IDENTIFICATION 1 PROPOSED REGULATORY CHANGECOMMENTS Implement a four step ELL identification process to ensure holistic and individualized decisions can.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
IDEA® English Language Proficiency Tests (IPT)
Advertisements

RIDE – Office of Special Populations
NCLB, Highly Qualified and IDEA 2004 How it all fits together and What it means for you. RIDE Spring Leadership Conference May 11, 2006 Grossi/Olsen 2006.
Title I & Title III Annual Parent Meeting
DEPARTMENT OF SPECIAL SERVICES PROJECTIONS PREPARED BY KIM CULKIN, DIRECTOR OF SPECIAL SERVICES MARCH 2013.
Title III-A All identified English language learners assessed for English language proficiency (ELP) with the ACCESS for ELLs TM, with all 4 domains (Reading,
1 Gifted and Talented Task Force Presentation to the Howell Township Board of Education March 29, 2006.
IEP Training for Kansas Schools 2013 – 2014 Kansas State Department of Education Technical Assistance System Network Services Special Factors/Considerations.
Ensuring Effective Services to Immigrant &/or LEP/ELL Children & Families: It’s Right, & It’s the Law! © Statewide Parent Advocacy Network.
Annual Parent Meeting Klein Road Elementary. © Not for use of distribution without permission. Why are we here?  NCLB law requires that Title I Schools.
Rules and Regulations.  Requirements (Title I and Title III)  Notices  Timeline  Schools on Improvement  Use of Funds.
Bilingual Special Education Interface Developing IEPs for Exceptional Language Minority Students.
IDEA AND ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS WITH DISABILITIES Office of General Counsel Division of Educational Equity August 15, 2012.
Ensuring Equal Educational Opportunities for English Language Learners
Implementation of Amended CR Part 154
Elementary Campus LPAC Training Mansfield ISD. LPAC stands for Language Proficiency Assessment Committee.
Local Control Funding Formula and English Learners Flexibility Amid Federal and State Regulations and Laws California Latino School Boards Association.
LPAC overview - Fall 2004 The Language Assessment Process in Texas  LPAC, Language Assessment Proficiency Committee  ARD is the Admissions, Review and.
Language Proficiency Assessment Commitee (LPAC)
Identification of English Language Learners (ELLs) in Wisconsin Jacqueline A. Iribarren, Ph.D. ESL/Bilingual & Title III Consultant.
Language Proficiency Assessment Commitee (LPAC)
Daniel Boone Area School District English as a Second Language (ESL) Program.
Ensuring Effective Services to Immigrant &/or LEP/ELL Children & Families: It’s Right, & It’s the Law! © Statewide Parent Advocacy Network 1.
Impact of Changes to NYSED Part 154 of Commissioner’s Regulations
Texas Administrative Code (TAC), Title 19, Part II Chapter 89. Adaptations for Special Populations, Subchapter BB. Commissioner's Rules Concerning State.
International Regional Hindi Conference 2014 New York Presenter: Sushma Malhotra Assistant Principal New York City Department of Education.
CAPELL Connecticut Administrators of Programs for English Language Learners English Language Learners and Special Education: A Resource Handbook.
What is the Parent Involvement Plan (PIP)? Why do we have a Parent Involvement Plan (PIP)? (PIP) PARENT INVOLVEMENT PLAN 1.
English as a Second Language Parent Orientation Lackawanna City School District Martin Road Elementary School.
Our Children Are Our Future: No Child Left Behind No Child Left Behind Accountability and AYP A Archived Information.
PREPARED BY DR. HAROLD SMITH EDAD 5399 Bilingual/ESL Education.
Language Proficiency Assessment Commitee (LPAC)
This session will begin with a discussion of strategies to ensure appropriate identification and interventions for ELLs as well as teacher resources. Strategies.
Rowland Unified School District Program Specialist/ LD Meeting September 10, 2012.
NCLB Title I, Part A Parent Notification Idaho SDE Title I Director’s Meeting September 15, 2008 Cathryn Gardner, Senior Program Advisor Northwest Regional.
Secondary Campus LPAC Training Mansfield ISD. LPAC stands for Language Proficiency Assessment Committee.
State Laws, Recommendations, & NCLB How research becomes policies Janice Kroeger, Ph.D. Associate Professor, TLC, ECED.
Provided by Education Service Center Region XI 1 Title I, Part A Overview Provided by Education Service Center Region XI
A Parent’s Guide to Understanding the State Accountability Workbook.
C.O.R.E Creating Opportunities that Result in Excellence.
ESL Education Program Report Hudson ISD ESL/Content-Based An English program that serves students identified as students of limited English proficiency.
Pre-referral Process Student support team Student support team –General education teacher identifies a student –Meets with the SST to discuss strategies.
Highlights of Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) Waiver Renewal Application.
Re-envisioning English Language Development and Native Language Literacy Office of ENL, World Languages and Bilingual Education
Spotlight on Practice: The English Language Learner SES Spring 2010 And Special Education.
Rebecca H. Cort, Deputy Commissioner NYSED VESID Presentation to NYS Staff / Curriculum Development Network Targeted Activities to Improve Results for.
© 2014, Florida Department of Education. All Rights Reserved. Prekindergarten Contacts' Meeting February 3, 2015 Bureau Update.
Bilingual Students and the Law n Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 n Title VII of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act - The Bilingual Education.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
ESL PROGRAM OVERVIEW. What is ESL? An English as a Second Language program is a free-standing language arts program for English Language Learners.
Collaboration of Interventions: ESL, RTI, and BBSST August 31, 2009.
ALBERTVILLE CITY SCHOOLS Enrollment, Identification and Education of EL Students
Read to Achieve Parent Presentation What is Read to Achieve? Read to Achieve was created in legislation and approved by the North Carolina.
Presented By WVDE Title I Staff June 10, Fiscal Issues Maintain an updated inventory list, including the following information: description of.
 ask in writing for evaluation; keep a copy of the request  explain child’s problems and why evaluation is needed  share important information with.
English Learners at MPS January Who are our students? O MPS currently has 398 EL students enrolled K-12 O Current EL students speak 10 different.
Title I Annual Meeting What Every Family Needs to Know!
A GUIDE FOR CANTON PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT’S PARENTS AND STAKEHOLDERS The Mississippi Literacy-Based Promotion Act
ESL Program Highlights of ESL Program Highlights of Changes relating to ESL and CCSS.
V: Maryland’s High School Assessments (HSAs) & the Bridge Plan for Academic Validation Overview.
K - 12 students are identified as English Language Learners (ELLs) if, at the time of their enrollment, they meet the following criteria: 1. There is a.
Parent Academy September 17, 2016
English Language learners
Radford City Schools School Board Presentation
Title III of the No Child Left Behind Act
Verification Guidelines for Children with Disabilities
Lead Evaluator for Principals Part I, Series 1
Radford City Schools School Board Presentation
August 5, 2015 – Proposal Level
What Every Family Needs to Know! Date
Presentation transcript:

IDENTIFICATION 1 PROPOSED REGULATORY CHANGECOMMENTS Implement a four step ELL identification process to ensure holistic and individualized decisions can be made by qualified staff, including: (1)administration of the Home Language Questionnaire; (2)an individual interview with the student; (3)a determination for students with a disability of whether the disability is the determinant factor affecting the student’s ability to demonstrate proficiency in English; and (4)the administration of a statewide English language proficiency identification assessment. Qualified staff is defined as an bilingual or ESL teacher, or a teacher trained in cultural competency, language development and the needs of English Language Learners.  Support was expressed for defining qualified staff to conduct the identification process and enhance intake procedures that will provide teachers with more information about incoming ELLs.  Concerns were raised about lack of qualified staff and additional resources necessary to fully implement the enhanced identification process for example requiring additional student work.

IDENTIFICATION 2 PARENT NOTIFICATION AND INFORMATION PROPOSED REGULATORY CHANGECOMMENTS School staff shall meet with parents or persons in parental relation at least once a year, in addition to other generally required meetings with parents, to discuss with parents their child’s academic content and language development progress and needs. Districts shall collect and maintain: records indicating parent’s preferred language or mode of communication; and records of notices and forms generated during the identification and placement process in ELL student’s cumulative record.  Support was expressed for higher quality and frequency of opportunities for parents/guardians to participate in their child ‘s academic development in the language they best understand.  Further explanation was requested for meetings, required documentation and record keeping.  Concern was expressed about acquiring additional translators.

IDENTIFICATION 3 PLACEMENT PROPOSED REGULATORY CHANGECOMMENTS Require placement in a Bilingual Education / ESL program within 10 school days after initiating the identification process. Districts shall complete the identification process before an ELL student receives a final school placement.  Support was expressed for completing ELL Identification process ensuring proper program placement.  Concern was expressed regarding resource implications of the identification process conducted during the summer.

IDENTIFICATION 4 PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS & PROVISION OF PROGRAMS PROPOSED REGULATORY CHANGECOMMENTS English as a Second Language instruction shall be offered through two settings: Integrated ESL (ESL methodologies in content area instruction co-taught or taught by a dually certified teacher); and Stand-alone (ESL instruction with an ESL teacher to develop the English language needed for academic success). Continue to require that each school with 20 or more ELL students of the same grade who speak the same home language provide a Bilingual Education program.  Support was expressed for integrating ESL and Content area instruction.  Concern was expressed over the possibility of a district choice to house a bilingual program in one building.  Concerns were raised regarding implementing the integrated ESL co teaching model as it may impact configuration of programs and resources.

