Right-Sized Nanosatellites: Finding the Sweet Spot between 3U/6U and ESPA June 9, 2015 Clint Apland (240) 228-0388 clint.apland@jhuapl.edu.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LightSail.
Advertisements

Prof. Paolo Gaudenzi - Aerospace Structures 1 Configuration of a satellite and of its structural system Prof. P. Gaudenzi Università di Roma La Sapienza,
What is a U Class Payload?
NSF Small Satellite Workshop - May 15-17,2007 Science Requirements Flowdown : Impacts on the Capabilities of Small* Satellites David Klumpar Montana State.
GSFC/Wallops Flight Facility 1 Small Satellite Opportunities at Wallops Flight Facility Dr. John Campbell Director, Wallops Flight Facility.
Secondary Payload Adapters and Interfaces
Aug.19, 1999 George T. Roach Integration Mission Design Center NASA- GSFC Code 543 Greenbelt, MD FAX
Advanced Processing Systems Honeywell Proprietary1 12/04/2003 Honeywell UF HCS & Honeywell DSES Opportunities Presented by Advanced Processing Systems.
Payload Design Criteria for the Space Test Program Standard Interface Vehicle (STP-SIV) Mr. Mike Marlow STP-SIV Program Manager Payload Design Criteria.
Delta II –7920 Fitup Study Model TMA-56 f10 optics In-Line configuration Delta II Launch Vehicle 7920 H 10L Composite Fairing.
Slide : 1 6/ SpaceWire Conference SpaceWire Test and Demonstration using the Integrated Payload Processing Module J.Ilstad, D.Jameux European Space.
(c) 2014 California Institute of Technology. Government sponsorship acknowledged. Pre-Decisional: For planning and discussion purposes only. Mars CubeSat.
Monopropellant Micro Propulsion system for CubeSats By Chris Biddy 174 Suburban Rd Suite 120 San Luis Obispo CA (805)
Protocol & Test Review Spaceport America Student Launch University/Institution Team Members Date.
Data Test Review Spaceport America Student Launch University/Institution Team Members Date.
May 14th, 2010 FMSTR. The Problem and Proposed Solution No current, acceptable solution exists to determine liquid volume in a tank exposed to microgravity,
1 Atlas Truss Adapter & Launch Vehicle Details (all I can find in the Atlas Mission Planner’s Guide and Standard Interface Spec) David Robinson/543 7/18/08.
Design of a Piloted Spacecraft to Bridge the Gap between the Space Shuttle and Crew Exploration Vehicle Michael Seibert University of Colorado at Boulder.
Spacecraft Structure Development - Vibration Test - (60 minutes)
List of investigators Next Generation EP PPUs Brian Gilchrist, UM Steve Battel, Battel Engineering (consultant) Alec Gallimore, UM Ken Arnett, UM-Space.
Spacecraft Design and Sizing Dr Andrew Ketsdever MAE 5595 Lesson 14.
Icarus Student Satellite Project Hannah Goldberg Dr. Brian Gilchrist BT Cesul Student Space System Fabrication Lab (S 3 FL) University of Michigan, College.
Instrument, Spacecraft, and Launch Overview Joan Howard Ball Aerospace.
Gateway to Space AJ - 1 Mechanical System Design & the StarLight Project Andy Jarski Mechanical Systems Engineer Ball Aerospace & Technologies.
Icarus Student Satellite Project
Spacecraft Launch Vehicles
Launch Opportunities for Standardized Payloads kg The 17th Annual Small Payload Rideshare Symposium June 9-11, 2015 Johns Hopkins University Applied.
FINAL PRESENTATION P The Team Austin Frazer Role: Lead Engineer - Analysis Major: Mechanical Engineering Eileen Kobal Role: Lead Engineer – Mixtures.
All content in this presentation is protected – © 2008 American Power Conversion Corporation Rael Haiboullin System Engineer Capacity Manager.
1 Electrical Power System By Aziatun Burhan. 2 Overview Design goal requirements throughout mission operation: Energy source generates enough electrical.
The Pursuit for Efficient S/C Design The Stanford Small Sat Challenge: –Learn system engineering processes –Design, build, test, and fly a CubeSat project.
0 衛星結構設計 (II) 祝飛鴻 6/17/  What you should learn from this course?  低軌道小衛星發展趨勢  Why spacecraft structure fails?
Maximizing ISS Utilization for Small Satellite Deployments and External Hardware/Sensor Testing Photo credit: NASA.
