Josephine San Dave Olney 18 August, 1999. 15 July 1999NASA/GSFC/IMDC2  Appears to be Feasible  Requirements  Coarse Pointing baselined on NGST  Future.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Israeli Universal Spacecraft Bus Characteristics and Design Trade-Offs
Advertisements

LightSail.
Coasting Phase Propellant Management for Upper Stages Philipp Behruzi Hans Strauch Francesco de Rose.
Astronomers Learn to Work in Space. Technical Challenges Detectors Pointing and Stability Data Storage Contamination Thermal Control Background radiation.
1 Interstellar Heliopause Probe M. Leipold, Kayser-Threde GmbHISSS 2010, New York, July 19 – 22, 2010 Interstellar Heliopause Probe (IHP) System Design.
Kedrick Black1 ECE 5320 Mechatronics Assignment #1 Torque Coils/Rods and Reaction Wheels Kedrick Black.
Attitude Determination and Control
Karla Vega University of California, Berkeley Attitude Determination and Control 6/9/2015.
Introduction to Attitude Control Systems
MAXIM Power Subsystem Diane Yun Vickie Moran NASA/GSFC Code (IMDC) 8/19/99.
Instrument, Spacecraft, and Launch Overview Joan Howard Ball Aerospace.
Spacecraft Subsystem Introduction to Space Systems and Spacecraft Design Space Systems Design.
Feasibility of Demonstrating PPT’s on FalconSAT-3 C1C Andrea Johnson United States Air Force Academy.
Attitude & Orbit Control Subsystem 26 April 2007.
N A S A G O D D A R D S P A C E F L I G H T C E N T E R I n s t r u m e n t S y n t h e s i s a n d A n a l y s i s L a b o r a t o r y Super Star Tracker.
Integrated Orbit and Attitude Control for a Nanosatellite with Power Constraints Bo Naasz Matthew Berry Hye-Young Kim Chris Hall 13th Annual AAS/AIAA Space.
1 Project Name Solar Sail Project Proposal February 7, 2007 Megan Williams (Team Lead) Eric Blake Jon Braam Raymond Haremza Michael Hiti Kory Jenkins Daniel.
Satellite Communication
The Relativity Mission, Gravity Probe B Experimental Design, Sources of Error, and Status Mac Keiser Snowmass 2001 July 4, 2001.
1 Formation Flying Shunsuke Hirayama Tsutomu Hasegawa Aziatun Burhan Masao Shimada Tomo Sugano Rachel Winters Matt Whitten Kyle Tholen Matt Mueller Shelby.
Attitude Determination and Control System
Attitude Determination and Control System (ADCS)
Final Version Micro-Arcsecond X-ray Imaging Mission Pathfinder (MAXIM-PF) Eric Stoneking Paul Mason May 17, 2002 ACS.
Printed by ACS 2 Gyro Mode Data Analysis Cheryl Pavlovsky, Marco Sirianni, Ken Sembach, ACS Instrument Team and the 2 Gyro Mode Team.
1 SAE Aerospace Control and Guidance Systems, 2006 Lake Tahoe, NV 1-3 March 2006 Tye Brady The Inertial Stellar Compass (ISC) Tye Brady.
20a - 1 NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center Attitude Control System (ACS) Eric Holmes, Code 591 Joe Garrick, Code 595 Jim Simpson, Code 596 NASA/GSFC August.
1 Spacecraft Attitude Determination and Control Hsiu-Jen Liu 劉修任 National SPace Organization 國家太空中心 May 12, 2005 Reference: [1] James R. Wertz, “Spacecraft.
MG 1/10/01 1 PCS SMOV-3B Review Objectives Overview Activity Descriptions Requirements.
Single-slew manoeuvres for spin-stabilized spacecraft 29 th March 2011 James Biggs Glasgow In collaboration with.
