NERC LTRA Update / CDR Capacity Counting Issues

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 RTWG Tariff update to the BOD, MOPC, SPC, and RSC January 4, 2005.
Advertisements

Power Supply Adequacy Assessment Model/Methodology Review Steering Subcommittee Meeting January 29, 2010.
1 Generation Adequacy Task Force Report to TAC April 7, 2005.
06/04/2009 TAC 2009 Long-term Demand and Energy Forecast (LTDEF) and Capacity, Demand and Reserves (CDR) Calculation Dan Woodfin Director, System Planning.
ERS Update Presented to: Demand Side Working Group December 5, 2014.
Generation Adequacy Task Force Results of the 2012 Loss of Load Study January 18, 2013.
TPTF Presentation Registration of PUN Facilities December 19, 2007.
Andy Meyers Interchange Scheduling and Accounting Subcommittee Chair Discussion Item: Use of Emergency eTags January 2015 Salt Lake City, UT.
Proposal to Modify ERS Time Periods 2014 DSWG Goal #10 Presented to: Demand Side Working Group.
SAWG Update to WMS February 4 th, 2015 Brandon Whittle.
2011 Long-Term Load Forecast Review ERCOT Calvin Opheim June 17, 2011.
1 The Effects of Integrating Wind Power on Transmission System Planning, Reliability, and Operations Phase 1 Preliminary Overall Reliability Assessment.
PLWG Report to ROS July 9, PGRRs needing vote PGRR043 – FIS Scoping Amendment – PGRR043 moves the Subsynchronous Resonance (SSR) Study out of the.
Joel Koepke, P.E. ERCOT Operations Support Engineer ERCOT Experiences During Summer 2011.
ERCOT PUBLIC 4/21/ Loss of Load Probability Assessment for NERC April, 2015.
Warren Lasher Director, System Planning October 4, 2014 Our Energy Future.
NW Resource Adequacy Forum Steering Committee Conference Call November 4, 2010.
NPRR 365 Change in Resource Outage Approvals from 8 to 45 or 90 Days Woody Rickerson Director Grid Coordination
1 ERCOT 2007 Strategic Financial Plan & Budget Proposal _____________________ Board of Directors November 14, 2006.
ERCOT Long-Term Demand and Energy Forecasting February 20, 2007 Bill Bojorquez.
1 Planning Reserve Margin Dan Egolf Senior Manager, Power Supply & Planning.
Developing an Adequacy Metric Resource Adequacy Forum Technical Subcommittee Meeting October 16, 2009.
Wind ELCC Calculation Comparisons and ERCOT’s NERC LTRA Capacity Forecasts GATF Meeting, June 24, 2014.
Section 5.9 – added export language Each ERS Generator site must have an interconnection agreement with its TDSP prior to submitting an ERS offer and must.
Texas Nodal 1 Nodal Operations Model Posting Confirmation TAC May 7, 2009 Matt Mereness, ERCOT.
ERCOT Planning WMS 10/20/2010 Target Reserve Margin and Effective Load Carrying Capability of Installed Wind Capacity for the ERCOT System – Methodology.
ERCOT Planning October 2010 Target Reserve Margin and Effective Load Carrying Capability of Installed Wind Capacity for the ERCOT System - Methodology.
Comparison of LOLP Practices Mary Johannis PNW Resource Adequacy Technical Committee Mtg January 23, 2009.
WGR Ramp Rate in Nodal: “As High as Possible” Mike Grimes for QMWG Meeting 10 August 2009.
ERS Update Plus Revisions to Proposed Changes for ERS Time Periods Presented to: Demand Side Working Group November 5, 2014.
Report to TAC August In Brief Working Group Reports Working Group Reports CMWG CMWG DSWG (No report) DSWG (No report) MCWG MCWG MWG (No report)
California’s Proposed DR Cost-Effectiveness Framework January 30, 2008.
Generation Adequacy Task Force Update to WMS November 18, 2009.
Standards Review Subcommittee Update August 17, 2010.
Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT) A Success Story… In Progress Ingmar Sterzing United States Association of Energy Economics (USAEE) Pittsburgh.
Target Reserve Margin (TRM) and Effective Load Carrying Capability (ELCC) of Wind Plants Evaluation - Input and Methodology ERCOT Planning 03/25/2010.
09/17/2006 Ken Donohoo ERCOT Peak Day August Initial Settlement Data by Fuel Type.
May 11, 2012 RPG meeting YTP Scope and Process – RPG Comments.
ERS Update – DSWG Presentation September 21, 2012.
Operations Report Kent Saathoff System Operations ERCOT.
Protocol Revision Subcommittee Presentation to the ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee January 6, 2010.
Summary of Astrapé Reserve Margin Impact Analysis for the PUCT Pete Warnken WMS February 4, 2015.
October 29, 2012 RARF Workshop 2 Introduction to ERCOT Modeling Process Jay Teixeira Manager, Model Administration.
RAWG Agenda Item LAR Data WECC Staff. Data Elements Generator information – Existing – Changes Monthly Peak Demand and Energy (actual year and.
1 WMS Report TO TAC April 2007 (which is in March)
MISUG TAC Update Jackie Ashbaugh ERCOT 3/7/ TAC3/7/ /22/2011 Meeting Focus on the high priority items from MISUG: Review task list prioritization.
Overview of Governing Document for Weather-Sensitive ERS Pilot Project Stakeholder Workshop Mark Patterson, ERCOT Staff March 1, 2013.
Ancillary Services Methodology Changes Bill Blevins Manager, Operations Planning.
Capacity, Demand and Reserves Report Bill Bojorquez May 4, 2007.
2006 Report on the Capacity, Demand, & Resources for the ERCOT Region Technical Advisory Committee June 1, 2006 Kenneth A. Donohoo. P.E. Manager, Transmission.
Capacity, Demand and Reserves Report Bill Bojorquez Board of Directors Meeting May 16, 2007.
SERC Reliability Corporation 1 SERC RELIABILITY CORPORATION MID-AMERICA RELIABILITY CONFERENCE June 21, 2006 COLUMBUS, OHIO.
1 Entergy Transmission Planning Summit New Orleans, LA July 10, 2003 Generation and Transmission Development in the Southeastern United States.
2006 CDR Status Report Technical Advisory Committee May 4, 2006 Bill Bojorquez.
Probabilistic Approach to Resource Adequacy Resource Adequacy Forum Technical Committee Meeting Portland, OR January 23, 2009.
Capacity Forecast Report Fall Update Sean Chang Market Analysis and Design Suresh Pabbisetty CQF, ERP, CSQA Credit CWG/MCWG December 16, 2015 ERCOT Public.
1 TAC Report to the ERCOT Board July 18, TAC Summary 4 PRRs for approval (3 unanimous) 4 PRRs for approval (3 unanimous) 5 Nodal PRRs for approval.
Generation Adequacy Task Force Meeting April 10, 2014.
Overview of FIP Issues in the RUC, Verifiable Cost, and other Nodal Market Processes November 12, 2008 VCWG Meeting.
Protocol Revision Subcommittee Sandy Morris May 5, 2011.
2016 LTSA Update Doug Murray 6/21/2016. Agenda Introduction Scenario Retirement Process Scenario Summary Results Appendix.
1 Energy Storage Settlements Consistent with PUCT Project & NPRR461 ERCOT Commercial Market Operations November 2, 2012 – RCWG Meeting.
Impact of not including proposed generators lacking RARF data in the planning models Planning Guide Section 6.9 Issues February 17, 2016.
GATF Loss of Load Process (or How to Make Sausage) October, 2012.
Target Reserve Margin (TRM) and Effective Load Carrying Capability (ELCC) of Wind Plants Evaluation - Input and Methodology ERCOT Planning 03/25/2010.
Variable Energy Resource Capacity Contributions Consistent With Reserve Margin and Reliability Noha Abdel-Karim, Eugene Preston,
NPRRs 815NPRR Revise the Limitation of Load Resources Providing Responsive Reserve (RRS) Service.  This Nodal Protocol Revision Request (NPRR) revises.
PLWG Review 6.9 and the Interconnection process
Generation Adequacy Task Force Update to WMS
Planning Reserve Margin
Presentation transcript:

NERC LTRA Update / CDR Capacity Counting Issues GATF Meeting, November 10, 2014

NERC LTRA and LOLE Study Update

2014 Long Term Reliability Assessment Release expected November 11, 2014 Mentions status of the Frontera switchable resource TRE-ERCOT Reserve Margins: Anticipated – CDR resources only Prospective – Anticipated capacity plus forecast of other capacity in the interconnection queue expected to become operable plus mothballed capacity that could potentially be bought back under RMR arrangements Adjusted-Potential – Prospective capacity plus forecast of announced projects not currently in the interconnection request queue expected to become operable

2014 LTRA Probabilistic Assessment ERCOT’s final study results submitted to NERC on November 3, 2014; public release of report in March 2015 All assessment regions provide Loss of Load Hours (LOLH), Expected Unserved Energy (EUE), and EUE as a percentage of Net Energy for Load for years 2016 and 2018 based on loads and resources used for the 2014 LTRA The purpose of the assessment project is not to establish reserve margin targets or assess reliability standard criteria, such as one LOL event in 10 years

Loads in SCED

Status update (Sai Moorty) Loads in SCED Status update (Sai Moorty) Potential impact to the CDR, and timing of when to consider the impact

Revisions to ERS Capacity Forecasting Methodology

Proposed Change to ERS Methodology ERCOT would like to add the following wording to the existing ERS capacity estimation methodology in Section 3.2.6.2.1: “The estimate may be adjusted to account for program modifications, procurement methodology changes, changes in the seasonal risk assessment, and ERS time period expenditure limits.” Also, change the compound period from two years to three years.

