Persuasion Through Rhetoric Words, Phrases, and Simple Assertions.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Four Elements of Rhetoric
Advertisements

Argumentation.
Argument, Persuasion, Persuasive Techniques, and Rhetorical Fallacies
RHETORIC I Rhetoric = df. 1. (M&P) Language used primarily to persuade or influence beliefs or attitudes rather than to prove something logically. 2. The.
Understanding Logical Fallacies
Copyright © 2008, Terry Hudson Session 3. Copyright © 2008, Terry Hudson Chapter 2 – Argument Coordination Relationship between arguer and recipient as.
Persuasion Through Rhetoric Words, Phrases, and Simple Assertions.
Fallacies What are they?. Definition There are over 100 fallacies They are illogical statements that demonstrate erroneous reasoning (sometimes intended-manipulation/
Mastering the Art of Persuasion & Recognizing Fallacies.
Chapter 5 PERSUASION THROUGH RHETORIC So far we’ve examined: Those trying to prove or demonstrate a conclusion Those trying to support a conclusion 2©
Persuasion Through Rhetoric Supplementary Material (pages 2 – 5)
©2006 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 16 Thinking and Speaking Critically.
Letter from Birmingham Jail
By: Zechariah J Taylor EUPHEMISMS AND DYSPHEMISM'S.
More Bad Reasoning and Bad Rhetoric Violence to both People and Logic.
Persuasion Through Rhetoric Words, Phrases, and Simple Assertions.
Persuasion in the Media and Text
How to sway the audience
 Read the following argument. Examine it closely. Do you think it is logically sound? Why?  [T]he acceptance of abortion does not end with the killing.
Unit 2: The Art of Persuasion Argument and Persuasion Unit 2: Society’s Influence of the Individual; Art of Persuasion.
DO NOW Identify whether each statement is True or False
2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5pt 1 pt 2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt 2pt 3 pt 4pt 5 pt 1pt 2pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt 2 pt 3 pt 4pt 5 pt 1pt WORD S.
Rhetoric : the art or skill of speaking or writing formally and effectively especially as a way to persuade or influence people.
Basics of Argumentation Victoria Nelson, Ph.D.. What is an argument? An interpersonal dispute.
Counterarguments Direct Ways of Refuting an Argument 1.Show that at least of the premises is false. 2.Show that an argument is not valid or strong 3.Show.
The Nature of Language Language is symbolic
Research Paper Arguments Premises Fallacies Take Notes!
Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2008 Types of Informative Speeches.
Critical Inquiry Part Two.
Persuasive Text 8 TH Journal Have you ever tried to persuade someone to do something they didn’t want to do? What are some things you said or did.
Warm-up What is the best way to persuade someone? Written or Spoken Word? Explain your position.
Persuasive Appeals ENGLISH 11. Persuasion Persuasion is presenting an argument The goal of argument is to win acceptance of one's ideas. Modern argumentation.
: the art or skill of speaking or writing formally and effectively especially as a way to persuade or influence people.
Irrational Techniques of Persuasion
Fallacies It’s not useful to think of ‘fallacies’ as a laundry list of forms to avoid, or as an algorithm for finding weaknesses in authors’ arguments.
Persuasion Through Rhetoric Words, Phrases, and Simple Assertions.
Techniques for Highly Effective Communication Professional Year Program - Unit 5: Workplace media and communication channels.
RECOGNIZING, ANALYZING, AND CONSTRUCTING ARGUMENTS
Argumentative Terms Complete your foldable with the following.
Persuasion Terms. Logos- The process of reasoning that uses logic, numbers facts and data. Pathos- When the writer appeals to the reader’s emotions Ethos-
Reasoning & Problem Solving Lecture 4 Rhetoric
©2007 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Identifying Rhetorical Devices Go To Next Slide The aim of this tutorial is to help you learn.
THE RHETORIC OF REVOLUTION RHETORIC IT IS THE ART OF PERSUASION; INSINCERE LANGUGE.
It’s No Laughing Matter Understanding Political Cartoons.
: the art or skill of speaking or writing formally and effectively especially as a way to persuade or influence people.
Persuasive Text 8th 8.18.
Rhetoric: The art of persuasion 1.3 kinds a.Appeal to reason, logic, and evidence b.Appeal to emotions c.Appeal to ethics/morals 2.Rhetorical devices –
Critical Thinking Lecture 5b More Fallacies
Reasoning & Problem Solving Lecture 5b More Fallacies By David Kelsey.
Logical Fallacies A logical fallacy is an element of an argument that is flawed If spotted one can essentially render an entire line of reasoning invalid.
Propaganda Techniques 7th grade Language Arts Pam Winarski/ Hilary Williams.
SOAPSTONE & STRATEGIES Annotation Notes. SOAPS Speaker Occasion Audience Purpose Subject.
Strategies for Creating Success in College and in Life On Course Chapter 7 Adopting Lifelong learning.
Logical Fallacies & Rhetorical Devices English II.
8 th grade English. Definition Rhetorical Devices – is an artful arrangement of words to achieve a particular emphasis and effect. It consists of two.
Persuasive Speech Unit Logical Fallacies Fallacy: A mistake in an argument that automatically invalidates it.
Persuasive Terms persuasive essay: uses logic and reasoning to persuade readers to adopt a certain point of view or take action propaganda: uses emotional.
Persuasive Terms persuasive essay: uses logic and reasoning to persuade readers to adopt a certain point of view or take action propaganda: uses emotional.
Critical Thinking Lecture 4 Rhetoric
Fallacies It’s not useful to think of ‘fallacies’ as a laundry list of forms to avoid, or as an algorithm for finding weaknesses in authors’ arguments.
What is a logical fallacy?
Introduction to Logic Lecture 5b More Fallacies
Chapter 16 and 17 Review December 8, 2008.
More on Argument.
Chapter 5 Persuasion Through Rhetoric
Terms to know for persuasion
Critical Thinking Lecture 4 Rhetoric
PERSUASIVE TEXTS.
A POCKET GUIDE TO PUBLIC SPEAKING 5TH EDITION Chapter 24
Philosophy 1100 Title: Critical Reasoning Instructor: Paul Dickey
Presentation transcript:

Persuasion Through Rhetoric Words, Phrases, and Simple Assertions

A psychological point about rhetoric and suggestion... It’s a fact that even fleeting impressions may have measurable influence on behavior.

A psychological point about rhetoric and suggestion... It’s a fact that even fleeting impressions may have measurable influence on behavior. The operation of such influences may occur below the threshold of consciousness.

A psychological point about rhetoric and suggestion... It’s a fact that even fleeting impressions may have measurable influence on behavior. The operation of such influences may occur below the threshold of consciousness. The positive and negative impressions made by use of rhetorical devices, while they may sometimes seem trivial, can have powerful and long-lasting effects.

A psychological point about rhetoric and suggestion... It’s a fact that even fleeting impressions may have measurable influence on behavior. The operation of such influences may occur below the threshold of consciousness. The positive and negative impressions made by use of rhetorical devices, while they may sometimes seem trivial, can have powerful and long-lasting effects. Critical thinking addresses influence of rhetoric in two ways: (1) helps identify attempts at non-argumentative persuasion (2) helps check “spontaneous” beliefs and impulses

Euphemisms and Dysphemisms  Words or phrases that are substituted for other words or phrases to put what is being discussed in a more positive or negative light

Euphemisms and Dysphemisms  Words or phrases that are substituted for other words or phrases to put what is being discussed in a more positive or negative light Euphemism: “Infidelity” becomes “an indiscretion”. Dysphemism: “Spouse” becomes “ball and chain”.

Euphemisms and Dysphemisms  Words or phrases that are substituted for other words or phrases to put what is being discussed in a more positive or negative light Euphemism: “Infidelity” becomes “an indiscretion”. Dysphemism: “Spouse” becomes “ball and chain”. Note: Reports and descriptions may convey pleasant or unpleasant information without being euphemistic or dysphemistic. It’s the quality of the language that matters.

Rhetorical Comparisons, Definitions, and Explanations  Ways of speaking that depart positively or negatively from a fair or neutral position  Problems of content, not of form

Rhetorical Comparisons, Definitions, and Explanations  Ways of speaking that depart positively or negatively from a fair or neutral position  Problems of content, not of form Comparison: The American revolutionaries used tactics similar to those employed by the Viet Cong.

Rhetorical Comparisons, Definitions, and Explanations  Ways of speaking that depart positively or negatively from a fair or neutral position  Problems of content, not of form Comparison: "Talking to you is like trying to talk to the Iranians." (landlord to insistent tenant) Definition: religion - the opiate of the people

Rhetorical Comparisons, Definitions, and Explanations  Ways of speaking that depart positively or negatively from a fair or neutral position  Problems of content, not of form Comparison: "Talking to you is like trying to talk to the Iranians." (landlord to insistent tenant) Definition: religion - the opiate of the people Explanation: Franklin stayed in France throughout the revolution because he was a celebrity there.