CERES – Atelier Vol en formation pour l’astrophysique et la physique solaire 17 Octobre ASPICS 2 - Formation Flying for Solar Physics 100 m +/-
Dr. Aprille Ericsson Eric Stoneking June 28, 2001 SuperNova/ Acceleration Probe (SNAP) Attitude Control Systems.
Dynamics and Control of Space Vehicles
Guidance, Navigation and Controls Subsystem Winter 1999 Semester Review.
Competition Sensitive Dennis Asato June 28, 2001 XSuperNova / Acceleration Probe (SNAP) Propulsion.
Henry Heetderks Space Sciences Laboratory, UCB
ADCS Review – Attitude Determination Prof. Der-Ming Ma, Ph.D. Dept. of Aerospace Engineering Tamkang University.
Attitude Determination & Control System Group 930 & 931.
AAE450 Spring 2009 Brian Erson Attitude Control Systems Trans Lunar Phase Alternative Design Comparison [Brian Erson] [Attitude] 1.
1 Weekly Summary Weekly Summary Formation Flight AEM4332 Spring Semester March 7,2007 Masao SHIMADA.
1 System Architecture Mark Herring (Stephen Merkowitz Presenting)
Final Version Gary Davis Robert Estes Scott Glubke Propulsion May 13-17, 2002 Micro Arcsecond X-ray Imaging Mission, Pathfinder (MAXIM-PF)
Spacecraft Systems Henry Heetderks Space Sciences Laboratory, UCB.
AAE 450 – Spacecraft Design 1 Attitude Determination Methods Brienne Bogenberger January 18, 2004 Dynamics & Control Group Lead, Attitude Determination.
Orbital Analysis for Inter-Calibration Dave Mac Donnell Brooke Anderson Bruce Wielicki Don Garber NASA Langley Research Center Solar Workshop January 30,
Jan 2008 LMSSC - 1 SWEA Plume Impingements Mars Atmosphere and Volatile EvolutioN (MAVEN) Mission.
EXTP Accomodation Study Hong Bin, Zhang Long Institute of Spacecraft System Engineering. CAST Oct 27th, 2015.
1 Mid term – Laser Swarm Pruned Design Option Tree ADCS.
Micro Arcsecond X-ray Imaging Mission Pathfinder (MAXIM-PF) Mechanical George Roach Dave Peters 17 May 2002 “Technological progress is like an axe in the.
Solar Sail Department of Aerospace Engineering and Mechanics AEM 4332W – Spacecraft Design Spring 2007.
Scarab Autonomous Traverse Carnegie Mellon December 2007 David Wettergreen.
TRIO-CINEMA 1 UCB, 2/08/2010 ACS Dave Auslander, Dave Pankow, Han Chen, Yao-Ting Mao, UC Berkeley Space Sciences Laboratory University of California, Berkeley.
Preliminary Platform Design for KuaFu-A
Maxim Pathfinder Prework 16 August 1999
Technical Resource Allocations
ACS UC Berkeley Space Sciences Laboratory
CINEMA Orbit/Attitude? (looking down from top toward earth)
Fig. 1 above portrays an overall closed-loop architecture of autonomous relative navigation of a client satellite with an integrated sensor System composed.
SDO Flight Dynamics Subsystem
First Assessments of EUVI Performance on STEREO SECCHI
Flight Dynamics Michael Mesarch Frank Vaughn Marco Concha 08/19/99
Henry Heetderks Space Sciences Laboratory, UCB
Micro-Arcsecond X-ray Imaging Mission Pathfinder (MAXIM-PF)
SPECS 2004 Various ADCS Sizing
Kletskous Magnetic Stabilization
Attitude Determination and Control Preliminary Design Review
CubeSat vs. Science Instrument Complexity
Attitude Determination Overview
Final Slides Attitude Control System (ACS) – Lunar Transfer
THERMAL CONTROL SYSTEM
Propulsion Jon Lewis Mike Rhee 8/19/99
Presentation transcript:

Josephine San Dave Olney 18 August, 1999

15 July 1999NASA/GSFC/IMDC2  Appears to be Feasible  Requirements  Coarse Pointing baselined on NGST  Future technology  Control modes  Area of concerns

15 July 1999NASA/GSFC/IMDC3  Pointing Requirements on Optical Spacecraft ACS  Accuracy (1  ) : Course (with tracker) Pitch/Yaw ± 2.0 arcsec; Roll 20 arcsec Fine (long term drift) pitch/yaw ± 0.5 marcsec  Jitter Coarse ± 0.1 arcsec Fine ± 0.1 marcsec  Pointing Requirements on Detector Spacecraft ACS  Stability (1  ) :Pitch/Yaw ± 20 arcsec; Roll 20 arcsec  Lateral Stability (1  ) : 3 mm

15 July 1999NASA/GSFC/IMDC4  Rate null/Sun Acquisition: null rates, point arrays normal to sun  Sensors : Coarse Sun Sensor, Gyro  Actuator: options: large wheel/small wheel + good PAF/thruster  Acquisition: acquire stars to establish reference attitude  Sensors: HD301 Star tracker(ST), Fine Sun Sensor (FSS), gyro (ring laser)  Actuator: same as rate null/sun acquisition  Science: inertial pointing  Sensors: coarse pointing - ST, FSS, gyro; Fine pointing - instrument  Actuator: options:/large wheel with thruster/PPT/small wheel with PPT  Slew: eigenaxis rotation capability  Sensor: gyro  Actuator:options: wheel/PPT  Safehold: independent safe mode, same as sun acquisition

15 July 1999NASA/GSFC/IMDC5 Detector ACS mode scenarios  Rate null/Sun Acquisition: null rates, point arrays normal to sun  Sensor same as Optics spacecraft; actuator can be wheel or thruster  Initial Acquisition: acquire stars to establish reference attitude  Sensors same ad Optics spacecraft’s acquisition; actuator same as sun acquisiton  Science: inertial pointing  Pointing: same as optics spacecraft coarse pointing  Lateral control: laser and PPT  Slew: Acquire optics spacecraft, acquire new target  Sensor: gyro  Actuator: wheel or thruster  Delta V - Re-acquire new target position  Safehold: independent safe mode, same as sun acquisition

15 July 1999NASA/GSFC/IMDC6 Actuator Selection Criteria  Quantization - Science requirement  Disturbance torque - Science requirement  Torque Capability - slew and solar torque  Momentum capability  Tip off rate  Solar pressure at drift orbit Solar force is about 0.2 m N Assuming 0.1 meter cp offset for optics spacecraft, Solar torque is 20 micro Nm In one day the momentum build up is about 1.8 Nms

15 July 1999NASA/GSFC/IMDC7 Optics - sun acq/rate null  Large wheel (80 Nms)  Tip off rate less than 0.05 deg/sec  Imbalance torque disturbance  Weight and Power  Small wheel (40 Nms)+ PAF  Assuming with good PAF, tip off rate less than 0.01 deg/sec  40 Nms wheel  Weight and Power  Thruster  PPT is not sufficient to null the rate (0.01 deg/sec) and acquire the sun  hydrazine - Sloshing problem  Cold gas - only choice

15 July 1999NASA/GSFC/IMDC8 Optics - SCIENCE  PPT only  Better quantization*  No need to unload momentum*  No heritage yet, EO1 will have one axis PPT control as test  Need 12 PPT with no redundancy*  Mass, power, cost  Limited number (10 million) of firing (fire every 3 s for 1 year)  Plume impingement  Electro-magnetic contamination  Need to further investigate items without ‘*’  Wheel with isolation; thruster for momentum unloading  Quantization  Need to unload momentum*  Has heritage*  Longer life time*  With four wheel provides redundancy*  Mass, power, cost  Imbalance torque disturbance  Same as PPT last item

15 July 1999NASA/GSFC/IMDC9 Optics - Science (con’t)  Small wheel with isolation /PPT  Wheel for pointing, PPT for momentum unloading Finer quantization of wheel Extend PPT life time  Wheel for coarse pointing, PPT for fine pointing and momentum unloading Better quantization for fine pointing Extend PPT lifetime  Depend on the actuator induced disturbance and other studies

15 July 1999NASA/GSFC/IMDC10 Optics - Slew  Wheel  Less than 6 hours to slew 45 degree  Remain a zero-momentum system  PPT  12 hours to slew 45 degree  After the slew, the system momentum may not be zero

15 July 1999NASA/GSFC/IMDC11 Technology  New Generation Integrated Wheel  Wheel and electronic all integrated  Low noise, low imbalance torque, low power  Spartan 400 series and Triana heritage  New Generation Star Tracker  NGST heritage  Accuracy 1.35 arcsec accuracy per star  Pulse Plasma Thruster  As three axis fine control actuator

15 July 1999NASA/GSFC/IMDC12  PPT concerns  Plume impingement, EMI, Life time  Maintain a zero momentum system  A better solar torque estimation  Tracking strategy of optics and detector spacecraft  Fine pointing Strategies  Operation scenarios post separation  Null rate before separate two spacecraft  Rate after two spacecraft separation  What is the rate after two spacecraft separation

15 July 1999NASA/GSFC/IMDC13 Component (wheel option)