Law and Economics-Charles W. Upton A Model of Liability.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ECON 1450 – Professor Berkowitz Lectures on Chapter 2 Tort Law Area of Common Law concerned with accidental injuries Potential defendant engages in activity.
Advertisements

Law and Economics-Charles W. Upton Is Tort Law about Money.
Clicker Review. The following table represents a two person game played once by individuals who cannot communicate with each other. Each individual can.
Law and Economics-Charles W. Upton Relying on Contracts.
Chapter Thirty-Three Law and Economics. Effects of Laws u Property right assignments affect –asset, income and wealth distributions; v e.g. nationalized.
Tort – injury to person or property We are interested in unintentional torts, inadvertent accidents. Injuries sustained by breach of contract are covered.
Economics of Tort Law. CBO Study. The Economics of U.S. Tort Liability: A Primer, October 2003.
Hazards Liability and Tort Lecture 8. Outline Another economic role for the government is regulating hazards and risks Factory producing explosives (location.
Economics of Tort Law. What is a tort?  Contract law: injury from a broken promise  Tort law: injury without any promises Intentional tort (≈ crime)
Law and Economics-Charles W. Upton Introduction to Bankruptcy.
Law and Economics-Charles W. Upton Hicks-Kaldor Optimality.
Law and Economics-Charles W. Upton Extensions of the Model.
Law and Economics-Charles W. Upton Valuing Litigation.
Law and Economics-Charles W. Upton Other Issues in Tort Law.
Law and Economics-Charles W. Upton Errors in Application.
Law and Economics-Charles W. Upton The Plan of Reorganization.
Law and Economics-Charles W. Upton More on the Common Law.
Law and Economics-Charles W. Upton Negligence. The Problem Neither the rule of strict liability nor the rule of no liability gives both victim and injurer.
Law and Economics-Charles W. Upton A Model of Joint Action.
Law and Economics-Charles W. Upton The Litigation Process.
Law and Economics-Charles W. Upton Coase on Pigou.
Law and Economics-Charles W. Upton Levels of Activity.
Law and Economics-Charles W. Upton More on Remedies.
Law and Economics-Charles W. Upton Legal Institutions.
Law and Economics-Charles W. Upton Tort Law Reform.
Law and Economics-Charles W. Upton Why Property Rights.
Law and Economics-Charles W. Upton Personal Bankruptcy.
Lectures in Macroeconomics- Charles W. Upton Macroeconomic Policy Overview.
Law and Economics-Charles W. Upton Other Issues in Litigation.
Econ 522 Economics of Law Dan Quint Spring 2013 Lecture 19.
Econ 522 Economics of Law Dan Quint Spring 2014 Lecture 19.
Tech 435 – Legal Aspects of Safety Dr. E. Hansen, CIE Department of Technology NIU-DeKalb, IL.
1 Ins301 Chp12 Tort Law Background on the law Basic tort liability rules Liability from negligence Economic objectives of the tort liability system.
Econ 522 Economics of Law Dan Quint Spring 2014 Lecture 17.
Econ 522 Economics of Law Dan Quint Fall 2009 Lecture 18.
ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS – 2e Charles D. Kolstad Copyright © 2011 by Oxford University Press, Inc. C H A P T E R 18 MANAGING RISK AND UNCERTAINTY.
3.2 Negligence and Liability
Discussion of: “The Reasonable Person Negligence Standard and Liability Insurance” By: Vickie Bajtelsmit Colorado State University Paul Thistle University.
The role of international liability in the regulation of SRM field research: An economic analysis Jesse L. Reynolds – Faculty of Law,
Econ 522 Economics of Law Dan Quint Fall 2010 Lecture 15.
Liability Exposure1 Chapter Outline 14.1Some Background on the Law 14.2Overview of Tort Liability Rules and Procedures Basic Tort Liability Rules No Liability.
Econ 522 Economics of Law Dan Quint Fall 2009 Lecture 16.
Economics and Pathogen Performance Standards Elise Golan Economic Research Service, USDA.
The Reasonable Person Negligence Standard and Liability Insurance Vickie Bajtelsmit Colorado State University Paul Thistle University of Nevada Las Vegas.
Monitoring and Supervision in the Economic Analysis of Safety and Security Louis Visscher Erasmus University Rotterdam Rotterdam Institute of Law and Economics.
Econ 522 Economics of Law Dan Quint Fall 2015 Lecture 15.
Econ 522 Economics of Law Dan Quint Fall 2012 Lecture 16.
Econ 522 Economics of Law Dan Quint Spring 2013 Lectures
Econ 522 Economics of Law Dan Quint Fall 2011 Lecture 15.
Disclaimer: The contents of this presentation are general in nature. Please use your discretion while following them. The author does not guarantee legal.
LAW 531 Week 2 DQ 4 Discuss one defense to negligence or strict liability and explain how it works. To purchase this material click
Quality of Care Chapter 7.
Legal Theories in a Product Liability Claim
Strict Liability and Public Policy
Econ 522 Economics of Law Dan Quint Spring 2017 Lecture 17.
Econ 522 Economics of Law Dan Quint Fall 2015 Lecture 16.
Economics of Accidents and Learned Hand Formula of Liability for Negligence Torts are wrongs that subject the wrongdoer to a suit for damages by the victim.
Construction Accidents Caused by Defective Equipment
Econ 522 Economics of Law Dan Quint Fall 2010 Lecture 16.
Econ 522 Economics of Law Dan Quint Spring 2014 Lecture 18.
שמירה אופטימאלית בהלכות נזקי אש
Econ 522 Economics of Law Dan Quint Spring 2010 Lecture 16.
Chapter Thirty-Three Law and Economics.
Econ 522 Economics of Law Dan Quint Fall 2011 Lecture 16.
Econ 522 Economics of Law Dan Quint Fall 2016 Lecture 17.
Spring Seminar for the Injured Worker's Advocates
Part D-II The Economics of Tort Law
The Statute of Limitations for a Personal Injury Case
Accidental Infringement
Business Law Final Exam
Presentation transcript:

Law and Economics-Charles W. Upton A Model of Liability

Can we Generalize Our examples show that liability rules are a matter of giving incentive. Can we generalize to allow for giving both parties incentives?

A Model of Liability Model 1 The Social Cost (SC) of an accident is given by SC = wx +p(x)A

A Model of Liability Model 1 The Social Cost (SC) of an accident is given by SC = wx +p(x)A Where –w= cost of each unit of precaution –x = units of precaution –p(x) = probability of accident [p’(x)<0] –A = cost of an accident

A Model of Liability Minimization The Social Cost (SC) of an accident is given by SC = wx +p(x)A Optimization requires that w=-p’(x)A Denote the optimal level of precaution as x*

A Model of Liability Two Rules of Liability No liability, meaning that the injurer has no responsibility for the accident. Strict liability, meaning that the injurer has liability for the accident no matter what he does.

A Model of Liability Two Rules of Liability No liability, meaning that the injurer has no responsibility for the accident. Strict liability, meaning that the injurer has liability for the accident no matter what he does. Query: does either rule provide all parties an incentive?

A Model of Liability No Liability Rule The victim will choose x to minimize PC = wx +p(x)A by setting w = -p’(x)A

A Model of Liability No Liability Rule The victim will choose x to minimize PC = wx +p(x)A by setting w = -p’(x)A The victim has optimal incentives to invest in precautions.

A Model of Liability No Liability Rule The victim will choose x to minimize PC = wx +p(x)A by setting w = -p’(x)A The victim has optimal incentives to invest in precautions. The injurer will choose x to minimize PC = wx by setting x =0

A Model of Liability No Liability Rule The victim will choose x to minimize PC = wx +p(x)A by setting w = -p’(x) The victim has optimal incentives to invest in precautions. The injurer will choose x to minimize PC = wx by setting x =0 The injurer has no incentive for precautions

A Model of Liability Strict Liability Rule Injured, victim gets D. PC = wx +p(x)[A-D] If D = A, then PC = wx Minimization means x =0

A Model of Liability Strict Liability Rule Injured, victim gets D. PC = wx +p(x)[A-D] If D = A, then PC = wx Minimization means x =0 The victim has no incentive to invest in precautions.

A Model of Liability Strict Liability Rule Injured, victim gets D. PC = wx +p(x)[A-D] If D = A, then PC = wx Minimization means x =0 The victim has no incentive to invest in precautions. The injurer will choose x to minimize PC = wx+ p(x)D by setting x =p’(x)D

A Model of Liability Strict Liability Rule Injured, victim gets D. PC = wx +p(x)[A-D] If D = A, then PC = wx Minimization means x =0 The victim has no incentive to invest in precautions. The injurer will choose x to minimize PC = wx+ p(x)D by setting x =p’(x)D If D = A, the injurer has optimal incentive for precautions

A Model of Liability Conclusion

A Model of Liability End ©2004 Charles W. Upton