What You Need to Know about Application Receipt and Referral

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Module 10 Submit.
Advertisements

Myths, Facts, and Suttons Law
Applying for a Grant The Community Foundation of the Mahoning Valley (CFMV)
Laurie Tompkins, PhD Acting Director, Division of Genetics and Developmental Biology NIGMS, NIH Swarthmore College May 14, 2012 NIH 101.
Archived File The file below has been archived for historical reference purposes only. The content and links are no longer maintained and may be outdated.
From your ideas… 1 … into our systems… …to advance medical discovery. Interacting Electronically with NIH Megan Columbus NIH Program Manager for Electronic.
PI Desktop Application prepared as single file using PureEdge software NIH Submitting Electronic NIH Grant Proposals AECOM Office of Grant Support Sept.
Sponsored Projects Administration
Navigating the NIH Web Site for Funding and Getting Started with Grants Grants-For-Lunch December 6, 2005.
Grants.gov (G.g) “Relax, we’re from the government. We’re here to help you.”
Application Complete… Next Steps Megan Columbus. 2 Be sure all Mandatory Documents are completed and moved to the submission list. Refer to the agency-specific.
ESubmission Pop Quiz Drilling the key points home.
Communicating With Your Program Director : Understanding the Who, Why & How Elisa Woodhouse Division of Cancer Biology New Grantee Workshop March 18, 2015.
Roger Sorensen, Ph.D., MPA Program Official National Institute on Drug Abuse 1 Update on “New” Investigator Activities.
The Life Cycle of an NIH Grant Application Alicia Dombroski, Ph.D. Deputy Director Division of Extramural Activities NIDCR.
GRANTS PROCESS VANDERBILT Office of Sponsored Programs
Find HRSA Funding Opportunities. Grants.gov All discretionary grants offered by the 26 federal grant-making agencies can be found on Grants.gov. You do.
From Your Idea to Your First R01: Perspectives of a National Institutes of Health Extramural Scientist.
NIH OBSSR Summer Institute July 2012 National Institutes of Health U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Overview of the NIH Peer Review Process.
1 Electronic Research Administration Office of Extramural Research National Institutes of Health June 2011 Successful eSubmission of NIH Grant Applications.
1 NIH Regional Seminar Baltimore, MD June 28, 2013 Finding and Understanding NIH’s Funding Opportunities Christopher L. Hatch, Ph.D. Chief Program Coordination.
EGrants Electronic Grants Submission: Grants.gov eRA Commons Tom Hilton National Institute on Drug Abuse.
Navigating and Preparing a HRSA Application Responding to a Funding Opportunity Announcement Sarah Hammond, Grants Policy Analyst HRSA’s Office of Federal.
1 …Same Focus on Science New Technology… NIH Electronic Grant Application.
Office of Sponsored Projects & Industry Partnerships 1 NIH Eliminates the Error/Correction Window Cynthia Sylvester Office of Sponsored Projects & Industry.
INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH SUPPORT Kassie M. Obelleiro Funding Opportunities Program Coordinator Rainbow Vogt Editorial Coordinator Pivot: Identifying.
POST-AWARD GRANT MANAGEMENT June 23, 2014 Presented by Arina V. Kramer Grants Management Specialist Office of Grants Administration, NCI.
1 electronic Research Administration Office of Extramural Research National Institutes of Health February 2010 Interacting Electronically with NIH Sheri.
1. Proposal deadline 2. Timeline  A grant opportunity announcement will include a sponsor deadline for receipt of the proposal.  The instructions will.
THE NIH SUBMISSION AND ASSIGNMENT PROCESS Suzanne E. Fisher, Ph.D Director, Division of Receipt and Referral Center for Scientific Review January 2002.
NuPAFP Conference October 13-14, 2010 Operational Adjustment Grants.
Electronic Submissions of Grant Applications Muhsin Aboud Principal Investigator, IEARDA Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences.
A guide to navigating Grants.gov. Slideshow Overview Getting Started With Grants.gov Searching and Downloading Grant Applications Completing and Submitting.
The Grant Renewal Review Process Nywana Sizemore, PhD Scientific Review Officer Molecular Oncogenesis - MONC Oncology I - Basic Translational - OBT Integrated.
SUBMITTING AN SBIR/STTR APPLICATION FOR DECEMBER 5? November 25, 2008 National Institutes of Health U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Suzanne.
Quality Research Administration Meeting May, 2012.
NIH Grant Renewal Review Process (and Beyond)
NIH Mentored Career Development Awards (K Series) Part 5 Thomas Mitchell, MPH Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics University of California San Francisco.
Define the project identify potential funding sources gather information write and package the proposal submit the proposal to a funder Piece of cake?
Grants Putting it All Together. Funding Opportunity Sources Grants.gov – notification available Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA) NIH – weekly.
OSP Updates MRAM May 2010 Office of Sponsored Programs May 13, 2010 Presented by: Casi Heintzman, Grant and Contract Administrator Carol Rhodes, Associate.
NIH Peer Review Process – Grant Renewal
Susan Harwood Training Grant Program FY 2015 Proposal Webinar:Grants.gov.
April 2008 Application Submission and Review Considerations NIGMS Mona R. Trempe, Ph.D. Scientific Review Officer NIGMS Office of Scientific Review.
Scarlett Gibb NIH Office of Extramural Research Office of Electronic Research and Reports Management Interim Chief, eRA User Support, Training & Documentation.
ESubmission Review Bringing the Key Points Home. For NIH opportunities, who registers in Grants.gov? Applicant Organizations –E-biz POC designated.
JEFF WARNER CONTRACT AND GRANT OFFICER FEDERAL UPDATE.
ESubmission Review Bringing the Key Points Home. For NIH opportunities, who registers in Grants.gov? Applicant Organizations –E-biz POC designated.
NIH Peer Review Process – Grant Renewal Angela Y Ng, MBA, PhD Scientific Review and Referral Officer Center for Scientific Review NCI DCB New Grantee Workshop.
Sheri Cummins November ASSIST is NIH's online system for the preparation, submission & tracking of grant applications through Grants.gov to NIH.
An Overview of the Pre-Award Grant Process
What University Administrators Need to Know About Getting from Submission to Review Cathleen Cooper, Ph.D. Director, CSR Division of Receipt and Referral.
The Role of a Program Director NCI Division of Cancer Biology New Grantee Workshop October 18-19, 2010 Jerry Li, MD, PhD Division of Cancer Biology NCI/NIH.
2 Who Are the Peer Reviewers? Senior Researchers Well-funded by NIH or Other Agencies Well-published, recognized in the field Associate Professor or higher.
Funding Opportunities for Investigator-initiated Grants with Foreign Components at the NIH Somdat Mahabir, PhD, MPH Program Director Epidemiology and Genetics.
National Center for Research Resources NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH T r a n s l a t I n g r e s e a r c h f r o m b a s i c d i s c o v e r y t o i m.
NATA Foundation General Grants Program Process RC Chair identifies 3 RC members to review Pre-Proposal & information is sent for review (within 2 weeks.
Applying for a Grant Instructions for CFMV's Online Application Process.
NIH/AHRQ/NIOSH UPDATES effective January 25, 2017
“SPEAR” Workshop May 18, 2017 Julie Wammack
NATA Foundation Student Grants Process
RULES, RSO PROCESS AND APPLICATION SUPPORT
Submitting to Grants.gov
NATA Foundation General Grants Program Process
NSF/NIH Review Processes University of Southern Mississippi
NSF/NIH Review Processes University of Southern Mississippi
Sponsored Programs (SP)
The NIH Peer Review Process
NATA Foundation General Grants Program Process
Finding and Understanding Funding Opportunity Announcements
Presentation transcript:

What You Need to Know about Application Receipt and Referral Cathleen Cooper, Ph.D. Director, Division of Receipt and Referral (DRR)

Electronic Application Process (Overview) The electronic application process can be divided into four general steps. First, both your and your institution must have all the required registrations completed and in place at the time of application submission. All applications must be submitted to a Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA), so you will need to find one of those that fits your application (more on that later). Then you need to download the application package from that FOA, and follow all the instructions in the FOA and the application guide when you are preparing your application. Finally, your authorized organizational representative (AOR) will submit the application for you, after which time it is your responsibility to view your application and track its progress through the system. NIH and CSR first see your application after it clears Grants.gov.

DRR is at the End of the Grants.gov Pipeline Incoming applications for all of NIH + other HHS Agencies Remaining applications distributed among CSR IRGs Problems? Policy Compliance? DRR is at the end of the Grants.gov pipeline. We process applications for organizations across the Department of Health and Human Services in addition to the NIH. Some applications are sent directly to various NIH institutes for review. The remaining applications, about 70%, are distributed among CSR study sections. DRR also plays an active role in problem solving and policy compliance.

What does DRR do? Determines if application is on time formatted correctly complete Makes Institute Assignment for funding consideration Makes Study Section Assignment for review As I mentioned earlier, DRR is responsible for screening and returning late applications. We also perform a number of other policy checks, some of which are listed here. If we find problems, we’ll let you know. DRR also assigns applications to an NIH institute for funding consideration and to a study section for the review. Let me step back a moment, to talk about how you can get more information about which institute and study section is right for your application.

