CLIC Drive Beam Injector Design Update Shahin Sanaye Hajari 1.Institute For Research in Fundamental Sciences (IPM), Tehran, Iran 2.CERN, Geneva, Switzerland.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A Capture Section Design for the CLIC Positron Source A. VIVOLI* Thanks to: L. RINOLFI (CERN) R. CHEHAB (IPNL & LAL / IN2P3-CNRS) O. DADOUN, P. LEPERCQ,
Advertisements

ILC Accelerator School Kyungpook National University
Radiation Physics | ELBE | SRF Photo Injector for Electron- Laser Interaction LA 3 NET conference: Laser applications at accelerators, Mallorca,
1 Bates XFEL Linac and Bunch Compressor Dynamics 1. Linac Layout and General Beam Parameter 2. Bunch Compressor –System Details (RF, Magnet Chicane) –Linear.
Bunch compressors ILC Accelerator School May Eun-San Kim Kyungpook National University.
1 ILC Bunch compressor Damping ring ILC Summer School August Eun-San Kim KNU.
Possible new EMMA injectors bdm. Motivation ALICE due to shut down soon Alternate EMMA injection (assuming EMMA project continues which it should …) Several.
Bunch compressor design for eRHIC Yichao Jing and Vladimir Litvinenko FLS2012, Newport News, VA 3/8/2012.
David H. Dowell Injector Physics/Diagnostics/Gun&L0 RF April 29-30, 2004 Injector Physics / Diagnostics / Gun & L0 Linac.
Sub-Harmonic Buncher design for CLIC Drive Beam Injector Hamed Shaker School of Particles and Accelerators Institute for Research in Fundamental Sciences,
Compensation of Transient Beam-Loading in CLIC Main Linac
3 GeV,1.2 MW, Booster for Proton Driver G H Rees, RAL.
Influence of the Third Harmonic Module on the Beam Size Maria Kuhn University of Hamburg Bachelor Thesis Presentation.
ASTRA Injector Setup 2012 Julian McKenzie 17/02/2012.
High Current Electron Source for Cooling Jefferson Lab Internal MEIC Accelerator Design Review January 17, 2014 Riad Suleiman.
LCLS-II Magnet Error Sensitivities. Sensitivities of dipole magnets, from injector output (95 MeV) to SXR undulator input (4 GeV), where each plotted.
Velocity Bunching: experiment at Neptune Photoinjector P. Musumeci UCLA Dept. of Physics and Astronomy.
Update of 3.2 km ILC DR design (DMC3) Dou Wang, Jie Gao, Gang Xu, Yiwei Wang (IHEP) IWLC2010 Monday 18 October - Friday 22 October 2010 Geneva, Switzerland.
1.Institute For Research in Fundamental Science (IPM), Tehran, Iran 2.CERN, Geneva, Switzerland Mohsen Dayyani Kelisani Thermionic & RF Gun Simulations.
Overview of ERL MEIC Cooler Design Studies S.V. Benson, Y. Derbenev, D.R. Douglas, F. Hannon, F. Marhauser, R. A Rimmer, C.D. Tennant, H. Zhang, H. Wang,
Electron Source Configuration Axel Brachmann - SLAC - Jan , KEK GDE meeting International Linear Collider at Stanford Linear Accelerator Center.
Max Cornacchia, Paul Emma Stanford Linear Accelerator Center Max Cornacchia, Paul Emma Stanford Linear Accelerator Center  Proposed by M. Cornacchia (Nov.
A bunch compressor design and several X-band FELs Yipeng Sun, ARD/SLAC , LCLS-II meeting.
Optics considerations for ERL test facilities Bruno Muratori ASTeC Daresbury Laboratory (M. Bowler, C. Gerth, F. Hannon, H. Owen, B. Shepherd, S. Smith,
9/24-26/07 e- KOM Slide 1/20 ILC Polarized e- source RDR Overview A. Brachmann.
Design of the Turnaround Loops for the Drive Beam Decelerators R. Apsimon, J. Esberg CERN, Switzerland.
Accelerator Science and Technology Centre Extended ALICE Injector J.W. McKenzie, B.D. Muratori, Y.M. Saveliev STFC Daresbury Laboratory,