Proposed Change to ERS Methodology Recent changes in the ERS Procurement Methodology (implemented for the Feb-May 2014 SCT) creates incentive to increase participation during the Summer and Winter peak hours. Growth rate for Business Hours 3 during the summer Standard Contract term from 2013 to 2014 was 47.44%. Previous years from 2011 to 2012 was -11.3% and from 2012 to 2013 was 13.8%. Escalation rates based on compounding annual growth rates (CAGR) vary significantly depending on number of periods used in computation CAGR 2012, 2013, 2014 (Current Protocols) = 29.5 % CAGR 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014 = 14.18% Some additional growth is still expected but not sustainable under the $50 million/yr ERS expenditure limit.

Solar Capacity Contribution

Solar Capacity Contribution Application of top-20 peak load hour methodology yields the following preliminary results: Small resource population for the calculations: Summer: four resources in 2014, two in 2013, one in 2012 Winter: two resources in 2013-14, one in 2012-13 Winter results driven by predominance of morning peak loads (mainly HE 7-8) and peaks occurring after sunset (HE 19-21)

PUN Capacity Forecasting

Current PUN Capacity Reporting Requirements Protocol Section 3.2.6.2.2 Private Use Network Capacity—The Private Use Network capacities as provided to ERCOT pursuant to Section 3.10.7.3, Modeling of Private Use Networks. Section 3.10.7.3: A Generation Entity with a Resource located within a Private Use Network shall provide data to ERCOT, for use in the Network Operations Model, for each of its individual generating unit(s) located within the Private Use Network in accordance with Section 3.3.2.1, Information to Be Provided to ERCOT Protocol Section 10.3.2.4 All Generation Resource Facilities with associated Load shall report to ERCOT before February 1st of each year their projected Net Generation capacity available to the ERCOT Transmission Grid for use by others during the June to August time period for the current calendar year and ten subsequent years.

PUN Capacity Forecasting for the CDR May 2014 CDR method: Same method used for hydro and DC tie capacity: the average telemetered HSL for the highest 20 peak Load hours for each preceding three year period for Peak Load Season s and year i Method does not account for expected trends in process load requirements and generation capacity additions; may be overestimating net output to the grid for future years To improve the PUN capacity forecast, recommend surveying PUNs for forecasted annual changes in Expected Typical Private Network Net Interchange (MW), a current RARF field Annual Net Interchange amounts are added to the historical average capacity to create the forecast series

PUN Capacity Forecasting for the CDR (continued) Two approaches to acquiring the data: Informal Request for Information (RFI) Modify the language in Section 10.3.2.4 to require formal submission of Net Interchange forecast information Request other PUN information that may be useful for operations planning? Modify PUNCAP definition in section 3.2.6.2.2 to reflect use of 20 top peak hour historical settlement data and Net Interchange forecasts

Example of PUN Notice/RFI Language To supplement the historical settlement data used for forecasting PUN capacity in the Report on Capacity, Demand and Reserves (CDR), ERCOT requests that PUNs provide the forecasted annual changes in the RARF field, Expected Typical Private Network Net Interchange. The annual changes should reflect the actual and expected capacity amounts as of August 1st of each year. If forecasted capacity amounts are not available for certain periods, enter n/a. Any information collected will be treated as confidential per ERCOT Protocol Section 1.3, Confidentiality. Forecast Period Annual Change in Expected Typical Private Network Net Interchange (MW) August 1, 2014 August 1, 2015   August 1, 2016 August 1, 2017 August 1, 2018 August 1, 2019 August 1, 2020 August 1, 2021 August 1, 2022 August 1, 2023 August 1, 2024

Counties to be Considered Coastal for Nodal Protocol 3.2.6.2.2

Non-Coastal (NC) & Coastal Wind Resources Definition of Coastal Resources (NPRR 611) includes 11 southern counties adjacent to Gulf Coast Recent historical correlation data (Summer ’13-’14) for existing resources supports current definition Webb County data stands out among NC resources with higher correlation with coastal resources; may consider revisions in future years ERCOT staff supports current definition of Coastal and NC wind resources for planning purposes (no change)

Wind Correlation w/ ERCOT Load – Summer 2013-2014

Wind Correlation w/ TX Gulf Coast Wind Production ‘13-’14