Help Your Application Get to the Right Study Section http://www.csr.nih.gov

Help Your Application Get to the Right Institute http://projectreporter.nih.gov/reporter.cfm

Find a Funding Opportunity (FOA) http://grants1.nih.gov/searchGuide/search_guide.cfm Since all applications must be submitted to an FOA, you can use keywords to search active FOAs, and further, if you are interested in assignment to a specific institute, you can just search for FOAs where that institute participates (“Issuing Organization”). Once you find an FOA, you need to download the application package from that FOA and then follow all the instructions in the FOA and the application guide when you prepare your application.

Cover Letter The cover letter should be used for a number of important purposes: Suggest Institute/Center assignment Suggest review assignment Identify individuals in potential conflict and explain why Identify areas of expertise needed to evaluate the application Discuss any special situations It is NOT appropriate to use the cover letter to suggest specific reviewers. You communicate assignment preferences to the NIH via cover letter submitted with your application. Cover letters are for communication with NIH staff; they do not go to your reviewers. Cover letters are not required because our staff are very knowledgeable about where your science will fit into one of our institutes and study sections . However, if you wish to suggest an IC or study section assignment, or bring any other issues to the attention of the SRO who will be managing the review, you should include a cover letter. Things you can include in a cover letter…

Sample Cover Letter Please assign this Phase I SBIR “Drugs for Retinoblastoma Treatment” (RFA-CS-00-000) to the following: Institutes/Centers National Cancer Institute National Eye Institute Scientific Review Group Oncology Translational and Clinical IRG Please do not assign this application to the following: Biological Chemistry and Macromolecular Biophysics This study focuses on a new in vitro model for testing drugs for treatment of retinoblastoma, not the synthesis of new chemotherapeutic agents. The simpler the better. Using this format, with one request per line, we can easily understand your requests. Remember that we are processing hundreds of applications submitted for the major receipt dates and a request buried on the second page of a long cover letter describing your science could easily be missed. Be clear and we’ll do our best to honor your request.

Keep Track of Your Application AORs submit applications PD/PIs responsible for accuracy of submission Do not wait for e-mails; proactively check eRA Commons If you cannot see your application in eRA Commons, neither can we! Remember It is your career and your livelihood on the line Do not make any assumptions! Some important reminders. The Authorized Organizational Representative (AOR) in your grants office is responsible for submitting your application on time, but you are responsible for the content. Do not sit back and wait for e-mails. Proactively check your eRA Commons account. If you cannot see your application in Commons, neither can we, and if we can’t see it we can’t review it. Start the submission process early – days early rather than hours early – so that you have plenty of time to view your application after it is complied on Commons. Sometimes things don’t look the same in Commons as it did on your office computer. Take the time to look at the application the way your reveiwers will see it. Attachments such as letters of support can be omitted. Give yourself plenty of time to submit a corrected copy if necessary. We cannot accept missing pieces or corrected pages after the fact.

How NOT to submit a Late Application START EARLY! Application must be accepted TWICE: Grants.gov and NIH Check eRA Commons for your submitted application (e-mails are sent but can be caught in SPAM filters) High volume at deadlines slows processing/validation time On time application = submitted error-free by 5 PM local time on due date Errors cause rejection – Warnings are error-free and accepted No error correction window that extends deadline One very important policy is NIH’s late application policy. Submitting to the NIH is not like buying a book from a major on-line retailer where 30 seconds after you click on the “buy” button, the book is successfully downloaded to your e-reader. NIH applications must be accepted twice. Grants.gov serves as a general portal for electronic applications submitted to various federal agencies and second by NIH. When you receive a tracking number starting with the capital letters GRANT (and a 9 digit numeral) this just means it has been accepted by Grants.gov. At that point, NIH retrieves your application and performs numerous validations, all of which must be successfully passed in order for your application to be accepted by the NIH. E-mails are sent at various points during this process but e-mails are not 100% reliable, so you should always be checking the status of your application in eRA Commons. High volumes around submission deadlines can slow validation/processing times to an hour or more. If your application does not pass the validations, it will be rejected with an “error”. You need time to fix that error and start the submission process all over again. To be on time, your error-free application must be submitted by 5 PM LOCAL TIME on the due date. There is no error correction window that extends the deadline. Applications submitted after the deadline, including those to correct errors, are late and will not be sent forward to review.

A Window to Your Application: eRA Commons eRA Commons is an online interface where a grant applicant can: Check submitted grant application for errors and warnings and view final image Track review assignment, view review outcomes (score, summary statements), find contact info Update Personal Profile to ensure Early Stage Investigator eligibility is in place Submit pre-award information (just in time) View Notice of Award and other key documents And much more! https://commons.era.nih.gov/commons/