Comparative Regional Economic Advantages for Cellulosic Feedstocks for Bioenergy Production. Burton C. English.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Opportunities for Growing, Utilizing & Marketing Bio-Fuel Pellets Roger Samson REAP-CANADA Resource Efficient Agricultural Production-Canada Box 125, Ste.
Advertisements

A Potentially Valuable Component of Texas Bioenergy Projects
Combining Electric Power Generation and Water Quality Enhancement to Grow the Southwest Missouri Economy Agriculture as a Producer and Consumer of Energy.
Biofuels. Why are biofuels attractive? Energy security: locally produced, wider availability, “grow your own oil” Climate change mitigation: one of the.
ECONOMIC MODELING OF A LIGNOCELLULOSIC BIOMASS BIOREFINING INDUSTRY Francis M. Epplin Lawrence D. Mapemba Gelson Tembo Department of Agricultural Economics.
Heating with Biomass Timothy A. Volk, SUNY ESF SUNY Global Center February 8, 2013.
Market Penetration of Biodiesel Kenneth R. Szulczyk, Ph.D.
The Development of a Forest Module for POLYSYS Burton English, Daniel De La Torre Ugarte, Kim Jensen, Jamey Menard and Don Hodges USFS Forest Products.
Bioenergy Crops: the Good, the Bad & the Ugly Alternative Agricultural Enterprises for the Treasure Coast October 19, 2011 Tim Gaver, Extension Agent –
Looking at the Economics of the Next Generation of Biofuels
APEC Biofuels Task Force Messages for Ministers Some Ideas for Discussion Sixth Meeting of the Biofuels Task Force Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia 29 April 2010.
South Central Sun Grant: GIS/Data Report Michael R. Dicks Department of Agricultural Economics Oklahoma State University San Antonio February 24, 2010.
An Introduction to Economics of Bio-Fuels in Alabama: Capacity, Cost, Yield, Efficiency and Impact M. Keivan Deravi & Carel Ligeon October 24, 2006.
Alternatives to Gasoline Possibilities and Capacities.
Opportunities and Challenges of Expanding Agriculture’s Contribution to the Energy Supply Daniel G. De La Torre Ugarte University of Tennessee.
Frank Moore Director of Biofuels Dept. for Energy Development & Independence September 2, 2009 EXECUTIVE TASK FORCE ON BIOMASS & BIOFUELS DEVELOPMENT IN.
Identifying and Evaluating Risk Management Strategies for Alternative Energy Crops Joe L. Outlaw Professor & Extension Economist Co-Director, AFPC James.
Alternatives to Gasoline Possibilities and Capacities.
Economic and Land Use Implications of Biofuels: Role of Policy Madhu Khanna With Xiaoguang Chen and Haixiao Huang Department of Agricultural and Consumer.
Ethanol. Conversion of sugars to ETOH The manufacture of alcoholic beverages originated over 5000 years ago –Water was generally impure and thus fermented.
Alternatives to Gasoline Possibilities and Capacities.
The Energy Bill, Biofuel Markets and the Implications for Agriculture Daniel G. De La Torre Ugarte Chesapeake College, Wye Mill, MD February 21, 2008 University.
CATO ANALYTICS, LLC WITH FUNDING FROM THE NEW YORK FARM VIABILITY INSTITUTE. ESTABLISHING ENERGY SORGHUM AS A PROFITABLE CASH CROP IN NEW YORK STATE.
The New World of Biofuels: Implications for Agriculture and Energy Keith Collins, Chief Economist, USDA EIA Energy Outlook, Modeling, and Data Conference.
Biomass By: Christina, Angel, Kathleen, Yscilla, Jasmine.
ABFC2015 New Orleans, LA – June 9, 2015 Sorghum: An established crop for sustainable, global production.
Biomass Utilization The South’s Industry of the Future Dr Liam E. Leightley FUTURE TRENDS FOR FORESTRY MS SAF ANNUAL MEETING, JACKSON, MARCH 2005.
Economics of Cellulosic Ethanol Production Marie Walsh, Burt English, Daniel de la Torre Ugarte, Kim Jensen, Richard Nelson SAEA Annual Meeting Mobile,
Biomass/Fuels APES. PRODUCING ENERGY FROM BIOMASS  Plant materials and animal wastes can be burned to provide heat or electricity or converted into gaseous.
Fertility Issues in Switchgrass Production Joint Meetings of SERA-ieg 6, NEC-17 and NCRA Nashville, Tennessee Donald Tyler University of Tennessee.
Beyond Theory—Creating a New Biomass Energy Market in the Midwest Gary Radloff Midwest Energy Policy Director.
Bioma ss Alice Fontana, Joshua Hansel, Julie Pfeffer, and Sofi Valyi-Nagy Physics H 3-4.
Pennsylvania Biomass Energy Opportunities. Co-firing Biomass with Coal The opportunity to burn biomass with coal to produce electricity is better in PA.
