Jun 27, 2005S. Kahn -- Ckov1 Simulation 1 Ckov1 Simulation and Performance Steve Kahn June 27, 2005 MICE Collaboration PID Meeting.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CBM Calorimeter System CBM collaboration meeting, October 2008 I.Korolko(ITEP, Moscow)
Advertisements

Particle rate in M1 and M2 Muon Meeting
USE OF GEANT4 FOR LHCB RICH SIMULATION S. Easo, RAL, LHCB AND ITS RICH DETECTORS. TESTBEAM DATA FOR LHCB-RICH. OVERVIEW OF GEANT4 SIMULATION.
Cherenkov Detectors. Index of Refraction When light passes through matter its velocity decreases. –Index of refraction n. The index depends on the medium.
PID activities 1. Summary of work/activities since last CM in Berkeley 2. PID parallel session in Frascati 3. Topics specific to each subdetector CKOV1.
DHC 101 Introduction to scintillation detectors. How many PE/MIP should we expect? Scintillation & Fluorescence WSFWSF PMTPEs  (MIP)
TJR Feb 10, 2005MICE Beamline Analysis -- TRD SEPT041 MICE Beamline Analysis – TRD SEPT04 Tom Roberts Muons, Inc. February 10, 2005.
CKOV1 folded geometry 1. Optimization 2. Pion-muon separation 3. Instrumented area 4. Possible developments November 16, 2005 Gh. Grégoire Contents.
Could CKOV1 become RICH? 1. Characteristics of Cherenkov light at low momenta (180 < p < 280 MeV/c) 2. Layout and characterization of the neutron beam.
1 EMCal simulations MICE Video Conference Rikard Sandström Geneva University e MeV.
30 March Global Mice Particle Identification Steve Kahn 30 March 2004 Mice Collaboration Meeting.
Printed by MICE is a Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment running at the Rutherford-Appleton Laboratory, Chilton UK. Cooled muon beams.
TJR Sept 22, 2004MICE Beamline Analysis -- SEPT041 MICE Beamline Analysis – SEPT04 Tom Roberts Muons, Inc. September 22, 2004.
Mar 31, 2005Steve Kahn -- Ckov and Tof Detector Simulation 1 Ckov1, Ckov2, Tof2 MICE Pid Tele-Meeting Steve Kahn 31 March 2005.
1 Downstream scraping and detector sizes Rikard Sandström University of Geneva MICE collaboration meeting CERN.
Global Particle Identification Software Requirements Steve Kahn Mice Collaboration Meeting 31 March 2004.
Liquid Xenon Gamma Screening Luiz de Viveiros Brown University.
Review of PID simulation & reconstruction in G4MICE Yordan Karadzhov Sofia university “St. Kliment Ohridski” Content : 1 TOF 2 Cerenkov.
February 8 th, 2001 Status Report: SciFi for MICE Edward McKigney Imperial College London.
1 G4MICE downstream distributions G4MICE plans Rikard Sandström Universite de Geneve MICE collaboration meeting 27/6-05.
Luminosity Monitor Commissioning MICE Collaboration Meeting March 2010 Paul Soler, David Forrest Danielle MacLennan.
March 31, Status of the TOF, Ckov and Virtual Detector Packages in G4Mice Steve Kahn Brookhaven National Laboratory Mice Collaboration Meeting March.
MICE: The International Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment Diagnostic Systems Tracker Cherenkov Detector Time of Flight Counters Calorimeter Terry Hart.
Software parallel session summary MICE collaboration meeting INFN, Frascati 27/6-05.
Could CKOV1 become RICH? 1. Simulations 2. Sensitive area of the detection plane 3. Example of a workable solution 4. Geometrical efficiency of the photon.
Y. Karadzhov MICE Video Conference Thu April 9 Slide 1 Absolute Time Calibration Method General description of the TOF DAQ setup For the TOF Data Acquisition.
Downstream e-  identification 1. Questions raised by the Committee 2. Particle tracking in stray magnetic field 3. Cerenkov and calorimeter sizes 4. Preliminary.
Progress and plans on PID simulation and reconstruction Yordan Karadzhov Sofia university St. Kliment Ohridski.
28 April 2005Ckov1 Update -- S. Kahn1 Update to the Upstream Cherenkov  -  Separation Steve Kahn Brookhaven National Lab May 2, 2005 Detector Tele-Meeting.
Operated by Brookhaven Science Associates for the U.S. Department of Energy Optimized Parameters for a Mercury Jet Target X. Ding, D. Cline, UCLA, Los.
Oct 15, 2003 Video Conference Energy Deposition Steve Kahn Page 1 Energy Deposition in MICE Absorbers and Coils Steve Kahn October 15, 2003.
RF background simulations MICE collaboration meeting Fermilab Rikard Sandström.
Stephen KahnParticle ID Software Mice Collaboration Meeting Page 1 Particle ID Software Steve Kahn Brookhaven National Lab 27 March 2003.
