The Research Project: ethical approval process

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NHS R&D Jessica Bisset Acting Research Operations Manager UH Bristol.
Advertisements

The Research Ethics Process RPT Conference 28 th April 2006.
The HPSS Research Ethics Service Northern Ireland Dr Siobhan McGrath Office for Research Ethics Committees Northern Ireland Mar2007.
The School Research Ethics Committee Welsh School of Architecture.
Ethics – where to start! October 2013 Lois Neal FMS Research & Innovation Office.
An Introduction to the Ethics Review Procedure Lindsay Unwin: Research & Innovation Services, UREC Secretary.
A Guide. Why is writing an ethics application NOT a waste of time? It helps you to... clarify your research questions. limit your research questions.
1 Attributing the costs of health & social care Research & Development – Understanding AcoRD Trudi Simmons Senior Manager – Research Finance & Programmes.
Experiences of Patient and Public involvement in the Research Process Roma Maguire Senior Research Fellow Cancer Care Research Team School of Nursing and.
National Inpatient Survey Webinar 2014 August 21 st 2014.
UTHSC IRB Donna Hollaway, RN, CCRC 11/30/2011 Authority to Audit 45 CFR (e) An IRB shall conduct continuing review of research covered by this.
NURSING & MIDWIFERY PROGRAMMES ELECTIVE PLACEMENTS Updated October 11.
Research Governance in Practice
Human Research and Ethics Dr Michèle de Courcy Chair, Faculty of Education HEAG University of Melbourne.
GCP compliance for GenISIS  This presentation is intended for clinical staff involved in recruiting patients to the GenISIS (Genetics of Influenza Susceptibility.
Responsible Sponsorship A case study Dr Birgit Whitman, Head of Research Governance.
Developing information for participants in your research – getting started This presentation contains some exercises to help you get started. You can do.
Research Ethics-Integrity-Governance. University Initiative:The Catalyst? ‘02 Good Research Practice Standards & Procedure to Investigate Potential Research.
Research Proposal Development of research question
Creating a service Idea. Creating a service Networking / consultation Identify the need Find funding Create a project plan Business Plan.
Applying to a Research Ethics Committee
Human Research Ethics and Obtaining Ethics Approval
Topic 4 How organisations promote quality care Codes of Practice
Ethics and Regulatory Approvals Alison Robertson CMDHB Research Officer.
Introducing Research Ethics: Policy and Procedure
Institutional Review Board (IRB) Human Subject Dr. John N. Austin, Director and Ms. Renee S. Jones, Associate Director Delaware State University Office.
AfRE /AREC IN PARTNERSHIP WITH HRA AND Manchester University Making an Application to an NHS REC 25 th November 2013.
Workshop on Implementing Audit Quality Practices March 2006 Building Quality into the Financial Audit Process The NAO’s experience Gareth Caller.
The work of the Research Ethics Committee Dr Carol Chu.
Introduction to Evaluation Odette Parry & Sally-Ann Baker
School of Arts and Social Sciences 28 April 2010.
Negotiating access, ethics and the problems of ‘inside’ research.
Discovery Phase: where do we go from here? Co-directors contact information: Dr. Maureen Powers, Department of Cell Biology,
“What’s Ethics Got To Do With It” Presentation to the Canberra Evaluation Forum Gary Kent Head Governance Australian Institute of Health and Welfare.
Cardiff and Vale UHB Bwrdd lechyd Prifysgol Caerdydd a’r Fro NHS R&D Overview How to avoid the common pitfalls? Thomas Fairman Research Liaison Manager.
 The IRB: Why, what and how  Core Concerns: Subject selection, subject consent to participate, confidentiality  IRB Protocol Forms  Contact Information.
HUMAN SUBJECTS PROTECTION PROGRAM Office Location: 1350 N. Vine Ave. (one block west of Cherry Ave. & three blocks north of Speedway) PO Box Phone:
Module 5: Data Collection. This training session contains information regarding: Audit Cycle Begins Audit Cycle Begins Questionnaire Administration Questionnaire.
Human Subjects Protections Research Ethics. Basic Assumptions about How Research Should be Conducted Subjects should be protected from harm. Subjects.
SUNY Oswego Human Subjects Committee Last Revised 10/28/2011.
R&D – a perspective Dr Nana Theodorou Research Coordinator Sheffield Clinical Research Office.
Humanities and Social Sciences Research Ethics Committee (HSSREC) April 2014.
Presentation 1: Developing information for participants in your research – getting started This presentation contains some exercises to help you get started.
Discharge Pathway Preparation for admission Hospital ward to make contact with the person as far in advance as possible so that arrangements can be made.
LEO: LSHTM Ethics Online Patricia Henley Quality & Governance Manager Research Governance & Integrity Office London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine.
NIHR Themed Call Prevention and treatment of obesity Writing a good application and the role of the RDS 19 th January 2016.
8 th November 2007 Research: ethics and research governance Rossana Dowsett Research and Regional Development Division [Pre Award Support] University of.
1 Information Governance (For Dental Practices) Norman Pottinger Information Governance Manager NHS Suffolk.
AssessPlanDo Review QuestionYesNo? Do I know what I want to evaluate and why? Consider drivers and audience Do I already know the answer to my evaluation.
Pathway of care for people with learning disabilities Consent to treatment Does the person have the capacity to consent? Can the decision wait until the.
Application for Ethics Approval for BEd/BSSc Honours Projects Tianyuan Li, Chairperson of the PS Departmental Ethics Committee (June 2015)
Research ethics.
The research ethics review process Hazel Abbott, Chair University Research Ethics Committee.
Private and confidential Community Pharmacy Future Four-or-more medicines support service Update on progress and next steps Approved18 th June 2012 This.
QUALITY INSPECTIONS Inspection team briefing. THE PURPOSE OF QUALITY INSPECTIONS: To provide a rolling programme of assurance throughout the year To ensure.
GCP (GOOD CLINICAL PRACTISE)
Application for Ethics Approval for MSocScP(SCS) Research Projects Tianyuan Li, Chairperson of the PS Departmental Ethics Committee (May 2015)
SEBE Ethics Information Rod Gameson & Richard Hall.
Applying for ethical approval
REFLECT: Recovery Following Intensive Care Treatment
MAINTAINING THE INVESTIGATOR’S SITE FILE
IRB reporting updates.
HOW TO CONSENT A PATIENT?
Research Ethics: a short guide for Staff 2017/18
Managing a Research Project
Section 3: Sweep implementation
Application for research Ethical Approval in Practice
Clinical Audit Summary Guide
Russell Center Small Research Grants Program
Dr. Sarah Quinton, UREC Chair,
Presentation transcript:

The Research Project: ethical approval process John Witton Addictions Department

Outline of the talk Refresher on why research projects need ethical approval Audit vs Research Ethics committees The application process and the joys and horrors of the IRAS form Some things to play close attention to Useful sources of information and guidance

Ethical approval Ethical approval from King’s is mandatory when KCL staff/student research: includes human participants OR raises other ethical AND is undertaken by KCL staff or students

What kinds of research? Research involving human participants includes: Interviews Questionnaires Focus groups Observation Taking and using samples Giving drugs Physical activity

Why do you need ethical approval? Ensures generally accepted ethical standards are followed –consent, confidentiality, conduct Ensures you have thought through the research/audit proposed - why, how, when, where and who – so you do not waste people’s time, conduct research that is new and valuable and the research is likely to succeed Protects you and your study participants Mandatory requirement of the host university/clinical setting. Not following an approved ‘procedure’ can be reported as misconduct So you are covered by insurance if anything were to go wrong (and no-fault compensation) Funders will want to know Publishers will want to know

Research versus audit: research Research usually involves asking clearly defined questions and setting hypotheses Uses methods than are replicable Can use RCTs, cohort studies, placebos, database etc

Research versus audit: audit Audits aim to improve quality of patient care and clinical outcomes Audits review practice against evidence-based standards Are clinicians following best practice? What is happening to patients as a result of current practice? Results are specific to a particular tem or service Normally an audit (and service evaluation) does not need ethical approval But audits should still be conducted within an ethical framework – information sheets for patients etc.