Liberalization of Trade in Biofuels: Implications for GHG Emissions and Social Welfare Xiaoguang Chen Madhu Khanna Hayri Önal University of Illinois at.
Southeastern Regional Center Tennessee Agricultural Experiment Station U.S. Energy Situation & Outlook April 3-4, 2007 Jackson, TN Cookeville, TN Dr. Kelly.
Potential of Cotton for the Production of BioEnergy “Texas as a Case Study” Bill McCutchen, Ph.D. Deputy Associate Director Texas Agricultural Experiment.
Putting the Hopes and Fears of Climate Change Legislation in Perspective _________________________________________ Sustainable Agriculture: The Key to.
NexSteppe Vision Be a leading provider of scalable, reliable and sustainable feedstock solutions for the biofuels, biopower and biobased product industries.
Energy and Products from Agricultural Biomass: Prospects and Issues F. Larry Leistritz Donald M. Senechal Nancy M. Hodur Presented at: IAIA 2007 Conference,
AGGREGATE EFFECTS OF EXPANDED BIOFUEL PRODUCTION: Myth & Reality C. Robert Taylor Auburn Ronald D. Lacewell Texas A&M AgriLife.
In the Northwest Martin Tobias CEO & Chairman, Imperium Renewables Biofuels.
Potential for Biomass Energy Development in South Carolina Tim Adams Resource Development Director South Carolina Forestry Commission.
Office of the Chief Economist Office of Energy Policy and New Uses National Agricultural Credit Committee Harry S. Baumes Associate Director Office of.
Beyond Corn and Soybeans: Cellulose Feedstocks Marie E. Walsh, Burt English, Daniel de la Torre Ugarte, Chad Hellwinckel, Jamey Menard, Kim Jensen, and.
The Economics of Alternative Energy Sources and Globalization: The Road Ahead Embassy Suites Airport, Orlando, FL 1.
THE SUPPLY OF CORN STOVER IN THE MIDWESTERN UNITED STATES Richard G. Nelson 1, Marie E. Walsh 2, and John Sheehan 3 1 Kansas State University 2 University.
Estimated Impacts of Attaining 60 Billion Gallons of Ethanol by 2030 on Agriculture and the Nation’s Economy Governor’s Ethanol Coalition Kansas City,
Kurt M. Guidry Gilbert Durbin Professor LSU AgCenter Department of Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness 2010 LSU AgCenter’s Outlook Conference Outlook.
Future Of Agricultural Machinery in the United States UNACOMA General Assembly 21 June 2007 Charlie O’Brien Vice President – Agricultural Services.
Types of Switchgrass Switchgrass (Panicum virgatum): is a summer perennial grass that is native to North america. There are two major Categories for Switchgrass:
1 Bioenergy Development at West Virginia University West Virginia is the third most forested state in the US West Virginia is the third most forested state.
APCA Agricultural Policy Options for Improving Energy Crop Economics Daniel G. De La Torre Ugarte Agricultural Policy Analysis Center University of Tennessee.
American Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (EIS) and the global agriculture Yong Liu Department of Agriculture.
Bio-based electricity: How biomass resources can support renewable electricity policies Matt Kocoloski and Paulina Jaramillo Carnegie Mellon University.
Bioenergy: Where We Are and Where We Should Be Daniel G. De La Torre Ugarte Chad M. Hellwinckel.
Agenda n Introduction to Biofuels n Biotechnology can help make Biofuels cheaper n The next generation of biofuels and the US economy n Israeli biotechnology.
By Kai Evans and Andrew Duran
Corn and Wheat Market Overview and Outlook by Cory G. Walters Southern Regional Outlook Conference Agricultural Economics.
Western Governors’ Association – Expanded Biomass Resource Assessment & Supply Analysis Richard Nelson KSU Peter Tittman and Nathan Parker.
Department of Economics Biofuel Economics Intensive Program in Biorenewables Ames, Iowa June 9, 2009 Chad Hart Assistant Professor/Grain Markets Specialist.
Sustainable Aviation Biofuels Workshop Georgia Tech: H. Milton Stewart School of Industrial Systems & Engineering, December 3, 2015.
Biofuels CENV 110. Topics The Technology Current status around the world – Supply and trends in production Impact Benefits Costs – Carbon balance – Net.
Bioenergy Policies Chad Hart Center for Agricultural and Rural Development Iowa State University June 23, 2008.
Logistical Efficiency with Dedicated Energy Crops
Biorenewable Policy Analysis Center for Agricultural and Rural Development
Chad Hart & Bruce Babcock
Alternative Energy in NC
BIOMASS AS AN ALTERNATIVE FUEL
Commodity Market Outlook
Presentation transcript:

Comparative Regional Economic Advantages for Cellulosic Feedstocks for Bioenergy Production. Burton C. English

Use this time to address some questions Bioenergy – Potential Feedstocks Bioenergy – Potential Feedstocks Residues or Dedicated Energy Crops? Residues or Dedicated Energy Crops? What is the UT Switchgrass Project? What is the UT Switchgrass Project?

Renewable Energy Electricity Cattle Manure Residues Corn, Wheat Dedicated Energy Crops Digester Dairy, Poultry, Hogs Mill Wastes Fuel Reduction Forest Residues Biodiesel Oilseed Crops Yellow Grease Tallow Beef and Poultry Ethanol Corn Residues Corn and Wheat Dedicated Energy Crops Forest Residues Food Mill Wastes Renewable Energy Feedstocks From Agriculture

Geographical Competitiveness Biomass conversion to energy utilizes a number of different feedstocks including agricultural and forest residues, mill and urban wastes, and dedicated crops. Information on the quantity of feedstock supply available at the county level exists for prices ranging from $12.50 to $100 per dry ton (excluding transportation costs) for agricultural and residues, mill and urban wood wastes, and switchgrass. Biomass conversion to energy utilizes a number of different feedstocks including agricultural and forest residues, mill and urban wastes, and dedicated crops. Information on the quantity of feedstock supply available at the county level exists for prices ranging from $12.50 to $100 per dry ton (excluding transportation costs) for agricultural and residues, mill and urban wood wastes, and switchgrass.

Geographical Competitiveness Agricultural Residues – complementary products in the production of grain and oilseed crops and consists of corn stover and wheat straw derived from data supplied by Nelson (2002), Agricultural Residues – complementary products in the production of grain and oilseed crops and consists of corn stover and wheat straw derived from data supplied by Nelson (2002), Forest Residues – consist of logging residues and other removals, Forest Residues – consist of logging residues and other removals, Mill Waste – by-product resulting from operations at primary mills that convert round wood products into other wood products generally consisting of bark, fine wood residues, and coarse wood residues, Mill Waste – by-product resulting from operations at primary mills that convert round wood products into other wood products generally consisting of bark, fine wood residues, and coarse wood residues, Urban Wood Waste – wood contained in municipal solid waste streams including such items as containers, crates, pallets, furniture; yard trimmings; residential and non-residential construction wastes; residential and non-residential demolition wastes; and renovation and remodeling wastes, and Urban Wood Waste – wood contained in municipal solid waste streams including such items as containers, crates, pallets, furniture; yard trimmings; residential and non-residential construction wastes; residential and non-residential demolition wastes; and renovation and remodeling wastes, and Dedicated energy crops Dedicated energy crops

Residue composite at $30/dry ton

Residue composite at $50/dry ton

By the year 2025, America’s farms, ranches and forests will provide 25 percent of the total energy consumed in the U.S. while continuing to produce safe, abundant and affordable food, feed and fiber. 25x’25 25x’25 Vision:

Land Use by Major Use Category, Source: USDA, National Agricultural Statistical Service, 2004.