Stereotype  May function as an unexamined assumption behind a premise (easily results in fallacy of begging the question) or explanatory claim (especially, as circular reasoning)

Stereotype  May function as an unexamined assumption behind a premise (easily results in fallacy of begging the question) or explanatory claim (especially, as circular reasoning)  When directly expressed, takes the form of a generalization

Stereotype  May function as an unexamined assumption behind a premise (easily results in fallacy of begging the question) or explanatory claim (especially, as circular reasoning)  When directly expressed, takes the form of a generalization  As expectation, may cause an observer to ignore conflicting phenomena or supply consistent details that never occurred

Innuendo  A suggestion that is made indirectly  Creates a negative impression (using indirect language to create a positive impression is usually better classed as understatement)  May be constructed by association with something negative or by faint praise Example: Prof. X? Is he the one who admitted that his emotions influence his grading? (When speaker knows Prof. X didn’t.) Example: Student Y? Yes, I remember her. She satisfied the minimum requirements of the course.

Loaded Question  Often a yes-no question or a false dilemma, but could occur with any question form  If a person answers a loaded question they have bought into the assumption  May function similarly to innuendo Example: Are you still smoking crack? Example: Should I ask her to marry me or just never see her again? Example: What were you thinking when you attempted to steal that CD? Example: For how long have you been having wild unprotected sex with her?

Weaseler  A word or phrase that deceptively weakens a claim

Weaseler  A word or phrase that deceptively weakens a claim  Not to be confused with careful qualification

Weaseler  A word or phrase that deceptively weakens a claim  Not to be confused with careful qualification Example: Save up to 40% (when typical savings will be less) Example: Tori may be a liar. Example: It is possible that Tori is a liar. My Roomate Who Is Taking a Marketing Class

Downplayer  A word, phrase, or punctuation that subtly diminishes a concept or weakens a claim  May overlap with weaseler

Downplayer  A word, phrase, or punctuation that subtly diminishes a concept or weakens a claim  May overlap with weaseler

Downplayer  A word, phrase, or punctuation that subtly diminishes a concept or weakens a claim  May overlap with weaseler Example: His “hot” girlfriend… Example: Ms. Mert’s so-called “degree” in business... Example: My boyfriend spent $200 dollars on my gift, whereas Stefanie’s spent a mere $100.

Horse Laugh/Ridicule/Sarcasm  An attempt to weaken a claim or undermine credibility by making an idea or person appear ridiculous

Horse Laugh/Ridicule/Sarcasm  An attempt to weaken a claim or undermine credibility by making an idea or person appear ridiculous  May make use of other devices, e.g., hyperbole, slippery slope

Horse Laugh/Ridicule/Sarcasm  An attempt to weaken a claim or undermine credibility by making an idea or person appear ridiculous  May make use of other devices, e.g., hyperbole, slippery slope

Horse Laugh/Ridicule/Sarcasm  An attempt to weaken a claim or undermine credibility by making an idea or person appear ridiculous  May make use of other devices, e.g., hyperbole, slippery slope  Ex: “…you should move to Massachusetts.” (in response to, "Why should the richest 4% of Californians be taxed at a lower rate than the poorest?”)  Ex: "I think I have a role for you in Terminator 4”

Hyperbole  Use of exaggeration to make an impression of greater importance or deviation from expectations

Hyperbole  Use of exaggeration to make an impression of greater importance or deviation from expectations  May show up in other devices, e.g., ridicule, slippery slope, straw man, poisoning the well

Hyperbole  Use of exaggeration to make an impression of greater importance or deviation from expectations  May show up in other devices, e.g., ridicule, slippery slope, straw man, poisoning the well Example: Josh is the hottest guy I’ve seen in my life (my life!). [slanter]

Proof Surrogate  An assertion or strong suggestion that good evidence exists somewhere out of reach to support a claim

Proof Surrogate  An assertion or strong suggestion that good evidence exists somewhere out of reach to support a claim  May make use of listed, but unchecked or unverifiable references

Proof Surrogate  An assertion or strong suggestion that good evidence exists somewhere out of reach to support a claim  May make use of listed, but unchecked or unverifiable references Example: Unnamed sources report that... Example: Experts agree that... Example: I read on the Internet that... (if used as evidence)