhaiba, PE.
NEEP 541 Review for Second Exam
XI Conference on Reactor Materials May , 2019, Dimitrovgrad
Moscow Engineering Physics Institute Department of Materials Science
Prepared By: Mr. Prashant S. Kshirsagar (Sr.Manager-QA dept.)
Presentation transcript:

STRUCTURAL & NOZZLE MATERIALS ASSESSMENT M.C. Billone (ANL) ARIES EVALUATION OF HYLIFE-II DESIGN October 10, 2002

SUMMARY SLIDE Type 304 Stainless Steel (304SS) - Must tighten specs on Mo and Nb for low activation - Swelling limit on lifetime (e.g., 5 vol.% at 25 dpa) - Helium embrittlement (650±50°C) limit on T max - Creep limit on σ (e.g, 53 MPa at 600°C for 10-y life) Low-activation Ferritic Steel (LAFS) - Creep limit on σ (e.g, 55 MPa at 600°C for 10-y life) Developmental ODS LAFS - Good potential for high T ( °C) performance

APPROACH TO MATERIALS ASSESSMENT Materials: 304SS, LAFS, ODS-LAFS - Annealed Type 304 austenitic stainless steel - Low-activation (LA) Ferritic Steel (FA): e.g. F82H - Oxide Dispersion Strengthened (ODS) LAFS Design Limits used in Assessment - Based on ASME B&PVC, RCC-MR, ITER-ISDC - Short-time stress limits for pressure vessels/piping - Long-time stress limits based on thermal creep - Generic deformation limits (e.g., 5% vol. swelling)

304SS ASSESSMENT Low Activation & Swelling Compositions - Need tighten specs on Mo and Nb for LA - Need tight specs on Ni, Cr, P, Si & C to reduce ΔV/V o Swelling - Incubation (D<D o ), transient (D<D s ), steady-state (D  D s ) Helium-Induced Embrittlement - Severe at 650±25°C Thermal Creep Limits on Stresses - Severe for T > 550°C

TYPE 304SS COMPOSITION Activation Considerations - “Off-the-shelf 304SS contains high levels of Mo and Nb - Fast Breeder Reactor (FBR) program recommended < 0.2 wt.% Mo & < wt.%Nb to reduce data scatter - Recommend that activation analysis be used to determine upper Mo and Nb limits and then assign material cost Swelling Considerations - Specify 304L ( wt.% C) -  10.5%Ni,  18%Cr, %P,  %Si

TYPE 304 STAINLESS STEEL SWELLING General Results for 304SS and 316SS - Incubation phase (D<D o ) with negligible swelling - Transient phase (D o  D<D s ) with R = 0-1 vol.%/dpa - Steady state (D  D s ) with R = 1 vol.%/dpa - D o, D s and transient R depend on many parameters Specific Results for 304SS and 304L SS - At °C, D o = 5-12 dpa, trans. R = %/dpa - Upperbound correlation for ΔV/V o < 10 vol. % ΔV/V o = 0.33 vol.%/dpa (D – 10 dpa)

HELIUM EMBRITTLEMENT IN 304SS Low Temperature (<400°C) Behavior - Low uniform (UE) and total (TE) elongation - High reduction in area (RA>60%) & fracture toughness High Temperature (>550°C) Behavior - Low UE, TE, RA (40%  10%) at >600°C, 6 dpa, 3 ppm He - Results suggest low fracture toughness - He migration to grain boundaries reduces tensile ductility - Same phenomena will reduce creep ductility and failure time

TYPE 304SS THERMAL CREEP LIMITS Design Stresses based on Tensile Properties - S m limits primary membrane stresses P m - Primary bending stress (P B ) limit: P B +P m  1.5 S m - Thermal & swelling stress (Q) limit: Q+P B +P m  1.5 S m Thermal Creep Limits S m for given T & time - Limits based on creep strain, rupture and tertiary creep - 600°C and 10 yrs: S m = 93 MPa  S mt = 53 MPa - 650°C and 10 yrs: S m = 88 MPa  S mt = 35 MPa - He embrittlement will reduce failure time at >600°C

LOW-ACTIVATION (LA) FERRITIC STEEL (FS) ASSESSMENT Low Activation - IEA heat (modified F-82H) is satisfactory Swelling - Not an issue: ΔV/V o  vol.%/dpa Helium-Induced Embrittlement - Never been observed at high T for ferritic steels - High He production at 100 dpa may be an issue??? Thermal Creep Limits on Stresses - Severe for T > 550°C

TENSILE & THERMAL CREEP LIMITS FOR LOW-ACTIVATION FERRITIC STEELS Yield (YS) & Ultimate Tensile (UTS) Strength - High for T 450°C - S m = 128 MPa (550°C), 103 MPa (600°C), 73 MPa (600°C) Thermal Creep Limits based on 10-year Life - S mt = 100 MPa at 550°C - S mt = 55 MPa at 600°C - S mt = 23 MPa at 650°C

LOW-ACTIVATION (LA) ODS FERRITIC STEEL (FS) ASSESSMENT Commercial Alloys (M956, M957) - Mo content (0.3 wt.%) too high; Nb content not specified - Highly anisotropic: strong only in extruded direction Developmental Alloys - LAF-3 (mod. F-82H plus fine Y 2 O 3 & TiO 2 particles) - Japanese 12YWT (12-13% Cr vs. 8.6% for F-82H) - Japanese PNC 1DS (11% Cr, higher Y 2 O 3 than 12YWT) - Ongoing effort to optimize chemical composition and and heat treatment for high strength in all directions

TENSILE PROPERTIES FOR ODS LAFS ALLOY LAF-3 T °C YS MPa UTS MPa TE % S m MPa

MATERIALS SELECTION FOR HYLIFE-II IFE DESIGN (1994) FSW: Ti-modified 316SS (PCA), 304SS, other - Tubes (1994); allowed to leak flibe into chamber - Current design ??? (2002) Flow Guide Structures: 316SS (PCA), 304SS - Current: low-stress, swelling-tolerant, corrugated sheets Liquid Nozzle Systems: unspecified Vacuum Vessel: PCA, 304SS, C-C composites

RECOMMENDED MATERIALS FOR HYLIFE-II IFE DESIGN (2002) FSW: ODS LAFS (e.g., LAF-3) if tubes - 304SS would limit lifetime and T max (  600°C) - V alloys are limited to Li coolant; C-C or SiC-SiC ??? Corrugated Flow Guide Structures - LAFS if stresses are low and leaks are OK??? Liquid Nozzle Systems: ODS LAFS Vacuum Vessel: ODS LAFS - Fabricability and joining (welding) are issues