27 Jun 2005S. Kahn -- Tof/Ckov Status1 Status of TOF and Ckov Sub- packages in G4Mice Steve Kahn 27 June 2005.
Oct 15, 2003 Video Conference Energy Deposition Steve Kahn Page 1 Energy Deposition in MICE Absorbers and Coils Steve Kahn November 2, 2003.
RF background, analysis of MTA data & implications for MICE Rikard Sandström, Geneva University MICE Collaboration Meeting – Analysis session, October.
24/11/2014MAUS Status, A. Dobbs, MPB Talk2 24/11/2014MAUS Status, A. Dobbs, MPB Talk3 CKOV – Threshold Cherenkov detectors (aerogel) TOF – Three Time.
A Reconstruction Algorithm for a RICH detector for CLAS12 Ahmed El Alaoui RICH Workchop, Jefferson Lab, newport News, VA November th 2011.
Medium heavy Λ hyper nuclear spectroscopic experiment by the (e,e’K + ) reaction Graduate school of science, Tohoku University Toshiyuki Gogami for HES-HKS.
PERFORMANCE OF THE MACRO LIMITED STREAMER TUBES IN DRIFT MODE FOR MEASUREMENTS OF MUON ENERGY - Use of the MACRO limited streamer tubes in drift mode -Use.
Particle Production in the MICE Beam Line Particle Accelerator Conference, May 2009, Vancouver, Canada Particle Production in the MICE Beam Line Jean-Sebastien.
Feb 10, 2005 S. Kahn -- Pid Detectors in G4MicePage 1 Pid Detector Implementation in G4Mice Steve Kahn Brookhaven National Lab 10 Feb 2005.
ICHEP 2012 Melbourne, 7 July 2012 Paul Soler on behalf of the MICE Collaboration The MICE Beam Line Instrumentation (Trackers and PID) for precise Emittance.
Calibration of the new Particle Identification Detector (PID) Tom Jude, Derek Glazier, Dan Watts.
Exclusive π 0 electroproduction in the resonance region. Nikolay Markov, Maurizio Ungaro, Kyungseon Joo University of Connecticut Hadron spectroscopy meeting.
Cherenkov Counters for SoLID Z.-E. Meziani on behalf of Simona Malace & Haiyan Gao (Duke University) Eric Fuchey (Temple University) SoLID Dry Run Review,
ECAL PID1 Particle identification in ECAL Yuri Kharlov, Alexander Artamonov IHEP, Protvino CBM collaboration meeting
MICE: The International Muon Ionisation Cooling Experiment MOPLT106 Abstract The provision of intense stored muon beams would allow the properties of neutrinos.
Oct 15, 2003 Video Conference Energy Deposition Steve Kahn Page 1 Energy Deposition in MICE Absorbers and Coils Steve Kahn November 2, 2003.
G4Beamline Simulated Electron Distribution within the HPRF Cavity 2/15/20121.
Instrumentation and Simulations for Target Test MICE Collaboration Meeting 22 October Bill Murray 1, Paul Soler 1,2, Kenny Walaron 1,2 1 Rutherford.
KEK Test Beam Phase I (May 2005) Makoto Yoshida Osaka Univ. MICE-FT Daresbury Aug 30th, 2005.
1 MICE Beamline PID w Aerogel Counters Ghislain Gregoire, Don Summers, Lucien Cremaldi*, MICE Collaboration Meeting, FNAL, Jun 06.
00 Cooler CSB Direct or Extra Photons in d+d  0 Andrew Bacher for the CSB Cooler Collaboration ECT Trento, June 2005.
- MICE - The Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment Jean-Sebastien Graulich, Univ. Genève o Introduction: Aims And Concept o Design o Infrastructure: Hall,
Luminosity Monitor Design MICE Collaboration Meeting 31 May 2009 Paul Soler.
Low Momentum dE/dx Testbeam H.P. 7/24/98. Goals for Spectrometer are based on tracking and PID –Multiparticle correlation –production of particle species.
1 Performance of a Magnetised Scintillating Detector for a Neutrino Factory Scoping Study Meeting U.C. Irvine Monday 21 st August 2006 M. Ellis & A. Bross.
M. Bonesini - CM 22 RAL October 081 TOF0 status M. Bonesini Sezione INFN Milano Bicocca.
TOF Emittance Pion Emittance Measurement with the TOFs? Mark Rayner 11 December 2008.
TORCH IOP meeting Manchester March 31, 2015 TORCH Maarten van Dijk On behalf of the TORCH collaboration (CERN, University of Oxford,
RICH studies for CLAS12 L. Pappalardo1 Contalbrigo Marco Luciano Pappalardo INFN Ferrara CLAS12 RICH Meeting – JLab 21/6/2011.
Monte Carlo simulation of the particle identification (PID) system of the Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment (MICE) Mice is mainly an accelerator physics.
CKOV1 design status 1. Generation of muon and pion beam files 2. PID performances with water radiator 3. Does it help with fluorocarbon FC72 ? 4. Conclusion.
“Performance test of a lead glass
Luminosity Monitor Status
MICE Collaboration Meeting
MICE Beamline PID w Aerogel Counters
Particle ID Diagnostics in the MICE Beamline
The Detector System of the MICE Experiment
Presentation transcript:

Jun 27, 2005S. Kahn -- Ckov1 Simulation 1 Ckov1 Simulation and Performance Steve Kahn June 27, 2005 MICE Collaboration PID Meeting

Jun 27, 2005 S. Kahn -- Ckov1 Simulation2 Energy Loss for a Typical Muon Traversing the Cooling Channel  A typical muon will loose 35 MeV of KE from entering TOF0 to leaving the upstream SciFi detector (see table). There should be 10 MeV loss for each TOF station (5 cm Scintillator) and 10 MeV for 7.6 mm Pb Diffuser. The energy loss from Ckov1 radiator to upstream SciFi detector is only ~ 25 MeV

Jun 27, 2005 S. Kahn -- Ckov1 Simulation3 Upstream Cherenkov System  Upstream Ckov C 6 F 14 radiator with n= PMTs 2 on top, 2 on bottom. Cherenkov thresholds: 0.7 MeV for electrons 140 MeV for muons 190 MeV for pions

Jun 27, 2005 S. Kahn -- Ckov1 Simulation4 Cherenkov Threshold Effect The number of Č photons generated by the passage of a charged particle through the radiator is

Jun 27, 2005 S. Kahn -- Ckov1 Simulation5 Simulation Running Conditions  The beam contamination has the same momentum distribution as the muons. The relative number of PE from  and  now have meaning. The initial sample has 50%  and 50% . Events are generated just before Tof0 ( mm) with  x =  y =50 mm  x’ =  y’ =25 mr  Samples with mono-chromatic momentum are run 180, 200, 220, 240, 260 MeV/c samples.

Jun 27, 2005 S. Kahn -- Ckov1 Simulation6  c Generated by Traversing  /  180 MeV/c200 MeV/c 220 MeV/c240 MeV/c

Jun 27, 2005 S. Kahn -- Ckov1 Simulation7 260 MeV/c:  c Generated by Traversing  260 MeV/c

Jun 27, 2005 S. Kahn -- Ckov1 Simulation8 Photon Generation in the Cherenkov Detectors  For each track that crosses the radiator with a velocity above threshold a number of photons are generated proportional to the deposited energy.  We currently do not use the Cherenkov photon facility in Geant4. There is some question as to how well it works with reflective surfaces.  Imaginary photons are generated in a cone (at the č angle) around the particle direction.  Since all mirrors are at 45º w.r.t. the beam direction, we can position the PMTs on an imaginary plane. The č photons that intercept the PMT circles are “seen”. Note that Ckov1 has an angle of 53°. The circles should be ellipses. This has not yet been taken into account  Note that in Ckov 1 we are dealing with only 4 PMTS.

Jun 27, 2005 S. Kahn -- Ckov1 Simulation9 PE Seen in PMTs from  /  180 MeV/c200 MeV/c 220 MeV/c 240 MeV/c

Jun 27, 2005 S. Kahn -- Ckov1 Simulation MeV/c: PE Seen in PMTs from 

Jun 27, 2005 S. Kahn -- Ckov1 Simulation11  c generated proportional to sin 2  c Cone radius proportional to tan  c

Jun 27, 2005 S. Kahn -- Ckov1 Simulation12 What Other Radiators Are Available? RadiatorIndex of Refraction Muon Threshold Pion Threshold C 6 F MeV/c185 MeV/c Liquid N MeV/c208 MeV/c Liquid H MeV/c267 MeV/c Liquid Ne MeV/c318 MeV/c Aerogels<1.08>257MeV/c>341MeV/c

Jun 27, 2005 S. Kahn -- Ckov1 Simulation13 Using Liquid N 2 Radiator

Jun 27, 2005 S. Kahn -- Ckov1 Simulation14 Liquid N 2 Radiator

Jun 27, 2005 S. Kahn -- Ckov1 Simulation15 Ckov1 Efficiency as a Function of Energy P  =180 MeV/c P  =240 MeV/c

Jun 27, 2005 S. Kahn -- Ckov1 Simulation16 Conclusion  C 6 F 14 with n=1.25 is not the optimum radiator for  /  separation in the desired momentum range, particularly for p   240 MeV/c in the channel.  The problem is that we would like n=1.16 to handle the desired momentum range with a single radiator. There are no radiators in that range.