Office of Academic Appeals & Regulation 1 Plagiarism.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Academic Services Division. Assessment Policies & Procedures Examinations Office/Registry Academic Services Division Sandra Mienczakowski Ian Hamley Karen.
Advertisements

Refreshing institutional policies around academic integrity: a focus on student training Dr Neil Morris Faculty of Biological Sciences.
Warwick Business School. WBS Plagiarism: What we do Deter – Clear instruction to students what WBS and Warwick University considered poor and good academic.
Academic Misconduct Panels Student Governance December 2013 AMP DEC13.
WBS PLAGIARISM PROCEDURE
Quality &Validation Department (Q &V) BUE 1. Whats the Quality & Validation? 2.
ACADEMIC MISCONDUCT PROCEDURE Lynn Jones Regulations, Assessment and Awards Manager.
External Examiners’ Briefing  Tuesday 6 th January 2015.
Delivering local determinations and setting sanctions Speakers: Simon Bird Deputy President The Adjudication Panel for England Mark Jones Principal Legal.
Procedures for Dealing with Student Discipline and Misconduct Presented by: Linda Bird – Academic Registrar Adriana Jumelet – Secretary, Disciplinary Board.
BSc (Honours) Computing and Information Systems Part-time Course Code: 2172 Don McFall – Course Director Room 16J08.
1 TACKLING PLAGIARISM AND ACADEMIC MISCONDUCT ‘GETTING THE BALANCE RIGHT’ ROB BEHRENS INDEPENDENT ADJUDICATOR FOR HIGHER EDUCATION
Plagiarism Sarah Gregory Management Development Division Wednesday 2 nd March 2011.
WEEK 9: DISMISSAL AS A RESULT OF MISCONDUCT 1. LEARNING OUTCOME The students will be able to; 2 1 Discuss the issue of dismissal as a result of misconduct(C4,P2,
1 Procedural Fairness OIA Policy Seminar Plagiarism & Academic Misconduct 4 November 2009 Susanna Reece Deputy Adjudicator.
Plagiarism: What a postgrad needs to know Dr Richard Rowe Department of Psychology University of Sheffield.
Board of Examiners and Examination Committee Training Quality Assurance Services
LEEDS BECKETT UNIVERSITY BOARD OF EXAMINERS: STAFF DEVELOPMENT SESSIONS Faculty / Quality Assurance Services.
LEEDS BECKETT UNIVERSITY Board of Examiners and Examination Committee Training Quality Assurance Services.
Introducing the Academic Regulations for Taught Provision Staff Development Symposium September 2013 Malcolm MacLean Associate Dean, Quality & Standards.
PLAGIARISM AND HOW TO AVOID IT Ben Clift Department of Politics and International Studies
University of Brighton Regulations workshop for partner colleges Tanya Izzard, Partnership Manager
Quality &Validation Department (Q &V) BUE 1 By: Nehal Osman.
The Examination Process in the Final Year Where to find information? It is all on the Biology Department web pages!!!
Change of Mind – 8 th May (12:00) to 1st July (17:15) 2011.
Cheating, Plagiarism and Unfair Practice Franchise Delivery Quality Assurance Services.
How not to cheat! (even by accident)
LEEDS BECKETT UNIVERSITY BOARD OF EXAMINERS: STAFF DEVELOPMENT SESSIONS FOR ACADEMIC STAFF Quality Assurance Services.
Academic Regulations for Taught Programmes 2014/15 Stewart Smith-Langridge Annette Cooke Governance Services 5 November
Handling Complaints in Small and Specialist Institutions: Case Examples Siobhan Hohls Adjudication Manager 29 June 2010.
Office of Academic Appeals & Regulation Web Site Our core activities are the resolution and determination.
1 PLAGIARISM The OIA’s experience Ruth Deech & Michael Reddy.
School of Materials Information for Postgraduate Research Students.
Cheating, Plagiarism Unfair Practiceaterials Quality Assurance Services Collaborations and Partnerships Group.
Summary of Standard Assessment Regulations Academic Year 2013/14.
External Examiner Induction Academic Regulations for Taught Programmes 2015/16 Annette Cooke/Alison Jones Quality and Enhancement Office 4 November 2015.
Excellence - Education; Research; Knowledge Exchange Assessment Regulations Registry Academic Services Sara Welham 31 August 2010.
Excellence - Education; Research; Knowledge Exchange Academic Appeals and ways to avoid them David Robinson Academic Services.
International Partnerships Conference 21 November 2013 CREATE THE DIFFERENCE1 Dr Noel Morrison Academic Registrar and Director of the Student Experience.
University of Sunderland CSEM03 R.E.P.L.I. Unit 6 Plagiarism CSEM03 REPLI.
Wilfrid Laurier University,  Purpose  Outline:  What is it?  How do they detect it?  What happens if I’m caught?  Why is it important?
University of Derby PReSS – Plagiarism - A Guide for Students What is plagiarism? “…passing off someone else’s work, either intentionally or unintentionally,
Welcome to UCC Dr Liam Marnane Dean of Graduate Studies (Dept. Electrical & Electronic Engineering)
Academic honesty Academic honesty must be seen as a set of values and skills that promote personal integrity and good practice in teaching, learning and.
Academic HONESTY IBO. Academic Honesty Set of values and skills that promote personal integrity and good practice in teaching, learning, and assessment.
Intro to Exam System Dr Mike Spann May 3 rd 2011.
LAW SOCIETY OF ZIMBABWE Managing labour Disputes G Makings Legal Practitioner.
The work of the Senate Student Disciplinary Committee Student Discipline.
ACADEMIC INTEGRITY Dorothy Griffiths Ph.D Associate Dean of Faculty of Social Sciences.
BOARDS OF EXAMINERS’ REVIEW Prof Chris LANGLEY Chair – RSC Dominic STONE Secretary – RSC 16 th November 2015 Slide 1.
Using the Disciplinary Procedure Human Resources.
An Introduction to External Examining Procedures at Bangor University
Postgraduate Examination Board Briefing
Deleting Pupils and CME WORKSHOP
Academic Regulations Dr Sandra Mienczakowski Head of Academic Processes Student Services - Development.
Plagiarism and Academic Integrity
MMU Regulations.
Examination Board Briefing
Taught Award Regulations
Late hand-in of assignments
Marks/Exams Information – All Years
An Introduction to External Examining Procedures at Bangor University
Postgraduate Research Student Supervision
Academic Regulations Dr Sandra Mienczakowski Head of Academic Processes Student Services - Development.
Card Reader System and Student Attendance
OHSC 2018 CONSULTATIVE WORKSHOP - GAUTENG PROVINCE ENFORCEMENT
University of Brighton
University of Brighton
WEEK 9: DISMISSAL AS A RESULT OF MISCONDUCT
What happens if I don’t pass first time
Presentation transcript:

Office of Academic Appeals & Regulation 1 Plagiarism

Office of Academic Appeals & Regulation 2 Plagiarism Health Check –Update publications –Compulsory session before any submissions test? plagiarism activities

Office of Academic Appeals & Regulation 3 Plagiarism Turnitin –Beating Turnitin –Arms Race –% of Work? Plagiarism is an academic decision

Office of Academic Appeals & Regulation 4 Plagiarism Student Co-operation –must attend meeting –action if unavoidably absent –rights to advice and supporter no representation –student must provide information immediately as required by department

Office of Academic Appeals & Regulation 5 Plagiarism Common Procedural mistakes –marking up (incomplete) warning –“I know nothing” –entrapment –intention –all papers to the student including department’s reasoned conclusion (to the Office)

Office of Academic Appeals & Regulation 6 Plagiarism Elephant traps –group work –collusion –borrowed PCs –memory sticks Full and complete investigation at Departmental level

Office of Academic Appeals & Regulation 7 Plagiarism Concurrent Offences –First Offences addressed in department –If one offence is aggravated both to the Committee Aggravated Offences –Theft –Deception e.g. falsifying references Malpractice

Office of Academic Appeals & Regulation 8 Plagiarism Mitigation –Principle: not comparable with mitigation for under-performance –Unlikely to affect guilt or innocence –Can affect penalty

Office of Academic Appeals & Regulation 9 Plagiarism Annex 3 of published procedures –full list of penalties Departments can impose any penalty short of exclusion or delaying student’s progress Cases before the Committee mean that the student’s place is in question

Office of Academic Appeals & Regulation 10 Plagiarism Rule of thumb –compare penalty with case of student who has failed honestly if no difference, then penalty is too light –remember it is a penalty not action for a case of illness Factors for consideration –scale of offence, relative to the piece of work –seniority of the student –source of material, e.g. essay mill, internet etc –attempt at concealment –mitigation and its relevance Advice from Office

Office of Academic Appeals & Regulation 11 Plagiarism Consistency –record offences and penalties –keep penalties simple –bear in mind the student’s level of study –remember longer term consequences for the student but retain consistency effect on Honours displacement of work, workload issues

Office of Academic Appeals & Regulation 12 Plagiarism Office of the Independent Adjudicator (OIA) –identify cases at an early stage consistent and comprehensive checking process –retrospective investigations permitted –procedural irregularities fatal Change Procedures –August sits: Externals

Office of Academic Appeals & Regulation 13 Plagiarism Awards –University forbids any award where plagiarism has not been purged (PVC and Committee on Applications) –No knowingly plagiarised work can contribute to an award of the University –Degrees can be revoked

Office of Academic Appeals & Regulation 14 Plagiarism Have a nice day!