UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA © 2002 Centurion Communications LLC 1 How are they related?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Family Property and Family Debt: A New Approach She got the goldmine, I got the shaft. They split it right down the middle, And then they give her the.
Advertisements

Conflict of Interest, Conflict of Commitment, and Outside Activities UTSA HOP 1.33 Non-covered UTSA staff 1.
Nonprofit Organizations in Maine Maine Office of the Attorney General Linda J. Conti May 21, 2009.
New 403(b) Regulations Pete Gautreau, CPA Partner Danielle Witten, CPA Senior Manager.
Form – An Overview NATIONAL CONTRACT MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION BOARD OF DIRECTORS November 13, 2011 Speaker: Patricia A. O’Malley, CPA Rubino & McGeehin,
THE INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS OF SRI LANKA THE INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS OF SRI LANKA Thilanka Warnakulasooriya B.Com Special (Col),
Content General rules, Related parties, Price paid or payable, Introduction to the transfer pricing.
Legal Responsibilities for Board Members of Nonprofit Organizations Or…all you need to know to stay out of trouble. Presented: July 2007 Prepared by: Elsbeth.
Ethics and Disclosure Act W.S et. seq. Who does the act apply to All public officials, public members and public employees which includes District.
September 13, 2012 The Institute for Public Engagement The IRS’ Corporate Governance Regime.
© 2004 ME™ (Your Money Education Resource™) 1 Estate Planning Chapter 13: Generation Skipping Transfers.
Chapter 11 Tax Consequence of Property Disposal. Computation of Realized Gain or Loss  Everything of economic value received in exchange for a property.
Taxation of Noncompensatory Partnership Options
1 © 2010 Venable LLP. All Rights Reserved. Intermediate Sanctions: Why You Should Be Concerned about Excess Benefit Transactions and How You Can Avoid.
Stock Option Backdating and Practices Conference Presented by: Joseph T. Gulant, Esquire September 21, 2006.
Chapter 8 Interests In Joint Ventures © 2009 Clarence Byrd Inc. 2 Joint Venture Defined  Paragraph (c) A joint venture is an economic activity.
Executive Compensation for the Not-for-Profit Entity, BNKJ, September Executive Compensation for the Not-for- Profit Entity Susan Clark, CPA, FHFMA.
Agenda 4/26 BA 128A Questions from lecture Hand in project
Chapter 11 Partnerships: Distributions, Transfer of Interests, and Terminations Partnerships: Distributions, Transfer of Interests, and Terminations Copyright.
Business Essentials for Nonprofit Leaders
Nonprofit Organizations Class Nine: Public Charities – Corrected 4/16/04 Michael V. Bourland Michelle Coleman-Johnson Bourland, Wall & Wenzel, P.C.
Nonprofit Organizations Private Foundations Michael V. Bourland Michelle Coleman-Johnson Bourland, Wall & Wenzel, P.C.
Institutional Memberships November Institutional Memberships New Operational Guideline: Memberships Paid by University Funds can be found at
1 §1411, Passive Activities and Planning Opportunities AGC Financial Issues Forum January 2014.
Governing a Tax-Exempt Nonprofit Corporation The Basics MPCC December 16, 2010.
1 Legal Issues of Not-for-Profit Organizations Robert L. Waldman Venable LLP
ACCOUNTABILITY UPDATE Healthcare Trustees of New York State Audioconference September 22, 2005 Mark Thomas Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker General.
Presented by: Brian Carter, CPA Partner Mauldin & Jenkins, LLC Karen Jubrail Vice President of Development Glazer Children’s Museum 1.
UGANDA LEASING ASSOCIATION ACCOUNTING AND TAXATION OF LEASING TRASACTIONS BY: IRAGUHA ADAD DATE:17 th June,2015.
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST Revised August 4, 2008 Potential conflicts of interest A personal financial interest A personal financial interest A business interest.
Chapter 13 Basis Adjustments to Partnership Property.
Capital & Operating Leases ODJFS Office of Fiscal & Monitoring Services Bureau of County Finance & Technical Assistance OJFSDA Conference, June 2009.