IDENTIFICATION 5 CONTINUED: PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS & PROVISION OF PROGRAMS PROPOSED REGULATORY CHANGECOMMENTS Districts shall create annual estimates of ELL enrollment before the end of each school year and create a sufficient number of Bilingual Education programs in the district, if there are 20 or more ELLs of the same grade level who speak the same home language district wide. A district will be allowed to apply for a one-year waiver for languages that represent less than 5% of the statewide ELL population, if the district can demonstrate it meets established criteria and provides alternate home language supports. New programs triggered by this provision shall be placed in a school that has not been identified as a Schools Under Registration Review or as a Focus or Priority School, if such school exists in the district.  Support was expressed for the improved program planning, continuity, and uniformity resulting from the provision for an annual estimate of ELL enrollment.  Support was expressed for strengthened access, instruction, and services resulting from expanding eligibility to create more district level bilingual programs that develop academic proficiency in both the native language and English.  Recommendation was made by NYSUT to adopt class size maximums for each program type.  Recommendation was made by NYSUT to include procedures in the regulations for identifying and providing language support services (bilingual and ESL instruction) to address the language needs of young children enrolled in UPK classes.

IDENTIFICATION 6 GRADE SPAN AND PROGRAM CONTINUITY PROPOSED REGULATORY CHANGECOMMENTS Districts shall provide program continuity so that ELLs can continue to receive the program type (Bilingual Education or ESL) in which they were initially enrolled. In order to ensure program continuity, schools shall continue to provide a Bilingual Education program if at least 15 students who speak the same home language were enrolled in such program in the previous grade. The maximum allowable grade span for grouping instruction in ESL and Bilingual Education programs is two contiguous grades.  Support was expressed for the benefits of continuity of bilingual/ESL programs.  Concern was expressed over implementing the two year contiguous grade level provision in small school districts.

IDENTIFICATION 7 EXIT CRITERIA PROPOSED REGULATORY CHANGECOMMENTS Implement three different criteria to allow students to exit ELL status, including: (1)scoring proficient on the statewide English language proficiency assessment; (2)a combination of NYSESLAT scores and 3-8 ELA assessment or ELA Regents scores; or (3)a determination that an ELL with a disability cannot meet criteria (1) or (2) because of their disability and are not in need of ELL services.  Strong support was expressed for expansion of the ELL exit criteria as students will receive the most appropriate services to which they are entitled.  Concern was expressed over giving districts too much discretion to exit ELLs as a cost-cutting measure.

IDENTIFICATION 8 SUPPORT AND TRANSITIONAL SERVICES PROPOSED REGULATORY CHANGECOMMENTS Districts shall annually identify ELLs not demonstrating adequate performance and provide additional supports aligned to district wide intervention plans. Districts shall provide at least two years of transitional supports to ELLs who exit out of ELL status (former ELLs).  Support was expressed for the benefits of including ELLs in districtwide interventions plans.  Support was expressed for expanding transitional services for Former ELLs to two years as it further reinforces support for students who exit ELL status.

IDENTIFICATION 9 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND CERTIFICATION PROPOSED REGULATORY CHANGECOMMENTS Require that 15 percent of professional development hours for all teachers and administrators be specific to the needs of ELLs, language acquisition and cultural competency. Require that 50 percent of professional development hours for all Bilingual Education and ESL teachers to be specific to the needs of ELLs, language acquisition and cultural competency. Create certification areas for bilingual teaching assistants and tenure and seniority protection areas for bilingual teaching assistants, bilingual teachers and ESL teachers. Require that all prospective teachers complete coursework on ELL instructional needs, language acquisition and cultural competency  Support was expressed over including teachers and administrator in ELL specific professional development as it builds capacity to meet the specific needs of ELLs.  Concern was raised by NYSUT and others that the allotment of specific professional development hours is too prescriptive. NYSUT recommends that schools should be able to customize the PD according to their school-wide goals and the needs of teachers, school-related professionals, and administrators.

IDENTIFICATION 10 DISTRICT PLANNING AND REPORTING PROPOSED REGULATORY CHANGECOMMENTS Districts shall provide additional information in plans regarding programs for subpopulations of ELLs, information provided to parents, methods to annually measure and track ELL progress, and systems to identify, assess, and exit students from ELL status. Require districts to provide additional information in reports regarding programs for subpopulations of ELLs including program information, if offered, by subpopulations and languages spoken in the district.  Support was expressed in reporting ELL subpopulation and the recommendation was made that delineating subpopulation be made public in the best interest of transparency.  Concern was expressed over the increased paperwork for tracking and reporting requirements.

IDENTIFICATION 11 GRADUATION REQUIREMENTS PROPOSED REGULATORY CHANGECOMMENTS Allow for additional graduation requirement options, only for ELLs who enter the United States in 9th grade or above, including: -Scoring 65 or higher on all Regents except the ELA, and passing a rigorous exam of English proficiency that has been approved as an alternative to the English Regents examination, to receive a Regents diploma. -Scoring 65 or higher on all Regents except the ELA, and scoring on the ELA to appeal and receive a local diploma.  Strong support was expressed indicating that alternate path to graduation is a much needed provision for ELLs who enter the school system in or after 9 th grade.  No concerns were communicated on this proposed regulatory change.