Ethics committees King’s College London Committees Social Care Research Ethics Committee (all social care research funded by the Department of Health) NHS Research Ethics Committees patients and users of the NHS, or their carers NHS staff NHS premises Mental Capacity Act 2005 Human Tissue Act 2004

Ethic committee composition eg Harrow Research Ethics Committee Translator Pharmacist Consultant anaesthetist Research nurse Barrister Doctor of Medicine GP Consultant psychologist Retired IT consultant Business consultant

Where to get guidance http://www.kcl.ac.uk/iop/research/office/index.aspx

Preparing your ethics application Go to the Research Ethics web pages Read the guidelines Speak to your supervisor Download the current version of the application form and guidelines. Submit the correct number of copies, with the necessary signatures before the relevant deadline. Apply in plenty of time prior to your preferred start date. The length of approval asked for should cover the study up to publication.

Getting the application form right All applications go through a pre-review check by the Senior Research Ethics Officers. Applications will be assigned a unique reference number and will be sent to the Subcommittee for full review. Incomplete applications will be returned to the researcher and not sent to the Subcommittee for review.

What needs to be submitted? Application Form Information sheet for participants Consent form Supplementary documents may be needed: Questionnaire Topic guide Permission letters

The IRAS form Integrated Research Application System (IRAS) Is a single system for applying for the permissions and approvals for health and social care / community care research in the UK Enables you to enter the information about your project once instead of duplicating information in separate application forms Uses filters to ensure that the data collected and collated is appropriate to the type of study, and consequently the permissions and approvals required Helps you to meet regulatory and governance requirements Further information: http://www.hra.nhs.uk/research-community/applying-for-approvals/

Outcomes The results of an application will fall under one the following categories: Full approval -the research may commence. Approval in Principle-amendments are requested before full approval can be granted. Deferred-the Committee will need to seek expert advice before a decision is made. Not Approved-the application is seriously flawed and must be resubmitted to the full Committee. Rejected-the study is deemed unethical and cannot be resubmitted.

What could you get wrong? It was sent it to the wrong Committee. It has track changes. No information sheet is an immediate return. You did not submit the required number of copies or collate your application; it is your responsibility to ensure the applications are collated and ready to be sent to the individual committee members.

Application not approved because… Required sections have not been completed The recruitment process is unclear/insufficiently detailed. Power calculation if needed not carried out Consent procedure has not been sufficiently detailed and you have not taken into account: The age, reading ability or language spoken/written by participants. Any permission needed from outside organisations.

Application not approved because… Supporting documents have not been submitted which prevents immediate approval. E.g. Interview schedule/questionnaires. Consent forms. Advertising –posters/emails.

Application not approved because… Standard procedures have not been included. Such as: Arrangements for confidentiality Exclusion criteria Risks and benefits. Regardless of the type of project, the research proposal and procedures must always be of good quality.

Application not approved because… The application does not identify or address how you will minimise/avoid: Potential risks to the participants (physical or mental) and the researcher. Any conflict of interest; the researcher has another position within the chosen organisation or is in a position of authority.

But experience shows Careful preparation means your project will get ethical approval Prepare well in advance Involve your supervisor

Further information Research ethics FAQs: http://www.kcl.ac.uk/research/ethics/training/faqs/ “Does my research require ethical approval flowchart”: http://www.kcl.ac.uk/research/ethics/ How to write an information sheet: http://www.kcl.ac.uk/research/ethics/training/infosheet.html Research in the workplace: http://www.kcl.ac.uk/research/ethics/training/workplace.html