Copyright 2011 Fennemore Craig, P.C. 1 STANDARDS OF CONDUCT FOR NONPROFIT LEADERS Laura A. Lo Bianco Fennemore Craig, P.C. May 17, 2011.
HKAS 28 Investments in Associates
The IRS Targets TTOs: Hot Spots for Tax Compliance and Audit Avoidance Strategies September 15, 2009 Lorraine A. Sciarra Senior University Counsel Princeton.
Don’t Be Ambushed By The 2008 IRS Form 990 PCPA 2008 Conference October 7, 2008 Thomas E. Sweeney Tsoules, Sweeney, Martin & Orr, LLC 29 Dowlin Forge Road.
©2004 Prentice Hall, Inc. Sole Proprietorships and Flow-Through Entities Chapter 10.
Janet Kleffner ACCT 530 Graduate Presentation.  If you pay management or executives an excessive amount, penalties can be imposed on the board members.
Nonprofit Revitalization Act of 2013 Fred M. LaMarca CPA, CFP® Zoltan Kemeny, CPA.
Baylor Law School Nonprofit Organizations Spring 2005 Course Federal Standard of Care; Charitable Purpose; Social Welfare Organizations Prepared By: Darren.
1 Chapter 9: Partnership Formation and Operation.
Form – An Overview December 11, 2010 Speaker: Patricia A. O’Malley, CPA Rubino & McGeehin, Chartered CPA’s and Consultants
Need of AS on Related Party Transactions  There is general presumption that transaction reflected in the financial statements are executed on arm’s-length.
ESOPs: It’s More Than a Matter of Trust Presented by: Dan Reser President; Fiduciary Services, Inc
1 Chapter 9: Partnership Formation and Operation.
Connolly – International Financial Accounting and Reporting – 4 th Edition CHAPTER 22 RELATED PARTY DISCLOSURES.
IAR Legal Affairs presents: RESIDENTIAL FORMS 2015 LISTING CONTRACT.
SMU School of Law Role of the General Counsel Corporate Governance in the Nonprofit Setting Prepared By: Darren B. Moore Bourland, Wall & Wenzel, P.C.
Form – An Overview November 7, 2009 Speaker: Patricia A. O’Malley, CPA Rubino & McGeehin, Chartered CPA’s and Consultants Simple.
Stockholders’ Equity Three primary forms of business organization The Corporate Form of Organization ProprietorshipPartnershipCorporation.
Personal Holding Company Chapter 45 Tools & Techniques of Estate Planning Copyright 2011, The National Underwriter Company1 A personal holding company.
©2015, College for Financial Planning, all rights reserved. Session 3 Valuation of Transferred Assets for Gift and Estate Tax CERTIFIED FINANCIAL PLANNER.
Executive Compensation in Tax Exempt Organizations: Nonprofit Quick Guide to Navigating Intermediate Sanctions CBIZ Compensation Webcast Series.
DRAFTING AN EFFECTIVE CONFLICT OF INTEREST POLICY William H. Jordan, Esq. Sowell, Gray, Stepp & Laffitte, LLC (803)
Chapter 39 Corporations: Directors, Officers, and Shareholders Copyright © 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution.
Chapter 17 Partnerships and S Corporations. Learning Objectives Determine the tax implications of a partnership formation Apply the operating rules for.
Chapter 6 Deductions and Losses. Learning Objectives Distinguish between deductions for and from AGI Discuss the criteria for deducting business and investment.
© 2014 Gray Reed & McGraw, P.C. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice Nonprofit Compensation: Risks, Rules and Best Practices.
11 revision of basic groups. CopyRight 2013 By 周冬华 博士 CPA Some definitions  Subsidiary - an entity which is controlled by another entity (the parent)
Fundraising, Individual Scout Accounts, and IRS Changes.
Phoenix FamilyShield Annuity SM A Single Premium Immediate Annuity designed for Medicaid planning For Producer training purposes only. Not for use with.
Technology Transfer and
Forming and Operating Partnerships
Forming and Operating Partnerships
Business Organizations
Compensation and benefits tax: executive compensation
Based on program materials from ABA Business Law Section,
The NYS non-Profit revitalization act
The Legal and Regulatory Framework Governing Foundations
Helene S. Jaron Vice Chair, Private Client Services Cozen O’Connor
Presentation transcript:

UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA © 2002 Centurion Communications LLC 1 How are they related?

UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA © 2002 Centurion Communications LLC 2 Questions to Ask What are Intermediate Sanctions? How can they hurt me ? How can they hurt Penn ? How do we protect against them ?

UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA © 2002 Centurion Communications LLC 3 Session Agenda Understanding the “Intermediate Sanction” rules. Case studies—practical application of the rules. Group discussion—how the rules apply to Penn and you. Introduction of Penn “Intermediate Sanctions” Web site. Action steps—develop procedures that provide adequate protection.

UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA © 2002 Centurion Communications LLC 4 What are Intermediate Sanctions? Excise taxes Imposed by the IRS On individuals As penalties For use of substantial influence Over certain tax-exempt organizations For inappropriate personal gain

UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA © 2002 Centurion Communications LLC 5 History of Intermediate Sanctions Old rules—IRS only had the option to revoke tax exemption for misappropriating charitable assets for personal gain. IRS was reluctant to use such an extreme penalty. Revocation hurt the organization (already a victim) rather than responsible persons receiving inappropriate benefits. Intermediate Sanctions gives the IRS an effective “intermediate” solution to discourage certain individuals from misusing their influence over a tax exempt entity for personal benefit.

UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA © 2002 Centurion Communications LLC 6 Excess Benefit Transaction *An excess benefit transaction can include compensation /benefit arrangements as well as other transactions such as asset sales, rental agreements, or service contracts. Services Organization Manager Transaction Approval Management Authority Disqualified Person IRS Compensation* PENN

UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA © 2002 Centurion Communications LLC 7 Imposition of Excise Penalty Taxes IRS Disqualified Person Organization Manager Return Excess Benefit Cash 25% excise tax (200% additional excise tax possible) Cash 10% excise tax Negatives for Penn Adverse publicity Disclosure of events on annual IRS form 990 available for public inspection PENN

UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA © 2002 Centurion Communications LLC 8 Individuals Impacted by Intermediate Sanctions Any “disqualified person” Who benefits from an “excess benefit transaction” with Penn Is liable for the tax “Organization managers” can be liable for an additional tax

UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA © 2002 Centurion Communications LLC 9 Effective date for Intermediate Sanctions The excise taxes generally apply to “excess benefit transactions” occurring on or after September 14, 1995.

UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA © 2002 Centurion Communications LLC 10 Excise Tax Rates Disqualified Person who receives an excess benefit: Disqualified Person who receives an excess benefit, and does not return such excess benefit to the organization within a prescribed time frame: Organization Manager, who knowingly approves an excess benefit transaction: (Limited to $10,000 per Transaction) 25% Excise Tax 200% Excise Tax 10% Excise Tax

UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA © 2002 Centurion Communications LLC 11 Excise Tax – Corrective Action The disqualified person is required to correct the transaction by returning to the organization an amount equal to the excess benefit plus interest for the period the excess benefit was held. The IRS Form 990 Annual Information Return (available for public inspection) requires the organization to disclose each excess benefit transaction and the amount of excise taxes paid.

UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA © 2002 Centurion Communications LLC 12 Disqualified Person Any person who is in a position to exercise substantial influence over the affairs of an organization. The IRS will consider the person’s influence during the five-year period preceding the transaction (the lookback period).

UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA © 2002 Centurion Communications LLC 13 Disqualified Person Include certain family members of an individual with substantial influence. Include corporations, partnerships, or trusts in which a disqualified person owns more than a 35 percent interest. Individuals may be deemed to have substantial influence based upon all relevant facts and circumstances.

UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA © 2002 Centurion Communications LLC 14 Disqualified Persons Voting members of the governing body. CEOs, COOs, CFOs, and Treasurers. Department heads that manage a discrete segment or activity of the organization that represents a substantial portion of the activities, assets, income, or expenses of the organization.

UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA © 2002 Centurion Communications LLC 15 The University’s Potential Disqualified Persons Trustees Overseers Donors Officers Deans & Vice Deans Department Chairs Basic Science Chairs Physicians Faculty Others ?

UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA © 2002 Centurion Communications LLC 16 Organization Manager An officer, director, or trustee. Any individual having powers or responsibilities similar to those of officers, directors, or trustees regardless of title. Certain individuals serving on committees of the governing body even if not an officer, director or trustee.

UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA © 2002 Centurion Communications LLC 17 Organization Manager An organization manager must knowingly participate in the excess benefit transaction, unless such participation was not willful and was due to reasonable cause. Participation includes silence or inaction on the part of an organization manager where the manager is under a duty to speak or act. Knowing includes negligently failing to make reasonable attempts to ascertain whether the transaction is an excess benefit transaction.

UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA © 2002 Centurion Communications LLC 18 Excess Benefit Transaction Any transaction in which an economic benefit is provided By an applicable tax-exempt organization Directly or indirectly To or for the use of any disqualified person, And the value of the economic benefit exceeds the value of the consideration received for providing the benefit.

UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA © 2002 Centurion Communications LLC 19 Potential Excess Benefit Transactions Compensation arrangements including fringe benefits (both reported and unreported). Property transactions including both real and personal property and both sales, purchases, or uncompensated use of assets. Rental agreements. Other contractual arrangements; vendor relationships.

UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA © 2002 Centurion Communications LLC 20 “Rebuttable Presumption” For transactions that satisfy the rebuttable presumption, the burden of proof shifts to the IRS. Payments under a compensation arrangement are presumed to be reasonable and a transfer of property, or the right to use property, is presumed to be at fair market value, if three conditions are satisfied.

UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA © 2002 Centurion Communications LLC 21 “Rebuttable Presumption” Advance approval by the governing body (or authorized committee) that is comprised of individuals entirely without conflict. Reliance upon appropriate data as to comparability prior to the board making its determination. Adequately documenting the basis for the board’s determination concurrent with making its decision.

UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA © 2002 Centurion Communications LLC 22 Intermediate Sanction Case Studies Group application of basic rules to real- life scenarios

UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA © 2002 Centurion Communications LLC 23 Case Study Questions to Consider  Who are the disqualified persons and organization managers ?  Does a potential excess benefit transaction exist ?  Could a similar factual situation ever occur at Penn?  What steps could be taken to protect Penn and its leaders from exposure to this scenario?

UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA © 2002 Centurion Communications LLC 24 Group Discussion Applying the Rules to Penn and You

UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA © 2002 Centurion Communications LLC 25 Introduction of the New Penn Web Site on “Intermediate Sanctions” Discussion on how to use and benefit from the Web site.

UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA © 2002 Centurion Communications LLC 26