1 NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center 2005/4/14 LRO/CRaTER Technical Interchange Meeting LRO Mechanical Systems Giulio Rosanova / /
The ESA SME Initiative Training Courses Prof. Paolo Gaudenzi - Space Structures 1 Space mission environments: sources for loading and structural requirements.
NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center LRO Integration and Test Joanne Baker GSFC Code 568 August 16-17, 2005.
1 Formation Flying Project Proposal 2/5/07 Rachel Winters (Team Lead) Aziatun Burhan Tsutomu Hasegawa Shunsuke Hirayama Matt Mueller Masao Shimada Shelby.
ReVeal Passive Illumination by Radar (PAIR). Overview Payload / Mission Communication Launch Orbit Power Thermal Attitude Propulsion Finance.
GSFC 5 Space Technology “Tomorrow’s Technology Today” ST5 PDR June 19-20, 2001 Launch Vehicle Services Section 18.0 Clyde Woodall Launch Vehicle Manager.
Principles of Engineering System Design Dr T Asokan
Mechanical SuperNova/Acceleration Probe SNAP Study Dave Peters George Roach June 28, a man who's willing to make a decision in the first place can.
Space Engineering 2 © Dr. X Wu, Space Engineering 2 Lecture 1.
Structures and Mechanisms Subsystems AERSP 401A. Introduction to Structural Estimation Primary Structure: load-bearing structure of the spacecraft Secondary.
Contractor 3. I. Launch III. Formation Alignment with Star Pictures Data downlink Stationkeeping II. Deployment IV. Deorbit.
1 Structure (STR) Subsystem Overview Jonah White – STR Co-Lead.
Chapter 10 Analysis and Design Discipline. 2 Purpose The purpose is to translate the requirements into a specification that describes how to implement.
Competition Sensitive Dennis Asato June 28, 2001 XSuperNova / Acceleration Probe (SNAP) Propulsion.
NASA/Air Force Cost Model presented by Keith Smith Science Applications International Corporation 2002 SCEA National Conference June
March 2004 At A Glance autoProducts is an automated flight dynamics product generation system. It provides a mission flight operations team with the capability.
1 衛星結構設計 祝飛鴻 5/25/  What are the main functions of structure subsystem?  Provide support all other subsystems and attach the spacecraft to launch.
THEMIS IDPU PDR I&T REQUIREMENTS- 1 UCB, October 16, 2003 I&T REQUIREMENTS Ellen Taylor University of California - Berkeley.
© 2014 Orbital Sciences Corporation. All Rights Reserved. SPRSA Excess Capacity Panel Carol P. Welsch Orbital Sciences Corporation June 10, Welsch.
20c - 1 NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center Propulsion Chuck Zakrwski NASA/GSFC Code 597 August 16-17, 2005.
Wes Ousley June 28, 2001 SuperNova/ Acceleration Probe (SNAP) Thermal.
March 2004 At A Glance The AutoFDS provides a web- based interface to acquire, generate, and distribute products, using the GMSEC Reference Architecture.
ACE Science Workshop March 10 th, 2009 Armin T. Ellis, Deborah Vane, Mark Rokey Jet Propulsion Laboratory.
Micro Arcsecond X-ray Imaging Mission Pathfinder (MAXIM-PF) Mechanical George Roach Dave Peters 17 May 2002 “Technological progress is like an axe in the.
1 YamSat Bus Structures Analysis Tsai Ming-Hsien 蔡明憲 2005/03/24 YamSat.
Simplifying Customer Software Integration Tim Myers April 9 th, 2011 Colorado Undergraduate Space Research Symposium Payload Configuration GUI.
SmallSat Ground Systems, a C2 to RF Integrated Approach.
Millennium Engineering and Integration Company A NEW DOCUMENTATION PROCESS TO STREAMLINE RANGE SAFETY PROCEDURES 0 O. “Rusty” Powell, Allan Smith, Jeff.
USNA Standard CubeSat Bus USNA-P1 CubeSat (USNA-14)
Planetary Lander PDR Team Name
Integrated Thermal Analysis of the Iodine Satellite (iSAT) from Preliminary to Critical Design Review October 20th 2016 Stephanie Mauro NASA Marshall Space.
Chamber of Commerce Huntsville / Madison County Small Spacecraft Subcommittee Rich White, Chair (w): (c):
Sounding Rocket PDR Team Name
Sounding Rocket CDR Team Name
Mars Rover CDR Team Name
Command and Data Handling
MARKET BRIEF NEW AND EXISTING LAUNCH VEHICLES
Presentation transcript:

Right-Sized Nanosatellites: Finding the Sweet Spot between 3U/6U and ESPA June 9, 2015 Clint Apland (240) 228-0388 clint.apland@jhuapl.edu

Topics to Discuss Need and Motivation Express-class Space Vehicle Features and Benefits Payload Provisions and Suitability to Payloads with Significant Mission Utility Benefits of Rectangular Adaptor Systems First Generation Adapter System Second Generation Adapter System Future Work

Motivation for Express Class An intermediary mission class standard is needed between ESPA (181 kg) and 3/6U CubeSat (~4-12 kg), to: More optimally utilize excess LV secondary payload rideshare accommodation capability. Enable lower cost missions when ESPA-class not needed. Provide for more flexible and capable space vehicles than possible w/ 3U-6U CubeSat (physical) constraints: E.g., larger payloads, greater power generation, propulsion Permit more ready-use of COTS components and technologies. Poly-Picosat Orbital Deployer (P-POD) NASA Ames (3/6U) NLAS Dispenser Express Atlas V ESPA Configuration Initial top-down/bottom-up study performed by APL in 2010-11

Express Class: 25-75 kg Standardized Nanosatellite W/O Propulsion W/ Propulsion Provides a standard, flexible spacecraft interface compatible with multiple LVs: For secondary manifest: Space-X Falcon 1e/9/9H OSC Minotaur I/IV/V, Antares,Taurus XL ULA Atlas V, Delta IV LM/ATK Athena IIc For primary manifest: ORS Super-Strypi SMDC Nano-Launcher* DARPA ALASA* Bridges gap between 3U/6U and ESPA 26.4 cm (10.4 in) 55.8 cm (22 in) To be investigated as data becomes available 47.0 cm (18.5 in) 47.0 cm (18.5 in) Optional shroud alleviates concerns of primary Payload (PL) damage Protects/conceals contents from: Visual inspection Physical access and tampering Aero-heating, thruster plume thermal Acoustics and contamination EMI/EMC Launching high performance, reliable nanosatellites featuring inexpensive and reliable separation systems is possible over a wide selection of launch vehicles

Express Features and Benefits Configurations with or without propulsion. > 225 m/s ΔV chemical propulsion allows rideshare flexibility; enables formation flying and constellations. Non-propulsion is lower cost and accommodates larger payloads within standard volume. Multiple PL data interfaces. Allows >two independent payloads. Large payload volume. Propulsion: 6,500 cm3 (400 in3) Propulsion Extended: 35,000 cm3 (2100 in3) Non-propulsion: 20,000 cm3 (1200 in3) Size, shape and mass less constraining than CubeSats. Allows more use of COTS components, can still benefit from use of CubeSat components, appendages can protrude if necessary. Simplified Adaptor & Separation System Simple, proven, low cost, allows axial or radial deployment, easily adapted to any LV. Flyaway half of separation system can double as bottom deck of SV. Available shroud. Provides protected environment, prevents visual inspection, tamper-resistance prevents access.

Payload Provisions Nominal PL Mass: 21 kg w/o propulsion; 8 kg w/ propulsion Data processing capability may be supported by S/C C&DH Flexible S/C software architecture with encryption capability Time: 1 pulse per second, GPS referenced Solid State Recorder (Mass Memory) is scalable Nominal PL Power: Orbit Average (typical orbit): >10 W Peak: 100 W Available Voltages: Unregulated Bus: 28 V (24 to 33 V) Regulated: 3.3 V and 5.0 V @ >4 A; Adjustable Attitude Determination & Control: Full 3-axis (zero momentum) Control <0.1, Knowledge <0.03 Communications: Full duplex USB/S-band (DL >1 Mbps)

Express SERB Payloads Applicability Criteria: V < 20,000 cm3 (w/o prop.) P < 30 watts M < 15 kg Results: Suitable for 11 of 19 (58%) of candidate payloads from 2014 SERB list, and could accommodate every CubeSat payload

