29 Mar 2007Tracking - Paul Dauncey1 Tracking/Alignment Status Paul Dauncey, Michele Faucci Giannelli, Mike Green, Anne-Marie Magnan, George Mavromanolakis,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Efforts to Improve the Reconstruction of Non-Prompt Tracks with the SiD Lori Stevens UCSC ILC Simulation Reconstruction Meeting May 15, 2007 Includes contributions.
Advertisements

1 Calice UK Analysis Meeting 23/1/07David Ward Cambridge data analysis work David Ward Main focus – data-MC comparisons Using “official” reconstructed.
Adding electronic noise and pedestals to the CALICE simulation LCWS 19 – 23 rd April Catherine Fry (working with D Bowerman) Imperial College London.
Interactions of hadrons in the SiW ECAL (CAN-025) Philippe Doublet - LAL Roman Pöschl, François Richard - LAL CALICE Meeting at Casablanca, September 22nd.
1 Calice Meeting 20/9/06David Ward What did we learn from DESY 2005 run? DESY run May CERN run August Data/MC comparisons for ECAL.
Drift Chambers at DESY and CERN Mike Green, Fabrizio Salvatore, Michele Faucci Giannelli.
Anne-Marie Magnan Imperial College London Tuesday, December18th 2007 Calice Software Review -- DESY -- A.-M. Magnan (IC London) 1 Tracking and ECAL reconstruction.
3 Nov 2006News - Paul Dauncey1 The 2006 beam tests have finished! DESY in May, CERN in Jul-Oct Many tens of millions of events and many TBytes of data.
28 Feb 2006Digi - Paul Dauncey1 In principle change from simulation output to “raw” information equivalent to that seen in real data Not “reconstruction”,
Status of Tracking at DESY Paul Dauncey, Michele Faucci Giannelli, Mike Green, Hakan Yilmaz, Anne Marie Magnan, George Mavromanolakis, Fabrizio Salvatore.
Drift velocity and tracking Michele Faucci Giannelli, Mike Green, Fabrizio Salvatore.
March 6th, 2006CALICE meeting, UCL1 Position and angular resolution studies with ECAL TB prototype Introduction Linear fit method Results with 1, 2, 3,
1Calice-UK Cambridge 9/9/05D.R. Ward David Ward Compare Feb’05 DESY data with Geant4 and Geant3 Monte Carlos. Work in progress – no definitive conclusions.
Preliminary analysis of ZHH events (2) Michele Faucci Giannelli, Mike Green, Fabrizio Salvatore Royal Holloway, University of London UK CALICE UK-SOFTWARE.
© Imperial College LondonPage 1 Preliminary Studies of the Tracking Resolution at DESY Hakan Yilmaz.
Calculating the Beam Position at the Ecal for DESY Run (Independent of Tracking) Hakan Yilmaz.
Page 1 Calculating the Beam Position at the Ecal for DESY Run (Independent of Tracking) Hakan Yilmaz.
17 May 2007LCWS analysis1 LCWS physics analysis work Paul Dauncey.
Anne-Marie Magnan Imperial College London CALICE Si-W EM calorimeter Preliminary Results of the testbeams st part On behalf of the CALICE Collaboration.
Tracking System at CERN 06 and 07 test beams Michele Faucci Giannelli.
1 Calice Analysis Meeting 13/02/07David Ward Just a collection of thoughts to guide us in planning electron analysis In order to end up with a coherent.
1 Calice UK Analysis Meeting 23/1/07David Ward/Nige Watson UK Analysis tasks (WP1) David Ward Nige Watson TexPoint fonts used in EMF. Read the TexPoint.
1 Calice UK s/w meeting RHUL 24/1/06D.R. Ward David Ward Have previously reported on comparison of Feb’05 DESY data with Geant4 Monte Carlos. Issues with.
Michele Faucci Giannelli TILC09, Tsukuba, 18 April 2009 SiW Electromagnetic Calorimeter Testbeam results.
1 Calice UK Meeting 03/11/06David Ward/Nige Watson Analysis tasks David Ward Nige Watson TexPoint fonts used in EMF. Read the TexPoint manual before you.
Evaluation of G4 Releases in CMS (Sub-detector Studies) Software used Electrons in Tracker Photons in the Electromagnetic Calorimeter Pions in the Calorimeter.
SPiDeR  SPIDER DECAL SPIDER Digital calorimetry TPAC –Deep Pwell DECAL Future beam tests Wishlist J.J. Velthuis for the.
15 Dec 2010 CERN Sept 2010 beam test: Sensor response study Chris Walmsley and Sam Leveridge (presented by Paul Dauncey) 1Paul Dauncey.