Feedstock for Energy: Converted to Energy

Land Use: 2007, 2010, 2015, 2020, and 2025 (million acres )

Distribution of the Production of Cellulosic Materials, 2010

Distribution of the Production of Cellulosic Materials, 2015

Distribution of the Production of Cellulosic Materials, 2020

Distribution of the Production of Cellulosic Materials, 2025

Distribution of the Production of Dedicated Energy Crop, 2015

Distribution of the Production of Dedicated Energy Crop, 2020

Distribution of the Production of Dedicated Energy Crop, 2025

Changes in Farm Income and Government Payments (million $)

Change in Net Returns

Change in Net Returns

Change in Net Returns

Change in Net Returns

What is switchgrass? Native to the United States Native to the United States Warm Season Grass Warm Season Grass Managed using common agricultural practices Managed using common agricultural practices High yielding, drought tolerant, and requires lower fertilizer and herbicide quantities than traditional crops High yielding, drought tolerant, and requires lower fertilizer and herbicide quantities than traditional crops Planting-May to early June and can use no-till practices Planting-May to early June and can use no-till practices As a perennial, needs to be planted only once every 10 years or more As a perennial, needs to be planted only once every 10 years or more Harvested annually, either in a two harvest system or a one harvest system after the first frost, using conventional hay equipment Harvested annually, either in a two harvest system or a one harvest system after the first frost, using conventional hay equipment

What is the UT Switchgrass Project? The switchgrass project has three questions to address. The switchgrass project has three questions to address. What incentives are required to induce producers to convert commercial cropland to switchgrass? What incentives are required to induce producers to convert commercial cropland to switchgrass? What impact would a mature switchgrass feedstock industry have on Tennessee’s economy and the Nation’s agricultural sector? What impact would a mature switchgrass feedstock industry have on Tennessee’s economy and the Nation’s agricultural sector? What is the potential of converting switchgrass to bio-oil for use as light-off fuel in a coal fired burner or some other conversion process? What is the potential of converting switchgrass to bio-oil for use as light-off fuel in a coal fired burner or some other conversion process?

What incentives are required to induce producers to convert commercial cropland to switchgrass? Several Steps Several Steps Plant 32.5 acres on Experiment Station land Plant 32.5 acres on Experiment Station land Develop recommendations from literature and from experience Develop recommendations from literature and from experience Contract with producers to grow switchgrass Contract with producers to grow switchgrass Analyze the experiences of the producers and those of the experiment station Analyze the experiences of the producers and those of the experiment station Feed information learned into the Second Question Feed information learned into the Second Question Use switchgrass grown to develop potential bio-energy market Use switchgrass grown to develop potential bio-energy market

Experiment Video Video Video Two experiments Two experiments Variety yields Variety yields Seeding Rate X Fertilization Level X Landscape Seeding Rate X Fertilization Level X Landscape Seeding Rate 2.5, 5, 7.5, and 12 pounds per acre Seeding Rate 2.5, 5, 7.5, and 12 pounds per acre Fertilization Rates 0, 60, 120, and 180 pounds of N Fertilization Rates 0, 60, 120, and 180 pounds of N 4 Different Landscapes 4 Different Landscapes

Switchgrass Yields, Field N-21A-7 bottom Alamo Alamo SL SL GA GA GA GA

Switchgrass Yields, A-7 Hillside Alamo Alamo SL SL GA GA GA GA

What incentives are required to induce producers to convert commercial cropland to switchgrass? We also conducted a survey of Tennessee producers. We also conducted a survey of Tennessee producers. Found that Currently (pre Bush January 2005 speech) 29% of producers willing to grow switchgrass, 25% would not. The other 45% would need additional information before deciding. Found that Currently (pre Bush January 2005 speech) 29% of producers willing to grow switchgrass, 25% would not. The other 45% would need additional information before deciding. Of the 45%, An estimated probit model indicated that 75% would likely say yes. Of the 45%, An estimated probit model indicated that 75% would likely say yes.

Questions?