EELV, F-9/Heavy, Antares Accommodation: ESPA Nanosats & ESPA SVs on a ø62” ESPA ring (option for 3 at each ESPA port) B1194 PSR Atlas V Delta IV 5-m fairings 2x D1666 PSR CSA Flat Plate Adaptor & 3 SVs ESPA SV Falcon 9 C-29 Ring Atlas V Delta IV 4-m fairings Shrouded Option Antares (Figure courtesy of ULA) Clearance for Antennas, etc. Optional P-PODs on Moog-CSA ESPA 6U Mounts (SUMs) (Figure courtesy of Moog-CSA)

EELV, F-9/Heavy, Antares Accommodation: ESPA + FPA Nanosats & ESPA SVs On a CSA Flat Plate Adaptor B1194 PSR Atlas V Delta IV Falcon 9 5-m fairings ESPA SV 2x D1666 PSR Bottom View CubeSats (10) Atlas V Delta IV 4-m fairings C-13 Adaptor (between Centaur forward cone and CSA Flat Plate Adaptor) Moog-CSA Flat Plate Adaptor Antares The same mixed payload topologies and ride-share flexibility is possible with smaller LV

Express Adapter FY15 Prototype Improvements Several refinements and enhancements were made through additional detailed design, testing activities to: Increase space vehicle mass/volume accommodation: mass-CG curve raised Reduce parts count, simplify AI&T, lower costs Reduce adapter (baseplate) fly-away mass Increase customizability for specific SV equipment accommodations Reduce operations required for flight mate Increase scalability for larger-class space vehicles Next-gen design activities scheduled for 2015 Complete detailed design (Q2-3CY15) Prototype fabrication, separation & vibration testing (Q3CY15)

Express Adapter Prototype Hardware Full adapter system prototype designed, built and vibration tested US Patent 8939409 for an “Adaptor System for Deploying Small Satellites” Adapter w/ SV Baseplate Exploring opportunities for flight demonstration and characterization Z axis Adapter Deployment H/W Vibration Test Configuration (without shroud) Thermal Test Layout Shroud Assembly

Prototype Hardware Test Plan Vibration Test Configuration (without shroud) Test outline: Sine and Random Vibration Testing in each of 3 axes, each axis: Pre-test sine survey at .25g, Sine Sweep, Random Vibration, post-test survey Deployments at ±60C (to be scheduled for next-gen adaptor) Ambient pressure (nitrogen back-fill) Deployments in the direction of gravity Deployment characterization (to be scheduled for next-gen adaptor) Use 3rd party air bearing fixture Measure tip-off rates in axes parallel to separation plane Measure separation rate Z axis Thermal Test Layout

Design Overview Design is simpler, more reliable, more cost effective and requires less volume than a ring type separation system 2x 31-pin Separation Connector Low Shock Separation Nut (picture courtesy of HiShear Technology Corporation)

Benefits to Small Sats of Rectangular Separation Systems Square interface is more efficient than circular interface Small SVs are usually rectangular and don’t have the volume for center cylinder structural elements Most of the loads in rectangular SVs are concentrated in the corners Cylindrical separation systems are sensitive to load “peaking” To avoid load peaking, cylindrical interfaces require large and massive structures to distribute loads The rectangular adaptor is insensitive to load peaking; loads are reacted from SV corners into separation system corners The rectangular adaptor can be easily customized to be used as the bottom deck of the space vehicle Increases usable SV volume and decreases total system mass The rectangular adaptor is more cost effective than cylindrical adaptors Separation system is less costly than cylindrical systems Can eliminate the cost of SV bottom deck The rectangular adaptor is easier to set for flight than some cylindrical separation systems The rectangular adaptor can be used with “work- horse” LV-side GSE adaptors, unlike some cylindrical adaptors Other Features & Benefits: Simple and reliable Single machined deck from flat plate Much lower parts count than cylindrical adaptors Mechanism parts count dramatically reduced, as compared to cylindrical adaptors Separation nuts: Simultaneously actuated Low shock Reliable with heritage Non-explosive actuators are available Integral separation connectors Redundant Loop-back Break- wire separation indication No separation switch “chatter”

Future Work Continuing to Engage Sponsors Performing Mission Concept Studies Coordinating Experimental/Prototype Flight Missions in 2016 Seeking Industry Partners for Tech-Transfer of Express Dispenser APL’s role is not separation system hardware production Benefits our community Low cost, reliable, flexibly configured separation systems that reduce overall system mass and increase usable volume