Non-prompt Track Reconstruction with Calorimeter Assisted Tracking Dmitry Onoprienko, Eckhard von Toerne Kansas State University, Bonn University Linear.
LAV Software Status Emanuele Leonardi – Tommaso Spadaro Photon Veto WG meeting – 2015/03/24.
11 Sep 2009Paul Dauncey1 TPAC test beam analysis tasks Paul Dauncey.
1 Calice UK Meeting 27/03/07David Ward Plans; timescales for having analysis results for LCWS Status of current MC/data reconstruction Reconstruction status;
What is in my contribution area Nick Sinev, University of Oregon.
21 Jun 2010Paul Dauncey1 First look at FNAL tracking chamber alignment Paul Dauncey, with lots of help from Daniel and Angela.
7 May 2009Paul Dauncey1 Tracker alignment issues Paul Dauncey.
Nigel Watson / BirminghamCALICE ECAL, UCL, 06-Mar-2006 Test Beam Task List - ECAL  Aim:  Identify all tasks essential for run and analysis of beam data.
The ATLAS detector. High energy particle physics Typical detector layout Tracking chamber ElectroMagnetic calorimeter Hadronic calorimeter Muon chamber.
19 July 2007Paul Dauncey - Software Review1 Preparations for the Software “Review” Paul Dauncey.
W-DHCAL Analysis Overview José Repond Argonne National Laboratory.
Positional and Angular Resolution of the CALICE Pre-Prototype ECAL Hakan Yilmaz.
© Imperial College LondonPage 1 Tracking & Ecal Positional/Angular Resolution Hakan Yilmaz.
Results from particle beam tests of the ATLAS liquid argon endcap calorimeters Beam test setup Signal reconstruction Response to electrons  Electromagnetic.
1ECFA/Vienna 16/11/05D.R. Ward David Ward Compare these test beam data with Geant4 and Geant3 Monte Carlos. CALICE has tested an (incomplete) prototype.
3D Event reconstruction in ArgoNeuT Maddalena Antonello and Ornella Palamara 11 gennaio 20161M.Antonello - INFN, LNGS.
TB model improvements in Mokka and status of MC production Fabrizio Salvatore Royal Holloway University of London.
26 Jan 2010Paul Dauncey1 TPAC papers Paul Dauncey.
The experimental setup of Test Beam HE EE ES BEAM  A slice of the CMS calorimter was tested during summer of 2007 at the H2 test beam area at CERN with.
Inclusive Measurements of inelastic electron/positron scattering on unpolarized H and D targets at Lara De Nardo for the HERMES COLLABORATION.
ScECAL Beam FNAL Short summary & Introduction to analysis S. Uozumi Nov ScECAL meeting.
1 Oct 2009Paul Dauncey1 Status of 2D efficiency study Paul Dauncey.
LCWS11 – Tracking Performance at CLIC_ILD/SiD Michael Hauschild - CERN, 27-Sep-2011, page 1 Tracking Performance in CLIC_ILD and CLIC_SiD e + e –  H +
Longitudinal shower profile - CERN electron runs Valeria Bartsch University College London.
Giuseppe Ruggiero CERN Straw Chamber WG meeting 07/02/2011 Spectrometer Reconstruction: Pattern recognition and Efficiency 07/02/ G.Ruggiero - Spectrometer.
18 Sep 2008Paul Dauncey 1 DECAL: Motivation Hence, number of charged particles is an intrinsically better measure than the energy deposited Clearest with.
A. SarratILC TPC meeting, DESY, 15/02/06 Simulation Of a TPC For T2K Near Detector Using Geant 4 Antony Sarrat CEA Saclay, Dapnia.
December, Calibration of electromagnetic calorimeter of Hall A DVCS experiment Eric FUCHEY Ph.D Laboratoire de Physique Corpusculaire.
9 Sep 2008Paul Dauncey1 Tracking software status Paul Dauncey.
FCAL Krakow meeting, 6. May LumiCal concept including the tracker R. Ingbir, P.Růžička, V. Vrba.
DESY BT analysis - updates - S. Uozumi Dec-12 th 2011 ScECAL meeting.
11 Sep 2007Tracking - Paul Dauncey1 Tracking Code Paul Dauncey, Imperial College London.
1 MC Production and Reconstruction Summary and Plans Valeria Bartsch, Fabrizio Salvatore, A.-M. Magnan, and Nigel Watson.
Michele Faucci Giannelli
Tracking System at CERN 06 and 07 test beams
Interactions of hadrons in the Si-W ECAL
DESY drift chambers efficiency and track reconstruction
longitudinal shower profile
ZHH: Linear collider Benchmark
Michele Faucci Giannelli
ZHH Analysis preliminary results on different detector models
Beam properties for run
Presentation transcript:

29 Mar 2007Tracking - Paul Dauncey1 Tracking/Alignment Status Paul Dauncey, Michele Faucci Giannelli, Mike Green, Anne-Marie Magnan, George Mavromanolakis, Fabrizio Salvatore, Hakan Yilmaz

29 Mar 2007Tracking - Paul Dauncey2 Track finding/fitting changes Checks all hits for consistent track combinations Previously only used first hit in each chamber Allows more (or less) than one track per event Previously always one (unless a chamber had zero hits) Allows for missing hits on track Previously only had four-hit tracks Allows for non-perfect alignment Previously assumed all chamber placement was ideal Same code for CERN and DESY Different constants but algorithm is identical Missing layer in CERN just appears inefficient

29 Mar 2007Tracking - Paul Dauncey3 Constants status Have first version of tracking constants for Run Michele has checked drift velocity against other runs Sees values are mostly stable to ~0.0006mm/ns ~ 2% RunEnergyDC1DC2DC3DC ,03050,02840,03460, ,0310,02820,03860, ,03050,02840,0350, ,03050,02820,03450, ,03030,02820,03420, ,03010,02780,0340, ,50,02990,02780,03390,0294 Scattering matrices found for all DESY energies CERN runs put to zero scattering until calculated

29 Mar 2007Tracking - Paul Dauncey4 Mokka changes X and Y gas drift volumes physically separated Displaced in z by 44mm at DESY, 29mm at CERN Split sensitive volumes into two parts Removes correlation in energy deposits All SimTrackerHits in one collection Labeled by CellID; similar to calorimeters Chamber numbering made more uniform DESY was (from ECAL) DC2, DC1, DC3, DC4 CERN was (from ECAL) DC3, DC2, DC1 Small effect on tracking X/Y split only at 1% level Big effect on digitisation code and book-keeping DESY and CERN look much more similar Debug most of digitisation code only once

29 Mar 2007Tracking - Paul Dauncey5 N.B. Neighbouring chambers placed 1100mm centre-to-centre Fabrizio

29 Mar 2007Tracking - Paul Dauncey6 Fabrizio

29 Mar 2007Tracking - Paul Dauncey7 Digitisation changes Seed digitisation for every event from event number Repeatable if debugging event in middle of run Using ROOT gRandom; is this the standard? Allow more than one TDC hit per event Previously only first SimTrackerHit per layer used Incorporate SimTrackerHit times Some hits from preshowers significantly later Can overlap with real track in space but sometimes not in time Add TDC noise hits Currently flat distribution with rate matched to DESY data Check rate of random hits picked up by tracking Simulate efficiency < 1 Simply drops hits randomly Tune hit smearing to agree better with data

29 Mar 2007Tracking - Paul Dauncey8 Need to cross check against efficiency for track to have hits Michele

29 Mar 2007Tracking - Paul Dauncey9 Simulation request Add Fabrizio’s changes before big Mokka production run Otherwise need to maintain many different versions Change of coordinate system also means “fresh start” would be good Need high statistics samples for all DESY energies Also electrons and pions for all CERN energies (at lower priority) Need to smear beam position and angle to duplicate data better Many distributions look quite different otherwise

29 Mar 2007Tracking - Paul Dauncey10 Want to align ECAL to beam separately Decouples systematics of each detector Allows clean comparison of tracking to ECAL for position measurement Problem is determining average beam position = 0 Barycentre distorted by ECAL pad granularity Difference in x and y due to x layer staggering

29 Mar 2007Tracking - Paul Dauncey11 Hakan Corrected using smoothing (integral) function; assumed Gaussian Mean shifted by 1mm

29 Mar 2007Tracking - Paul Dauncey12 Code organisation

29 Mar 2007Tracking - Paul Dauncey13 Code status Code structure now effectively defined Sent to Roman; he will try it out If it works in his set-up, then load to cvs Remaining issue is database access Working with faked up version currently Not all runs will work until true database interface RunHeader: request for LCParameters information Need run number set for MC Also generally need Data or MC flag Run start/end times Nominal beam energy Location (DESY, CERN, FNAL later) Do these exist? Can missing items be added as part of reconstruction?

29 Mar 2007Tracking - Paul Dauncey14 Next steps Need to reprocess at least one run of each DESY energy E.g Best done centrally to check for interference Cross check all alignment and constants including ECAL changes If time, then repeat for CERN runs Need MC to evaluate scattering matrices for every energy Most of code is directly usable Need to re-evaluate (carefully) alignment, drift velocity Need to re-evaluate (roughly) efficiency, noise rate May not converge for LCWS… Must ensure DESY results are available first Minimum for LCWS; must take priority