Beam breakup and emittance growth in CLIC drive beam TW buncher Hamed Shaker School of Particles and Accelerators, IPM.
CLIC Drive Beam Injector Bunching System Sh. Sanaye H. 1,2, S. Doebert 2, S. H. Shaker 1,2 1.Institute For Research in Fundamental Science (IPM), Tehran,
1 Alternative ILC Bunch Compressor 7 th Nov KNU (Kyungpook National Univ.) Eun-San Kim.
1 Alternative Bunch Compressor 30 th Sep KNU Eun-San Kim.
Y. Roblin, D. Douglas, F. Hannon, A. Hofler, G. Krafft, C. Tennant EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES OF OPTICS SCHEMES AT CEBAF FOR SUPPRESSION OF COHERENT SYNCHROTRON.
XFEL Beam Dynamics Meeting Bolko Beutner, DESY Velocity Bunching Studies at FLASH Bolko Beutner, DESY XFEL Beam Dynamics Meeting
J. Wu J. Wu working with T.O. Raubenheimer, J. Qiang (LBL), LCLS-II Accelerator Physics meeting April 11, 2012 Study on the BC1 Energy Set Point LCLS-II.
Electron Source Design Dr Tim Noakes ASTeC, STFC Daresbury Laboratory.
P. Urschütz - CTF3 Collaboration Meeting 2007 CTF3 commissioning & operation in 2006 P. Urschütz for the CTF3 operations team  Commissioning of the Delay.
Capture and Transport Simulations of Positrons in a Compton Scheme Positron Source A. VIVOLI*, A. VARIOLA (LAL / IN2P3-CNRS), R. CHEHAB (IPNL & LAL / IN2P3-CNRS)
Injector Options for CLIC Drive Beam Linac Avni Aksoy Ankara University.
S. Bettoni, R. Corsini, A. Vivoli (CERN) CLIC drive beam injector design.
Future Circular Collider Study Kickoff Meeting CERN ERL TEST FACILITY STAGES AND OPTICS 12–15 February 2014, University of Geneva Alessandra Valloni.
Marcel Schuh CERN-BE-RF-LR CH-1211 Genève 23, Switzerland 3rd SPL Collaboration Meeting at CERN on November 11-13, 2009 Higher.
2 February 8th - 10th, 2016 TWIICE 2 Workshop Instability studies in the CLIC Damping Rings including radiation damping A.Passarelli, H.Bartosik, O.Boine-Fankenheim,
Awake electron beam requirements ParameterBaseline Phase 2Range to check Beam Energy16 MeV MeV Energy spread (  ) 0.5 %< 0.5 % ? Bunch Length (
CLIC DB injector facility, photo-injector option studies LCWS, Granada, September 26 th -30 th,2011Steffen Döbert, BE-RF  CLIC DB injector  Thermionic.
Status of the sub-harmonic bunching system for the CLIC DB injector front end Hamed Shaker School of Particles and Accelerators, Institute for Research.
Frank Stulle, ILC LET Beam Dynamics Meeting CLIC Main Beam RTML - Overview - Comparison to ILC RTML - Status / Outlook.
S.M. Polozov & Ko., NRNU MEPhI
Have a chance to operate your own beam at CERN
BUNCH LENGTH MEASUREMENT SYSTEM FOR 500 KV PHOTOCATHODE DC GUN AT IHEP
Update of Damping Ring parameters
Thermal emittance measurement Gun Spectrometer
Progress activities in short bunch compressors
Muon Inverse Rotation and Acceleration
Capture and Transmission of polarized positrons from a Compton Scheme
Electron Source Configuration
CEPC Injector Damping Ring
LHC (SSC) Byung Yunn CASA.
Pulsed Ion Linac for EIC
Linear Colliders Lecture 2 Subsystems I
MEBT1&2 design study for C-ADS
LCLS Tracking Studies CSR micro-bunching in compressors
Studies on orbit corrections
CEPC Injector Linac beam dynamics
PSB magnetic cycle 900 ms MeV to 2 GeV
CEPC injector beam dynamics
Bunch Compressor Beam Line Optics
Injector for the Electron Cooler
Update on ERL Cooler Design Studies
Fanglei Lin, Yuhong Zhang JLEIC R&D Meeting, March 10, 2016
Ya. Derbenev JLEIC R&D meeting CASA Jefferson Laboratory
Presentation transcript:

CLIC Drive Beam Injector Design Update Shahin Sanaye Hajari 1.Institute For Research in Fundamental Sciences (IPM), Tehran, Iran 2.CERN, Geneva, Switzerland

Contents 1. Injector layout and the latest results 2. Optimisation of the magnetic chicane 3. Chicane and the injector overall performance 3.1 Satellite population 3.2 Beam loss at chicane 4.Fourth SHB

1 Injector layout and the latest results 1 1 Injector layout and the latest results 1.1 Injector Layout

1 Injector layout and the latest results 2 1 Injector layout and the latest results 1.2 Latest results ParametersCurrent valueTarget value Longitudinal RMS bunch length3 mm RMS energy spread0.530 MeV< 0.5 MeV Satellite population2.6%As less as possible Transverse Normalised emittance35 mm-mrad<100 mm-mrad Average solenoidal field530 gaussAs small as possible Beam loss at chicane: 4%

2 Optimisation of the magnetic chicane 3 2 Optimisation of the magnetic chicane 2.1 Bunch compression

2 Optimisation of the magnetic chicane 4 2 Optimisation of the magnetic chicane 2.1 Bunch compression

2 Optimisation of the magnetic chicane 5 2 Optimisation of the magnetic chicane 2.1 Bunch compression Before chicane After chicane Bunch length reduction: ~ 20 %

2 Optimisation of the magnetic chicane 6 2 Optimisation of the magnetic chicane 2.2 Transvers plane and chicane parameters ParameterValue Dipole field0.186 T Dipole length29.5 cm Drift length70 cm Bending angle18.5 o

3 Chicane and the injector overall performance 7 3 Chicane and the injector overall performance 3.1 Satellite population At P1 At P2 At P3

3 Chicane and the injector overall performance 7 3 Chicane and the injector overall performance 3.1 Satellite population At P1 At P2 At P3

3 Chicane and the injector overall performance 8 3 Chicane and the injector overall performance 3.2 Bunch length and energy spread correlation 40 o off-crest 20 o off-crest After first accelerating structure (6 MeV)

3 Chicane and the injector overall performance 9 3 Chicane and the injector overall performance 3.3 Beam loss at chicane

4 Fourth SHB 10 4 Fourth SHB 4.1 Satellite reduction motivation ModelSatellite population CDR version4.9% Current model2.1% 4 SHB1.0% Satellite cleaning system Number of SHBSatellite population 1~14% 2~5% 3~2% 4~1%

4 Fourth SHB 11 4 Fourth SHB 4.2 Sub-harmonic bunching system parameters Cavity Distance to next cavity Voltage SHB1255 (cm)13 (kV) SHB2145 (cm)25 (kV) SHB385 (cm)35 (kV) SHB450 (cm)50 (kV) Prebuncher20 (cm)45 (kV) CavityVoltage SHB115 (kV) SHB230 (kV) SHB345 (kV) Prebuncher60 (kV) 4SHB 3SHB

5 Conclusion 12 5 Conclusion By optimising the magnetic chicane to act as a bunch compressor as well as phase space cleaner the allowed bunch length at the end of injector will be 20% longer. This results in:  Satellite population reduction  Beam loss reduction By using an additional SHB the Satellite population can be reduced to 1.0%.

Thanks for your attention.

TW Buncher: Beam Loss Reduction Buncher parameterValue L(cm)147 P(MW)~20 Beam parameterValue

Options for the Solenoid Channel: Emittance Growth