B Note from Dr. Henry These slides are suggested to be ADDED to your previous presentation that included system description, diagrams, SSOC, operating.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Quality Series (Sample Slides)
Advertisements

1 Markov Chains Tom Finke. 2 Overview Outline of presentation The Markov chain model –Description and solution of simplest chain –Study of steady state.
Non-Linear Statistical Static Timing Analysis for Non-Gaussian Variation Sources Lerong Cheng 1, Jinjun Xiong 2, and Prof. Lei He 1 1 EE Department, UCLA.
Green Team Dustin Fraley DeAndre Strong Stephanie Wilson September 14, 2005 UTC ENGR 329 Speed System.
Voltage Control System: Proportional Integral (PI) Controllers Team Purple: John Pangle Jessica Raymond Justin Whitt ENGR 329 November 30, 2005.
AQM for Congestion Control1 A Study of Active Queue Management for Congestion Control Victor Firoiu Marty Borden.
-Pressure System- Root Locus Cory Richardson Dennis To Jamison Linden 6/14/2015, UTC, ENGR-329.
Flow Rate Control System “Step Response Modeling” February 15, 2006 U.T.C. Engineering 329.
Flow Control System Steady State Operation & Step Response February 1 st, 2006 U.T.C. ENGR 329.
FLOW RATE CONTROL SYSTEM
Level Team Team Members Note by Dr. Henry: List your team members’ names on this slide.
LEVEL-1 Frequency Response –Experiments –Modeling Jim Henry.
Marshal Stout Michael Brooks Nathan Wilson ENGR 329 Team Green February 11, 2009.
Pressure System Amanda Newman Andy Patel Bryan Cuervo September 28 th 2005 ENGR. 329 UTC Engineering.
Flow Rate Control System
Team Green Speed Control - Steady State Performance and Step Response John Barker John Beverly Keith Skiles ENGR 329 UTC 2/1/06.
Red Team Amanda Newman Ankit Patel Bryan Cuervo UTC ENGR 329 Sept. 14, 2005.
Red Team -Pressure- Steady State Operating And Step Response Dennis To Cory Richardson Jamison Linden 6/26/2015, UTC, ENGR-329.
-Pressure System- Frequency Response Cory Richardson Dennis To Jamison Linden 6/27/2015, UTC, ENGR-329.
Pressure Control System: Root Locus Plotting Team Green: X Y Z.
Flow Rate Control System “Frequency Response” By: Taylor Murphy March 1, 2006 U.T.C. Engineering 329.
Team Green John Barker John Beverly Keith Skiles UTC ENGR Steady State and Step Response Performance Speed Control System.
Root Locus Plotting Red Squad Flow System Ben Gordon, Ben Klingler, Dianah Dugan October 31, 2007 University of Tennessee Chattanooga ENGR 329.
Green Team Speed System Proportional Only Controller Design and Experimental Dustin Fraley DeAndre Strong Stephanie Wilson.
Flow Rate Control System Proportional Only Controller April 2, 2006 U.T.C. Engineering 329.
What does Kc do?. What is Kc? Kc is the Controller Gain of a control system. It can be adjusted to obtain a variety of system responses.
What is your Objective? THE PROBLEM  Curiosity???????? ???????? Observation is a key element here!!!
Yellow Team Spray-Booth Pressure Station Steady, Step Behavior and Step Modeling Jamie West Jay Baker Joel Wood 10/10/11 UTC ENGR 3280L.
Receiver Design for Ultrawideband PPM Communication Systems Vijay Ullal Clemson University July 29, SURE Program.
4.7 Arithmetic Sequences A sequence is a set of numbers in a specific order. The numbers in the sequence are called terms. If the difference between successive.
On the Accuracy of Modal Parameters Identified from Exponentially Windowed, Noise Contaminated Impulse Responses for a System with a Large Range of Decay.
Graphical Analysis. Why Graph Data? Graphical methods Require very little training Easy to use Massive amounts of data can be presented more readily Can.
Power Supply Aware Computing Pradeep S. Shenoy and Philip T. Krein Support provided by National Science Foundation under Grant ECS and by the.
Physics 2015 – Mechanical Energy Conservation Department of Physics & Astronomy Minilab 6 Mechanical Energy Conservation Page 1.
Singapore’s Economic Growth
/6. DISAPPEARING INK Reviewer: Matija Martinčić Team Croatia.
Lecture 19 Review: First order circuit step response Steady-state response and DC gain Step response examples Related educational modules: –Section
Halobacteria Experiment Grader. Title (1 point): Does the Experiment start with a title that appropriately describes what the experiment is about? (Does.
Chairman: Hung-Chi Yang Presenter: Jhong-Yi Li Advisor: Dr. Chun-Ju Hou Date:2014/12/10.
Internal Assessment Investigation Assessment Criteria.
Recruitment Statistics Overview of Recruitment 2007/08 Of the 38 vacancies advertised this year, 27 roles were filled and 7 roles were not.
Inquiry lab layout. Experimental design What will we test How will we test Why are we testing.
7.4. 5x + 2y = 16 5x + 2y = 16 3x – 4y = 20 3x – 4y = 20 In this linear system neither variable can be eliminated by adding the equations. In this linear.
Write Title (statement that relates the IV & DV) By (your name)
ME 402 Class Project Presentation Template [Team Name] [Student Names] Disclaimer: This template is to help you assemble your presentation, but you are.
Overhead Controller Design Project Name Department and University Date Class Name.
Collapsing Bubble Project By: Qiang Chen Stacey Altrichter By: Qiang Chen Stacey Altrichter.
WHOOOA BIG SAFETY ISSUE!
General Comments In a presentation, you are telling a story
Modern Control Systems (MCS)
Sample Presentation. Slide 1 Info Slide 2 Info.
Giving Scientific Presentations
Suggested Project Report Outline
Digital Control Systems (DCS)
Control Systems With Embedded Implementation (CSEI)
Jamie West Jay Baker Joel Wood 11/2/11 UTC ENGR 3280L
Like all science, biology is a process of inquiry. Scientists:
Scientific Method.
SCIENTIFIC METHOD REVIEW.
Title of Physics Practical Investigation
Jamie West Jay Baker Joel Wood 10/10/11 UTC ENGR 3280L
TITLE OF YOUR PROJECT Your name and affiliation.
Scientific Method Outline
20-30 min. powerpoint presentation
Flow through Packed Beds
Characteristics.
Graphing with Uncertainties
Characteristics.
Scientific Method.
Completing the Square pages 544–546 Exercises , – , –2
Presentation transcript:

b Note from Dr. Henry These slides are suggested to be ADDED to your previous presentation that included system description, diagrams, SSOC, operating ranges, etc.

FOPDT Model b System Background Description, SSOC, Step ResponseDescription, SSOC, Step Response b FOPDT Theory b Model Theory b Results b Conclusions Note from Dr. Henry New outline

FOPDT Model b Model Equation C(t) = A*u(t-t d -t 0 )*K*(1-e ) C(t) = A*u(t-t d -t 0 )*K*(1-e ) ParametersParameters –t d =6.9 min –A = 10 % –K = 2.1 cm/% –t 0 = 0.16 min –tau = 1.93 min Model inbl = 60 % outbl= 125 cm -( t-td-t0 ) tau Note from Dr. Henry Equations, parameters

Experimental and Model Results Note from Dr. Henry Sample comparison of model and experiment Note from Dr. Henry Use labels & arrows rather than “Legend” Label

Experimental and Model Results…cont Note from Dr. Henry Sample comparison of “step down”

MODEL PARAMETERS DECREASING STEADY STATE GAINK2.5 V/% DEAD TIMEt o 0 s TIME CONSTANT  0.6 s / 1.2 s / 2.4 s EXPERIMENTAL PARAMETERS DECREASING STEADY STATE GAINK2.5 V/% DEAD TIMEt o 0 s TIME CONSTANT  0.2 s OVERALL RESULTS MODEL PARAMETERS DECREASING STEADY STATE GAINK2.5 V/% DEAD TIMEt o 0 s TIME CONSTANT  0.6 s / 1.2 s / 2.4 s EXPERIMENTAL PARAMETERS DECREASING STEADY STATE GAINK2.5 V/% DEAD TIMEt o 0 s TIME CONSTANT  0.2 s OVERALL RESULTS Note from Dr. Henry All your results --add the error analysis, however